Skip to main content

Personal Data Markets: A Narrative Review on Influence Factors of the Price of Personal Data

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Research Challenges in Information Science (RCIS 2022)

Abstract

Personal data has been described as the “the new oil of the Internet.” The global data monetization market is projected to increase to USD 6.1bn by 2025, and the success of giants like Facebook or Google speaks for itself. Almost all companies create, store, share and/or use personal data i.e. information from or about individuals. While the current assumption is that data subjects voluntarily share their data in exchange for a “free” service, the awareness of the value of personal data and data sovereignty is growing amongst consumers, businesses, and regulators alike. However, there is currently no consensus on which factors influence the value of personal data and how personal data should be priced regarding self-determination and data sovereignty. With this narrative review, we answer the following research question: Which factors influence the pricing of personal data? We show that research on the subject is diverse and that there is no consensus on the optimal pricing mechanism. We identify individual privacy and risk preferences, informational self-determination, sensitivity of data and data volume and inferability as most prevalent influence factors. We underline the need to establish ways for data owners to exercise data sovereignty and informed consent about data usage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The category “Data Market Model, Technical” refers to papers focusing on algorithms and technical solutions for data markets.

  2. 2.

    Willingness to pay (WTP) refers to the maximum amount of money an individual would be willing to pay to secure a specific change, while willingness to accept (WTA) refers to the minimum amount a person would be willing to accept to forego said change [34].

References

  1. Kuneva, M.: Keynote speech. Roundtable on online data collection, targeting and profiling, 31 March 2009

    Google Scholar 

  2. MarketsandMarkets: Data Monetization Market (2020). https://www.marketsandmarkets.com/Market-Reports/data-monetization-market-127405959.html. Accessed 23 Sep 2020

  3. Spiekermann, S., Korunovska, J.: Towards a value theory for personal data. J. Inf. Technol. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2016.4

  4. Feijóo, C., Gómez-Barroso, J.L., Voigt, P.: Exploring the economic value of personal information from firms’ financial statements. Int. J. Inf. Manag. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2013.12.005

  5. OECD: Exploring the Economics of Personal Data: A Survey of Methodologies for Measuring Monetary Value (2013). https://doi.org/10.1787/5k486qtxldmq-en

  6. Sidgman, J., Crompton, M.: Valuing personal data to foster privacy: a thought experiment and opportunities for research. J. Inf. Syst. (2016). https://doi.org/10.2308/isys-51429

  7. Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., Wagman, L.: The economics of privacy. J. Econ. Lite. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.54.2.442

  8. European Commission: EU data protection rules (2020). https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/law-topic/data-protection/eu-data-protection-rules_en. Accessed 27 July 2020

  9. Madiega, T.: Digital sovereignty for Europe. European Union (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  10. European Commission: A European Strategy for data (2021). https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/strategy-data. Accessed 13 Jan 2022

  11. Schwartz, P.M.: Property, privacy, and personal data. Harv. Law Rev. (2004). https://doi.org/10.2307/4093335

  12. Sindermann, C., Kuss, D.J., Throuvala, M.A., Griffiths, M.D., Montag, C.: Should we pay for our social media/messenger applications? Preliminary data on the acceptance of an alternative to the current prevailing data business model. Front. Psychol. (2020). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01415

  13. Currie, C.S.M., Dokka, T., Harvey, J., Strauss, A.K.: Future research directions in demand management. J. Revenue Pricing Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41272-018-0139-z

  14. Malgieri, G., Custers, B.: Pricing privacy–the right to know the value of your personal data. Comput. Law Secur. Rev. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2017.08.006

  15. Fricker, S.A., Maksimov, Y.V.: Pricing of data products in data marketplaces. In: Ojala, A., Holmström Olsson, H., Werder, K. (eds.) ICSOB 2017. LNBIP, vol. 304, pp. 49–66. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69191-6_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Wdowin, J., Diepeveen, S.: The value of data: literature review, Cambrige, UK (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cook, D.J., Mulrow, C.D., Haynes, R.B.: Systematic reviews: synthesis of best evidence for clinical decisions. Ann. Intern. Med. (1997). https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006

  18. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D.G.: Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. BMJ (Clin. Res. Ed.) (2009). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.b2535

  19. Elo, S., Kyngäs, H.: The qualitative content analysis process. J. Adv. Nurs. 62, 107–115 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Niyato, D., Alsheikh, M.A., Wang, P., Kim, D.I., Han, Z.: Market model and optimal pricing scheme of big data and Internet of Things (IoT). In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC). 2016 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–6 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2016.7510922

  21. Wang, W., Ying, L., Zhang, J.: The value of privacy: strategic data subjects, incentive mechanisms and fundamental limits. In: Proceedings of the SIGMETRICS 2016: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGMETRICS International Conference on Measurement and Modeling of Computer Science (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jiao, Y., Wang, P., Niyato, D., Abu Alsheikh, M., Feng, S.: Profit maximization auction and data management in big data markets. In: 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC). 2017 IEEE Wireless Communications and Networking Conference (WCNC), pp. 1–6 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/WCNC.2017.7925760

  23. Bataineh, A.S., Mizouni, R., Barachi, M.E., Bentahar, J.: Monetizing personal data: a two-sided market approach. Procedia Comput. Sci. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2016.04.211

  24. Xu, L., Jiang, C., Qian, Y., Zhao, Y., Li, J., Ren, Y.: Dynamic privacy pricing: a multi-armed bandit approach with time-variant rewards. IEEE Trans. Inf. Forensics Secur. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2611487

  25. Nget, R., Cao, Y., Yoshikawa, M.: How to balance privacy and money through pricing mechanism in personal data market (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Yang, J., Xing, C.: Personal data market optimization pricing model based on privacy level. Information 10, 123 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Di Vimercati, S.D.C., Foresti, S., Livraga, G., Samarati, P.: Toward owners’ control in digital data markets. IEEE Syst. J. 1–8 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.2970456

  28. Mahmoodi, J., et al.: Internet users’ valuation of enhanced data protection on social media: which aspects of privacy are worth the most? Front. Psychol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01516

  29. Bauer, M., et al.: Using crash outcome data evaluation system (CODES) to examine injury in front vs. rear-seated infants and children involved in a motor vehicle crash in New York State. Inj. Epidemiol. 8, 1–10 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Frik, A., Gaudeul, A.: A measure of the implicit value of privacy under risk. J. Consum. Mark. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2019-3286

  31. Benndorf, V., Normann, H.-T.: The willingness to sell personal data. DICE discussion paper, vol. 143. DICE, Düsseldorf (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Staiano, J., Oliver, N., Lepri, B., de Oliveira, R., Caraviello, M., Sebe, N.: Money walks: a human-centric study on the economics of personal mobile data. In: Proceedings of the 2014 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, 13 September 2014, pp. 583–594 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2632048.2632074

  33. Danezis, G., Lewis, S., Anderson, R.J.: How much is location privacy worth? In: WEIS

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hanemann, W.M.: Willingness to pay and willingness to accept: how much can they differ? Am. Econ. Rev. 81, 635–647 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Acquisti, A., John, L.K., Loewenstein, G.: What is privacy worth? J. Leg. Stud. (2013). https://doi.org/10.1086/671754

  36. Winegar, A.G., Sunstein, C.R.: How much is data privacy worth? A preliminary investigation. SSRN J. (2019). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3413277

  37. Grossklags, J., Acquisti, A.: When 25 cents is too much: an experiment on willingness-to-sell and willingness-to- protect personal information. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on the Economics of Information Security Proceedings 2007 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Nielsen, A.: Measuring lay reactions to personal data markets. In: Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (AIES 2021) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462582

  39. Biswas, S., Jung, K., Palamidessi, C.: An incentive mechanism for trading personal data in data markets. In: Cerone, A., Ölveczky, P.C. (eds.) ICTAC 2021. LNCS, vol. 12819, pp. 197–213. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85315-0_12

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. Cockcroft, S., Rekker, S.: The relationship between culture and information privacy policy. Electron. Mark. 26(1), 55–72 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0195-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hacker, P., Petkova, B.: Reining in the big promise of big data: transparency, inequality, and new regulatory frontiers. Northwestern J. Technol. Intellect. Prop. 15(1), 6–42 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Holt, T.J., Smirnova, O., Chua, Y.T.: Exploring and estimating the revenues and profits of participants in stolen data markets. Deviant Behav. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2015.1026766

  43. Jentzsch, N.: Monetarisierung der privatsphäre: welchen preis haben persönliche daten? DIW Wochenbericht (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Perera, C., Ranjan, R., Wang, L.: End-to-end privacy for open big data markets. IEEE Cloud Comput. 2(4), 44–53 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/MCC.2015.78

  45. Raskar, R., Vepakomma, P., Swedish, T., Sharan, A.: Data markets to support AI for all: pricing, valuation and governance (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Choi, J.P., Jeon, D.-S., Kim, B.-C.: Privacy and personal data collection with information externalities. J. Public Econ. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2019.02.001

  47. Dimakopoulos, P.D., Sudaric, S.: Privacy and platform competition. Int. J. Ind. Organ. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2018.01.003

  48. Gkatzelis, V., Aperjis, C., Huberman, B.A.: Pricing private data. Electron. Mark. 25(2), 109–123 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0188-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Li, X.-B., Raghunathan, S.: Pricing and disseminating customer data with privacy awareness. Decis. Support Syst. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2013.10.006

  50. Oh, H., Park, S., Lee, G.M., Choi, J.K., Noh, S.: Competitive data trading model with privacy valuation for multiple stakeholders in IoT data markets. IEEE Internet Things J. 7(4), 3623–3639 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2020.2973662

  51. Radhakrishnan, A., Das, S.: Data markets for smart grids: an introduction. In: 2018 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies - Asia (ISGT Asia). 2018 IEEE Innovative Smart Grid Technologies–Asia (ISGT Asia), pp. 1010–1015 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/ISGT-Asia.2018.8467818

  52. Spiekermann, S., Acquisti, A., Böhme, R., Hui, K.-L.: The challenges of personal data markets and privacy. Electron. Mark. 25(2), 161–167 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-015-0191-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Spiekermann, S., Novotny, A.: A vision for global privacy bridges: technical and legal measures for international data markets Comput. Law Secur. Rev. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.01.009

  54. Tian, L., Li, J., Li, W., Ramesh, B., Cai, Z.: Optimal contract-based mechanisms for online data trading markets. IEEE Internet Things J. 6(5), 7800–7810 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2902528

  55. Balazinska, M., Howe, B., Suciu, D.: Data markets in the cloud: an opportunity for the database community. Proc. VLDB Endow. 5(12), 1962–1965 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Li, C., Li, D.Y., Miklau, G., Suciu, D.: A theory of pricing private data. ACM Trans. Database Syst. (2014). https://doi.org/10.1145/2691190.2691191

  57. Mehta, S., Dawande, M., Janakiraman, G., Mookerjee, V.: How to sell a dataset? Pricing policies for data monetization. SSRN J. (2019). https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3333296

  58. Niu, C., Zheng, Z., Wu, F., Tang, S., Gao, X., Chen, G.: Online pricing with reserve price constraint for personal data markets (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Niu, C., Zheng, Z., Wu, F., Tang, S., Gao, X., Chen, G.: ERATO: trading noisy aggregate statistics over private correlated data. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2019.2934100

  60. Shen, Y., Guo, B., Duan, X., Dong, X., Zhang, H.: A pricing model for big personal data. Tsinghua Sci. Technol. 21(5), 482–490 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TST.2016.7590317

  61. Shen, Y., et al.: Pricing personal data based on data provenance. Appl. Sci. Basel 9(12) (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9163388

  62. Zhang, Z., Song, W., Shen, Y.: A reasonable data pricing mechanism for personal data transactions with privacy concern. In: U, L.H., Spaniol, M., Sakurai, Y., Chen, J. (eds.) APWeb-WAIM 2021. LNCS, vol. 12859, pp. 64–71. Springer, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85899-5_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  63. Hann, I.-H., Hui, K.-L., Lee, S.-Y.T., Png, I.P.L.: Overcoming online information privacy concerns: an information-processing theory approach. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. (2007). https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222240202

  64. Lim, S., Woo, J., Lee, J., Huh, S.-Y.: Consumer valuation of personal information in the age of big data. J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23915

  65. Schomakers, E.-M., Lidynia, C., Ziefle, M.: All of me? Users’ preferences for privacy-preserving data markets and the importance of anonymity. Electron. Mark. 30(3), 649–665 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-020-00404-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Coyle, D., Diepeveen, S., Wdowin, J., Kay, L., Tennison, J.: The value of data: policy implications, Cambrige, UK (Februaray 2020). https://www.nuffieldfoundation.org/project/valuing-data-foundations-for-data-policy

  67. Rose, J., Rehse, O., Robe, B.: The value of our digital identity (2012). https://www.bcg.com/publications/2012/digital-economy-consumer-insight-value-of-our-digital-identity.aspx. Accessed 29 Apr 2020

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was partially funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) within the scope of the research project DaWID (Platform for value determination and self-determined data release; funding reference number: 16SV8383).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julia Busch-Casler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix - Overview of Included Papers

Appendix - Overview of Included Papers

#

Paper

Classification

Key issue explored

13

Feijóo et al. [4]

Case Study

Case study on estimation of personal data

18

Hacker & Petkova [41]

Case Study

Case study on active choice of using data as currency

20

Holt et al. [42]

Case Study

Case study on value of data in stolen data markets

21

Jentzsch [43]

Commentary

Commentary on the difficulties of valuing personal data

37

Perera et al. [44]

Commentary

Commentary on the challenges of privacy protection in IoT

39

Raskar et al. [45]

Commentary

Commentary on challenges of data pricing and data markets

44

Sidgman & Crompton [6]

Commentary

Theoretical commentary on current challenges and research opportunities

4

Bataineh et al. [23]

Data Market Model

Two-sided data market model with experimental comparison based on real life data set

8

Choi et al. [46]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model with consumer consent for data collection

12

Dimakopoulos & Sudaric [47]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market with platform competition

16

Gkatzelis et al. [48]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model for unbiased data samples

22

Jiao et al. [22]

Data Market Model

Data market model with Bayesian profit maximization auction

23

Lei Xu et al. [24]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model with privacy and learning policies in a multi-armed bandit model

24

Li & Raghunathan [49]

Data Market Model

Data market model when purpose of data use is unclear

34

Niyato et al. [20]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model for optimal big data pricing with simulation

36

Oh et al. [50]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model between broker and service provider under profit maximization and respect for privacy protection and valuation

38

Radhakrishnan & Das [51]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model for smart grid data

45

Spiekermann et al. [52]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model focusing on challenges of personal data markets

46

Spiekermann & Novotny [53]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model focusing on operating principles

49

Tian et al. [54]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model based on optimal contract-based mechanisms

50

Wang et al. [21]

Data Market Model

Theoretical data market model with data owners exhibiting informed consent in a Nash equilibrium with a non-trusted data collector

3

Balazinska et al. [55]

Data Market Model, Technical

Technical data market model with query-based pricing

11

De Capitani Di Vimercati et al. [27]

Data Market Model, Technical

Technical data market model focusing on including privacy issues in a cloud setting

25

Li et al. [56]

Data Market Model, Technical

Technical data market model with query-based pricing

30

Nget et al.[25]

Data Market Model, Technical

Technical market model and simulation of query-based pricing mechanism

53

Yang & Xing [26]

Data Market Model, Technical

Algorithm for personal data pricing with multi-level privacy division

7

Biswas et al. [39]

Data Pricing Model

Theoretical model to induce data provider to accurately report privacy price within differential privacy

29

Mehta et al. [57]

Data Pricing Model

Theoretical data pricing model with price-quantity schedule and approximation scheme for data seller

32

Niu et al.[58]

Data Pricing Model

Technical pricing model for trading aggregate statistics over private correlated data

33

Niu et al. [59]

Data Pricing Model

Algorithm for personal data pricing with reverse price constraint

42

Shen et al. [60]

Data Pricing Model

Data pricing model for Big Personal Data based on tuple granularity

43

Shen et al. [61]

Data Pricing Model

Data pricing model based on data provenance

54

Zhang et al. [62]

Data Pricing Model

Data pricing with privacy concern introducing privacy cost concept

1

Acquisti et al. [35]

Experiment

Experiment on WTP/WTA money for private data and privacy

5

Bauer et al. [29]

Experiment

Survey-based experiment on value of Facebook user information from user perspective

6

Benndorf & Normann [31]

Experiment

Experiment to extraxt WTA money with take-it-or-leave-it offers

10

Danezis et al. [33]

Experiment

Experiment on WTA money for location tracking

15

Frik & Gaudeul [30]

Experiment

Method and experimental validation for elicitating the implicit value of privacy under risk

17

Grossklags & Acquisti [37]

Experiment

Experiment on WTP/WTA money for private data and privacy

19

Hann et al. [63]

Experiment

Conjoint analysis to estimate individual’s utility of mitigate privacy concerns

26

Lim et al. [64]

Experiment

Discrete choice experiment to estimate value of types of personal information leakage

27

Mahmoodi et al. [28]

Experiment

Experiment quantifying WTP for different levels of privacy on social media platforms & analysis of psychological factors (ongoing)

31

Nielsen [38]

Experiment

Experiment showing lay peoples reaction to data markets is diverse and shows unwillingness to participate in data market

41

Schomakers et al. [65]

Experiment

Mixed-method study on data sharing and privacy preferences in data markets

47

Spiekermann & Korunovska [3]

Experiment

Experiment on WTP/WTA money for private data and privacy

48

Staiano et al. [32]

Experiment

Living lab experiment focusing on pricing and correlated behaviour patterns

52

Winegar & Sunstein [36]

Experiment

Survey-based experiment on the disparity of WTP and WTA money to give up privacy

2

Acquisti et al. [7]

Literature Review

Literature review on privacy

14

Fricker & Maksimov [15]

Literature Review

Literature review on pricing of data products

28

Malgieri & Custers [14]

Literature Review

Literature review on pricing of personal data

51

Wdowin & Diepeveen[16]

Literature Review

Literature review on value of personal data

9

Coyle et al. [66]

Report

Policy Recommendation for capturing data value

35

OECD [5]

Report

Overarching report on pricing personal data

40

Rose et al. [67]

Report

Report on value of digital identity based on EU survey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Busch-Casler, J., Radic, M. (2022). Personal Data Markets: A Narrative Review on Influence Factors of the Price of Personal Data. In: Guizzardi, R., Ralyté, J., Franch, X. (eds) Research Challenges in Information Science. RCIS 2022. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 446. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05760-1_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05759-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05760-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics