Abstract
The rapid spread of fake news during the COVID-19 pandemic has aggravated the situation and made it extremely difficult for the World Health Organization and government officials to inform people only with accurate scientific findings. Misinformation dissemination was so unhindered that social media sites had to ultimately conceal posts related to COVID-19 entirely and allow users to see only the WHO or government-approved information. This action had to be taken because newsreaders lack the ability to efficiently discern fact from fiction and thereby indirectly aid in the spread of fake news believing it to be true. Our work helps in understanding the thought process of an individual when reading a news article. This information can further be used to develop their critical thinking ability. We expand the space of misinformation’s impact on users by conducting our own surveys to understand the factors consumers deem most important when deciding if some piece of information is true or not. Results from our study show that what people perceive to be important in deciding what is true information is different when confronted with the actual articles. We also find that prior beliefs and political leanings affect the ability of people to detect the legitimacy of the information.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Allcott H, Gentzkow M (2017) Social media and fake news in the 2016 election. J Econ Perspect 31(2):211–236
Ananny M (2018) The partnership press: Lessons for platform-publisher collaborations as facebook and news outlets team to fight misinformation. Tow Center for Digital Journalism (2018)
Baly R, Karadzhov G, Alexandrov D, Glass J, Nakov, P (2018) Predicting factuality of reporting and bias of news media sources. Preprint. arXiv:1810.01765
Bronstein MV, Pennycook G, Bear A, Rand DG, Cannon TD (2019) Belief in fake news is associated with delusionality, dogmatism, religious fundamentalism, and reduced analytic thinking. J Appl Res Memory Cogn 8(1):108–117
Burfoot C, Baldwin T (2009) Automatic satire detection: are you having a laugh? In Proceedings of the 2009 ACL-IJCNLP association for computational linguistcs and the international joint conference on natural language processing, pp. 161–164
Cerf VG Information and misinformation on the internet. Commun ACM 60(1):9
Chakraborty A, Paranjape B, Kakarla S, Ganguly N (2016) Stop clickbait: detecting and preventing clickbaits in online news media. In 2016 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM). IEEE, New York, pp 9–16
Cui L, Wang S, Lee D (2019) Same: sentiment-aware multi-modal embedding for detecting fake news. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, pp 41–48
Dickerson JP, Kagan V, Subrahmanian V (2014) Using sentiment to detect bots on twitter: are humans more opinionated than bots? In 2014 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM 2014). IEEE, New York , pp 620–627
Frederick S (2005) Cognitive reflection and decision making. J Econ Perspect 19(4):25–42
Gabielkov M, Ramachandran A, Chaintreau A, Legout A (2016) Social clicks: what and who gets read on twitter? In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMETRICS international conference on measurement and modeling of computer science, pp 179–192
Gollust SE, Lantz PM, Ubel PA (2009) The polarizing effect of news media messages about the social determinants of health. Am J Publ Health 99(12):2160–2167
Gottfried J, Shearer E (2016) News use across social media platforms 2016. Pew Research Center, Washington (2016)
Harper CA, Baguley T (2019) You are fake news: ideological (a) symmetries in perceptions of media legitimacy. Preprint. PsyArXiv:10.31234
Helmstetter S, Paulheim H (2018) Weakly supervised learning for fake news detection on twitter. In 2018 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM). IEEE, New York, pp 274–277
Horne B, Adali S. (2017) This just in: fake news packs a lot in title, uses simpler, repetitive content in text body, more similar to satire than real news. In Proceedings of the international AAAI conference on web and social media, vol. 11
Klein N, O’Brien E (2018) People use less information than they think to make up their minds. Proc Natl Acad Sci 115(52):13222–13227
Krishna K, Murty MN (1999) Genetic k-means algorithm. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet Part B (Cybernetics) 29(3):433–439
Metzger MJ, Flanagin AJ, Medders RB (2010) Social and heuristic approaches to credibility evaluation online. J Commun 60(3):413–439
Moravec P, Minas R, Dennis AR (2018) Fake news on social media: People believe what they want to believe when it makes no sense at all. Kelley School of Business Research Paper (18–87)
Pehlivanoglu D, Lin T, Deceus F, Heemskerk A, Ebner NC, Cahill BS (2021) The role of analytical reasoning and source credibility on the evaluation of real and fake full-length news articles. Cognit Res Prin Impl 6(1):1–12
Pennycook G, Rand DG Lazy, not biased: susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition 188:39–50
Pidikiti S, Zhang JS, Han R, Lehman T, Lv Q, Mishra S (2020) Understanding how readers determine the legitimacy of online news articles in the era of fake news. In 2020 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM). IEEE, New York, pp 768–775
Politifact (2019). http://www.politifact.com
Shao C, Hui PM, Wang L, Jiang X, Flammini A, Menczer F, Ciampaglia GL (2018) Anatomy of an online misinformation network. Publ Lib Sci One 13(4):e0196087 (2018)
Shu K, Zhou X, Wang S, Zafarani R, Liu H (2019) The role of user profiles for fake news detection. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining, pp 436–439
Silverman C (2016) This analysis shows how viral fake election news stories outperformed real news on facebook. BuzzFeed News 16 (2016)
Snopes (2019). http://www.snopes.com
Swire B, Ecker UK, Lewandowsky S (2017) The role of familiarity in correcting inaccurate information. J Exp Psychol Learn Memory Cogn 43(12):1948
Thorndike RL (1953) Who belongs in the family? Psychometrika 18(4):267–276
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pidikiti, S., Zhang, J.S., Han, R., Lehman, T.S., Lv, Q., Mishra, S. (2022). Understanding How Readers Determine the Legitimacy of Online Medical News Articles in the Era of Fake News. In: Bourlai, T., Karampelas, P., Alhajj, R. (eds) Disease Control Through Social Network Surveillance. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07869-9_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07869-9_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07868-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07869-9
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)