Skip to main content

Nonvascular Benign Tumors and Pseudotumors

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Textbook of Dermatologic Ultrasound

Abstract

This chapter reviews the ultrasonographic features of the most common benign nonvascular dermatologic tumors and pseudotumors. It comprises a broad range of pathologies, including cystic and solid lesions.

The material is highlighted by clinical-ultrasonographic and histologic correlations with state-of-the-art images.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Al-Khateeb TH, Al-Masri NM, Al-Zoubi F. Cutaneous cysts of the head and neck. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(1):52–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2007.05.023.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Catalano O, Varelli C, Sbordone C, et al. A bump: what to do next? Ultrasound imaging of superficial soft-tissue palpable lesions. J Ultrasound. 2020;23(3):287–300. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00415-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Huang CC, Ko SF, Huang HY, et al. Epidermal cysts in the superficial soft tissue: sonographic features with an emphasis on the pseudotestis pattern. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(1):11–7. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.1.11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mandava A, Ravuri PR, Konathan R. High-resolution ultrasound imaging of cutaneous lesions. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2013;23(3):269–77. https://doi.org/10.4103/0971-3026.120272.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wortsman X. Common applications of dermatologic sonography. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(1):97–111. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.1.97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wortsman X. Ultrasound in dermatology: why, how, and when? Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2013;34(3):177–95. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sult.2012.10.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wortsman X. Atlas of dermatologic ultrasound. 1st ed. Berlin: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 367.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Wortsman X, Jemec GBE. Dermatologic ultrasound with clinical and histologic correlations. 1st ed. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2013.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan WH, Hsu HC, Lai YC, Chou YH, Li AF. Differences in sonographic features of ruptured and unruptured epidermal cysts. J Ultrasound Med. 2012;31(2):265–72. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2012.31.2.265.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Jin W, Ryu KN, Kim GY, Kim HC, Lee JH, Park JS. Sonographic findings of ruptured epidermal inclusion cysts in superficial soft tissue: emphasis on shapes, pericystic changes, and pericystic vascularity. J Ultrasound Med. 2008;27(2):171–6.; quiz 177–8. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2008.27.2.171.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kuwano Y, Ishizaki K, Watanabe R, Nanko H. Efficacy of diagnostic ultrasonography of lipomas, epidermal cysts, and ganglions. Arch Dermatol. 2009;145(7):761–4. https://doi.org/10.1001/archdermatol.2009.61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pierucci A, Teixeira P, Zimmermann V, et al. Tumours and pseudotumours of the soft tissue in adults: perspectives and current role of sonography. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2013;94(3):238–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.diii.2012.10.018.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wagner JM, Rebik K, Spicer PJ. Ultrasound of soft tissue masses and fluid collections. Radiol Clin N Am. 2019;57(3):657–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcl.2019.01.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wortsman X, Wortsman J. Clinical usefulness of variable-frequency ultrasound in localized lesions of the skin. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010;62(2):247–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaad.2009.06.016.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. He P, Cui LG, Wang JR, Zhao B, Chen W, Xu Y. Trichilemmal cyst: clinical and sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med. 2019;38(1):91–6. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14666.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Matsuoka L, et al. Sonography in pathologies of scalp and hair. Br J Radiol. 2012;85(1013):647–55. https://doi.org/10.1259/bjr/22636640.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Folpe AL, Reisenauer AK, Mentzel T, Rütten A, Solomon AR. Proliferating trichilemmal tumors: clinicopathologic evaluation is a guide to biologic behavior. J Cutan Pathol. 2003;30(8):492–8. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1600-0560.2003.00041.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. He P, Chen W, Zhang Q, Cui LG, Zhang Q. Distinguishing a Trichilemmal cyst from a Pilomatricoma with ultrasound. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(10):1939–45. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15298.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Encabo B, Pascual JC, Romero D, Ruiz de Apodaca RF, Selva J, Jemec GB. Pilonidal sinus: clinical and ultrasonographic response to topical resorcinol 15. Br J Dermatol. 2016;175(5):1103–4. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjd.14872.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Wortsman X, Castro A, Morales C, Franco C, Figueroa A. Sonographic comparison of morphologic characteristics between pilonidal cysts and hidradenitis Suppurativa. J Ultrasound Med. 2017;36(12):2403–18. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14282.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee JY, Kang BS, Shim HS, et al. Clear cell Hidradenoma: characteristic imaging features on ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(8):1993–2001. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14552.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Vázquez-Osorio I, Gonzalvo-Rodríguez P, Rodríguez-Díaz E. Ultrasound diagnosis of nodular Hidradenoma. Actas Dermosifiliogr (Engl Ed). 2018;109(5):453–5. Diagnóstico ecográfico del hidradenoma nodular. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2017.06.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wortsman X, Reyes C, Ferreira-Wortsman C, Uribe A, Misad C, Gonzalez S. Sonographic characteristics of apocrine nodular Hidradenoma of the skin. J Ultrasound Med. 2018;37(3):793–801. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.14379.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chin K, Finger PT, Iacob C. High-frequency ultrasound imaging of periocular hidrocystomas. Optometry. 2003;74(12):760–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Furuta M, Shields CL, Danzig CJ, Eagle RC Jr, Shields JA. Ultrasound biomicroscopy of eyelid eccrine hidrocystoma. Can J Ophthalmol. 2007;42(5):750–1. https://doi.org/10.3129/i07-117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jordan GA, Beier K. Chalazion. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing Copyright © 2021, StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Arceu M, Martinez G, Alfaro D, Wortsman X. Ultrasound morphologic features of Steatocystoma multiplex with clinical correlation. J Ultrasound Med. 2020;39(11):2255–60. https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Mester J, Darwish M, Deshmukh SM. Steatocystoma multiplex of the breast: mammographic and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998;170(1):115–6. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.170.1.9423611.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Park KY, Oh KK, Noh TW. Steatocystoma multiplex: mammographic and sonographic manifestations. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180(1):271–4. https://doi.org/10.2214/ajr.180.1.1800271.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Aparisi Gómez MP, Errani C, Lalam R, et al. The role of ultrasound in the diagnosis of soft tissue tumors. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol. 2020;24(2):135–55. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0039-3402060.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Inampudi P, Jacobson JA, Fessell DP, et al. Soft-tissue lipomas: accuracy of sonography in diagnosis with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 2004;233(3):763–7. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2333031410.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim HW, Yoo SY, Oh S, Jeon TY, Kim JH. Ultrasonography of pediatric superficial soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. Korean J Radiol. 2020;21(3):341–55. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2019.0343.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee JY, Kim SM, Fessell DP, Jacobson JA. Sonography of benign palpable masses of the elbow. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30(8):1113–9. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2011.30.8.1113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Wortsman X. The accuracy of ultrasonography on location of lipomas in forehead. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(1):158–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000000835.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Choo HJ, Lee SJ, Lee YH, et al. Pilomatricomas: the diagnostic value of ultrasound. Skelet Radiol. 2010;39(3):243–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00256-009-0678-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hassanein AH, Alomari AI, Schmidt BA, Greene AK. Pilomatrixoma imitating infantile hemangioma. J Craniofac Surg. 2011;22(2):734–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318207f29f.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Hwang JY, Lee SW, Lee SM. The common ultrasonographic features of pilomatricoma. J Ultrasound Med. 2005;24(10):1397–402. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2005.24.10.1397.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Lin SF, Xu SH, Xie ZL. Calcifying epithelioma of Malherbe (Pilomatrixoma): clinical and sonographic features. J Clin Ultrasound. 2018;46(1):3–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22517.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Roche NA, Monstrey SJ, Matton GE. Pilomatricoma in children: common but often misdiagnosed. Acta Chir Belg. 2010;110(2):250–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2010.11680612.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Solivetti FM, Elia F, Drusco A, Panetta C, Amantea A, Di Carlo A. Epithelioma of Malherbe: new ultrasound patterns. J Exp Clin Cancer Res. 2010;29(1):42. https://doi.org/10.1186/1756-9966-29-42.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Arellano J, et al. Pilomatrixomas presenting as vascular tumors on color Doppler ultrasound. J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45(10):2094–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2010.07.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Alves JV, Matos DM, Barreiros HF, Bártolo EA. Variants of dermatofibroma--a histopathological study. An Bras Dermatol. 2014;89(3):472–7. https://doi.org/10.1590/abd1806-4841.20142629.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Echeverría-García B, García-Donoso C, Tardío JC, Borbujo J. Doppler ultrasound of aneurysmal dermatofibroma. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2017;108(2):159–61. Ecografía Doppler en el dermatofibroma aneurismático. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2016.09.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Won KY, Park SY, Jin W, Lew BL. Dermatofibroma: sonographic findings and pathologic correlation. Acta Radiol. 2018;59(4):454–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0284185117721263.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Zarchi K, Kromann CB, Wortsman X, Jemec GB. Usefulness of ultrasound for the diagnosis of dermatofibroma. Med Ultrason. 2016;18(1):132–3. https://doi.org/10.11152/mu.2013.2066.181.kza.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Zarchi K, Wortsman X, Jemec GB. Ultrasound as a diagnostic aid in identifying neurofibromas. Pediatr Dermatol. 2014;31(4):535–7. https://doi.org/10.1111/pde.12310.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Mitteldorf C, Kempf W. Cutaneous pseudolymphoma-a review on the spectrum and a proposal for a new classification. J Cutan Pathol. 2020;47(1):76–97. https://doi.org/10.1111/cup.13532.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Romero-Pérez D, Blanes Martínez M, Encabo-Durán B. Cutaneous pseudolymphomas. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016;107(8):640–51. Pseudolinfomas cutáneos. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ad.2016.05.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Elrefaie AM, Salem RM, Faheem MH. High-resolution ultrasound for keloids and hypertrophic scar assessment. Lasers Med Sci. 2020;35(2):379–85. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-019-02830-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Lobos N, Wortsman X, Valenzuela F, Alonso F. Color Doppler ultrasound assessment of activity in keloids. Dermatol Surg. 2017;43(6):817–25. https://doi.org/10.1097/dss.0000000000001052.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wortsman, X., Pizarro, K., Corredoira, Y., Carreño, L., Morales, C. (2022). Nonvascular Benign Tumors and Pseudotumors. In: Wortsman, X. (eds) Textbook of Dermatologic Ultrasound. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08736-3_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08736-3_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08735-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08736-3

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics