Skip to main content

Introduction to Blockchain: Between “Autonomisation” and Automatization, Challenges and Risks for Labour Law

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defining and Protecting Autonomous Work
  • 210 Accesses

Abstract

Taking the cue from a general introduction to “blockchain”, the contribution strives to offer—also through a positive contamination with other spheres of knowledge and through the analysis of some regulatory sources that can be found, both on the Italian side and the European one—a theoretical analysis and a critical reflection on the impact blockchain produces on employment relationship, labour market and regulation, exploring this new disruptive technology as a sort of fertile ground for the experimentation of a new relationship between humanism and technique.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • AA. VV. 2018. AI-spy, The Economist, 31st March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ales, Edoardo. 2019. “Subordination at Risk (of “Autonomisation”): Evidences and Solutions from Three European Countries”. In 12 Italian Labour Law E-Journal. 65–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baldassarre, Antonio. 1997. Diritti della persona e valori costituzionali. Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellini, Mauro. 2018. Blockchain Smart Contracts: che cosa sono, come funzionano, quali sono gli ambiti applicativi, www.blockchain4innovation.it/mercati/legal/smart-contract/blockchain-smart-contracts-cosa-funzionano-quali-gli-ambiti-applicativi/, 28th December (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

  • Bentivogli, Marco and Massimo Chiriatti. 2018. Blockchain, la tecnologia “umanizza” il lavoro. Manifesto per un nuovo bene pubblico digitale, in Il Sole 24 Ore, 12nd August, 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianca, Cesare Massimo. 1984. Diritto civile. Il contratto. Giuffré.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianca, Cesare Massimo. 2016. Istituzioni di diritto privato, Giuffré.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bifulco, Raffaele. 2018. Intelligenza Artificiale, internet e ordine spontaneo, in Franco Pizzetti, Intelligenza artificiale, protezione dei dati personali e regolazione, Giappichelli, 383–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bini, Stefano. 2021. La dimensión colectiva de la digitalización del trabajo, Bomarzo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breque, Maija, Lars De Nul, Athanasios Petridis. (European Commission—Research and Innovation DG) 2021. Industry 5.0. Towards a sustainable, human-centric and resilient European industry, Luxembourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capaccioli, Stefano. 2016. ““Smart contracts”: traiettoria di un’utopia divenuta attuabile” In Ciberspazio e diritto. 1–2, 25–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciucciovino, Silvia and Michele Faioli. 2018. “Blockchain e politiche del lavoro”. in Quaderni del CNEL, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corazza, Luisa and Orsola Razzolini. 2014. Who is an Employer?, in WP CSDLE “Massimo D’Antona”, 110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Conte, Maurizio. 2015. I poteri del datore di lavoro, in Matteo Persiani, Stefano Liebman, Marco Marazza, Michel Martone, Maurizio Del Conte, Paola Ferrari, Valerio Maio, Fondamenti di Diritto del lavoro, Cedam, 77–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Sabato, Daniela. 2017. “Gli “smart contracts”: “robot” che gestiscono il rischio contrattuale”. in 2 Contratto e Impresa. 378–402.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faioli, Michele. 2018a. “Con la blockchain migliorano politiche del lavoro e previdenza”. In Il Sole 24 Ore, 17th August, 14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faioli, Michele. 2018b. Mansioni e macchina intelligente. Giappichelli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Faioli, Michele. 2018c. “Sistemi di “social” blockchain, previdenza pubblica e smart contracts.” In Rivista di Diritto della Sicurezza Sociale, 3, 489–505.

    Google Scholar 

  • Floridi, Luciano. 2014. The 4th Revolution. How the Infosphere is Reshaping Human Reality, Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, David. 2016. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations, www.allenovery.com/SiteCollectionDocumentsArticle%20Decentralized%20Autonomous%20Organizations.pdf, 1st July (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

  • Irti, Natalino. 2013. L’uso giuridico della natura, Laterza.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentzsch, Christoph. 2016. Decentralized Autonomous Organization to Automate Governance, download.slock.it/pu-blic/DAO/WhitePaper.pdf, 2016, (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Manente, M. 2016. “Blockchain”: la pretesa di sostituire il notaio, in Notariato, 3, 211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto, Satoshi. 2008. Bitocoin: un sistema di moneta elettronica peer-to-peer, in bitcoin.org/files/bitcoin-paper/bitcoin_it.pdf, 31st October (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

  • Nicotra, M. 2018, Il decreto semplificazioni aiuterà la blockchain in Italia, ecco perché, agendadigitale.eu/cultura-digitale/il-decreto-semplificazioni-aiutera-la-blockchain-in-italia-ecco-perche/, 30th November (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. 2018. OECD Blockchain Primer, www.oecd.org/finance/blockchain (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

  • Ortolani, Pietro. 2019. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations: inquadramento giuridico de jure condito e prospettive de jure condendo, in Raffaele Battaglini, Marco Giordano (Eds.), Blockchain e Smart Contract. Funzionamento, profili giuridici e internazionali, applicazioni pratiche, Giuffré, 403–416.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piatti, Lorenzo. 2016. Dal codice civile al codice binario: “blockchains” e “smart contracts”, in Ciberspazio e diritto, 3, 325–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, Nathaniel. 2016. A Venture Fund with Plenty of Virtual Capital, but No Capitalist, www.nytimes.com/2016/05/22/bus-iness/dealbook/crypto-ether-bitcoin-currency.html, 21st May (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

  • Prassl, Jeremias. 2015. The Concept of the Employer, Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Prassl, Jeremias and Martin Risak. 2016. “Uber, TaskRabbit, & Co: Platform as Employers? Rethinking the Legal Analysis of Crowdwork”, in Comparative Labour Law & Policy Journal. 37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prencipe, Andreaand and Francesco Giorgino. 2018. Umanesimo digitale, il futuro è già arrivato, in LUISS Open, open.luiss.it/201-8/03/22/umanesimo-digitale-il-futuro-e-gia-arrivato/, 22nd March (date of last consultation: 22nd January 2022).

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, David, Johan Stahre, Thorsten Wuest, Dominic Gorecky, et al. 2016. Towards an operator 4.0 typology: a human-centric perspective on the fourth industrial revolution technologies, in Proceedings of the International Conference on Computers and Industrial Engineering, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sartre, Jean-Paul. 2014. L’esistenzialismo è un umanesimo, Mursia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, Klaus. 2016. La quarta rivoluzione industriale, Franco Angeli.

    Google Scholar 

  • Supiot, Alain. 2020. Homo faber: continuità e rotture, in Axel Honneth, Richard Sennett, Alain Supiot, Perché lavoro? Narrative e diritti per lavoratrici e lavoratori del XXI secolo. Feltrinelli. 21–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treu, Tiziano. 2018. “Blockchain, tecnologia a sostegno delle politiche del lavoro”. In Guida al lavoro, 48, 15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Manfred. 2018. “La platform economy e le principali sfide per il diritto del lavoro”. In 3 Diritto delle Relazioni Industriali. 715–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Fan, Ethan Cecchetti, Kyle Croman, Ari Juels, Elaine Shi E. 2016. Town Crier: An Authenticated Data Feed for Smart Contracts, in Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security. 270–282.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Bini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Bini, S. (2022). Introduction to Blockchain: Between “Autonomisation” and Automatization, Challenges and Risks for Labour Law. In: Addabbo, T., Ales, E., Curzi, Y., Fabbri, T., Rymkevich, O., Senatori, I. (eds) Defining and Protecting Autonomous Work. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06397-8_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics