Skip to main content

Reconstruction After Glossectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Tongue Lesions
  • 647 Accesses

Abstract

The oral tongue is the most common site of oral cavity malignancy and presents a significant reconstructive challenge due to its highly specialized function [1]. The oral tongue has a lot of functions in speech and articulation, as well as mastication, oral hygiene, and the oral phase of swallowing [2]. The oropharyngeal tongue is important for the pharyngeal phase of swallowing and prevention of aspiration. Normal swallowing begins with containing the food bolus within the oral cavity. Greater volumes of tongue resection are associated with reduction in swallowing function [3–5] since the lack of adequate tongue bulk leads to premature spillage into the pharynx [6]. Thus, the defect left by resecting malignant tumors dramatically affects speech, mastication, swallowing, and general quality of life. A variety of options are available to the head and neck surgeon for reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. de Vicente JC, de Villalaín L, Torre A, Peña I. Microvascular free tissue transfer for tongue reconstruction after hemiglossectomy: a functional assessment of radial forearm versus anterolateral thigh flap. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008;66(11):2270–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Lam L, Samman N. Speech and swallowing following tongue cancer surgery and free flap reconstruction--a systematic review. Oral Oncol. 2013;49(06):507–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Nicoletti G, Soutar DS, Jackson MS, Wrench AA, Robertson G. Chewing and swallowing after surgical treatment for oral cancer: functional evaluation in 196 selected cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(2):329–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kazi R, Johnson C, Prasad V, De Cordova J, Venkitaraman R, Nutting CM, et al. Quality of life outcome measures following partial glossectomy: assessment using the UW-QOL scale. J Cancer Res Ther. 2008;4(3):116–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Malone JP, Stephens JA, Grecula JC, Rhoades CA, Ghaheri BA, Schuller DE. Disease control, survival, and functional outcome after multimodal treatment for advanced-stage tongue base cancer. Head Neck. 2004;26(7):561–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsiao HT, Leu YS, Chang SH, Lee JT. Swallowing function in patients who underwent hemiglossectomy: comparison of primary closure and free radial forearm flap reconstruction with videofluoroscopy. Ann Plast Surg. 2003;50(5):450–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartl DM, Dauchy S, Escande C, Bretagne E, Janot F, Kolb F. Quality of life after free-flap tongue reconstruction. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(05):550–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bokhari WA, Wang SJ. Tongue reconstruction: recent advances. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;15(04):202–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Diz Dios P, Fernández Feijoo J, Castro Ferreiro M, Alvarez J. Functional consequences of partial glossectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1994;52(01):12–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hara I, Gellrich NC, Düker J, Schon R, Nilius M, Fakler O, et al. Evaluation of swallowing function after intraoral soft tissue reconstruction with microvascular free flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2003;32(06):593–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vincent A, Kohlert S, Lee TS, Inman J, Ducic Y. Free-flap reconstruction of the tongue. Semin Plast Surg. 2019;33(1):38–45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanna TC, Lubek JE. The hybrid submental flap for tongue reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015;73(09):18760–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Baas M, Duraku LS, Corten EML, Mureau AM. A systematic review on the sensory reinnervation of free flaps for tongue reconstruction: does improved sensibility imply functional benefits? J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2015;68(08):1025–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Engel H, Huang JJ, Lin CY, Lam W, Kao HK, Gazyakan E. A strategic approach for tongue reconstruction to achieve predictable and improved functional and aesthetic outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(6):1967–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang X, Yan G, Zhang G, Li J, Liu J, Zhang Y. Functional tongue reconstruction with the anterolateral thigh flap. World J Surg Oncol. 2013;11:303–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nasajpour H, Steele MH. Anterolateral thigh free flap for “head-to-toe” reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;66:530–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee JC, Hugo SH, Christy MR, Wise MW, Rodriguez ED. Anterolateral thigh flap for trauma reconstruction. Ann Plast Surg. 2011;64:164–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Chen HC, Tang YB. Anterolateral thigh flap: an ideal soft tissue flap. Clin Plast Surg. 2003;30:383–401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sharabi SE, Hatef DA, Koshy JC, Jain A, Cole PD, Hollier LH. Is primary thinning of the anterolateral thigh flap recommended? Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65:555–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ichinose A, Terashi H, Nakahara M. Do multiple venous anastomoses reduce risk of thrombosis in free-flap transfer? Efficacy of dual anastomoses of separate venous systems. Ann Plast Surg. 2004;52:61–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Boca R, Kuo YR, Hsieh CH, Huang EY, Jeng SF. A reliable parameter for primary closure of free anterolateral thigh donor site. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:1558–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. di Candia MD, Lie K, Kumiponjera D, Simcock J, Cormack GC, Malata CM. Versatility of the anterolateral thigh free flap: the four seasons flap. Eplasty. 2012;12:e21–4.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Xu ZF, Dai W, Zhang EJ. Perforator-based chimeric anterolateral thigh flap for head and neck reconstruction after en bloc resection. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue. 2012;21:107–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chien CY, Su CY, Hwang CF, Chuang HC, Jeng SF, Chen YC. Ablation of advanced tongue or base of tongue cancer and reconstruction with free flap: functional outcomes. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2006;32(03):353–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Liao G, Su Y, Zhang J, Hou J, Chen Y, Li M. Reconstruction of the tongue with reinnervated rectus abdominis musculoperitoneal flaps after hemiglossectomy. J Laryngol Otol. 2006;120(03):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Biglioli F, Liviero F, Frigerio A, Rezzonico A, Brusati R. Function of the sensate free forearm flap after partial glossectomy. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2006;34(06):332–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yu P, Robb GL. Reconstruction for total and near-total glossectomy defects. Clin Plast Surg. 2005;32(3):411–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yu P. Reinnervated anterolateral thigh flap for tongue reconstruction. Head Neck. 2004;26(12):1038–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Longo B, Pagnoni M, Ferri G, Morello R, Santanelli F. The mushroom-shaped anterolateral thigh perforator flap for subtotal tongue reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132(3):656–65.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Chang EI, Yu P, Skoracki RJ, Liu J, Hanasono MM. Comprehensive analysis of functional outcomes and survival after microvascular reconstruction of glossectomy defects. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22(09):3061–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ozkan O, Ozkan O, Derin AT, Bektas G, Cinpolat A, Duymaz A, et al. True functional reconstruction of total or subtotal glossectomy defects using a chimeric anterolateral thigh flap with both sensorial and motor innervation. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74(05):557–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Yoleri L, Mavioğlu H. Total tongue reconstruction with free functional gracilis muscle transplantation: a technical note and review of the literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2000;45(2):181–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Manrique OJ, Leland HA, Langevin CJ, Wong A, Carey JN, Ciudad P, et al. Optimizing outcomes following total and subtotal tongue reconstruction: a systematic review of the contemporary literature. J Reconstr Microsurg. 2017;33(2):103–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Dziegielewski PT, Ho ML, Rieger J, Singh P, Langille M, Harris JR, et al. Total glossectomy with laryngeal preservation and free flap reconstruction: objective functional outcomes and systematic review of the literature. Laryngoscope. 2013;123(1):140–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European organization for research and treatment of cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993;85:365–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Bjordal K, Hammerlid E, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, de Graeff A, Boysen M, Evensen JF, et al. Quality of life in head and neck cancer patients: validation of the European organization for research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire-H&N35. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1008–19.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Jansen F, Snyder CF, Leemans CR, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM. Identifying cutoff scores for the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the head and neck cancer–specific module EORTC QLQ-H&N35 representing unmet supportive care needs in patients with head and neck cancer. Head Neck. 2016;38(Suppl 1):E1493–500.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Chen AY, Frankowski R, Bishop-Leone J, Hebert T, Leyk S, Lewin J, et al. The development and validation of a dysphagia-specific quality-of-life questionnaire for patients with head and neck cancer: the MD Anderson dysphagia inventory. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2001;127:870–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. List MA, D’Antonio LL, Cella DF, Siston A, Mumby P, Haraf D, et al. The performance status scale for head and neck cancer patients and the functional assessment of cancer therapy-head and neck scale: a study of utility and validity. Cancer. 1996;77:2294–301.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Matsui Y, Shirota T, Yamashita Y, Ohno K. Analyses of speech intelligibility in patients after glossectomy and reconstruction with fasciocutaneous/myocutaneous flaps. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(04):339–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Shin YS, Koh YW, Kim SH, Jeong JH, Ahn S, Hong HJ, et al. Radiotherapy deteriorates postoperative functional outcome after partial glossectomy with free flap reconstruction. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2012;70(01):216–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Khariwala SS, Vivek PP, Lorenz RR, Esclamado RM, Wood B, Strome M, et al. Swallowing outcomes after microvascular head and neck reconstruction: a prospective review of 191 cases. Laryngoscope. 2007;117(8):1359–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Rieger JM, Zalmanowitz JG, Li SY, Sytsanko A, Harris J, Williams D. Functional outcomes after surgical reconstruction of the base of tongue using the radial forearm free flap in patients with oropharyngeal carcinoma. Head Neck. 2007;29(11):1024–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. O’Connell DA, Rieger J, Harris JR, Dziegielewski P, Zalmanowitz J, Sytsanko A. Swallowing function in patients with base of tongue cancers treated with primary surgery and reconstructed with a modified radial forearm free flap. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(8):857–8564.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Pauloski BR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, McConnel FM, Stein D, Beery Q. Speech and swallowing function after oral and oropharyngeal resections: one-year follow-up. Head Neck. 1994;16(4):313–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Martin-Harris B, Jones B. The videofluorographic swallowing study. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2008;19:769–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Colodny N. Interjudge and intrajudge reliabilities in fiberoptic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (Fees®) using the penetration–aspiration scale: a replication study. Dysphagia. 2002;17:308–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Dakkak M, Bennett JR. A new dysphagia score with objective validation. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1992;14:99–100.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Rosenbek JC, Robbins JA, Roecker EB, Coyle JL, Wood JL. A penetration-aspiration scale. Dysphagia. 1996;11:93–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Brown L, Rieger JM, Harris J, Seikaly H. A longitudinal study of functional outcomes after surgical resection and microvascular reconstruction for oral cancer: tongue mobility and swallowing function. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010;68(11):2690–700.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Namin AW, Varvares MA. Functional outcomes of sensate versus insensate free flap reconstruction in oral and oropharyngeal reconstruction: a systematic review. Head Neck. 2016;38(11):1717–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Pedersen A, Wilson J, McColl E, Carding P, Patterson J. Swallowing outcome measures in head and neck cancer--how do they compare? Oral Oncol. 2016;52:104–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. So WK, Chan RJ, Chan DN, Hughes BMG, Chair SY, Choi KC, et al. Quality-of-life among head and neck cancer survivors at one year after treatment–a systematic review. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48:2391–408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Gabriele M, Michael G, Giulia M, Alessandro S, Andrea M, Daniele M, Livio P. Quality of life, swallowing and speech outcomes after oncological treatment for mobile tongue carcinoma. Eur J Plast Surg. 2020;43:247–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Rihani J, Lee T, Ducic Y. Secondary onlay free flap reconstruction of glossectomy defects following initial successful flap restoration. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(02):232–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. McConnel FM, Pauloski BR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Colangelo L, Shedd D. Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: a prospective study of speech and swallowing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1998;124(6):625–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Urken ML, Moscoso JF, Lawson W, Biller HF. A systematic approach to functional reconstruction of the oral cavity following partial and total glossectomy. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1994;120(6):589–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Michiwaki Y, Ohno K, Imai S, Yamashita Y, Suzuki N, Yoshida H. Functional effects of intraoral reconstruction with a free radial forearm flap. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 1990;18(4):164–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. McConnel FM, Cerenko D, Mendelsohn MS. Manofluorographic analysis of swallowing. Otolaryngol Clin N Am. 1988;21(4):625–35.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. Pigno MA, Funk JJ. Prosthetic management of a total glossectomy defect after free flap reconstruction in an edentulous patient: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(2):119–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Huang CH, Chen HC, Huang YL, Mardini S, Feng GM. Comparison of the radial forearm flap and the thinned anterolateral thigh cutaneous flap for reconstruction of tongue defects: an evaluation of donor-site morbidity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(7):1704–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Mazarro A, de Pablo A, Puiggròs C, Velasco MM, Saez M, Pamias J, et al. Indications, reconstructive techniques, and results for total glossectomy. Head Neck. 2016;38:E2004–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Gibson MK, Forastiere AA. Multidisciplinary approaches in the management of advanced head and neck tumors: state of the art. Curr Opin Oncol. 2004;16(3):220–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Brunner M, Gore SM, Read RL, Alexander A, Mehta A, Elliot M, Milross C, Boyer M, Clark JR. Head and neck multidisciplinary team meetings: effect on patient management. Head Neck. 2015;37(7):1046–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Wheless SA, McKinney KA, Zanation AM. A prospective study of the clinical impact of a multidisciplinary head and neck tumor board. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2010;143(5):650–4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Patil RD, Meinzen-Derr JK, Hendricks BL, Patil YJ. Improving access and timeliness of care for veterans with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a multidisciplinary team’s approach. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(3):627–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Wang YH, Kung PT, Tsai WC, Tai CJ, Liu SA, Tsai MH. Effects of multidisciplinary care on the survival of patients with oral cavity cancer in Taiwan. Oral Oncol. 2012;48(9):803–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Shellenberger TD, Weber RS. Multidisciplinary team planning for patients with head and neck cancer. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2018;30(4):435–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. American Head and Neck Society. Practice guidelines: oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma, T1-N0 and T2-N0. Los Angeles, CA: AHNS; n.d.. http://www.headandneckcancer.org/clinicalresources/docs/oralcavity.php. Accessed 2011.

  70. Gourin CG, Williams HT, Seabolt WN, Herdman AV, Howington JW, Terris DJ. Utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography in identification of residual nodal disease after chemoradiation for advanced head and neck cancer. Laryngoscope. 2006;116(5):705–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Menda Y, Graham MM. Update on 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography and positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging of squamous head and neck cancers. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35(4):214–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Weymuller EA, Yueh B, Deleyiannis FW, Kuntz AL, Alsarraf R, Coltrera MD. Quality of life in patients with head and neck cancer: lessons learned from 549 prospectively evaluated patients. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000;126(3):329–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sakr, M.F. (2022). Reconstruction After Glossectomy. In: Tongue Lesions. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08198-9_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08198-9_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08197-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08198-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics