Skip to main content

The ‘New’ Normal of Business Education in a Post COVID Era: The CDIO Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Higher Education in the Arab World

Abstract

With the resumption to normal life peering at the end of the tunnel, one cannot help but pause and ponder what the future of business education will look like in a post COVID world. Based on the evolution of the professional business context that goes beyond basic disciplinary knowledge, this chapter caters to the current and future needs of this discipline and presents an innovative framework and roadmap for Business schools to follow using the Conceive-Design-Implement-Operate (CDIO) adjusted Business Syllabus and applying standards that go hand in hand. Moreover, the chapter includes a Business Generic Management Curriculum that includes the required knowledge, skills, and attributes needed for successful business graduates.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Reynolds R, Rizvi A (2019) Dubai university figures shows nearly half study business degrees, as science lags behind. The National Gulf, UAE. https://www.thenationalnews.com/uae/education/dubai-university-figures-show-nearly-half-study-business-degrees-as-science-lags-behind-1.867847

  2. Riccoboni A (2010) Who invented the Business School. Business Because. https://www.businessbecause.com/news/mba-degree/352/who-invented-the-business-school

  3. James E (2019) As business needs evolve, so should business education, says Goizueta’s dean. Bus J Atlanta Bus Chronicles. https://www.bizjournals.com/atlanta/news/2019/04/15/as-business-needs-evolve-so-should-business.html

  4. Tanuja A (nd) Classification of management theories: 4 schools of thought. Business Management Ideas. https://www.businessmanagementideas.com/management/theories-management/classification-of-management-theories-4-schools-of-thought/4679

  5. Azana G, Grama S, Bono G (2017) Entrepreneurship education in business schools: Best Practices and Recommendations. Equal Report for Orientation of Entrepreneurship Activity on Business Schools in Europe. https://equal.network/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/1.-Entrepreneurship-Education-in-Business-Schools_Project-report-Spain.pdf

  6. Amour M (2020) Faculty face uphill adapting to needs of today’s students. Insider Higher Ed, Washington DC. https://www.insidehighered.com/print/news/2020/04/03/faculty-face-uphill-battle-adapting-needs-todays-students

  7. Comevo (2020) The changing student demographics in 2020. https://comevo.com/the-changing-student-demographics-in-2020/

  8. Seale S (2021) How higher education institutions can “future-proof” against the demographic cliff. Higher Ed Connects. https://higheredconnects.com/futureproofing-against-demographic-cliff/

  9. Hittepole C (nd) Nontraditional students: supporting changing student population. University of Denver, US. https://naspa.org/images/uploads/main/Hittepole_NASPA_Memo.pdf

  10. Chen JC (2017) Nontraditional Adult learners: the Neglected Diversity in Postsecondary Education. SAGE J. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244017697161

  11. Powell A (2020) Lockdown has a lot to answer for: the mature students going back to university. The Guardian, International Edition. https://www.theguardian.com/education/2020/jun/15/lockdown-has-a-lot-to-answer-for-the-mature-students-going-back-to-university

  12. Sledge L, Fishman TD (2014) Reimagining Higher Education. Deloitte University Press, NYC, Deloitte Development LLC. https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/public-sector/reimagining-higher-education.html

  13. Elliot KM, Healy MA (2001) Key factors influencing student satisfaction related to recruitment and retention. J Mark High Educ. https://doi.org/10.1300/J050v10n04_01

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vidalakis C, Sum M, Papa A (2013) The quality and value of higher education facilities: a comparative study. Facilities 31(11):489–504. https://doi.org/10.1108/F-10-2011-0087

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Higa K, Vel J (2016) Designing innovative campuses for tomorrow’s students. Plan Higher Educ J 44(4). Designing Innovative Campuses for Tomorrow's Students - ProQuest

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rullman L (2018) Lazy rivers and learning. Insider Higher Ed, Washington DC. https://www.insidehighered.com/views/2018/01/17/improving-value-campus-facilities-opinion

  17. Abele E, Metternich J, Tisch M, Chryssolouris G, Sihn W, ElMaraghy H, Hummel V, Ranz F (2015) Learning factories for research, education, and training. In: Proceedings from the 5th conference on learning factories 2015, science direct. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.187

  18. APPA Thought Leader Series (2015) Facilities and Technology: the transformation of campus. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED581273

  19. Hanssen TS, Solvoll G (2014) The importance of university facilities for student satisfaction at a Norwegian university. University of Nordland, Bodo, Norway. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/https://doi.org/10.1108/F-11-2014-0081/full/html

  20. University of Jordan (2020) Faculty for factory. http://sites.ju.edu.jo/ar/fff/EnHome.aspx

  21. Canals J (2009) Seeking a greater impact: new challenges for business schools. IESE Business School-University of Navara, working paper. https://media.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0838-E.pdf

  22. Avolio B, Benzaquen J, Pretell C (2019) Global challenges for business education and the new educational agenda: graduate attributes and teaching methods. E-J Bus Educ Sch Teaching 13(2):80–99. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1250465.pdf

  23. Vieira H (2017) Why much of academic business research remains irrelevant for business. LSE Business Review. The London School of Economic and Political Sciences. https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/businessreview/2017/11/21/why-much-of-academic-business-research-remains-irrelevant-for-business/

  24. Derkach AA (2004) Akmeologicheskie osnovy razvitiya professionala: Acmeological Basis of Professional Development. Voronezh Publ. Derkach A.A. Akmeologicheskie osnovy razvitiya professionala./DERKACH A.A. Akmeologicheskie of of professional., 2004, Voronezh by n/a - 2004 (biblio.com)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Slastenin VA, Podymova LS (2007) Readiness of the teacher for innovative activity. Siberian Pedagogical J (1):42–49 (in Russian). https://elibrary.ru/item.asp?id=11687141

  26. Walters N (2015) McDonald’s hamburger university can be harder to get into than Harvard and is even cooler than you’d imagine. Business Insider India. https://www.businessinsider.in/McDonalds-Hamburger-University-can-be-harder-to-get-into-than-Harvard-and-is-even-cooler-than-youd-imagine/articleshow/49517893.cms

  27. Marquardson J, Elnoshokaty A (2019) Skills, certifications, or degrees: what companies demand for entry-level cybersecurity jobs. Inf Syst Educ J. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1246234.pdf

  28. Hill C (2019) You don’t need a 4-year college degree for these high-paying jobs at Google, Apple, Netflix. Market Watch. https://www.marketwatch.com/story/you-dont-need-a-4-year-college-degree-for-these-high-paying-jobs-at-google-apple-netflix-2019-04-08/

  29. Flavin M (2012) Disruptive technologies in higher education. Res Learn Technol. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Disruptive-Technologies-in-Higher-Education-Flavin/ae28f9aa228c1321424ae5b7f095c2c5b027dda6

  30. Marsick V (2009) Toward a unifying framework to support informal learning theory, research and practice. J Workplace Learn 21(4):265–275. https://www.emerald.com/insight/content/doi/https://doi.org/10.1108/13665620910954184/full/html

  31. Illeris K (2009) Transfer of learning in the learning society: How can the barriers between different learning spaces be surmounted, and how can the gap between learning inside and outside the schools be bridged? Int J Lifelong Educ 28(2):137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/02601370902756986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. OECD (2019) The future of education and skills: Education 2030. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/contact/E2030%20Position%20Paper%20(05.04.2018).pdf

  33. Chandler N (2010) Reasons and forms of organizational resistance to change in the higher education sector. Pract Theory Syst Educ 5(1):87–104. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/266287738_REASONS_AND_FORMS_OF_ORGANIZATIONAL_RESISTANCE_TO_CHANGE_IN_THE_HIGHER_EDUCATION_SECTOR_Reasons_for_change_in_Higher_Education

  34. Brennan J, Ryan S, Ranga M, Broek S, Durazzi N, Kamphuis B (2014) Study on innovation in higher education: final report. European Commission Directorate for Education and Training Study on Innovation in Higher Education, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. ISBN 9789279350818. http://eprints.lse.ac.uk/55819/1/__lse.ac.uk_storage_LIBRARY_Secondary_libfile_shared_repository_Content_Durazzi%2C%20N_Study%20innovation_Durazzi_Study%20innovation_2014.pdf

  35. Sester B, Morris H (2015) Building a culture of innovation in higher education: design and practice for leaders. In partnership 2Revolutions & Educause. https://library.educause.edu/-/media/files/library/2015/4/ngt1502-pdf.pdf

  36. UNESCO IBE (2021) Curriculum (plural curricula). http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/glossary-curriculum-terminology/c/curriculum-plural-curricula

  37. Zhao N (2006) Four pillars of learning for the reorientation and reorganization of curriculum: reflections and discussions. UNESCO IBE. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/fileadmin/user_upload/archive/cops/Competencies/PillarsLearningZhou.pdf

  38. Jacques D (1996) Learning: the treasure within; report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the twenty-first century (highlights). UNESCO Digital Library. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000109590

  39. Griffith University (2021) Principles to promote excellence in learning and teaching practices at Griffith University. https://www.griffith.edu.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0014/370400/PrinciplesLandT.pdf

  40. CDIO (2021) About CDIO. http://www.cdio.org/about

  41. Zabalawi I (2018) Engineering education for future world: the CDIO approach. In: 28th Arab engineering conference, December 11–13. http://www.cdio.org/files/document/file/Engineering%20Education%20for%20the%20Future%20World%20-%20The%20CDIO%20Approach.pdf

  42. Crawley EF, Brodeur DR, Soderholm DH (2008) The education of future Aeronautical engineers: conceiving, designing, implementing, operating. J Sci Educ Technol 17(2):138–151. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9088-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Crawley EF (2001) The CDIO syllabus: a statement of goals for undergraduate engineering education. CDIO. http://www.cdio.org/files/CDIO_Syllabus_Report.pdf

  44. Crawley EF, Malmqvist J, Lucas WA, Brodeur DR (2011) The CDIO syllabus v2.0: An updated statement of goals and engineering education. In proceedings of the 7th Int. CDIO conference, Technical University of Denmark, Copenhagen, June 20–23. http://www.cdio.org/files/document/file/crawleyetalcdiosyllabus2.0paper_29may2013_0.pdf

  45. The CDIO standards v.2.0 (with customized rubrics) (2010) CDIO. http://www.cdio.org/files/standards/CDIOStds&Rubricsv2.0_2010Dec8.pdf

  46. Malmqvist J, Kwee Huay HL, Kontio J, Thi Minh TD (2016) Application of CDIO in non-engineering programs- motives, implementation and experiences. In: Proceedings of the 12th Int. CDIO conference, Turku University of Applied Sciences, Turku, June 12–16. http://rocketship.cdio.org/files/document/cdio2016/76/76_Paper_PDF.pdf

  47. Crawley EF, Malmqvist J, Östlund S, Brodeur DR, Edström K (2014) Rethinking engineering education: the CDIO approach, 2nd edn. Springer International Publishing. https://link.springer.com/book/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05561-9

  48. Froyd J, Pchenitchnaia L, Fowler D, Simpson N (2007) Systems thinking and integrative learning outcomes. American Society for Engineering Education. https://peer.asee.org/systems-thinking-and-integrative-learning-outcomes.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isam Zabalawi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendices

Appendix 1

The below curriculum is designed for Business Management Studies which is mapped to the CDIO Syllabus. The flexibility is embedded, and the program is adapted to the four principles of CDIO (Conceiving, Designing, Implementing, Operating). The program (4 years) is targeted to equip business students with graduate attributes that are applicable in real-life job market. With sub-major specific course modifications, this program can be applied to other majors under the business umbrella.

Business Management Curriculum—Diploma (Two years)

Semester 1

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

Business Computer Applications

1.1 General Knowledge

English for Business

1.3 Basic Knowledge

Marketing Principles

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

Management Principles

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

Business Math

1.2 Math and Social Sciences

Semester 2

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

Principles of Economics

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

Business Communications

1.2 Math and Social Sciences

3.2 Communication

Accounting Principles

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

Business Law

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

Foundation of Management Information System

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

Semester 3 (Includes 2 PBL Courses)

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

Event Management (PBL)

2.3 Systematic Thinking

4.5 Implementing Business Plan/Project

Business Ethics

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

Principles of Finance

1.3 Basic Knowledge

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

Business Planning (PBL)

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

4.4 Designing Economics/Business Plan/Project

Electives (humanities, social skills, arts, drama, music)

1.1 General Knowledge

4.1 External and Societal Context

Semester 4 (Includes 2 PBL Courses)

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

Business Leadership

1.5 Disciplinary Specialized Knowledge (Sub-Major)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

Change Management

1.5 Disciplinary Specialized Knowledge (Sub-Major)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

2.3 Systematic Thinking

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication In Foreign Languages

4.1 External and Societal Context

Innovation and Entrepreneurship (PBL)

1.5 Disciplinary Specialized Knowledge (Sub-Major)

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

4.3 Conceiving Business Ideas

4.4 Designing Economics/Business Plan/Project

4.5 Implementing Business Plan/Project

Business Research (PBL)

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

4.3 Conceiving Business Ideas

4.4 Designing Economics/Business Plan/Project

Operations Management

1.5 Disciplinary Specialized Knowledge (Sub-Major)

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

2.3 Systematic Thinking

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Summer Internship I: Covering all aspects of CDIO Syllabus (applying theory to practice)

Business Management Curriculum—Bachelor (2 years after the Diploma, in total 4 years)

Semester 1

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

HR in Organizations

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

4.1 External and Societal Context

Managerial Accounting

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.3 Systematic Thinking

Organizational Behavior

1.5 Disciplinary Specialized Knowledge (Sub-Major)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.3 Systematic Thinking

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Customer Service

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Elective (Humanities)

1.1 General Knowledge

4.1 External and Societal Context

Semester 2 (Includes 2 PBL Courses)

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

Managerial Economics

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.3 Systematic Thinking

4.1 External and Societal Context

Business Data Analysis (PBL)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

2.3 Systematic Thinking

4.3 Conceiving Business Ideas

4.4 Designing Economics/Business Plan/Project

Market Research (PBL)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

2.3 Systematic Thinking

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

4.3 Conceiving Business Ideas

4.4 Designing Economics/Business Plan/Project

International Business

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Strategic Management

1.5 Disciplinary Specialized Knowledge (Sub-Major)

2.3 Systematic Thinking

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Semester 3 (Includes 2 PBL Courses)

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

Wealth Management (Investment Simulation)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Managing Organizational Change (PBL)

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Entrepreneurship, Innovation and New Ventures (PBL)

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

2.3 Systematic Thinking

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

4.3 Conceiving Business Ideas

4.5 Designing Economics/Business Plan/Project

Implementing Business Plan/Project

Islamic Finance

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Elective (Language)

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

Semester 4 (Includes 2 PBL Courses)

Unit Name

Mapping to CDIO Syllabus

Emotional Intelligence

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

3.1 Teamwork

3.2 Communication

3.3 Communication in Foreign Languages

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

Digital Marketing (PBL)

1.4 Disciplinary Fundamental Knowledge (Acc, Eco, Mrkt, Mgt, Computer)

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

4.1 External and Societal Context

4.2 Enterprise and Business Context

4.3 Conceiving Business Ideas

Quality Management

1.5 Disciplinary Specialized Knowledge (Sub-Major)

4.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

Business Information and Decision Systems

2.1 Business Reasoning & Problem Solving

2.2 Research and Knowledge Discovery

2.3 Systematic Thinking

2.4 Personal Skills and Attributes

2.5 Professional Skills and Attributes

4.5 Implementing Business Plan/Project

Graduation Project (PBL)

Covering all aspects of CDIO Syllabus

Start-up companies with team members from different business sub-majors (HR, MIS, ACC, Finance, Marketing and Management as simulation to how real companies operate)

Appendix 2

Correlation between AACSB Accreditation Standards and CDIO Standards

figure d

Appendix 3

Correlation between AACSB Accreditation Standards and CDIO Syllabus

figure e
figure f

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zabalawi, I., Kordahji, H., Mourdaa, R. (2022). The ‘New’ Normal of Business Education in a Post COVID Era: The CDIO Approach. In: Badran, A., Baydoun, E., Mesmar, J. (eds) Higher Education in the Arab World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07539-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07539-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07538-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07539-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics