Abstract
In the mid- to late-twentieth century, the fields of both bioenergetics and evolutionary biology were roiled by controversy. In the former, the chemiosmotic hypothesis led to the nearly two-decade “oxphos wars.” Meanwhile, the latter underwent a contentious examination of how natural selection could and could not produce cooperation and complexity, particularly throughout the history of life. Remarkably, chemiosmosis can potentiate such evolutionary cooperation. Chemiosmosis functions like a poorly insulated wire. When supply exceeds demand, electrons can be cast off, typically forming potentially dangerous reactive oxygen species. Sharing products with cooperative partners mitigates these risks. Chemiosmotic cells and organisms may thus be predisposed to form groups with partners that absorb excess products. Metabolism can lead to groups, groups can lead to cooperation, and cooperation can lead to complexity. Much of the natural world may be explained by the simple principle, “follow the electrons.”
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lewis D (2020) Where COVID contract-tracing went wrong. Nature 588:384–387
Henderson MT (2019) How technology will revolutionize public trust. Wall Street J October 19–20, p C3
Newton K (2001) Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. Int Polit Sci Rev 22:201–214
Smil V (2010) Energy transitions: history, requirements, prospects. Praeger, Santa Barbara
Mitchell P (1961) Coupling of phosphorylation to electron and hydrogen transfer by a chemi-osmotic type of mechanism. Nature 191:144–148
Boyer PD, Chance B, Ernster L, Mitchell P, Racker E, Slater EC (1977) Oxidative phosphorylation and photophosphorylation. Annu Rev Biochem 46:955–1026
Wynne-Edwards VC (1962) Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior. Hafner, New York
Williams G (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton
Williams G (ed) (1971) Group selection. Aldine Atherton, Chicago
Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–346
Radzvilavicius AL, Blackstone NW (2018) The evolution of individuality, revisited. Biol Rev 93:1620–1633
Service RF (2019) Renewable bonds. Science 365:1236–1239
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16
Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52
Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57
Wilson DS (1975) A theory of group selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72:143–146
Blackstone NW (2020) Chemiosmosis, evolutionary conflict, and eukaryotic symbiosis. In: Kloc M (ed) Symbiosis: cellular, molecular, medical, and evolutionary aspects. Springer, Cham, pp 237–252
Blackstone NW, Gutterman JU (2021) Can natural selection and druggable targets synergize? Of nutrient scarcity, cancer, and the evolution of cooperation. BioEssays 43:2000160
Pinker S (2002) The blank slate. Penguin Books, New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Blackstone, N.W. (2022). Introduction. In: Energy and Evolutionary Conflict. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06059-5_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06059-5_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-06058-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-06059-5
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)