Skip to main content

Some Serious Limits of John Maynard Keynes on Money, the Crisis, and the State

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Confronting Mainstream Economics for Overcoming Capitalism

Part of the book series: Marx, Engels, and Marxisms ((MAENMA))

  • 175 Accesses

Abstract

The ongoing profound economic crisis has caused some to turn back to Keynesian arguments and policy proposals aiming at introducing alterations to the functioning of the capitalist system in order to make it survive. We, therefore, choose to analyze John Maynard Keynes’ thought, first in its links with the economic mainstream of his time, then in his theoretical interpretation of money, the crisis, and the State. This is an opportunity for us to underline the limits of this paradigm, especially as far as money is concerned, and to argue that a return to the “Keynesian compromise,” on the model of that of the post-World War II period, is illusory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter owes much to two articles jointly written with Paulo Nakatani: Herrera and Nakatani (2010) and Nakatani and Herrera (2013).

  2. 2.

    Robinson (1971, p. 131).

  3. 3.

    J.M. Keynes liked to say that the French are incompetent… just when the Popular Front was nationalizing. Or that the English preferred to deprive a sovereign of his power than of his head… See: Keynes (1971, p. 199).

  4. 4.

    At the Second Congress of the International, Lenin, in the midst of praising Keynes for advising not to pay the debt, called him “a well-known bourgeois and (…) implacable enemy of Bolshevism” (Lenin [1965], pp. 213–263).

  5. 5.

    Harrod (1951, p. 224).

  6. 6.

    Keynes (1933, p. 233).

  7. 7.

    Keynes (1920).

  8. 8.

    Proposals for an International Currency Union of November 1941, in Keynes (1987, vol. XXV, pp. 42–66). Also: Keynes (1951).

  9. 9.

    Robinson (1971, p. 128). Also: Robinson (1972, p. 124 et s).

  10. 10.

    Keynes (1936, p. 29, introduction, note 1).

  11. 11.

    Kicillof (2007, p. 154).

  12. 12.

    This model was presented by Hicks (1937).

  13. 13.

    Keynes (1936, p. 31).

  14. 14.

    Ibidem, pp. 37–39.

  15. 15.

    See: The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, p. 23, in Keynes (1987).

  16. 16.

    Marx (1978, p. 199).

  17. 17.

    Say (1996, p. 138).

  18. 18.

    Mill (1865 [1848]) and Ricardo (1951 [1817], p. 197).

  19. 19.

    Jevons (1957 [1871], p. 126).

  20. 20.

    Walras (2009, p. 179).

  21. 21.

    Keynes (1936, p. 177).

  22. 22.

    Ibidem, pp. 178–179.

  23. 23.

    Ibidem, pp. 162–163.

  24. 24.

    Ibidem, p. 86.

  25. 25.

    Mandel (1985, p. 224).

  26. 26.

    Keynes (1936, p. 180).

  27. 27.

    Keynes (1926, p. 48).

  28. 28.

    Quoted by Mattick (1972, p. 33).

  29. 29.

    See: Bloumine (1952, p. 185).

  30. 30.

    Robinson writes, in particular: “Many refinements and complications (…), neglected by Marx, are elaborated in the Keynesian theory, but the main outline is clearly to be seen in Marx’s analysis of investment as ‘purchases without sales,’ and saving as ‘sales without purchases’.” See: Robinson (1971, pp. 66–67).

  31. 31.

    Harrod (1951, p. 462).

  32. 32.

    See, for example, Marx (1974, pp. 121–122): “Nothing more silly than the dogma according to which circulation necessarily implies the balance of purchases and sales, since all sale is purchase, and vice versa. (…) [T]hese two acts, circulation separates them (…) [and] if the split (…) is accentuated, their intimate connection is affirmed – by a crisis.”

  33. 33.

    Kicillof (2007, p. 443).

  34. 34.

    See: Poulon (2000).

  35. 35.

    Keynes (1936, p. 96).

  36. 36.

    Mattick (1972, p. 39).

  37. 37.

    As shown by Lavoie (1985), effective demand, as the anticipated value of sales, must in reality be interpreted as… supply.

  38. 38.

    Keynes (1936, p. 228).

  39. 39.

    Schumpeter (1951).

  40. 40.

    Keynes (1930, vol. 2, pp. 150–151). We do not include here the author’s notes, but we respected his original punctuation. Eleven years earlier, he wrote in The Economic Consequences of the Peace: “Lenin is said to have declared that the best way to destroy the capitalist system was to debauch the currency. (…) [He] was certainly right. There is no subtler, no surer means of overturning the existing basis of society than to debauch the currency. The process engages all the hidden forces of economic law on the side of destruction, and does it in a manner which not one man in a million is able to diagnose” (Keynes [1920], pp. 219–220). Fine, but even if Lenin said that, he did not say—and did—only that….

  41. 41.

    Marx (1972 [1859], pp. 122–123). Available on: https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/download/Marx_Contribution_to_the_Critique_of_Political_Economy.pdf.

  42. 42.

    Vilar (1974, p. 35).

  43. 43.

    See, for more details: Nakatani and Gomes (2010).

  44. 44.

    Lavoie (1985). Also on this subject: Barrère (1979).

  45. 45.

    Keynes (1936, p. 229 et s). Available on: https://www.files.ethz.ch/isn/125515/1366_KeynesTheoryofEmployment.pdf.

  46. 46.

    Keynes (1971 [1920], p. 198).

  47. 47.

    Keynes (1936, Chapter 13).

  48. 48.

    Ibidem, Chapter 15, Section II, pp. 179–180.

  49. 49.

    Keynes (1936, Chapter 15, Section II, pp. 178–179).

  50. 50.

    “Except in an insane asylum, who would want money as a store of value?” Read: Szmreczanyi (1978).

  51. 51.

    Keynes (1936, Chapter 17, Section III, pp. 236–237).

  52. 52.

    Ibidem, pp. 237–238.

  53. 53.

    Keynes (1936, Chapter 15, Section I, points (i), (ii) and (iii), respectively, p. 203 et s).

  54. 54.

    Ibidem, p. 209.

  55. 55.

    Ibidem, p. 178.

  56. 56.

    On this subject: Kicillof (2007, p. 457), where the author rightly links Keynes’s analysis of money (presented in Chapter 17 of the General Theory) to his conception of capital (explained previously, in Chapter 16).

  57. 57.

    Krugman (2009). Also: Hicks (1974).

  58. 58.

    Marx (1974, Book I, vol. 1, pp. 113–114).

  59. 59.

    Ibidem, p. 140.

  60. 60.

    For a detailed discussion of this issue: Macedo e Silva (2008, pp. 241–265).

  61. 61.

    Keynes (1936, p. 228).

  62. 62.

    Herrera (2001, 2003).

  63. 63.

    Minsky (2008).

  64. 64.

    Papadimitriou and Wray (2008).

  65. 65.

    Are we experiencing a “Minsky moment”? See, among many others, an answer sketched out by Kregel (2010).

  66. 66.

    http://www.manifestoforeconomicsense.org/.

  67. 67.

    Palley (2010). Available at: http://monthlyreview.org/author/thomasipalley.

  68. 68.

    A Marxist critique against such arguments is due to Foster and McChesney (2010).

  69. 69.

    Keynes (1936, Chapter 16, p. 227).

  70. 70.

    Ibidem, pp. 228–229.

  71. 71.

    Read: Herrera and Nakatani (2008), and Nakatani and Herrera (2009).

References

  • Barrère A. (1979), Déséquilibres économiques et contre-révolution keynésienne, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloumine I. (1952), “L’économie politique de Keynes,” La Pensée, n° 42–43, p. 182–186, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster J.B. and F. McChesney (2010), “Listen Keynesians, It’s the System! Response to Palley,” available on: http://monthlyreview.org/2010/04/01/listen-keynesians-its-thesystem-response-to-palley#.UIWcxm-HWU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrod R.F. (1951), The Life of John Maynard Keynes, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera R. (2001), “Brève introduction à la Théorie de l’État chez Marx et Engels,” Cahier de la Maison des Sciences économiques de l’Université de Paris 1, n° 1, Paris, available on: https://vimeo.com/144550507.

  • ——— (2003), “L’État contre le service public?”, Actuel Marx, n° 34, p. 147–160, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herrera R. and P. Nakatani (2008), “La Crise financière: racines, raisons, perspectives,” La Pensée, n° 353, p. 109–113, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2010), “Keynes (et Marx), la monnaie et la crise,” La Pensée, n° 364, p. 57–68, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hicks J.R. (1937), “Mr. Keynes and the Classics: A Suggested Interpretation,” Econometrica, vol. 5, n° 2, p. 147–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1974), The Crisis in Keynesian Economics, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jevons W.S. (1957 [1871]), The Theory of Political Economy, New York: Kelley and Millman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Keynes J.M. (1920), The Economic Consequences of the Peace, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1926), Laissez-faire and Communism, New York: New Republic Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1930), Treatise on Money, 2 volumes, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1933), Essais de persuasion, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, Cambridge (UK): Macmillan Cambridge University Press (for Royal Economic Society).

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1951), Essays in Bibliography (first edition in 1933), Rupert Hart-Davis, Londres.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1971 [1920]), A Tract on Monetary Reform, The Collected Writings of J.M. Keynes, vol. IV, London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1987), The Collected Writings of John Maynard Keynes, London: Cambridge University Press, Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kicillof A. (2007), Fundamentos de la Teoria General: las consecuencias teoricas de Lord Keynes, Buenos Aires: Eudeba.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kregel J. (2010), “Minsky Moments and Minsky’s Proposals for Regulation of an Unstable Financial System,” Draft of Opening Remarks for the 19th Annual H.P. Minsky Conference, available on: http://www.levyinstitute.org/pubs/conf_april10/19th_Minsky_Kregel_drt.pdf.

  • Krugman P.R. (2009), The Return of Depression Economics and the Crisis of 2008, New York: W.W. Norton & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lavoie M. (1985), “La Théorie générale et l’inflation de sous-emploi,” in F. Poulon (ed.), Les Écrits de Keynes, p. 131–152, Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenin V.I. (1965 [1920]), Collected Works, 4th ed., vol. 31, Moscow: Progress Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macedo e Silva A.C. (2008), “Do Treatise à General Theory: o extravio dos ‘detalhes monetários’,” in J. Sicsú and C. Vidotto (eds.), Economia do desenvolvimento: Teoria e políticas keynesianas, p. 241–265, Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandel E. (1985), La Crise, Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marx K. (1972 [1859]), Contribution à la critique de l’économie politique, Paris: Éditions sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1974), Théories sur la plus-value, vol. 1, Paris: Éditions sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1978), Le Capital - Critique de l’économie politique, Paris: Éditions sociales.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mattick P. (1972), Marx et Keynes: les limites de l’économie mixte, Paris: Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mill J.S. (1865 [1848]), Principles of Political Economy with some of their Applications to Social Philosophy, London: Mongmans.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minsky H. (2008), Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, New York: MacGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani P. and R. Herrera (2009), “Critique des politiques anticrise orthodoxes,” La Pensée, n° 360, p. 31–42, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (2013), “Keynes et la crise: hier et aujourd’hui,” Actuel Marx, n° 53, p. 153–168, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakatani P. and H. Gomes (2010), “Dinheiro: natureza e funções”, mimeo, Vitoria: Federal University of Espirito Santo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palley T. (2010), “The Limits of Minsky’s Financial Instability Hypothesis as an Explanation of the Crisis,” available on: http://monthlyreview.org/2010/04/01/thelimits-of-minskys-financial-instability-hypothesis-as-an-explanation-ofthecrisis#.UIWZv2–_HWU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadimitriou D.B. and L.R. Wray (2008), “Minsky’s Stabilizing an Unstable Economy: Two Decades Later,” in H. Minsky (ed.), Stabilizing an Unstable Economy, p. xxv et s., New York: MacGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulon F. (2000), La Pensée économique de Keynes, Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricardo D. (1951 [1817]), On the Principles of Political Economy and Taxation, Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson J.V. (1971), Essai sur l’économie de Marx, Paris: Dunod.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (1972), Hérésies économiques, Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Say J.-B. (1996), Cours d’économie politique et autres essais, Paris: Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter J.A. (1951), Ten Great Economists, London: George Allen & Unwin Ldt.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szmreczanyi T. (ed.) (1978), John Maynard Keynes, São Paulo: Ática.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vilar P. (1974), Or et monnaie dans l’histoire, Paris: Éditions Flammarion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walras L. (2009), Œuvres économiques complètes, Paris: Economica.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rémy Herrera .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Herrera, R. (2022). Some Serious Limits of John Maynard Keynes on Money, the Crisis, and the State. In: Confronting Mainstream Economics for Overcoming Capitalism. Marx, Engels, and Marxisms. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05851-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics