Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Intelligent Systems Reference Library ((ISRL,volume 223))

  • 551 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter we describe how to formalize statistical decision problems. These involve making decisions whose utility depends on an unknown state of the world. In this setting, it is common to assume that the state of the world is a fundamental property that is not influenced by our decisions. However, we can calculate a probability distribution for the state of the world, using a prior belief and some data, where the data we obtain may depend on our decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    These distributions may be singular, that is, they may be concentrated in one point. For example, \(\sigma ^*\) is singular, if \(\sigma ^*(a)=1\) for some \(a\) and \(\sigma ^*(a')=0\) for all \(a'\ne a\).

  2. 2.

    For that reason, policies are also sometimes called decision functions or decision rules in the literature.

  3. 3.

    We obtain a different probability of observations under the binomial model, but the resulting posterior, and hence the policy, is the same.

  4. 4.

    For example, through Lipschitz conditions on the policy.

  5. 5.

    The following figures are not really accurate, as they are liberally adapted from different studies.

References

  1. Leonard, J.: Savage. The Foundations of Statistics. Dover Publications (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kearns, M., Roth, A.: The Ethical Algorithm: The Science of Socially Aware Algorithm Design. Oxford University Press, USA (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dwork, C., Hardt, M., Pitassi, T., Reingold, O., Zemel, R.: Fairness through awareness. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Innovations in Theoretical Computer Science Conference, pp. 214–226. ACM (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chouldechova, A.: Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments. Technical Report (2016). arXiv:1610.07524

  5. Corbett-Davies, S., Pierson, E., Feller, A., Goel, S., Huq, A.: Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. Technical Report (2017). arXiv:1701.08230

  6. Kleinberg, J., Mullainathan, S., Raghavan, M.: Inherent trade-offs in the fair determination of risk scores. Technical Report (2016). arXiv:1609.05807

  7. Kilbertus, N., Rojas-Carulla, M., Parascandolo, G., Hardt, M., Janzing, D., Schölkopf, B.: Avoiding discrimination through causal reasoning. Technical Report (2017). arXiv:1706.02744

  8. Dimitrakakis, C., Liu, Y., Parkes, D., Radanovic, G.: Subjective fairness: fairness is in the eye of the beholder. Technical Report (2017). arXiv:1706.00119

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christos Dimitrakakis .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Dimitrakakis, C., Ortner, R. (2022). Decision Problems. In: Decision Making Under Uncertainty and Reinforcement Learning. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 223. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07614-5_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics