Skip to main content

Problem Status

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Uncertainty Deconstructed

Part of the book series: Science, Technology and Innovation Studies ((STAIS))

  • 276 Accesses

Abstract

A major problem for researchers, analysts, forecasters and, indeed, investors is to identify how, when, and where new events and trends will play out. In essence most problems have multiple numbers of variables, and where each variable has a number of conditions or dimensions. So, how can we address the outcomes of futures governed by such complexity? This chapter introduces the notion that problems come in various shapes and sizes which can be best addressed via a set of techniques known as Problem Structuring Methods (PSMs). Once the problem characteristic has been identified (is it a puzzle, a causal problem, or a wicked problem?), then the problem can be positioned within the Uncertainty matrix so the most appropriate PSM can be applied. This positioning also allows the analyst to explore issues such as decision stakes and systems uncertainties. The chapter ends by introducing Rosenhead’s Robustness Analysis method as an appropriate MTT for addressing the early stages of problem identification.

“Earlier, I didn’t understand why I got no answer to my question, today I don’t understand how I presumed to ask a question. But then I didn’t presume, I only asked” Franz Kafka—the Zurau Aphorisms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ackoff, R. (1961). Progress in operations research. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ackoff, R. L. (1974). Redesigning the future. Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, S. (1984). The viable system model: Its provenance, development, methodology and pathology. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 35, 7–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conklin, J. (2006). Dialogue mapping: Building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell, N. (2001). Evaluating soft OR: Some reflections on an apparently “unsuccessful” implementation using Soft Systems Methodology (SSM).

    Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (May 1994). Uncertainty, complexity and post-normal science. In The annual review of environmental toxicology and chemistry, Vol 13, No 12. Pergamon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, B. (October 2016). Combining qualitative and qualitative aspects of problem structuring in computational morphological analysis. PhD thesis. Dyson School of Design Engineering, Imperial College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, B., & Childs, P. R. N. (2013). Applying problem structuring methods to the design process for safety helmets. Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Helmet Performance and Design, London, February 15, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grint, K. (1997). Fuzzy management: Contemporary ideas and practices at work. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunz, W., & Rittel, H. (1970). Issues as elements of information systems. Working Paper No. 131, Heidelberg-Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levin, K., Cashore, B., Auld, G., & Bernstein, S. (2012). Introduced the distinction between “wicked problems” and “super wicked problems” in a 2007 conference paper, followed by a 2012 journal article in Policy Sciences. Problems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchau, A., Walker, W., Bloeman, & Popper, S. (Eds.). (2019). Decision making under deep uncertainty, Chapters 2, 7. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, D. (2011). A robust approach to military research programme planning. Smith System Engineering Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, R. R. (1974). Intellectualizing about the Moon-Ghetto Metaphor. Policy Sciences, 5, 375–414. Elsevier Scientific Publishing, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ormerod, R. (2001). Viewpoint: The success and failure of methodologies – A comment on Connell (2001): Evaluating soft OR. The Journal of Operational Research Society, Palgrave, October 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pidd, M. (1996). Tools for thinking (p. 40). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. (1959). The logic of scientific discovery. Springer and Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, T. (2002). Modelling complex socio-technical systems using morphological analysis. Adapted from address to the Swedish Parliamentary IT Commission, Stockholm, December 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ritchey, T. (2006). Problem structuring using computer-aided morphological analysis. Published by Journal of the Operational Research Society, 57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rittel, H., & Webber, M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, Vol. 4, pp 155–169. Elsevier Scientific Publishing Company: Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenhead, J., & Mingers, J. (2001). A new paradigm of analysis in rational analysis for a problematic world revisited (2nd ed.). Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, A. H. (1977). The new science of management decision. Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treverton, G. (2010). Addressing complexities in homeland security. In L. K. Johnson (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of national security intelligence. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Garvey, B. (2022). Problem Status. In: Uncertainty Deconstructed. Science, Technology and Innovation Studies. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-08007-4_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics