Skip to main content

The Governance of Energy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trajectories of Governance

Part of the book series: International Series on Public Policy ((ISPP))

  • 174 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter begins by outlining the classic goals of energy policy: energy security, energy efficiency and the mitigation of the environmental impacts of energy production and use. It stresses the importance of neoliberal ideas that provided the impulse for deregulation and privatization efforts in a sector that had previously emphasized state ownership of resources and heavily regulated energy markets. The key puzzle is why none of the six case countries can be said to have moved definitively to market governance of energy. The chapter emphasizes both the central importance of institutional constraints and the effect of unpredictable intervening variables, which influence both the costs and the social acceptability of different energy sources. These factors explain why efforts to base energy policy on the assumption that a search for efficiency will necessarily deliver both security and the mitigation of impacts (especially greenhouse gas emissions) have produced a mix of common and unique governance arrangements in the six cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In addition to the distinction between primary and secondary energy sources, for example the use of coal and oil for heating versus the production of electricity from coal or oil, there are various energy-intensive activities, for example transportation, where it is sometimes difficult to distinguish energy policy from other sectoral policies.

References

  • Australian Government. (2018). Australian energy update 2018. Department of Environment and Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayres, R., Turton, H., & Casten, T. (2007). Energy efficiency, sustainability and economic growth. Energy, 32(5), 634–648.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beckman, K., & van den Beukel, J. (2019). The great Dutch gas transition. Oxford Energy Insight, 54. Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://www.oxfordenergy.org/wpcms/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/The-great-Dutch-gas-transition-54.pdf

  • Bogdanor, V. (1996). The fall of Heath and the end of the post-war settlement. In S. Ball & A. Seldon (Eds.), The Heath government, 1970–74: A reappraisal (pp. 371–389). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brownsey, K. (2007). The new oil order: The post staples paradigm and the Canadian upstream oil and gas industry. Canadian Political Science Review, 1(1), 91–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cammi, C., & Assanelli, M. (2012). An overview of Italy’s energy mix. Institut francais des relations internationales (Ifri). Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://www.connaissancedesenergies.org/sites/default/files/pdf-pt-vue/ifri_anoverviewofitalysenergymixifriversion13062012.pdf

  • Carroll, P., & Head, B. (2010). Regulatory reform and the management of intergovernmental relations in Australia. Australian Journal of Political Science, 45(3), 407–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarkson, S. (2009). The governance of energy in North America: The United States and its continental periphery. In G. B. Doern & B. Eberlein (Eds.), Governing the energy challenge: Canada and Germany in a multi-level regional and global context (pp. 99–120). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. (2015). Energy White Paper. Retrieved March 7, 2022 from https://apo.org.au/sites/default/files/resource-files/2015-04/apo-nid54017.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Conejo, A. J., & Sioshansi, R. (2018). Rethinking restructured electricity market design: Lessons learned and future needs. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 98, 520–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Correljé, A., & Verbong, G. (2004). The transition from coal to gas: Radical change of the Dutch gas systems. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence, and policy (pp. 114–136). Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curran, G. (2019). Is renewable energy still green? Shaping Australia’s renewable energy enterprise in an age of ecological modernisation. Environmental Politics, 28(5), 950–969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Jong, J. (2006). Liberalising Dutch energy markets, champions and governance, rules and regulations: The 1995–2005 stories. Clingendael International Energy Programme CIEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dewees, D. (2005). Electricity restructuring in Canada. In G. B. Doern (Ed.), Canadian energy policy and the struggle for sustainable development (pp. 128–150). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Nucci, M. R., & Prontera, A. (2021). The Italian energy transition in a multilevel system: Between reinforcing dynamics and institutional constraints. Zeitschrift fur Politikwissenschaft. Retrieved February 4, 2022. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s41358-021-00306-y.

  • Diesendorf, M. (1996). How can a “competitive” market for electricity be made compatible with the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions? Ecological Economics, 17(1), 33–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diesendorf, M. (2012). Lost energy policies, opportunities and practice. In K. Crowley & K. Walker (Eds.), Environmental policy failure: The Australian story (pp. 44–59). Tilde University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, C. (2016). Harper without jeers, Trudeau without cheers: Assessing 10 years of intergovernmental relations. IRPP Insight, 8, 1–29 Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://irpp.org/research-studies/insight-no8/

  • Eberlein, B., & Doern, G. B. (2009). German and Canadian multi-level energy regulatory governance: Introduction, context, and analytical framework. In G. B. Doern & B. Eberlein (Eds.), Governing the energy challenge: Canada and Germany in a multi-level regional and global context (pp. 3–37). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberlein, B., & Schneider, S. G. (2007). A tale of two federations: Policy reform in Canada and Germany. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 12(3), 1–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Froschauer, K. (2009). National or supra-national electricity governance - NAFTA and the EU. In G. B. Doern & B. Eberlein (Eds.), Governing the energy challenge: Canada and Germany in a multi-level regional and global context (pp. 147–173). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldthau, A., & Witte, J. (2009). Back to the future or forward to the past? Strengthening markets and rules for effective global energy governance. International Affairs, 85(2), 373–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grubb, M., & Newberry, D. (2018). UK Electricity market reform and the energy transition: Emerging lessons. Energy Journal, 39(6), 1–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hake, J.-F., Fischer, W., Venghaus, S., & Weckenbrock, C. (2015). The German Energiewende: History and status quo. Energy, 92(3), 532–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hay, J. (2009). Challenges to liberalism: The case of Australian energy policy. Resources Policy, 34(3), 142–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (2004). Energy, the state, and the market: British energy policy since 1979. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Helm, D. (2017) Cost of energy review. Retrieved March 7, 2022 from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/654902/Cost_of_Energy_Review.pdf

  • Houle, D. (2015). Carbon pricing in Canadian provinces: From early experiments to adoption (1995–2014). PhD Dissertation, University of Toronto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber, M. (2013). Lifeblood: Oil, freedom, and the forces of capital. University of Minnesota Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2009). World energy outlook 2009. IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2013). Energy policies of IEA countries: Germany 2013 review. IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2014). Energy policies of IEA countries: The Netherlands 2014 review. IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2018a). Energy policies of IEA countries: Australia 2018 review. IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA. (2018b). Energy policies of IEA countries: Canada 2018 review. IEA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IEA (International Energy Agency). (2008). Energy policies of IEA countries: The Netherlands 2008 Review. IEA.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsson, S., & Lauber, V. (2006). The politics and policy of energy system transformation: Explaining the German diffusion of renewable energy technology. Energy Policy, 34(3), 256–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. (2012). A tale of two cities: Climate change policies in Vancouver and Melbourne - barometers of cooperative federalism? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 36(6), 1242–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kent, A., & Mercer, D. (2006). Australia’s mandatory renewable energy target (MRET): An assessment. Energy Policy, 34(9), 1046–1062.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing transition management as policy reforms: A case study of the Dutch energy sector. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 391–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kern, F., Kuzemko, C., & Mitchell, C. (2014). Measuring and explaining policy paradigm change: The case of UK energy policy. Policy and Politics, 42(4), 513–530.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Labbate, S. (2013). Italy and the development of European energy policy: From the dawn of the integration process to the 1973 oil crisis. European Review of History/Revue Européenne d’Histoire, 20(1), 67–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laird, F., & Steffes, C. (2009). The diverging paths of German and United States policies for renewable energy: Sources of difference. Energy Policy, 37(7), 2619–2629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leipprand, A., Flachsland, C., & Pahle, M. (2017). Energy transition on the rise: Discourses on energy future in the German parliament. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 30(3), 283–305.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, H., Bulkeley, H. A., & Owens, S. E. (2009). Converging agendas? Energy and climate change policies in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 27(1), 90–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macdonald, D. (2020). Carbon province, hydro province: The challenge of Canadian energy and climate federalism. University of Toronto Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • MacNeil, R. (2014). Canadian environmental policy under Conservative majority rule. Environmental Politics, 23(1), 174–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahalingam, A., & Reiner, D. M. (2016). Energy subsidies at times of economic crisis: A comparative study and scenario analysis of Italy and Spain. EPRG Working Paper 1603/Cambridge Working Paper in Economics 1608. Cambridge. Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/resrep30453.pdf

  • MCE (Ministerial Council on Energy). (2003). Report to the Council of Australian Governments: Reform of energy markets (December 11, 2003). Ministerial Council on Energy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mez, L. (2009). Renewables in electricity generation. Germany as pioneer? In G. B. Doern & B. Eberlein (Eds.), Governing the energy challenge: Canada and Germany in a multi-level regional and global context (pp. 373–395). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Milne, D. (1986). Tug of war: Ottawa and the provinces under Trudeau and Mulroney. James Lorimer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C., & Connor, P. (2004). Renewable energy policy in the UK 1990–2003. Energy Policy, 32, 1935–1947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulder, M. (2017). Influence of climate policy and market forces on coal-fired power plants: Evidence on the Dutch market over 2006–2014. Economics of Energy and Environmental Policy, 6(2), 87–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Faircheallaigh, C. (1990). Minerals and energy policy. In C. Jennett & R. Stewart (Eds.), Hawke and Australian public policy: Consensus and restructuring (pp. 137–154). Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D. (2006). The political economy of an energy tax: The United Kingdom’s climate change levy. Energy Economics, 28(2), 149–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P., & Watson, J. (2012). UK energy policy 1980-2010: A history and lessons to be learnt. IET and the Parliamentary Group for Energy Studies. Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://www.theiet.org/impact-society/factfiles/energy-factfiles/energy-generation-and-policy/uk-energy-policy-1980-2010/

  • Pollitt, M. (2008). The arguments for and against ownership unbundling of energy transmission networks. Energy Policy, 36(2), 704–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, M. (2012). The role of policy in energy transitions: Lessons from the energy liberalisation era. Energy Policy, 50(C), 128–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prontera, A. (2010). Europeanization, institutionalization and policy change in French and Italian electricity policy. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 12(5), 491–507.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prontera, A. (2018). Italian energy security, the Southern Gas Corridor and the new pipeline politics in Western Europe: From the partner state to the catalytic state. Journal of International Relations and Development, 21(2), 464–494.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prontera, A. (2021). The dismantling of renewable energy policy in Italy. Environmental Politics, 30(7), 1196–1216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn, O., & Marshall, J. P. (2016). Coal, nuclear and renewable energy policies in Germany: From the 1950s to the “Energiewende”. Energy Policy, 99(C), 224–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riedy, C. (2005). The eye of the storm: An integral perspective on sustainable development and climate change response. PhD. Dissertation. University of Technology, Sydney. Institute for Sustainable Futures. Retrieved February 4, 2022 from http://hdl.handle.net/10453/20350

  • Robinson, C. (2016). Energy policy: The return of the regulatory state. Economic Affairs, 36(1), 33–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, I. (2009). Renewable electricity: The prospects for innovation and integration in provincial policies. In D. VanNijnatten & R. Boardman (Eds.), Canadian environmental policy and politics: Prospects for leadership and innovation (pp. 183–196). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rutledge, I. (2007). New Labour, energy policy and ‘competitive markets’. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 31(6), 901–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simshauser, P. (2014). From first place to last: The National Electricity Market’s policy-induced ‘energy market death spiral’. Australian Economic Review, 47(4), 540–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simshauser, P. (2018). Garbage can theory and Australia’s National Electricity Market: Decarbonisation in a hostile policy environment. Energy Policy, 120(C), 697–713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. (1997). Energy privatization: Sensitivities and realities. Journal of Energy and Development, 23(1), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thatcher, M. (2002). Regulation after delegation: Independent regulatory agencies in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(6), 954–972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theobald, C. (2009). The transformation of German energy policy regulation: Struggling with policy legacy. In G. B. Doern & B. Eberlein (Eds.), Governing the energy challenge: Canada and Germany in a multi-level regional and global context (pp. 259–284). University of Toronto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Damme, E. (2005). Liberalizing the Dutch electricity market: 1998–2004. Energy Journal, 26(Special Issue), 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verbong, G., & Geels, F. (2007). The ongoing energy transition: Lessons from a socio-technical, multi-level analysis of the Dutch electricity system (1960–2004). Energy Policy, 35(2), 1025–1037.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J., & Bell, K. (2017). ‘Scottish Energy Strategy: The Future of Energy in Scotland’ Scottish Government, Edinburgh: Consultation Response by the UK Energy Research Centre (UKERC). Working Paper. UKERC, Retrieved February 4, 2022 from https://strathprints.strath.ac.uk/61057/

  • WEC (World Energy Council). (2021). World energy trilemma index. WEC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wellstead, A., Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2016). Alberta’s oil sands reclamation policy trajectory: The role of tense layering, policy stretching, and policy patching in long-term policy dynamics. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 59(10), 1873–1890.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giliberto Capano .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Capano, G., Zito, A.R., Toth, F., Rayner, J. (2022). The Governance of Energy. In: Trajectories of Governance. International Series on Public Policy . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-07457-8_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics