Abstract
This chapter explores Arundhati Roy’s second novel, The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. It argues that Roy’s novel works transversally, moving across various subject positions different from her own, as a means of expressing her political solidarities with the plights of India’s constructed ‘others.’ The chapter engages the book’s challenging form, proposing that Roy’s vexation with the novel as a genre and her prolificness as a non-fiction writer have led her to create a ‘perturbatory narration’ querying truth and fiction, especially regarding the conflicted Valley of Kashmir. The article also queers the prominent notion of necropolitics, showing how the transversal community of misfits at the Jannat Guest House and Funeral Services challenge the contours of Indian nationalism. Lastly, the novel’s embrace of a three-way form of motherhood beyond bloodlines is interpreted as a hopeful gesture toward India’s more just and more socially diverse future.
This chapter is affiliated to the Research Project ‘Bodies in Transit 2’ (Ref. FFI2017-84555-C2-1-P), funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities, the European Regional Development Fund, and the Spanish Research Agency. I also wish to acknowledge the kind mentoring of Professor Ananya Jahanara Kabir, whose sharp reading of Roy’s novel and generous guidance on Kashmir scholarship have been highly instrumental to my own analysis.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Pranav Jani argues that ‘[w]hile Roy’s writings offer a devastating and powerful critique of modernity and help to rally the forces of the Left whenever they appear, they offer no alternative to that modernity’ (2010, 230), yet despite this pessimism he also positions The God of Small Things against Salman Rushdie’s Midnight’s Children as the single contemporary Anglophone Indian text that can decenter Rushdie’s bourgeois cosmopolitanism. For other sources on Roy’s first novel, see Ranjan Ghosh and Antonia Navarro Tejero (2009), Amitabh Roy (2005), Alex Tickell (2007), and Nilanshu Kumar Agarwal (2012).
- 2.
- 3.
Roy is self-confessedly vexed by being labeled a ‘writer-activist.’ In her essay ‘The Ladies Have Feelings, So … Shall We Leave It to the Experts?’ she writes: ‘Now, I’ve been wondering why it should be that the person who wrote The God of Small Things is called a writer, and the person who wrote the political essays is called an activist’ (2019, 111). Her ensuing theory explains that political writers pick sides, whereas writers are not supposed to stick to one single political agenda but should prize sophistication and a plurality of viewpoints. Roy playfully intimates: ‘I’m all for discretion, prudence, tentativeness, subtlety, ambiguity, complexity. I love the unanswered question, the unresolved story, the unclimbed mountain, the tender shard of an incomplete dream. Most of the time’ (2019, 112). What she means is that she likes the complexity afforded by fiction but she also has political allegiances, something that comes across strongly in Ministry and that creates synergies between her literary and political writings.
- 4.
Roy deploys popular narratives of hijra identity and of hijras’ position in South Asian history, which are orally shared by hijras for collective self-empowerment in the face of contemporary precarity. As Jennifer Ung Loh observes, ‘[b]y maintaining that they enjoyed a position of privilege “in the past” or “in history”, hijras make a comparison with their relatively low respect in modern society. […] Using narratives and developing an association with historical figures is an ongoing “mythmaking” process’ (2014, 29). The novel reflects this by reclaiming hijras as figures of trust in Mughal India’s Islamic court, where they were allowed in the women-only zenanas due to their sexual status as eunuchs. As Roy’s character Ustad Kulsoom Bi exclaims, following a brief mention of a eunuch’s laughter in the historical archive: ‘That is our ancestry, our history, our story. We were never commoners, you see, we were members of the staff of the Royal Palace’ (2017, 51). Hijras’ status in Mughal India is explored in scholarship by Ina Goel (2016) and Adnan Hossain (2012). Ministry also maps hijras’ ‘special place of love and respect in Hindu mythology’ (2017, 51). Hindu God Ram turned to his followers on the outskirts of Ayodhya, telling all the men and women to return to their homes; when he finally revisited the same spot, he found the hijras had been waiting ‘faithfully for him at the edge of the forest for the whole fourteen years’ (2017, 51). Ung Loh recalls that ‘[a]s a result, Rāma is touched by their devotion and he blesses them, saying they will rule the world in the “future”’ (2014, 32). The Ram story is also recorded by Serena Nanda (1986) and Gayatri Reddy (2003). Curiously, this story demonstrating the hijras’ ‘love and respect’ in Hinduism is told as a joke on them in Kushwant Singh’s Delhi: A Novel (1990, 376). Singh’s is one of the first major modern Indian novels in English to give prominence to a hijra character, yet Bhagmati’s hijra subjectivity is always channeled through the diegetic narrator’s cisgender and supposedly heterosexual perspective, being often the object of ridicule, while also being a key figure of solidarity. I must thank Shital Pravinchandra for directing me to Singh’s work.
- 5.
As Alessandra Diehl et al. observe, ‘in India, the Supreme Court has ruled out homosexuality as a crime […] and has given legal recognition to the third gender and stated that people of the third gender have equal rights to education, jobs and social benefits’ (2017, 391); in addition, they note how ‘the Supreme Court of India in April 2014 recognised the ‘third gender’ status of hijras and other transgender groups’ (2017, 393). So hijras have been legally recognized as a third gender and apportioned equality in Indian law, even if, in the practicalities of their daily lives, they are still the objects of routine social discrimination.
References
Acocella, J. 2017. Civil Wars. New Yorker, May 19.
Agarwal, Nilanshu Kumar, ed. 2012. Arundhati Roy The God of Small Things. Howrah: Roman.
Ahmed, Sara. 2010. The Promise of Happiness. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Birne, Eleanor. 2017. Men with Saffron Smiles. London Review of Books 39 (15): 29–31.
Diehl, Alessandra, Denise Leite Vieira, Marina Milograna Zaneti, Ana Fanganiello, Pratap Sharan, Rebecca Robles, Jair de Jesus, and Mari. 2017. Social Stigma, Legal and Public Health Barriers Faced by the Third Gender Phenomena in Brazil, India and Mexico: Travestis, Hijras and Muxes. International Journal of Social Psychiatry 63 (5): 389–399.
Ghosh, Ranian, and Antonia Navarro-Tejero, eds. 2009. Globalizing Dissent: Essays on Arundhati Roy. Abington and New York: Routledge.
Goel, Ina. 2016. Hijra Communities of Delhi. Sexualities 19 (5/6): 535–546.
Guattari, Félix. 2015. Psychoanalysis and Transversality: Texts and Interviews 1955–1971. Trans. Ames Hodges. South Pasadena, CA: Semiotext(e).
Haritaworn, Jin, Adi Kuntsman, and Silvia Posocco, eds. 2014. Queer Necropolitics. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
Hong, Terry. 2017. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Library Journal 142 (14): 69.
Hossain, Adnan. 2012. Beyond Emasculation: Being Muslim and Becoming Hijra in South Asia. Asian Studies Review 36: 495–513.
Jani, Pranav. 2010. Decentering Rushdie: Cosmopolitanism and the Indian Novel in English. Columbus: The Ohio State University Press.
Junaid, Mohamad. 2019. Disobedient Bodies, Defiant Objects: Occupation, Necropolitics, and the Resistance in Kashmir. The Funambulist 21: 30–35.
Kabir, Ananya Jahanara. 2009. Territory of Desire: Representing the Valley of Kashmir. London and Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lal. Vinay. 1999. Not This, Not That: The Hijras of India and the Cultural Politics of Sexuality. Social Text 61: 119–140.
Loh, Jennifer Ung. 2014. Narrating Identity: the Employment of Mythological and Literary Narratives in Identity Formation Among the Hijras of India. Religion and Gender 4 (1): 21–39.
Mbembe, Achille. 2003. Necropolitics. Public Culture 15 (1): 11–40.
McLeod, John. 2015. Life Lines: Writing Transcultural Adoption. London: Bloomsbury.
———. 2017. Against Biocentrism: Blood, Adoption, and Diasporic Writing. Études Anglaises 70 (1): 28–44.
Mendes, Ana, and Lisa Lau. 2020. The Precarious Lives of India’s Others: The Creativity of Precarity in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 56 (1): 70–82.
Menozzi, Filippo. 2018. Too Much Blood for Good Literature: Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness and the Question of Realism. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 55 (1): 20–33.
Morton, Stephen. 2014. Sovereignty and Necropolitics at the Line of Control. Journal of Postcolonial Writing 50 (1): 19–30.
Murray, Stuart J. 2008. Thanatopolitics: Reading in Agamben a Rejoinder to Biopolitical Life. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 5 (2): 203–207.
Nanda, Serena. 1986. The Hijras of India: Cultural and Individual Dimensions of an Institutionalized Third Gender Role. Journal of Homosexuality 11 (3/4): 35–54.
Newport, Sarah Elizabeth. 2017. Unnatural Offences, Postcolonial Problems: The Ambivalent Position of Hijras in Contemporary Indian Law and Literature. South Asian Review 38 (1): 87–99.
Prose, Francine. 2017. The Passion and Rage of Arundhati Roy. New York Review of Books 64 (12): 16–18.
Puar, Jasbir K. 2007. Terrorist Assemblages: Homonationalism in Queer Times. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Reddy, Gayatri. 2003. ‘Men’ Who Would Be Kings: Celibacy, Emasculation, and the Re-Production of Hijras in Contemporary Indian Politics. Social Research 70 (1): 163–200.
Roy, Arundhati. 1998. The God of Small Things. London: Flamingo.
Roy, Amitabh. 2005. The God of Small Things: A Novel of Social Commitment. New Delhi: Atlantic.
Roy, Arundhati. 2017. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. London: Hamish Hamilton.
———. 2019. My Seditious Heart: Collected Non-Fiction. London: Hamish Hamilton.
Schlickers, Sabine, and Vera Toro, eds. 2018. Perturbatory Narration in Film Narratological Studies of Deception, Paradox and Empuzzlement. Berlin and Boston: de Gruyter.
Seabrook, Jeremy. 2017. The Ministry of Utmost Happiness/The God of Small Things. Resurgence and Ecologist 306: 55–57.
Seaman, Donna. 2017. A Supermarket of Grief. Booklist 113 (18): 13–14.
Sehgal, Parul. 2017. Arundhati Roy’s Fascinating Mess. Atlantic 320 (1): 36–39.
Singh, Khushwant. 1990. Delhi: A Novel. New Delhi: Penguin.
Tickell, Alex. 2007. Arundhati Roy’s The God of Small Things. Abingdon and New York: Routledge.
———. 2018. Writing in the Necropolis: Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. Moving Worlds: A Journal of Transcultural Studies 18 (1): 100–112.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Carbajal, A.F. (2022). “[S]titched Together by Threads of Light”: Perturbatory Narration, Queer Necropolitics as Biopower, and Transversality in Arundhati Roy’s The Ministry of Utmost Happiness. In: Dwivedi, O.P. (eds) Representations of Precarity in South Asian Literature in English. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06817-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06817-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06816-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06817-1
eBook Packages: Literature, Cultural and Media StudiesLiterature, Cultural and Media Studies (R0)