Abstract
This chapter is the concluding chapter of the book. It first assesses the impact of neoliberalism on how States wield policy instruments and govern. The chapter emphasizes the need for nuance in understanding the substantial influence that neoliberalism has played as well as the continued importance of the State steering society. It then reflects on the importance of certain variables laid out in Chap. 1, in particular noting the importance of elections and institutions in shaping the state trajectory. The chapter builds on this analysis to assess the role of critical junctures and particular variables in shifting the policy sequences. It finishes by reflecting on the future of the State and proposing a future comparative public policy research agenda.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aalbers, M. B. (2013). Neoliberalism is dead … long live neoliberalism! International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 37(3), 1083–1090.
Barnett, C., Clarke, N., Cloke, P., & Malpass, A. (2008). The elusive subjects of neo-liberalism: Beyond the analytics of governmentality. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 624–653.
Béland, D. (2009). Ideas, institutions, and policy change. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(5), 701–713.
Béland, D., & Schlager, E. (2019). Varieties of policy feedback research: Looking backward, moving forward. Policy Studies Journal, 47(2), 184–205.
Béland, D., Cantillon, B., Hick, R., & Moreira, A. (2021). Social policy in the face of a global pandemic: Policy responses to the COVID-19 crisis. Social Policy and Administration, 55(2), 249–260.
Bennett, A., & Checkel, J. (2015). Process tracing: From philosophical roots to best practices. In A. Bennett & J. Checkel (Eds.), Process tracing: From metaphor to analytical tool (pp. 3–39). Cambridge University Press.
Breton, A., Brosio, G., Dalmazzone, S., & Garrone, G. (2007). Environmental governance and decentralisation. Edward Elgar.
Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1). Retrieved March 21, 2022 from doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568.
Capano, G., & Lippi, A. (2017). How policy instruments are chosen: Patterns of decision makers’ choices. Policy Sciences, 50(2), 269–293.
Capano, G., & Pritoni, A. (2019). Varieties of hybrid systemic governance in European higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(1), 10–28.
Carey, G., Kay, A., & Nevile, A. (2019). Institutional legacies and “Sticky Layers”: What happens in cases of transformative policy change? Administration and Society, 51(3), 491–509.
Cashore, B., & Howlett, M. (2007). Punctuating which equilibrium? Understanding thermostatic policy dynamics in Pacific Northwest forestry. American Journal of Political Science, 51(3), 532–551.
Challies, E. R., & Murray, W. E. (2008). Towards post-neoliberalism? The comparative politico-economic transition of New Zealand and Chile. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49(2), 228–243.
Chwieroth, J. M. (2007). Testing and measuring the role of ideas: The case of neoliberalism in the International Monetary Fund. International Studies Quarterly, 51(1), 5–30.
Cooper, L. (2020). The end of neoliberalism? Why the current crisis is different to 1989, 2001 and 2008. 24 June. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/covid19/2020/06/24/the-end-of-neoliberalism-why-the-current-crisis-is-different-to-1989-2001-and-2008/
Coyne, C. J., & Yatsyshina, Y. (2020). Pandemic police states. Peace Economics, Peace Science and Public Policy, 26(3), Retrieved March 21, 2022, from doi:https://doi.org/10.1515/peps-2020-0021.
Daugbjerg, C. (2009). Sequencing in public policy: The evolution of the CAP over a decade. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(3), 395–411.
Daugbjerg, C., & Kay, A. (2020). Policy feedback and pathways: When change leads to endurance and continuity to change. Policy Sciences, 53(2), 253–268.
Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713.
Flynn, B. (2020). The inexorable rise of the pandemic state? Second-guessing the long-term political repercussions of COVID 19. Irish Politics Forum, 18 March. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://politicalreform.ie/2020/03/18/the-inexorable-rise-of-the-pandemic-state-second-guessing-the-long-term-political-repercussions-of-covid-19/
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16(Summer), 3–18.
Gerring, J. (2007). The mechanismic worldview: Thinking inside the box. British Journal of Political Science, 38(1), 161–179.
Goodwin, M. (2020). COVID-19 will reshape our relationship with the state. Chatham House blog, 12 May. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://www.chathamhouse.org/2020/05/covid-19-will-reshape-our-relationship-state
Green, M. (2007). Governing under advanced liberalism: Sport policy and the social investment state. Policy Sciences, 40(1), 55–71.
Häusermann, S. (2012). The politics of old and new social policies. In G. Bonoli & D. Natali (Eds.), The politics of the new welfare state (pp. 111–132). Oxford University Press.
Higgins, V. (2001). Calculating climate: ‘Advanced liberalism’ and the governing of risk in Australian drought policy. Journal of Sociology, 37(3), 299–316.
Holzinger, K., & Knill, C. (2005). Causes and conditions of cross-national policy convergence. Journal of European Public Policy, 12(5), 775–796.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2006). Globalization and governance capacity: Explaining divergence in national forest programs as instances of “next-generation” regulation in Canada and Europe. Governance, 19(2), 251–275.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2008). Third generation policy diffusion studies and the analysis of policy mixes: Two steps forward and one step back. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis, 10(4), 385–402.
Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). Patching vs packaging in policy formulation: Assessing policy portfolio design. Politics and Governance, 1(2), 170–182.
Jacques, M. (2016). The death of neoliberalism and the crisis in western politics. The Guardian, 21 August. Retrieved March 21, 2022 from https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2016/aug/21/death-of-neoliberalism-crisis-in-western-politics
Jensen, C., Arndt, C., Lee, S., & Wenzelburger, G. (2018). Policy instruments and welfare state reform. Journal of European Social Policy, 28(2), 161–176.
Koppenjan, J., Karré, P., & Termeer, C. (2019). New governance arrangements. Towards hybrid and smarter government? In J. Koppenjan, P. M. Karré, & K. Termeer (Eds.), Smart hybridity: Potentials and challenges of new governance arrangements (pp. 11–28). Eleven International Publishing.
Lowi, T. J. (1964). American business, public policy, case-studies, and political theory. World Politics, 16(4), 677–715.
Mahoney, J. (2001). Beyond correlational analysis: Recent innovations in theory and method. Sociological Forum, 16(3), 575–593.
Moran, M. (2001). Not steering but drowning: Policy catastrophes and the regulatory state. The Political Quarterly, 72(4), 414–427.
Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause: Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(4), 595–628.
Pierson, P. (1994). Dismantling the welfare state? Reagan, Thatcher, and the politics of retrenchment. Cambridge University Press.
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.
Rose, N. (1993). Government, authority and expertise in advanced liberalism. Economy and Society, 22(3), 283–299.
Rose, N. (1996). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader (pp. 144–162). Blackwell Publishing.
Rosenbloom, D., Meadowcroft, J., & Cashore, B. (2019). Stability and climate policy? Harnessing insights on path dependence, policy feedback, and transition pathways. Energy Research and Social Science, 50, 168–178.
Rossouw, N., & Wiseman, K. (2004). Learning from the implementation of environmental public policy instruments after the first ten years of democracy in South Africa. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 22(2), 131–140.
Saad-Filho, A. (2020). From COVID-19 to the end of neoliberalism. Critical Sociology, 46(4–5), 477–485.
Shahjahan, R. A. (2016). International organizations (IOs), epistemic tools of influence, and the colonial geopolitics of knowledge production in higher education policy. Journal of Education Policy, 31(6), 694–710.
Silva, P. (1991). Technocrats and politics in Chile: From the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks. Journal of Latin American Studies, 23(2), 385–410.
Sitaraman, G. (2019). The collapse of Neoliberalism. The New Republic, 23 December. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://newrepublic.com/article/155970/collapse-neoliberalism
Stenson, K., & Watt, P. (1999). Governmentality and ‘the death of the social’?: A discourse analysis of local government texts in south-east England. Urban Studies, 36(1), 189–201.
Stiglitz, J. E. (2021). The proper role of government in the market economy: The case of the post-COVID recovery. Journal of Government and Economics, 1(100004), 1–7.
Šumonja, M. (2020). Neoliberalism is not dead–On political implications of Covid-19. Capital and Class, 45(2), 215–227.
Tilly, C. (2001). Mechanisms in political processes. Annual Review of Political Science, 4, 21–41.
Trubek, D., & Trubek, L. (2006). New governance and legal regulation: Complementarity, rivalry or transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13(3), 539–564.
Wong, F. (2020). The post-neoliberal world is already here. Democracy: A Journal of Ideas, 7 May. Retrieved March 21, 2022, from https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/the-post-neoliberal-world-is-already-here/
Zito, A., Eckersley, S., & Turner, S. (2019). The instruments of European heritage. In C. Whitehead, S. Eckersley, M. Daugbjerg & G. Bozoğlu (Eds.), Dimensions of heritage and memory: Multiple Europes and the politics of crisis (pp. 50–71). Routledge.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Capano, G., Zito, A.R., Toth, F., Rayner, J. (2022). The Conclusions: The Changing and Unchanging State. In: Trajectories of Governance. International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07457-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07457-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-07456-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-07457-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)