Skip to main content

Evaluation of Mixed Reality Technologies in Remote Teaching

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS,volume 13329)


The trend towards remote teaching is steadily increasing and intensified by the current situation of the global pandemic. This is a particular challenge for subjects with a high practical relevance, such as mining engineering education, as practical experiences and on-site excursions are an integral part of the curriculum. In face-to-face teaching settings, mixed reality technologies are already considered a promising medium for the implementation of e.g., virtual field trips. Based on this, the current study addresses the question to what extent the integration of mixed reality technologies is suitable for remote teaching and which strengths and challenges are perceived by students and teachers. For this purpose, two 60-min remote lectures in the field of mining engineering were conducted, in which the use of mixed reality was tested on the basis of shared 360° experiences and 3D models and evaluated by students and teachers. Results reveal that the use of mixed reality in remote teaching was perceived as useful, enabled a realistic experience and improved students’ understanding of presented theory compared to traditional teaching methods. In this paper, we discuss possible potentials and risks of using mixed reality in remote teaching and derive directions for further research.


  • Remote teaching
  • Mixed reality
  • Virtual excursions
  • Mining engineering
  • Education

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-05675-8_3
  • Chapter length: 14 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
USD   59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-031-05675-8
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Softcover Book
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.


  1. Dede, C. J., Jacobson, J., Richards, J.: Introduction: virtual, augmented, and mixed realities in education. In: Liu, D., Dede, C., Huang, R. et al. (eds.) Virtual, Augmented, and Mixed Realities in Education, vol. 59, pp 1–16. Springer, Singapore (2017).

  2. Hughes, M.C., Henry, B.W., Kushnick, M.R.: Teaching during the pandemic? An opportunity to enhance curriculum. Pedagogy Health Promot. 6(4), 235–238 (2020)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Scoble, M., Laurence, D.: Future mining engineers – educational development strategy. In: Proceedings of the First International Future Mining Conference, pp. 237–242. Sydney (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Daling, L., Eck, C., Abdelrazeq, A., Hees, F.: Potentials and challenges of using mixed reality in mining education: a Europe-wide interview study. In: Lloret Mauri, J., Saplacan, D., Çarçani, K., Ardiansyah Prima, O.D., Vasilache, S. (eds.) Thirteenth International Conference on Advances in Computer-Human Interactions, ACHI 2020, pp. 229–235. IARIA (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bertignoll, H., Ortega, M.L., Feiel, S.: MiReBooks – mixed reality Lehrbücher für das Bergbau-Studium (MiReBooks—mixed reality handbooks for mining education). Berg Huettenmaenn Monatshefte 164(4), 178–182 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Daling, L., Kommetter, C., Abdelrazeq, A., Ebner, M., Ebner, M.: Mixed reality books: applying augmented and virtual reality in mining engineering education. In: Geroimenko, V. (ed.) Augmented reality in education, Springer Series on Cultural Computing, pp. 185–195. Springer, Cham (2020).

  7. International Organization for Standardization: ISO 9241–11:2018 Ergonomics of human-system interaction — Part 11: Usability: Definitions and concepts. International Organization for Standardization (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brooke, J.: SUS-A Quick and Dirty Usability Scale. Usability Evaluation in Industry. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lewis, J.R.: Comparison of four TAM item formats: effect of response option labels and order. J. Usability Stud. 14(4), 224–236 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kalkofen, D., et al.: Tools for teaching mining students in virtual reality based on 360° video experiences. In: 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces Abstracts and Workshops (VRW), pp. 455–459. IEEE (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Zoom Video Communications Inc: Zoom.

  12. Cisco Webex: Cisco Webex.

  13. Microsoft Corporation: Microsoft Teams.

  14. Kuckartz, U.: Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse: Methoden, Praxis, Computerunterstützung (Qualitative content analysis: methods, practice, computer support). 3rd. edn. Beltz, Weinheim Basel (2016)

    Google Scholar 

Download references


This work is part of the project “Mixed Reality Books (MiReBooks)” and was funded by the EIT RAW Materials. The author is responsible for the contents of this publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations


Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lea M. Daling .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Daling, L.M. et al. (2022). Evaluation of Mixed Reality Technologies in Remote Teaching. In: Zaphiris, P., Ioannou, A. (eds) Learning and Collaboration Technologies. Novel Technological Environments. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13329. Springer, Cham.

Download citation

  • DOI:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05674-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05675-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)