Skip to main content

To Tax or not to Tax Sin Goods: That’s the Question for Emerging Economies

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Innovation of Businesses, and Digitalization during Covid-19 Pandemic (ICBT 2021)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 488))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In times of crisis and budgetary pressures, world governments (specially from emerging economies) look more decisively for alternative sources of income generation. One such alternative is the so-called “sin taxes’’. Many factors affect individual attitudes toward “legal vices” such as smoking, alcohol, gambling, plastic consumption, or consumption of beef, with religion having the greatest impact. Taxing the consumption of products or activities that pose a threat to the health of people and that cause damage to the environment has resulted in a lucrative, controversial strategy with variable results in the governments that have implemented it. This paper aims to use Scopus and Web of Science to systematically contrast how developed economies have implemented such types of taxes, which challenges those countries have faced and which lessons they can share with under developed countries. In the same way, this paper will present how, sometimes, taxes on sins do not discourage unhealthy behaviors nor are they a good way to increase government revenues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aasness, J., Nygård, O.E.: Revenue functions and dupuit curves for indirect taxes with cross-border shopping. Int. Tax Public Financ. 21(2), 272–297 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-013-9268-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auerbach, A., Hines, J.: Taxation and Economic Efficiency. In: Auerbach, A.J., Feldstein, M. (eds.) Handbook of Public Economics, vol. 3, pp. 1347–1421. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bartlett, B.: Taxing sin: a win-win for everyone. Policy Persp. Tax Anal. 128, 1–3 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bascuñán, J., Cuadrado, C.: Efectividad de los impuestos a bebidas azucaradas para reducir niveles de obesidad: resumen de evidencia para políticas. Medwave 17(8), e7054 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxandall, P.: Taxing habits: when it comes to state taxes, sin is in. In: Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Regional Review, pp 19–26 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bogenschneider, N.: ‘Sin tax’ as signpost in food labeling. Eur. Food Feed Law Rev. 12(1), 14–21 (2017). ISSN: 18622720

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, J.L.: Writing literature reviews. Human Res. Dev. Rev. 13(3), 271–275 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1177/1534484314536705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cassandra, T.: Cigarette Wars: The Triumph of ‘“The Little White Slaver.”’ Oxford University Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawthorne, A.: Africa wages war on scourge of plastic bags. Reuters (2007). http://www.reuters.com/articlePrint?articleId=USL2060151420070820

  • Cheng, C., Chu, H.: Optimal policies for sin goods and health care: tax or subsidy? Int. Tax Public Financ. 25(2), 412–429 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10797-017-9452-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, E., de Fonseka, J., McGowan, R.: Caloric sweetened beverage taxes: a toothless solution? Econ. Voice 14(1) (2017). https://doi.org/10.1515/ev-2017-0009

  • Convery, F., McDonnell, S., Ferreira, S.: The most popular tax in Europe? Lessons from the Irish plastic bags levy. Environ. Resour. Econ. 38, 1–11 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-006-9059-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Chan, S., Hofer, A.: The green economy: pragmatism or revolution? Perceptions ofyoung researchers on social ecological transformation. Environ. Values 26(4), 413–435 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikgang, J., Visser, M.: Behavioral Response to Plastic Bag Legislation in Botswana. Environment for Development Initiative (2010). http://www.jstor.org/stable/resrep14935

  • Ely, R.: Taxation in American States and Cities. Crowell, New York (1888)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hines, J.: Taxing Consumption and Other Sins. J. Econ. Perspect. 21(1), 49–68 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavio, M., Kotakorpi, K.: Sin licenses revisited. J. Public Econ. 144, 40–51 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Equinox Center Plastic Bag Bans: Analysis of Economic and Environmental Impacts (2013). https://energycenter.org/sites/default/files/Plastic-Bag-Ban-Web-Version-10-22-13-CK.pdf

  • Kish, R.J.: Using legislation to reduce one-time plastic bag usage. Econ. Aff. 38(2), 224–239 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzi, P.: A different carbon tax: the sustainable green Tariff. Soc. 54, 342–345 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxman, A.D., Bjørndal, A., Becerra-Posada, F., Gibson, M., Block, M.A.G., Haines, A., Hamid, M., Odom, C.H., Lei, H., Levin, B., Lipsey, M.W.: A framework for mandatory impact evaluation to ensure well informed public policy decisions. The Lancet 375(9712), 427–431 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riahi, M., Rohani, H., Rajabi, N., Bidkhori, M.: Tobacco tax and price in the developed and developing countries in the World. Data Brief 20 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Spokas, K.: Plastics: still young, but having a mature impmpact. Waste Manag. 28(3), 473–474 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, S.: Clogged by plastic bags, Africa begins banning them. Christ. Sci. Monit. (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • The UK government. Climate Change Act 2008. The Stationery Office Limited, London (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Report on the status of Styrofoam and plastic bag bans in the wider Caribbean region UNEP (DEPI)/CAR WG.39/INF.8 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  • Thom, M.: Tax politics and policy (1.a ed.). Politics & International Relations (2017). https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315645889

  • United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Plastic bag ban in Kenya proposed as part of a new waste strategy. UNEP press release (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Beukering, P., Kuik, O., Oosterhuis, F. The Economics of recycling. In: Handbook of Recycling, pp. 479–489 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-396459-5.00031-3. OECD Municipal waste. Environment at a Glance 2

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James Manuel Pérez-Morón .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Pérez-Morón, J. (2023). To Tax or not to Tax Sin Goods: That’s the Question for Emerging Economies. In: Alareeni, B., Hamdan, A. (eds) Innovation of Businesses, and Digitalization during Covid-19 Pandemic. ICBT 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 488. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08090-6_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08090-6_25

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-08089-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-08090-6

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics