Skip to main content

Paul Lévy’s Perspective on Jean Ville and Martingales

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 898 Accesses

Part of the book series: Trends in the History of Science ((TRENDSHISTORYSCIENCE))

Abstract

As the first part of this chapter explains, Paul Lévy’s theory of martingales was about extending the law of large numbers and other theorems about sequences of independent random variables to dependent random variables, Lévy showed that this extension is possible when each random variable has mean zero given the preceding ones. Under this condition, the sequence of cumulative sums is a martingale as Jean Ville and later Joseph L. Doob used the word, but Lévy never focused on this sequence of cumulative sums as a mathematical object. In this respect, his was not a theory of martingales. Moreover, he never showed much interest in the properties of martingales studied by Ville and Doob. The second part of the chapter describes Lévy’s troubled relationship with Ville and his disdain for Ville’s mathematical work. We find insights into Lévy’s attitude towards Ville in the decades-long correspondence Lévy sustained with Maurice Fréchet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For more detailed treatments of this topic, see Lévy’s comments in his autobiography [2, 3, 34, 35, 39].

  2. 2.

    See for instance [43].

  3. 3.

    See [20, pp. 253ff] for details about Bernstein’s extensions of the central limit theorem to sums of dependent variables.

  4. 4.

    Bernstein’s interest in secular perturbations was inspired by a paper published by Bohl in 1909.

  5. 5.

    That is to say, Bernstein’s own Theorem 4 in [4].

  6. 6.

    On Hostinský’s beginnings in probability, see in particular [23].

  7. 7.

    The tortuous story of Fréchet and Lévy’s elections to the Academy can be followed in detail in [2].

  8. 8.

    We do not know when Khinchin had an occasion to discuss the matter with Lévy. The appearance of Khinchin’s name is interesting because beginning in the 1920s he had been one of the first readers and critics of von Mises’ collectives, which, despite some regrettable idealistic tendencies, were considered the approach to probability most compatible with the young USSR’s dialectical materialism. See [45] for a translation with commentary of the 1929 text by Khinchin on the subject. As late as 1952, in the icy final period of the Stalinist era, Khinchin again came back to this question in the rather controversial and ideological book Philosophical questions of contemporary physics with a chapter entitled The method of arbitrary functions and the battle against idealism in probability theory [19].

  9. 9.

    This book is part of the great Borelian project of the interwar period, the Treaty of probability and its application, which Borel launched at the beginning of the 1920s and published in successive volumes until 1939. In [15], the authors study the origins and the development of the Borelian project, and how Borel convened much of his network of past students of the École Normale to publish his lecture notes. About Ville, see in particular Sects. 2.2.5 and 3.1.5 in [15].

  10. 10.

    This means for their graduation.

References

  1. Baldi, P., Mazliak, L., Priouret, P.: Martingales and Markov Chains. Chapman & Hall/CRC (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barbut, M., Locker, B., Mazliak, L.: Paul Lévy - Maurice Fréchet, 50 years of Correspondence in 107 letters. Springer (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Barbut, M., Mazliak, L.: Commentary on Lévy’s lecture notes to the Ecole Polytechnique (1919). Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 4(1) (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bernstein, F.: Über eine Anwendung der Mengenlehre auf ein aus der Theorie des säkularen Störungen herrührendes Problem. Math. Ann. 71, 417–439 (1912)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bernstein, S.: Sur l’extension du théorème limite du calcul des probabilités aux sommes de quantités dépendantes. Math. Ann 97, 1–59 (1927)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Borel, É.: Remarques sur certaines questions de probabilités. Bull. SMF 33, 123–128 (1905)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Borel, É.: Les probabilités dénombrables et leurs applications arithmétiques. Rend. Circ. Palermo 27, 247–271 (1909)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Borel, É.: Sur le battage des cartes. CRAS 154, 23–25 (1912)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Borel, É.: Sur un problème de probabilités relatif aux fractions continues. Math. Annalen 72, 578–584 (1912)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Borel, É.: Applications aux jeux de hasard (J. Ville, rédacteur). Gauthier-Villars (1938). Volume VI, fascicle II of Traité du calcul des probabilités et de ses applications, par É. Borel

    Google Scholar 

  11. Borel, É.: Les probabilités et la vie. Presses Universitaires de France. (1943)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bru, B.: Doeblin’s life and work from his correspondence. In: Doeblin and Modern Probability, pp. 1–64. American Mathematical Society (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bru, B.: Souvenirs de Bologne. Jour. Soc. Fr. Stat 144, 135–226 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bru, M.F., Bru, B.: Les jeux de l’infini et du hasard. Presses Universitaires de Franche-Comté (2018). Collection “Sciences: concepts et problèmes”

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bustamante, M.C., Clery, M., Mazliak, L.: Le Traité du calcul des probabilités et de ses applications. étendue et limites d’un projet borélien de grande envergure (1921-1939). North-Western European Journal of Mathematics 1, 85–123 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cantelli, F.P.: Sulla determinazione empirica delle leggi di probabilità. Giornale Ist. Ital. Attuari 4, 421–424 (1933)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Chaumont, L.i., Mazliak, L., Yor, M.: Some aspects of the probabilistic works. In: E. Charpentier, A. Lesne, N.K. Nikolski (eds.) Kolmogorov’s heritage in mathematics. Springer, London (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Crépel, P.: Quelques matériaux pour l’histoire de la théorie des martingales (1920-1940). Publications mathématiques et informatique de Rennes (1) (1984). Talk:1; available online at Numdam

    Google Scholar 

  19. А. Я. Хинчин: метод    произвольных   функциЙ    и   борьба   иротив   идеализма   в   теории    вероятностеЙ. In: Философские    вопросы  современноЙ   физики. Академия наук, Москва(1952)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fischer, H.: A History of the Central Limit Theorem: From Classical to Modern Probability. Springer (2010). Sources and Studies in the history of mathematics and physical sciences

    Google Scholar 

  21. Frechet, M.: Recherches théoriques modernes sur le calcul des probabilités, Livre I. Gauthier-Villars (1937). Volume I, fascicle III of Traité du calcul des probabilités et de ses applications, par É. Borel

    Google Scholar 

  22. Glivenko, V.I.: Sulla determinazione empirica delle leggi di probabilità. Giornale Ist. Ital. Attuari 4, 92–99 (1933)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Havlova, V., Mazliak, L., Šišma, P.: Le début des relations mathématiques franco-tchécoslovaques vu à travers la correspondance Hostinský-Fréchet. Electronic Journal for History of Probability and Statistics 1(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Hawkins, T.: Lebesgue’s Theory of Integration: Its Origins and Development. University of Wisconsin Press (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kolmogorov, A.N.: Grundbegriffe der Warscheinlichkeitsrechnung. Springer (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kolmogorov, A.N.: Sulla determinazione empirica delle leggi di probabilità. Giornale Ist. Ital. Attuari 4, 83–91 (1933)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lévy, P.: Leçons d’analyse fonctionnelle. Gauthier-Villars (1922)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Lévy, P.: Calcul des probabilités. Gauthier-Villars (1925)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lévy, P.: Sur les lois de probabilité dont dépendent les quotients complets et incomplets d’une fraction continue. Bull. SMF 57, 178–194 (1929)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Lévy, P.: Propriétés asymptotiques des sommes de variables aléatoires enchaînées. Bull. Sci. Math 59, 84–96, 109–128 (1935)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Lévy, P.: La loi forte des grands nombres pour les variables aléatoires enchaînées. J. Math. Pures et Appl. 15, 11–24 (1936)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Lévy, P.: Théorie de l’addition des variables aléatoires. Gauthier-Villars (1937)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Lévy, P.: Le mouvement brownien plan. AMS Journal 62, 487–550 (1940)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Lévy, P.: Quelques aspects de la pensée d’un mathématicien. Blanchard (1970)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Locker, B.: Paul Lévy, la période de guerre (2001). Thesis, Université Paris 5

    Google Scholar 

  36. Loève, M.: Paul Lévy, 1886–1971. Annals Proba. 1(1), 1–18 (1973)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Mazliak, L.: On the exchanges between Wolfgang Doeblin and Bohuslav Hostinský. Revue Hist. Math. 13, 155–180 (2008)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Mazliak, L.: Poincaré’s odds. In: B. Duplantier, V. Rivasseau (eds.) ‘Poincaré, 1912–2012’, Poincaré Seminar XVI, 24 November 2012. Birkhäuser-Science (2014). Progress in Mathematical Physics

    Google Scholar 

  39. Mazliak, L.: The Ghosts of the Ecole Normale. Statistical Science 30(3), 391–412 (2015)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. Mazliak, L., Sage, M.: Altered states. Borel and the probabilistic approach to reality. In: P. Cantù, G. Schiemer (eds.) Logic, Epistemology, and Scientific Theories. From Peano to the Vienna Circle. Springer (2021). Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook Series

    Google Scholar 

  41. von Plato, J.: Creating Modern Probability. Cambridge University Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Poincaré, H.: Calcul des Probabilités, 2 edn. Gauthier-Villars (1912)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Seneta, E.: Bernstein, Sergei Natanovich. In: S. Kotz, N.L. Johnson (eds.) Encyclopedia of Statistical Sciences, vol. I, pp. 221–223. Wiley, New York (1982)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Shafer, G., Vovk, V.: The sources of Kolmogorov’s Grundbegriffe. Statist. Sci. 21(1), 70–98 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Verburgt, L.M.: Khinchin’s 1929 paper on von Mises’s frequency theory of probability. Statistical Science (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Ville, J.: Sur la convergence des médianes des \(n\) premiers résultats d’une suite infinie d’épreuves indépendantes. CRAS 203, 1309–1310 (1936)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. Ville, J.: Étude critique de la notion de collectif (1939). Thesis, Université Paris 5

    Google Scholar 

  48. Ville, J.: Sur un problème de géométrie suggéré par l’étude du mouvement brownien. CRAS 215, 51–52 (1942)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  49. Wiman, A.: Über eine Wahrscheinlichkeitsaufgabe bei Kettenbruchentwickelungen. Stockh. Öfv. 57, 829–841 (1900)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laurent Mazliak .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mazliak, L. (2022). Paul Lévy’s Perspective on Jean Ville and Martingales. In: Mazliak, L., Shafer, G. (eds) The Splendors and Miseries of Martingales. Trends in the History of Science. Birkhäuser, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05988-9_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics