Skip to main content

The US Unipolar World Order and China’s Rise

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Polarity in International Relations

Part of the book series: Governance, Security and Development ((GSD))

  • 978 Accesses

Abstract

The “assertive turn” in Chinese foreign and security policy and the intensifying US-China great power rivalry developing over the recent decade—and centred in East Asia—are unavoidable consequences of the weakening US unipolarity. The years with China’s “peaceful development” strategy and the accompanying “keeping a low profile” guidelines stand as an intermediate waiting period, where the neorealist rules of the game were on hold. However, applying the neorealist arguments on the specific dynamics under unipolarity developed in particular by Birthe Hansen allows us to understand Beijing’s manoeuvring in the US unipolar world order. This further provides a solid platform to discuss how in a post-US unipolar world order to avoid US-China great power rivalry in East Asia developing into military conflict.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Breslin, S. (2018). Global reordering and China’s rise: Adoption, adaption and reform, International Spectator. Italian Journal of International Affairs, 53(1), 57–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks, S. G., & Wohlforth, W. C. (2016). The rise and fall of the great powers in the twenty-first century. International Security, 40(3), 7–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buzan, B. (2014). The logic and contradictions of ‘peaceful rise/development’ as China’s grand strategy. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 7(4), 381–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai, P. (2017, March 22). Understanding China’s belt and road initiative. Lowy Institute Analyses. https://www.lowyinstitute.org/publications/understanding-belt-and-road-initiative

  • Christensen, T. (2015). The China challenge. W. W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cossa, R. A., & Glosserman, B. (2021, January). Multilateralism (still) matters in/to Asia. Comparative Connections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dittmer, L. (2010). On China’s rise. In B. Womack (Ed.), China’s rise in historical perspective (pp. 39–60). Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doshi, R. (2021). The long game: China’s grand strategy to displace American order. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fravel, T. (2019). Active defense: China’s Military strategy since 1949. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Friedberg, A. L. (2015). Competing with China. Survival, 60(3), 7–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A. (2005). Rising to the challenge: China’s grand strategy and international security Stanford. Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, B. (2011). Unipolarity and world politics: A theory and its implications. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hass, R. (2021). Stronger. Adapting America’s China strategy in an age of competitive interdependence. Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heath, T. R. (2014, June 11). China and the U.S. alliance system. The Diplomat. https://thediplomat.com/2014/06/china-and-the-u-s-alliance-system/

  • Jia, Q. (2007, November). Danji Shijie yu Zhongguo de Heping Fazhan (Unipolarity and China’s peaceful development). International Politics Quarterly, 4, 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, A. I. (2013). How new and assertive is China’s new assertiveness? International Security, 37(4), 7–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Limaye, S. (2021, January). India-East Asia relations: Acting across the Indo-Pacific, actually and virtually. Comparative Connections.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lobell, S. E. (2018). A granular theory of balancing. International Studies Quarterly, 62(3), 593–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T. V. (2004). Introduction: The enduring axioms of balance of power theory and their contemporary relevance. In Thazah V. Paul, James J. Wirtz, & Michel Fortmann (EDs.), Balance of power. Theory and practice in the 21st Century (pp. 1–25). Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paul, T. V. (2018). Restraining great powers: Soft balancing from empires to the global era. Yale University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schweller, R. L. (2004). Unanswered threats: A neoclassical realist theory of underbalancing. International Security, 29(2), 159–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweller R. L., & Pu X. (2011). After unipolarity: China’s visions of international order in an era of U.S. decline. International Security, 36(1), 41–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shih, C. (2005). Breeding a reluctant dragon: Can China rise into partnership and away from antagonism? Review of International Studies, 131, 755–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, C. T. N. (2015). The significance of Xi Jinping’s ‘Chinese Dream’ for Chinese foreign policy: From ‘Tao Guang Yang Hui’ to ‘Fen Fa You Wei.’ Journal of China and International Relations, 3(1), 53–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen, C. T. N. (2019). That is not intervention; That is interference with Chinese characteristics: New concepts, distinctions and approaches developing in the Chinese debate and foreign and security policy practice. The China Quarterly, 239, 594–613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, N. (2019, September 3). Matters of record: Relitigating engagement with China. Macro Polo. https://macropolo.org/analysis/china-us-engagement-policy/

  • Townshend, A., & Jim G. (2020, April 8). Fighting corona will strain US military capacity in the Indo-Pacific. The Interpreter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J. (2011). China’s search for a grand strategy. Foreign Affairs, March-April

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, J. (2020). Infrastructure choices and the future of the Indo-Pacific. Security Challenges, 16(3), 64–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohlforth, W. C. (1999). The stability of a unipolar world. International Security, 24(1), 5–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Womack, B. (2015). China and the future status quo. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8(2), 115–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu, J., & Du, Z. (2015). The dominant thinking sets in Chinese foreign policy research: A criticism. The Chinese Journal of International Politics, 8(3), 251–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Camilla T. N. Sørensen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sørensen, C.T.N. (2022). The US Unipolar World Order and China’s Rise. In: Græger, N., Heurlin, B., Wæver, O., Wivel, A. (eds) Polarity in International Relations. Governance, Security and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics