Abstract
Tooth loss impacts the quality of life especially when it comes to nutrition, appearance, and general well-being. Dental implants have beneficial effects on the partially and fully edentulous patients. As demand for dental implants continues to grow, modern technology aids clinicians to carry on more precise implant procedures in a timely and cost-effective manner. The accuracy of the placement of the implant has a positive impact on both implant success rates and restorative results. In this chapter, we have reviewed static and dynamic navigation in implant surgery.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Restorative driven implant solutions using the latest technology. Glidewell. https://glidewelldental.com/education/inclusive-dental-implant-magazine/volume-3-issue-1/restorative-driven-implant-solutions-utilizing-the-latest-technology/. Accessed 22 August 2021.
Poor implant placement causes its failure. Elite prosthetic dentistry. https://www.eliteprostheticdentistry.com/poor-implant-placement-causes-its-failure/. Published 13 May 2013. Accessed 15 August 2021.
Levin L. Dealing with dental implant failures. J Appl Oral Sci. 2008;16(3):171–5. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1678-77572008000300002.
Stevens MR, Ghasemi S, Tabrizi R, editors. Innovative perspectives in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-75750-2.
Manikandan RG. Implant surgical guides: from the past to the present. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2013;5(Suppl 1):S98. https://doi.org/10.4103/0975-7406.113306.
Cushen SE, Turkyilmaz I. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2013;109(4):248–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-3913(13)60053-0.
Rosenfeld AL, Mandelaris GA, Tardieu PB. Prosthetically directed implant placement using computer software to ensure precise placement and predictable prosthetic outcomes. Part 1: diagnostics, imaging, and collaborative accountability. Restor Dent. 2005;26(3):8.
Orentlicher G, Horowitz A, Goldwaser B, Abboud M. Ten myths of guided implant surgery. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017;38(8):552–7.
Tm S, He L, Th L. Comparing accuracy of implant installation with a navigation system (NS), a laboratory guide (LG), NS with LG, and freehand drilling. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2107. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062107.
Shelley AM, Ferrero A, Brunton P, Goodwin M, Horner K. The impact of CBCT imaging when placing dental implants in the anterior edentulous mandible: a before–after study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(4):20140316. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20140316.
Al Yafi F, Camenisch B, Al-Sabbagh M. Is digital guided implant surgery accurate and reliable? Dent Clin N Am. 2019;63(3):381–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cden.2019.02.006.
Wood R, Sun Z, Chaudhry J, Tee BC, Kim D-G, Leblebicioglu B, England G. Factors affecting the accuracy of buccal alveolar bone height measurements from cone-beam computed tomography images. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;143(3):353–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.10.019.
Koch GK, Hamilton A, Wang K, et al. Dimensional accuracy of cone beam CT with varying angulation of the jaw to the X-ray beam. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2019;48(4):20180319. https://doi.org/10.1259/dmfr.20180319.
KamburoÄŸlu K. Use of dentomaxillofacial cone beam computed tomography in dentistry. World J Radiol. 2015;7(6):128. https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v7.i6.128.
Grimwood A, Thomas K, Kember S, Aldis G, Lawes R, Brigden B, Francis J, Henegan E, Kerner M, Delacroix L, Gordon A, Tree A, Harris EJ, McNair HA. Factors affecting accuracy and precision in ultrasound guided radiotherapy. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2021;18:68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2021.05.003.
The glossary of prosthodontic terms. J Prosthet Dent. 2005;94:1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2005.03.013.
Koyanagi K. Development and clinical application of a surgical guide for optimal implant placement. J Prosthet Dent. 2002;88(5):548–52. https://doi.org/10.1067/mpr.2002.129377.
Sahwil H. Choosing the right type of surgical guide or safe guide. https://blog.ddslab.com/type-of-surgical-guide-or-safe-guide. Accessed 27 August 2021.
Bencharit S, Staffen A, Yeung M, Whitley D 3rd, Laskin DM, Deeb GR. In vivo tooth-supported implant surgical guides fabricated with desktop stereolithographic printers: fully guided surgery is more accurate than partially guided surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2018;76(7):1431–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2018.02.010.
CBCT: the new standard of care, are you getting the full picture? Integrated dental care. https://www.idcexton.com/blog/2020/october/cbct-the-new-standard-of-care-are-you-getting-th/. Accessed 22 August 2021.
Pattanaik S, Pattanaik BK. Fabrication of a surgical guide with help of a milling machine by ridge mapping method. J Indian Prosthodont Soc. 2013;13(1):61. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13191-012-0199-5.
Dandekeri SS, Sowmya MK, Bhandary S. Stereolithographic surgical template: a review. J Clin Diagn Res. 2013;7(9):2093. https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2013/6052.3418.
Mandelaris GA, Stefanelli LV, DeGroot BS. Dynamic navigation for surgical implant placement: overview of technology, key concepts, and a case report. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2018;39(9):614–21; quiz 622
Jayaratne YSN, Zwahlen RA, Lo J, Tam SC, Cheung LK. Computer-aided maxillofacial surgery: an update. Surg Innov. 2010;17(3):217–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1553350610371626.
Luebbers HT, Messmer P, Obwegeser JA, et al. Comparison of different registration methods for surgical navigation in cranio-maxillofacial surgery. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2008;36(2):109–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms.2007.09.002.
Pellegrino G, Bellini P, Cavallini PF, et al. Dynamic navigation in dental implantology: the influence of surgical experience on implant placement accuracy and operating time. An in vitro study. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(6):2153. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17062153.
EBSCOhost | 121352331 | Implant placement accuracy using dynamic navigation. Accessed 20 August 2021. https://web.b.ebscohost.com/abstract?direct=true&profile=ehost&scope=site&authtype=crawler&jrnl=08822786&asa=Y&AN=121352331&h=B239RhXEMpBaHjedtJo5NhoAfiQ9DKfY7d2s5pG88bIEPExGb50wLyG1ztIIptGpEUhFbZ1vgV%2fOTvwN6uq2%2fQ%3d%3d&crl=c&resultNs=AdminWebAuth&resultLocal=ErrCrlNotAuth&crlhashurl=login.aspx%3fdirect%3dtrue%26profile%3dehost%26scope%3dsite%26authtype%3dcrawler%26jrnl%3d08822786%26asa%3dY%26AN%3d121352331
Chiu W-K, Luk W-K, Cheung L-K. Three-dimensional accuracy of implant placement in a computer-assisted navigation system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006;21(3):465–70.
Kramer F-J, Baethge C, Swennen G, Rosahl S. Navigated vs. conventional implant insertion for maxillary single tooth replacement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005;16(1):60–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.01058.x.
Block MS, Emery RW. Static or dynamic navigation for implant placement—choosing the method of guidance. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016;74(2):269–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joms.2015.09.022.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mauer, R.G., Shadrav, A., Dashti, M. (2022). Static Surgical Guides and Dynamic Navigation in Implant Surgery. In: Parhiz, S.A., James, J.N., Ghasemi, S., Amirzade-Iranaq, M.H. (eds) Navigation in Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06223-0_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06223-0_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06222-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06223-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)