Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Energy and Evolutionary Conflict
  • 135 Accesses

Abstract

In the mid- to late-twentieth century, the fields of both bioenergetics and evolutionary biology were roiled by controversy. In the former, the chemiosmotic hypothesis led to the nearly two-decade “oxphos wars.” Meanwhile, the latter underwent a contentious examination of how natural selection could and could not produce cooperation and complexity, particularly throughout the history of life. Remarkably, chemiosmosis can potentiate such evolutionary cooperation. Chemiosmosis functions like a poorly insulated wire. When supply exceeds demand, electrons can be cast off, typically forming potentially dangerous reactive oxygen species. Sharing products with cooperative partners mitigates these risks. Chemiosmotic cells and organisms may thus be predisposed to form groups with partners that absorb excess products. Metabolism can lead to groups, groups can lead to cooperation, and cooperation can lead to complexity. Much of the natural world may be explained by the simple principle, “follow the electrons.”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lewis D (2020) Where COVID contract-tracing went wrong. Nature 588:384–387

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Henderson MT (2019) How technology will revolutionize public trust. Wall Street J October 19–20, p C3

    Google Scholar 

  3. Newton K (2001) Trust, social capital, civil society, and democracy. Int Polit Sci Rev 22:201–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Smil V (2010) Energy transitions: history, requirements, prospects. Praeger, Santa Barbara

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell P (1961) Coupling of phosphorylation to electron and hydrogen transfer by a chemi-osmotic type of mechanism. Nature 191:144–148

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Boyer PD, Chance B, Ernster L, Mitchell P, Racker E, Slater EC (1977) Oxidative phosphorylation and photophosphorylation. Annu Rev Biochem 46:955–1026

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wynne-Edwards VC (1962) Animal dispersion in relation to social behavior. Hafner, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Williams G (1966) Adaptation and natural selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  9. Williams G (ed) (1971) Group selection. Aldine Atherton, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  10. Maynard Smith J, Szathmáry E (1995) The major transitions in evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 1–346

    Google Scholar 

  11. Radzvilavicius AL, Blackstone NW (2018) The evolution of individuality, revisited. Biol Rev 93:1620–1633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Service RF (2019) Renewable bonds. Science 365:1236–1239

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I. J Theor Biol 7:1–16

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Hamilton WD (1964) The genetical evolution of social behaviour. II. J Theor Biol 7:17–52

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trivers RL (1971) The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Q Rev Biol 46:35–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Wilson DS (1975) A theory of group selection. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 72:143–146

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Blackstone NW (2020) Chemiosmosis, evolutionary conflict, and eukaryotic symbiosis. In: Kloc M (ed) Symbiosis: cellular, molecular, medical, and evolutionary aspects. Springer, Cham, pp 237–252

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Blackstone NW, Gutterman JU (2021) Can natural selection and druggable targets synergize? Of nutrient scarcity, cancer, and the evolution of cooperation. BioEssays 43:2000160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pinker S (2002) The blank slate. Penguin Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Blackstone, N.W. (2022). Introduction. In: Energy and Evolutionary Conflict. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-06059-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics