Skip to main content

Provocative Testing

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Short Stay Management of Chest Pain

Part of the book series: Contemporary Cardiology ((CONCARD))

  • 438 Accesses

Abstract

Provocative cardiac testing has had an important role in recent advances in the management of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with chest pain (CP). These patients comprise a majority of those presenting to the ED with CP, and provocative cardiac testing is one of the approaches that has facilitated safe, rapid, and cost-effective evaluation of these patients. The major methods for provocative testing in this setting are treadmill exercise (ETT), stress echocardiography (SE), and myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Cardiac magnetic resonance has also had limited application in low-risk patients presenting with CP. In addition to cardiac provocation by exercise, pharmacologic agents can be utilized for this purpose in all of the imaging techniques noted above. Although these methods differ in methodology, applicability, limitations, adverse effects, and sensitivity and specificity for detection of coronary artery disease and myocardial ischemia, they all have very high negative predictive values for excluding a coronary event in low-risk patients presenting with CP. This factor, in association with a low-risk clinical evaluation, has promoted the development of accelerated diagnostic protocols which have enabled early discharge of the low-risk patient.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Bluemke DA, Diercks D, Farkouh ME, Garvey JL, Kontos MC, McCord J, Miller TD, Morise A, Newby LK, Ruberg FL, Scordo KA, Thompson PD. Testing of low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;122:1756–76.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Amsterdam EA, Kirk JD, Diercks DB, Lewis WR, Turnipseed SD. Immediate exercise testing to evaluate low-risk patients presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:251–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Stauber SM, Teleten A, Li Z, Venugopal S, Amsterdam EA. Prognosis of low-risk young women presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 2015;117:36–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prasad P, Sharma A, Vipparla N, Majid M, Daniela A, Howell S, Wilson M, Amsterdam EA. Identification and management of intermediate risk patients in the chest pain unit. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2019;19:26–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eddin M, Venugopal S, Chatterton B, Thinda A, Amsterdam EA. Long-term prognosis of low-risk women presenting to the emergency department with chest pain. Am J Med. 2017;130:313–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Howell SJ, Bui JB, Balasingam T, Amsterdam EA. Utility of Physician Selection of Cardiac Tests in a Chest Pain Unit to Exclude Acute Coronary Syndrome Among Patients Without a History of Coronary Artery Disease. Am J Cardiol. 2018;121:825–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Howell SJ, Prasad P, Vipparla NS, Venugopal S, Amsterdam EA. Usefulness of predischarge cardiac testing in low risk women and men for safe, rapid discharge from a chest pain unit. Am J Cardiol. 2019;123:1772–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Amsterdam EA, Takahashi N, Majid M, Taha S, Alismail Y, Venugopal S. Chapter “Exercise electrocardiographic stress testing”. In: Wong N, Amsterdam EA, Toth PP, editors. ASPC manual of preventive cardiology. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Humana Press; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chaitman BR. Exercise electrocardiographic stress testing. In: Beller GA, editor. Chronic ischemic heart disease. In Braunwald E (series ed), Atlas of heart diseases. Vol 5. Chronic Ischemic Heart Disease. Philadelphia, Current Medicine; 1995. p. 2.1–2.30.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Takahashi N, Gall E, Fan D, Majid M, Amsterdam EA. ST elevation during recovery phase of exercise test. Am J Med. 2020;133:1287–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Beri N, Dang P, Bhat A, Venugopal S, Amsterdam EA. Usefulness of excellent functional capacity in men and women with ischemic exercise electrocardiography to predict a negative stress imaging test and very low late mortality. Am J Cardiol. 2019;124:661–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Farkouh M, Smars PA, Reeder GS, Zinsmeister AR, Evans RW, Meloy TD, Kopecky SL, Allison TG, Gibbons RJ, Gabriel SE. A clinical trial of a chest-pain observation unit for patients with unstable angina. NEJM. 1998;339:1882–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gomez MA, Anderson JL, Labros AK, Muhlestein JB, Mooders FB. An emergency department-based protocol for rapidly ruling out myocardial ischemia reduces hospital time and expense: results of a randomized study (ROMIO). J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28:25–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Amsterdam EA, Aman E. The patient with chest pain. Low risk, high stakes. JAMA Intern Med. 2014;174:553–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Winchester DE, Brandt J, Schmidt C, Allen B, Payton T, Amsterdam EA. Diagnostic yield of routine noninvasive cardiovascular testing in low-risk acute chest pain patients. Am J Cardiol. 2015;116:204–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Amsterdam EA, Venugopal S. Utility of simplicity for low-risk chest pain patients. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2018;7:285–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Booth J, Thomas JJ. Provocative testing for low-risk chest pain patients, must we continue? J Nucl Cardiol. 2019;26:1647–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Trippi JA, Lee KS, Kopp G, Nelson DR, King GY, Cordel WH. Dobutamine stress tele- echocardiography for evaluation of emergency department patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30:627–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Trippi JA, Lee KS. Dobutamine stress tele-echocardiography as a clinical service in the emergency department to evaluate patients with chest pain. Echocardiography. 1999;16:179–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davies R, Liu G, Sciamanna C, Davidson WR Jr, Leslie DL, Foy AJ. Comparison of the effectiveness of stress echocardiography versus myocardial perfusion imaging in patients presenting to the emergency department with low-risk chest pain. Am J Cardiol. 2016;118:786–1791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Levsky JM, Haramati LB, Spevack DM, Menegus MA, Chen T, Mizrachi S, Brown-Manhertz D, Selesny S, Lerer R, White DJ, Tobin JN, Taub CC, Garcia MJ. Coronary computed tomography angiography versus stress echocardiography in acute chest pain: a randomized controlled trial. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11:1288–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Jasani G, Papas M, Patel AJ, Jasani N, Levine B, Zhang Y, Marshall ES. Immediate stress echocardiography for low-risk chest pain patients in the emergency department: a prospective observational cohort study. J Emerg Med. 2018;54:156–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Samiei N, Parsaee M, Pourafkari L, Tajlil A, Pasbani Y, Rafati A, Nader ND. Value of negative stress echocardiography in predicting cardiovascular events among adults with no known coronary disease. J Cardiovasc Thorac Res. 2019;11:85–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Lewis WR, Arsna FJ, Galloway MT, Bommer WJ. Acute myocardial infarction associated with dobutamine stress echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 1997;10:576–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Henzlova MJ, Duvall WL, Einstein AJ, Travin MI, Verberne HJ. ASNC imaging guidelines for SPECT nuclear cardiology procedures: stress, protocols, and tracers. J Nucl Cardiol. 2016;23:606–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Udelson JE, Beshansky JR, Ballin DS, Feldman JA, Griffith JL, Handler J, Heller GV, Hendel RC, Pope JH, Ruthazer R, Spiegler EJ, Woolard RH, Selker HP. Myocardial perfusion imaging for evaluation and triage of patients with suspected acute cardiac ischemia: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002;288:2693–7000.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nabi F, Kassi M, Muhyieddeen K, Chang SM, Xu J, Peterson L, Wray N, Shirkey B, Ashton C, Mahmarian J. Optimizing evaluation of patients with low-to-intermediate-risk acute chest pain: a randomized study comparing stress myocardial perfusion tomography incorporating stress-only imaging versus cardiac CT. J Nucl Med. 2016;2016(57):378–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rybicki FJ, Udelson JE, Peacock WF, Goldhaber SZ, Isselbacher EM, Kazerooni E, Kontos MC, Litt H, Woodard PK, Emergency Department Patients With Chest Pain Rating Panel; Appropriate Utilization of Cardiovascular Imaging Oversight Committee. ACR/ACC/AHA/AATS/ACEP/ASNC/NASCI/SAEM/SCCT/SCMR/SCPC/SNMMI/STR/STS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:853–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Amirian J, Javdan O, Misher J, et al. Comparative efficiency of exercise stress testing with and without stress-only myocardial perfusion imaging in patients with low-risk chest pain. J Nucl Cardiol. 2018;25:1274–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Ingkanisorn PW, Kwong RW, Bohme NS, Geller NL, Rhoads KL, Dyke CK, Paterson DI, Mushabbar AS, Aletras AH, Arai AE. Prognosis of negative adenosine stress magnetic resonance in patients presenting to an emergency department with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47:1427–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Lerakis S, McLean DS, Anadiotis AV, Janik M, Oshinski JN, Alexopoulos N, Zaragoza-Macias E, Veledar E, Stillman AE. Prognostic value of adenosine stress cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with low-risk chest pain. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Heitner JF, Klem I, Rasheed D, Chandra A, Kim HW, Van Assche LM, Parker M, Judd RM, Jollis JG, Kim RJ. Stress cardiac MR imaging compared with stress echocardiography in the early evaluation of patients who present to the emergency department with intermediate-risk chest pain. Radiology. 2014;271:56–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Balfour PC Jr, Gonzalez JA, Kramer CM. Non-invasive assessment of low- and intermediate-risk patients with chest pain. Trends Cardiovasc Med. 2017;27:182–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ezra A. Amsterdam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Amsterdam, E.A., Venugopal, S., Majid, M., Aman, E. (2022). Provocative Testing. In: Pena, M., Osborne, A., Peacock, W.F. (eds) Short Stay Management of Chest Pain. Contemporary Cardiology. Humana, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05520-1_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05520-1_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Humana, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05519-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05520-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics