Skip to main content

Opening up the Black Box on Digitalisation and Agility: Key Drivers and Main Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Advancement through Technology Volume II

Abstract

Given the rising global interest in the digital technologies, the study aims to investigate the influence of digital transformation on the firm’s organizational performance and sustainable development. A quantitative research was carried out, with data collection based on a questionnaire that has been sent via email to Tunisian companies as an example of emerging economy. We applied linear regressions on data from 270 Tunisian companies. The data analysis shows a growing interest in digital transformation over time. The results suggest that increasing investments in digital transformation and innovation practices tackle the current environment and improved organizational performance and sustainable development. The model that has been engineered can enrich theoretical knowledge and digitalization.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 139.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 179.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, R. B. (2016). Women on Boards: The Superheroes of Tomorrow? The Leadership Quarterly, 27(3), 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, 2001, 107–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloini, D., Dulmin, R., Mininno, V., & Ponticelli, S. (2015). Key Antecedents and Practices for Supply Chain Management Adoption in Project Contexts. International Journal of Project Management, 33(6), 1301–1316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amit, R., & Schoemaker, P. J. (1993). Strategic Assets and Organisational Rent. Strategic Management Journal, 14(1), 33–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amores-Salvadó, J., Martín-de Castro, G., & Navas-López, J. E. (2014). Green Corporate Image: Moderating the Connection Between Environmental Product Innovation and Firm Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 83, 356–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, I. (1997). Combinatorial Designs and Tournaments (Vol. 6). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asensio, O. I., & Delmas, M. A. (2015). Nonprice Incentives and Energy Conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(6), E510–E515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (2017). Strategic Entrepreneurial Internationalization: A Normative Framework. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 11(3), 211–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Autio, E. (2018). Creative Tension: The Significance of Ben Oviatt’s and Patricia McDougall’s Article ‘Toward a Theory of International New Ventures’. International Entrepreneurship, 2018, 59–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking Trash: Legitimacy, Impression Management, and Unsystematic Risk in the Context of the Natural Environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barlatier, P. J., & Burger-Helmchen, T. (2019). The Digital Organization: Opportunities and Risks. Revue internationale de psychosociologie et de gestion des comportements organisationnels, 25(61), 5–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bena, J., & Simintzi, E. (2016). Labor-Induced Technological Change: Evidence from Doing Business in China. Accessed from SSRN

    Google Scholar 

  • Bi, K., Huang, P., & Wang, X. (2016). Innovation Performance and Influencing Factors of Low-Carbon Technological Innovation Under the Global Value Chain: A Case of Chinese Manufacturing Industry. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 111, 275–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodwell, W., & Chermack, T. J. (2010). Organizational Ambidexterity: Integrating Deliberate and Emergent Strategy with Scenario Planning. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 77(2), 193–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau, S., Aubert, B., & Bareil, C. (2020). The Effects of IT Use Intensity and Innovation Culture on Organizational Performance: The Mediating Role of Innovation Intensity. Management Research Review.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. R., Martinsson, G., & Petersen, B. C. (2013). Law, Stock Markets, and Innovation. The Journal of Finance, 68(4), 1517–1549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camisón, C., & Villar-López, A. (2014). Organizational Innovation as an Enabler of Technological Innovation Capabilities and Firm Performance. Journal of Business Research, 67(1), 2891–2902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, K. M., Guerry, A. D., Balvanera, P., Klain, S., Satterfield, T., Basurto, X., & Woodside, U. (2012). Where Are Cultural and Social in Ecosystem Services? A Framework for Constructive Engagement. Bioscience, 62(8), 744–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. H. (2011). The Influence of Corporate Environmental Ethics on Competitive Advantage: The Mediation Role of Green Innovation. Journal of Business Ethics, 104(3), 361–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. T., Lin, C. T., & Huang, S. F. (2006). A Fuzzy Approach for Supplier Evaluation and Selection in Supply Chain Management. International Journal of Production Economics, 102(2), 289–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 128–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conding, J., Habidin, N. F., Zubir, A. F. M., Hashim, S., & Jaya, N. A. S. L. (2012). The Structural Analysis of Green Innovation (GI) and Green Performance (GP) in Malaysian Automotive Industry. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 3(6), 172–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2015). The Economic Relevance of Environmental Disclosure and Its Impact on Corporate Legitimacy: An Empirical Investigation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6), 431–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello, N., Kano, L., & Liesch, P. W. (2017). Adapting the Uppsala Model to a Modern World: Macro-context and Microfoundations. Journal of International Business Studies, 48(9), 1151–1164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dangelico, R. M., & Pujari, D. (2010). Mainstreaming Green Product Innovation: Why and How Companies Integrate Environmental Sustainability. Journal of Business Ethics, 95(3), 471–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delahaye, M., Degand, P., & Jacquemin, A. (2019). Quels sont les impacts de la digitalisation sur les mesures d’accompagnement publiques proposées aux entrepreneurs en Wallonie?

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado-Ceballos, J., Aragón-Correa, J. A., Ortiz-de-Mandojana, N., & Rueda-Manzanares, A. (2012). The Effect of Internal Barriers on the Connection Between Stakeholder Integration and Proactive Environmental Strategies. Journal of Business Ethics, 107(3), 281–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downes, L., & Nunes, P. (2013). Big Bang Disruption. Harvard Business Review, 44–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durif, F., Boivin, C., & Julien, C. (2010). In Search of a Green Product Definition. Innovative Marketing, 6(1), 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gebhardt, C. (2017). Humans in the Loop: The Clash of Concepts in Digital Sustainability in Smart Cities. In Sustainability in a Digital World (pp. 85–93). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gueguen, G., & Isckia, T. (2011). The Borders of Mobile Handset Ecosystems: Is Coopetition Inevitable? Telematics and Informatics, 28(1), 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guiral, A. (2012). Corporate Social Performance, Innovation Intensity, and Financial Performance: Evidence from Lending Decisions. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 24(2), 65–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horváthová, E. (2012). The Impact of Environmental Performance on Firm Performance: Short-Term Costs and Long-Term Benefits? Ecological Economics, 84, 91–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, P. H., Tian, X., & Xu, Y. (2014). Financial Development and Innovation: Cross-Country Evidence. Journal of Financial Economics, 112(1), 116–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, R., & Pearson, P. (2007). Final Report MEI Project About Measuring Eco-Innovation. UM Merit, Maastricht, 10(2), 1–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiron, D., & Unruh, G. (2018). Business Needs a Safety Net. MIT Sloan Management Review, 59(3), 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K. H., & Min, B. (2015). Green R & D for Eco-innovation and Its Impact on Carbon Emissions and Firm Performance. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 534–542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, D., Zheng, M., Cao, C., Chen, X., Ren, S., & Huang, M. (2017). The Impact of Legitimacy Pressure and Corporate Profitability on Green Innovation: Evidence from China top 100. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lopez-Nicolas, C., & Soto-Acosta, P. (2010). Analyzing ICT Adoption and Use Effects on Knowledge Creation: An Empirical Investigation in SMEs. International Journal of Information Management, 30(6), 521–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manyika, J., Chui, M., Bisson, P., Woetzel, J., Dobbs, R., Bughin, J., & Aharon, D. (2015). Unlocking the Potential of the Internet of Things (Vol. 1). McKinsey Global Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelino, F., Caputo, M., Cammarano, A., & Lamberti, E. (2014). Inbound and Outbound Open Innovation: Organization and Performances. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 9(3), 65–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miozzo, M., Desyllas, P., Lee, H. F., & Miles, I. (2016). Innovation Collaboration and Appropriability by Knowledge-Intensive Business Services Firms. Research Policy, 45(7), 1337–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murillo-Luna, J. L., Garcés-Ayerbe, C., & Rivera-Torres, P. (2011). Barriers to the Adoption of Proactive Environmental Strategies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 19(13), 1417–1425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nambisan, S. (2017). Digital Entrepreneurship: Toward a Digital Technology Perspective of Entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(6), 1029–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neubert, M. (2018). The Impact of Digitalization on the Speed of Internationalization of Lean Global Startups. Technology Innovation Management Review, 8(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, S., & Huse, M. (2010). The Contribution of Women on Boards of Directors: Going Beyond the Surface. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 18(2), 136–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Orbik, Z., & Zozuľaková, V. (2019). Corporate social and digital responsibility. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 2(27), 79–83. https://doi.org/10.1515/mspe-2019-0013

  • Osburg, T., & Lohrmann, C. (Eds.). (2017). Sustainability in a Digital World. New Opportunities through New Technologies. Springer, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54603-2

  • Pagani, M., & Pardo, C. (2017). The Impact of Digital Technology on Relationships in a Business Network. Industrial Marketing Management, 67, 185–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. M., & Gully, S. M. (2015). Multilevel and Strategic Recruiting: Where Have We Been, Where Can We Go from Here? Journal of Management, 41(5), 1416–1445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, C., & Byron, K. (2015). Women on Boards and Firm Financial Performance: A Meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 58(5), 1546–1571.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining Innovation—Eco-innovation Research and the Contribution from Ecological Economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rybacki, J., & Kowalski, A. M. (2018). Moderate Innovator Trap – Does Convergence of Innovative Potential Occur?

    Google Scholar 

  • Scuotto, V., Santoro, G., Bresciani, S., & Del Giudice, M. (2017). Shifting Intra- and Inter-organizational Innovation Processes Towards Digital Business: An Empirical Analysis of SMEs. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(3), 247–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seele, P., & Lock, I. (2017). The Game-Changing Potential of Digitalization for Sustainability: Possibilities, Perils, and Pathways. Sustainability Science, 12(2), 183–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Acosta, P., Popa, S., & Palacios-Marqués, D. (2016). E-business, Organizational Innovation and Firm Performance in Manufacturing SMEs: An Empirical Study in Spain. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 22(6), 885–904.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. M. (2006). Activist Rhetorics and the Struggle for Meaning: The Case of “sustainability” in the Reticulate Public Sphere. Rhetoric Review, 25(3), 297–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strandhagen, J. W., Buer, S. V., Semini, M., & Alfnes, E. (2019, September). Digitalized Manufacturing Logistics in Engineer-to-Order Operations. In IFIP International Conference on Advances in Production Management Systems, pp. 579–587.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strange, R., & Zucchella, A. (2017). Industry 4.0, Global Value Chains and International Business. Multinational Business Review, 25(3), 174–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Z. Y., Xue, L. R., & Zhang, K. (2015). A New Approach to Finite-Time Adaptive Stabilization of High-Order Uncertain Nonlinear System. Automatica, 58, 60–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thornhill, S. (2006). Knowledge, Innovation and Firm Performance in High- and Low-Technology Regimes. Journal of Business Venturing, 21(5), 687–703.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tidd, J., & Trewhella, M. J. (1997). Organizational and Technological Antecedents for Knowledge Acquisition and Learning. R & D Management, 27(4), 359–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turel, O., & Bart, C. (2014). Board-Level IT Governance and Organizational Performance. European Journal of Information Systems, 23(2), 223–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchiato, R., Favato, G., Di Maddaloni, F., & Do, H. (2020). Foresight, Cognition, and Long-Term Performance: Insights from the Automotive Industry and Opportunities for Future Research. Futures & Foresight Science, 2(1), e25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Weber, Y., Shams, R., Tsoukatos, E., & Efthymiou, L. (2022a). Business Under Crisis Volume I: Avenues for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (Palgrave Studies in Cross-Disciplinary Business Research). Association with EuroMed Academy of Business, Palgrave Macmillan (Springer). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76567-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Weber, Y., Shams, R., Tsoukatos, E., & Efthymiou, L. (2022b). Business Under Crisis, Volume II: Organisational Adaptations. Palgrave Studies in Cross-Disciplinary Business Research. Association with EuroMed Academy of Business, Palgrave Macmillan (Springer). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76575-0

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vrontis, D., Thrassou, A., Weber, Y., Shams, R., Tsoukatos, E., & Efthymiou, L. (2022c). Business Under Crisis, Volume III: Avenues for Innovation, Entrepreneurship and Sustainability (Palgrave Studies in Cross-Disciplinary Business Research). Association with EuroMed Academy of Business, Palgrave Macmillan (Springer). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-76583-5

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, D. S., & Shyu, C. L. (2009). The Longitudinal Effect of HRM Effectiveness and Dynamic Innovation Performance on Organizational Performance in Taiwan. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(8), 1790–1809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wittkop, A., Zulauf, K., & Wagner, R. (2018). How Digitalization Changes the Internationalization of Entrepreneurial Firms: Theoretical Considerations and Empirical Evidence. Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, 6(2), 193–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, R. I. (2018). Transparency and Firm Innovation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 66(1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., & Kraemer, K. L. (2005). Post-adoption Variations in Usage and Value of E-business by Organizations: Cross-Country Evidence from the Retail Industry. Information Systems Research, 16(1), 61–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matteo Rossi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chouaibi, S., Rossi, M., Chouaibi, J., Thrassou, A. (2022). Opening up the Black Box on Digitalisation and Agility: Key Drivers and Main Outcomes. In: Thrassou, A., Vrontis, D., Efthymiou, L., Weber, Y., Shams, S.M.R., Tsoukatos, E. (eds) Business Advancement through Technology Volume II. Palgrave Studies in Cross-disciplinary Business Research, In Association with EuroMed Academy of Business. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07765-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics