Skip to main content

Critical, Restless, and Relevant: Realism as Normative Thought

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polarity in International Relations

Part of the book series: Governance, Security and Development ((GSD))

Abstract

This chapter engages realism as a tradition of thought invariably entangled with a normative drive to speak truth to power. To understand political power, realists hold, is to seek to restrain it. Yet, realist restraint risks leaving the human field barren and void of aspiration, in turn enabling “strong man” politics and unrestrained power. Realism has therefore always sought to take root in the aspiration for human well-being that so fuels liberalism while at the same time serving as liberalism’s critical next of kin. To detach realism from liberalism is thus to misunderstand the tradition. Instead, we must appreciate realism as the enduring corrective to liberalism, the travel companion that guards against excess and warns against unbounded aspiration. When realism counters the certitude of purpose that comes with aspiration, it is critical; when it seeks to anchor human values in imperfect institutions, it becomes restless; and when it reminds us that political and human responsibility is to balance the desirable and the responsible, it remains, as ever, relevant.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Almond, G. A., & Ver, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bendix, R., & Roth, G. (1971). Scholarship and partisanship: Essays on Max Weber. University of California Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H. (1945). Nationalism and after. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr, E. H., & Cox, M. (2016). The twenty years’ Crisis, 1919–1939. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Desch, M. C. (2018). Cult of the irrelevant: The waning Influence of social science on national security. Princeton Studies in International History and Politics. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, K. W., & Singer, D. J. (1964, April). Multipolar power systems and international stability. World Politics, XVI, 390–406.

    Google Scholar 

  • Easton, D. (1965). A systems analysis of political life. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, N. (2015). Kissinger: 1923–1968: The idealist. Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. (2011). Unipolarity and world politics: A theory and its implications. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hitchens, C. (2001). The trial of Henry Kissinger. Book, Whole. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobson, J. A. (1917). Democracy after the war. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, S. (1974). Decline or renewal? France since the 1930s. Viking Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, M. (2008). War and the liberal conscience (2008th ed.). Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jentleson, B. W., & Ratner, E. (2011). Bridging the beltway—Ivory Tower gap. International Studies Review, 13(1), 6–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. A. (1957). A world restored: Metternich, Castlereagh and the problems of peace, 1812–22. Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. A. (1979). White House years. Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. A. (1994). Diplomacy. Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kissinger, H. A. (2011). On China. Penguin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Machiavelli, N. (1996). Discourses on Livy. University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mearsheimer, J., & Walt, S. M. (2013). Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for international relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 427–457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • More, T. (2016). Utopia. Gyldendal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (1946). Scientific man vs. power politics. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgenthau, H. J. (2012). The concept of the political. Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Niebuhr, R. (1960). Moral man and immoral society: A study in ethics and politics. Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott, D. (2014). Had a distinct template for a ‘Western Way of War’ been established before 1800? In H. Strachan & S. Scheipers (Eds.), The changing character of war (pp. 48–63). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, T. (1964). The social system. Free Press of Glencoe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preble, C. (2017). Bridging the gap: Managing expectations, improving communications. Journal of Strategic Studies, 40(1–2), 275–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rynning, S., Schmitt, O., & Theussen, A. (2021). (eds.) War time: Temporality and the decline of Western Military power. Brookings.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheuerman, W. E. (1999). Carl schmitt: The end of law. Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, B. C. (2012). International relations and the first great debate. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, C. (1996). The Concept of the Political. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, E. (2013). War from the ground up: Twenty-first century combat as politics. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, A.-M. (2004). A new world order. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, H. (2014). Strategy in the twenty-first century. In H. Strachan & S. Scheipers (Eds.), The changing character of war (pp. 503–521). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strachan, H. (2020). Strategy and democracy. Survival, 62(2), 51–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuchman, B. W., & MacMillan, M. 2012. The guns of August: The proud tower. Library of America.

    Google Scholar 

  • von Clausewitz, C., Howard, M., & Paret, P. (1984). On war. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wæver, O. (1996). The rise and fall of the inter-paradigm debate. In S. Smith, K. Booth, & M. Zalewski (Eds.), International theory: Positivism and beyond (pp. 149–185). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. M. (1999). Rigor or Rigor Mortis? Rational choice and security studies. International Security, 23(4), 5–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walt, S. M. (2020, August 17). China and the United States are in a race to lose power. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/08/17/china-and-the-united-states-are-in-a-race-to-lose-power

  • Waltz, K. N. (1964, Summer). Stability of the bipolar world. Daedelus, XCIII, 881–909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics (1st ed.). McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. N. (2018). Man, the state and war: A theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., Dreijmanis, J., & Wells, G. C. (2008). Max Weber’s complete writings on academic and political vocations. Algora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M., Gerth, H. H., & Wright, C. M. (2009). From Max Weber: Essays in sociology. Routledge Classics in Sociology. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolfers, A. (1952). National security as an ambiguous symbol. Political Science Quarterly, 67(4), 481–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, L. B. (2011). The Vietnam War debate: Hans J. Morgenthau and the attempt to halt the drift into disaster. Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sten Rynning .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Rynning, S. (2022). Critical, Restless, and Relevant: Realism as Normative Thought. In: Græger, N., Heurlin, B., Wæver, O., Wivel, A. (eds) Polarity in International Relations. Governance, Security and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics