Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Doing Dramaturgy

Part of the book series: New Dramaturgies ((ND))

  • 612 Accesses

Abstract

The Introduction outlines how this book elaborates an expanded approach to doing dramaturgy informed by today’s highly diverse field of theatre, dance, and performance. Key elements are (1) an understanding of making theatre as a form of thinking through practice; (2) an understanding of doing dramaturgy as attending and being response-able to practices of making-thinking; (3) the development of dramaturgical sensibility toward choices that can be made and decisions that can be taken in creative processes, as well as the implications of these choices and decisions, and (4) a dramaturgical mode of looking as a looking for how performances do what they do as a result of how they are constructed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Katalin Trencsényi and Bernadette Cochrane, in their New Dramaturgy: International Perspectives on Theory and Practice (2014), observe that “new dramaturgy does not replace traditional dramaturgy: it incorporates it into a much wider paradigm” (10). With “traditional dramaturgy” they refer to dramaturgy as it is historically associated with Aristotelian poetics and understood as an attribute of dramatic text (10). My understanding of what new dramaturgy brought about in terms of a paradigm shift relates to, but also differs from, theirs in how it draws attention to the fact that the developments referred to as new dramaturgy not merely expand dramaturgical practice beyond its roots in Aristotelian poetics and theatre based on dramatic texts (and thus integrates these ways of understanding dramaturgy in a wider paradigm) but, more than that, involve a transformation of the very understanding of dramaturgy (including dramaturgy for text-based theatre) from this expanded perspective.

  2. 2.

    The only exception is Kamp, created in 2005 and still on repertoire at the moment of writing.

References

  • Bleeker, Maaike (2015). Thinking No-One’s Thought in: Dance Dramaturgy. Modes of Agency, Awareness and Engagement edited by Pil Hansen and Darcey Callison, Basingstoke: Palgrave, 67-83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Certeau, Michel. 1984 [1980]. The Practice of Everyday Life. trans. Steven Rendall, Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eckersall, Peter. 2006. Towards and Expanded Dramaturgical Practice. A Report on “The Dramaturgy and Cultural Intervention Project.” Theatre Research International 31(3): 283–297. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S0307883306002240

  • Fuchs, Elinor. 2004. EF’s Visit to a Small Planet. Some Questions to Ask a Play. Theater 34 (2): 4-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgelou, Konstantina, Efrosini Protopapa and Danae Theodoridou (eds.) 2017. The Practice of Dramaturgy. Working on Actions in Performance. Amsterdam: Antennae Valiz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, Donna. 2016. Staying with the Trouble: Making Kin in the Chthulucene. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heathfield, Adrian. 2016. Dramaturgy without a Dramaturg. The Theatre Times. https://thetheatretimes.com/dramaturgy-without-a-dramaturg/ Accessed 31-10-2020.

  • Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. New York and London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, Hans-Thies and Patrick Primavesi. 2009. Dramaturgy on Shifting Grounds. Performance Research 14 (3): 3-6 D O I : 1 0 . 1 0 8 0 / 1 3 5 2 8 1 6 0 9 0 3 5 1 9 4 6 8

    Google Scholar 

  • Luckhurst, Mary. 2006. Dramaturgy: A Revolution in the Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Proehl, Geoffrey S. with DD Kugler, Mark Lamos, and Michael Lupu. 2008. Toward a Dramaturgical Sensibility: Landscape and Journey. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickinson University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trencsényi, Katalin. 2015. Dramaturgy in the Making. A User’s Guide for Theatre Practitioners. London: Bloomsbury Methuen Drama.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trencsényi, Katalin and Bernadette Cochrane. 2014. New Dramaturgy. International Perspectives on Theory and Practice. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, Cathy and Synne Behrndt. 2007. Dramaturgy and Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kerkhoven, Marianne. 1994a. On Dramaturgy. Theaterschrift 5-6 On Dramaturgy: 8-33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Kerkhoven, Marianne and Anoek Nuyens. 2012. Listen to the Bloody Machine. Creating Kris Verdonck’s END. Utrecht and Amsterdam: Utrecht School of the Arts and International Theatre & Film Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maaike Bleeker .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bleeker, M. (2023). Introduction. In: Doing Dramaturgy. New Dramaturgies. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08303-7_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics