Abstract
The Longitudinal Study on Older People’s Quality of Life during the Covid-19 pandemic (ILQA-19) is a qualitative study carried out during the 2020 lockdown on 40 older men and women living in the ten villages in northern Italy subject to the first lockdown in Europe. This study focuses on older people’s lives and the role of digital technologies during the pandemic, and it has been carried out fully remotely. Despite the need to research the social consequence of pandemics for older people, there is a shortage of studies that provide guidelines on how to successfully involve this population in online qualitative studies. This paper contributes to fill this gap by discussing the use of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) in implementing the different stages of ILQA-19 research. The best practices of qualitative studies conducted through ICTs are discussed, along with the strategies we enacted to enhance participation in the study. Specifically, panel engagement, tailoring procedures and building positive and trustworthy interactions with study members are crucial when researching older people through online methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
There is debate in the literature on how to transcribe qualitative interviews. We have opted for the literal transcription of the interviews, maintaining typos, use of capital letters, etc.
References
Blumer, H.: What is wrong with social theory? Am. Sociol. Rev. 19(1), 3–10 (1954)
Boyatzis, R.E.: Transforming Qualitative Information. Sage, Thousand Oaks (1998)
Charmaz, K.: Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In: Denzin, N.K., Lincoln, Y.S. (eds.) Strategies for Qualitative Inquiry, pp. 249–291. Sage, Thousand Oaks (2003)
Cheung, E., Mutahar, R., Assefa, F., Ververs, M.T., Nasiri, S.M., Borrel, A., Salama, P.: An epidemic of scurvy in Afghanistan: assessment and response. Food Nutr. Bull. 24(3), 247–255 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1177/156482650302400303
Dodds, S., Hess, A.C.: Adapting research methodology during COVID-19: lessons for transformative service research. J. Serv. Manage. ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print). (2020) https://doi.org/10.1108/JOSM-05-2020-0153
Granovetter, M.S.: The strength of weak ties. Am. J. Sociol. 78(6), 1360–1380 (1973)
Gregory, K.: The video camera spoiled by ethnography: a critical approach. Int. J. Qual. Methods 19, 1–9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920963761
Grossoehme, D., Lipstein, E.: Analyzing longitudinal qualitative data: the application of trajectory and recurrent cross-sectional approaches. BMC. Res. Notes 9(1), 1–5 (2016)
Guha-Sapir, D., Hoyois, P., Below, R.: Annual disaster statistical review 2014: The numbers and trends. CRED (2015)
Henderson, T.L., Sirois, M., Chen, A.C.C., Airriess, C., Swanson, D.A., Banks, D.: After a disaster: lessons in survey methodology from Hurricane Katrina. Popul. Res. Policy Rev. 28(1), 67–92 (2009) https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-008-9114-5
Howlett, M.: Looking at the ‘field’through a Zoom lens: Methodological reflections on conducting online research during a global pandemic. Qual. Res. 1468794120985691 (2021)
Johnson, G.A., Vindrola-Padros, C.: Rapid qualitative research methods during complex health emergencies: a systematic review of the literature. Soc. Sci. Med. 189, 63–75 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2017.07.029
Kobakhidze, M.N., Hui, J., Chui, J., González, A.: Research disruptions, new opportunities: re-imagining qualitative interview study during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Qual. Methods 20, 16094069211051576 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211051576
Lavin, R.P., Schemmel-Rettenmeier, L., Frommelt-Kuhle, M.: Conducting research during disasters. Annu. Rev. Nurs. Res. 30(1), 1–19 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1891/0739-6686.30.1
Lo, M.C.M., Fan, Y.: How narratives of disaster impact survivors’ emotionality: the case of Typhoon Morakot. Poetics, 101579 (2021)
Lo Iacono, V.L., Symonds, P., Brown, D.H.: Skype as a tool for qualitative research interviews. Sociol. Res. Online 21(2), 1–12 (2016). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3952
Lobe, B., Morgan, D., Hoffman, K.A.: Qualitative data collection in an era of social distancing. Int. J. Qual. Methods 19, 160940692093787 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406920937875
Melis, G., Sala, E., Zaccaria, D.: Remote recruiting and video-interviewing older people: a research note on a qualitative case study carried out in the first Covid-19 Red Zone in Europe. Int. J. Soc. Res. Methodol. (2021a). https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2021.1913921
Melis, G., Sala, E., Zaccaria, D.: «I turned to Facebook to know when they would open the cemetery» Results from a qualitative case study on older people’s social media use during COVID-19 lockdown in Italy. RASSEGNA ITALIANA DI SOCIOLOGIA, LXII(2), 431–457, (2021b). https://doi.org/10.1423/101851
Newman, P.A., Guta, A., Black, T.: Ethical considerations for qualitative research methods during the COVID-19 pandemic and other emergency situations: navigating the virtual field. Int. J Qual. Methods 20, 16094069211047824 (2021)
Parkes, E.: ‘Wait! I’m not a journalist’: conducting qualitative field research in post-disaster situations. Graduate J. Asia-Pacific Stud. 7(2), 30–46 (2011)
Phillips, B.D.: Qualitative disaster research. In: Leavy, P. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research, pp. 533–556. Oxford University Press (2014)
Richardson, S.J., et al.: Research with older people in a world with COVID-19: Identification of current and future priorities, challenges and opportunities. Age Ageing 49(6), 901–906 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa149
Roberts, J.K., Pavlakis, A.E., Richards, M.P.: It’s more complicated than it seems: virtual qualitative research in the COVID-19 era. Int J Qual Methods 20, 16094069211002960 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069211002959
Rodríguez, H., Quarantelli, E.L., Dynes, R.R. (eds.) Handbook of Disaster Research. vol. 643. New York, Springer (2007). http://eprints.ukh.ac.id/id/eprint/294/1/2007_Book_HandbookOfDisasterResearch.pdf
Saberi, P.: Research in the time of coronavirus: continuing ongoing studies in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic. AIDS Behav. 24(8), 2232–2235 (2020)
Saldaña, J.: The Coding Manual for Qualitative Research. Sage, Thousand Oak (2012)
Sy, M., O’Leary, N., Nagraj, S., El-Awaisi, A., O’Carroll, V., Xyrichis, A.: Doing interprofessional research in the COVID-19 era: a discussion paper. J. Interprof. Care 34(5), 600–606 (2020)
Vindrola-Padros, C., et al.: Carrying out rapid qualitative research during a pandemic: emerging lessons from COVID-19. Qual. Health Res. 30(14), 2192–2204 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323209515261049732320951526
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Melis, G., Sala, E., Zaccaria, D. (2022). The Role of Information and Communication Technologies in Researching Older People During the Covid-19 Pandemic. In: Gao, Q., Zhou, J. (eds) Human Aspects of IT for the Aged Population. Design, Interaction and Technology Acceptance. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13330. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05581-2_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05581-2_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05580-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05581-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)