Abstract
This chapter revisits Birthe Hansen’s ‘Unipolarity and World Politics’ (2011) to re-evaluate Hansen’s proposed relationship between the United States as a unipole and the political project(s) of post-Cold War US administrations. The drafted but unrealized 1992 Defense Planning Guidance for American unipolarity developed during the Bush Sr. administration serves as a ‘maximization strategy’ against which political projects from the Clinton to the Trump administrations are examined. It is shown that consecutive American management of the delta of unipolarity through political projects pursuing a globalized liberal world order has resulted in misalignment between the objective of maintaining a ‘single option’ system and a world order conducive to this goal. The chapter identifies four distinct political projects: Clinton's globalization as economics, Bush's globalization as Westernization, Obama's globalization as multilateralism and Trump's anti-globalization as patriotism and it concludes on the misalignment of each in regard to the American world order.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Acharya, A. (2017). After liberal hegemony: The advent of a multiplex world order. Ethics & International Affairs, 31(3), 271–285.
Ajemian, R. (1987, January 26). Where is the real George Bush? Time. http://content.time.com/time/subscriber/article/0,33009,963342-2,00.html
Beckley, M. (2018). Unrivaled: Why America will remain the world’s sole superpower (Unabridged). Cornell University Press.
Blanchette, J. (2020, January 20). The case of Xi Jinping. The Asan Forum. https://theasanforum.org/the-case-of-xi-jinping/
Brands, H. (2018a). Choosing primacy: U.S. strategy and global order at the dawn of the Post-Cold War Era. https://doi.org/10.15781/T2VH5D166
Brands, H. (2018b). The Chinese Century? The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/the-chinese-century-24557
Brinkley, D. (1997). Democratic enlargement: The Clinton doctrine. Foreign Policy, 106, 111–127.
Brooks, D. (2004). The Neocon cabal and other fantasies. In I. Stelzer (Ed.), The Neocon Reader (pp. 39–42). Grove Press.
Brooks, S. G. (2012). Can we identify a benevolent hegemon? Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 25(1), 27–38.
Bush, G. W. (2001). Address to the nation on the September 11 attacks. Retrieved July 19, 2021.
Bush, G. W. (2005). The second inaugural address. Retrieved July 19, 2021, from https://georgewbushwhitehouse.archives.gov/infocus/bushrecord/documents/Selected_Speeches_George_W_Bush.pdf
Chollet, D., & Goldgeier, J. (2008). America between the Wars: From 11/9 to 9/11 (1st ed.). PublicAffairs.
Clinton, B. (2000a, December 8). A foreign policy for the global age—Address to the University of Nebraska. Cushing Health and Sports Center University of Nebraska at Kearney.
Clinton, B. (2000b, March 9). President Clinton’s speech today at the Paul H. Nitze School of Advanced International Studies of the Johns Hopkins University, as recorded by the Federal News Service. Retrieved July 19, 2021, from https://clintonwhitehouse5.archives.gov/WH/Accomplishments/eightyears-10.html
Cooley, A., & Nexon, D. H. (2021, January 30). How hegemony ends. Foreign Affairs. https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/united-states/2020-06-09/how-hegemony-ends
Davis, B. (2018, July 27). When the world opened the gates of China. Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/when-the-world-opened-the-gates-of-china-1532701482
DPG92. (1992). Draft of defence planning guidance 1992. United States Department of Defence.
Farrell, H., & Newman, A. L. (2019). Weaponized interdependence: How global economic networks shape state coercion. International Security, 44(1), 42–79.
Fukuyama, F. (1989). The end of history? The National Interest, 16, 3–18. Retrieved July 19, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk:2048/stable/24027184
Goldberg, J. (2016). The Obama Doctrine. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2016/04/the-obama-doctrine/471525/
Goldgeier, J. M. (1999). Not whether but when: The U.S. decision to enlarge NATO (1st ed.). Brookings Institution Press.
Goldman, C. A. (1995). Managing policy toward China under Clinton: The changing role of economics (Working Paper 95-1). Center for the Asia-Pacific Policy, RAND.
Hansen, B. (2011). Unipolarity and world politics: A theory and its implications. Routledge.
Hanson, V. D. (2009). How the Obama administration threatens our national security. Encounter Books (Encounter Broadside, 5).
Holzman, T. (2009, June 4). Obama seeks “new beginning” with Muslim World. NPR.org. https://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=104891406
Horovitz, L., & Götz, E. (2020). The overlooked importance of economics: Why the Bush Administration wanted NATO enlargement. Journal of Strategic Studies, 43(6–7), 847–868.
Kissinger, H. (2017). A world restored: Metternich, Castlereagh, and the problems of peace, 1812–22. Friedland Books.
Krauthammer, C. (1990). The unipolar moment. Foreign Affairs, 70(1), 23–33.
Kristol, W., & Kagan, R. (1996). Toward a neo-reaganite foreign policy. Foreign Affairs, 18–32. https://carnegieendowment.org/1996/07/01/toward-neo-reaganite-foreign-policy-pub-276
Kupchan, C. A. (1998). After Pax Americana: Benign power, regional integration, and the sources of a stable multipolarity. International Security, 23(2), 40–79.
Kupchan, C. A. (2012). No one’s world: The west, the rising rest, and the coming global turn. Oxford University Press.
Mann, J. (2004, March 7). The true rationale? It’s a decade old. Washington Post. https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/2004/03/07/the-true-rationale-its-a-decade-old/81f7247b-bc7b-4750-94c6-e9896dabdaa5/
Mattis, J. (2018). Summary of the 2018 National Defense Strategy—Sharpening the American Military’s Competitive Edge (p. 14).
Miller, P. D. (2010, November 17). Bush on Nation Building and Afghanistan. Foreign Policy. https://foreignpolicy.com/2010/11/17/bush-on-nation-building-and-afghanistan/
NATO. (1995). Study on NATO Enlargement. NATO. http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_24733.html
NSS. (2002). The National Security Strategy of the United States of America 2002 (p. 35). United States Government.
Nye, J. S. (2019). The rise and fall of American hegemony from Wilson to Trump. International Affairs, 95(1), 63–80.
Obama, B. (2009). Remarks by the President at the New Economic School Graduation. whitehouse.gov. https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/remarks-president-new-economic-school-graduation
Obama, B. (2015). National Security Strategy. Retrieved July 20, 2021, from https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/sites/default/files/docs/2015_national_security_strategy_2.pdf
Paravicini, G. (2017, 28 May). Angela Merkel: Europe must take “our fate” into own hands. POLITICO. https://www.politico.eu/article/angela-merkel-europe-cdu-must-take-its-fate-into-its-own-hands-elections-2017/
Patrick, T. E. (1992, March 11). Senior U.S. officials assail lone-superpower policy. New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/1992/03/11/world/senior-us-officials-assail-lone-superpower-policy.html
Powell, R. (1991). Absolute and relative gains in international relations theory. The American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1303–1320.
Repucci, A. S. (2021). Freedom in the World 2021—Democracy under Siege. Freedom House. https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2021/democracy-under-siege
Scott, R. E. (2000). The high cost of the China-WTO deal: Administration’s own analysis suggests spiraling deficits, job losses. Economic Policy Institute. https://www.epi.org/publication/issuebriefs_ib137/
Smith, W. S. (2020). Jeane J. Kirkpatrick: 30 years unheeded. The National Interest. https://nationalinterest.org/feature/jeane-j-kirkpatrick-30-years-unheeded-162667
Stelzer, I. (2004). Neoconservatives and their critics—An introduction. In I. Stelzer (Ed.), The Neocon Reader (pp. 3–28). Grove Press.
Summers, L. H. (1994). The Clinton administration’s international economic policy. Challenge, 37(2), 24–27. Retrieved July 10, 2021, from https://www.jstor.org.proxy1-bib.sdu.dk:2048/stable/40721509
Trump, D. J. (2017a, January 21). Inaugural address: Trump’s full speech. CNN. https://www.cnn.com/2017a/01/20/politics/trump-inaugural-address/index.html
Trump, D. J. (2017b, May 21). President Trump’s Speech to the Arab Islamic American Summit—The White House. Retrieved 20 July, 2021, from https://trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov/briefings-statements/president-trumps-speech-arab-islamic-american-summit/
UN. (2018, September 25). US President Trump rejects globalism in speech to UN General Assembly’s annual debate. UN News. https://news.un.org/en/story/2018/09/1020472
Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.
Waltz, K. N. (2001). Man, the state, and war: A theoretical analysis. Columbia University Press.
Wolff, M. (2016). Ringside with Steve Bannon at Trump Tower as the President-Elect’s Strategist Plots. An Entirely New Political Movement (Exclusive). The Hollywood Reporter. https://www.hollywoodreporter.com/news/general-news/steve-bannon-trump-tower-interview-trumps-strategist-plots-new-political-movement-948747/
Zakaria, F. (2008). The Post-American World (1st ed.). W. W. Norton & Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Jakobsson, A.K. (2022). Managing the Delta of Unipolarity: Post-Cold War Misalignment of American Political Projects and World Order from DPG92 to Trump. In: Græger, N., Heurlin, B., Wæver, O., Wivel, A. (eds) Polarity in International Relations. Governance, Security and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05505-8_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05504-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05505-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)