Abstract
Under the circumstance of continuous variation of COVID-19 virus, verified the temporariness of the vaccines made by various countries. One cannot expect permanent protection by accepting only one dose of vaccine. In order to prepare and respond to the pandemic, many countries are applying different strategies to increase vaccination rates. The WHO appeals to the world to take the vaccine booster shot for community immunity. Relevant authorities then have to provide and spread visual health messages on the booster shot to keep the public informed. This study examine how unofficial organizations can guide and persuade people to adopt relevant health actions more effectively (such as continuous vaccination) by introducing emoji with different emotional valences in different message framing. An online experiment adopted a 2 (emoji: positive versus negative) × 2 (message framing: gain framing versus loss framing) design to investigate the effects of contrary emoji on people’s self-efficacy to continuously take the booster shot. In total of 240 university students were recruited to participate in this study. Within two types of message framing, the experiment simulated 4 pieces of health messages on the COVID-19 booster shot released by an unofficial organization, together with emoji of two emotional valences. The results showed that health messages with negative emoji result in stronger self-efficacy to user. Moreover, there is an interaction effect between emoji and message framing on self-efficacy. This study is intended to provide meaningful insights for health communicators, visual designers and health practitioners concerned.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abhyankar, P., O’connor, D.B., Lawton, R.: The role of message framing in promoting MMR vaccination: evidence of a loss-frame advantage. Psychol. Health Med. 13(1), 1–16 (2008)
Ajzen, I.: The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 50(2), 179–211 (1991)
Ancker, J.S., Senathirajah, Y., Kukafka, R., Starren, J.B.: Design features of graphs in health risk communication: a systematic review. J. Am. Med. Inform. Assoc. 13(6), 608–618 (2006)
Bai, Q., Dan, Q., Mu, Z., Yang, M.: A systematic review of emoji: current research and future perspectives. Front. Psychol. 10, 2221 (2019)
Bandura, A.: Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol. Rev. 84(2), 191 (1977)
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Impact of vaccines universally recommended for children–United States, 1990–1998. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 48(12), 243–248 (1999)
Chang, C.: Seeing is believing: the direct and contingent influence of pictures in health promotion advertising. Health Commun. 28(8), 822–834 (2013)
Chang, C.: Motivated processing: how people perceive news covering novel or contradictory health research findings. Sci. Commun. 37(5), 602–634 (2015)
Cooper, C.P., Roter, D.L.: “If it bleeds it leads”? Attributes of TV health news stories that drive viewer attention. Publ. Health Rep. 115(4), 331 (2000)
Covey, J.: The role of dispositional factors in moderating message framing effects. Health Psychol. 33(1), 52 (2014)
Das, G., Wiener, H.J., Kareklas, I.: To emoji or not to emoji? Examining the influence of emoji on consumer reactions to advertising. J. Bus. Res. 96, 147–156 (2019)
Floyd, D.L., Prentice-Dunn, S., Rogers, R.W.: A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 30(2), 407–429 (2000)
Garcia-Retamero, R., Cokely, E.T.: Effective communication of risks to young adults: using message framing and visual aids to increase condom use and STD screening. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 17(3), 270 (2011)
Gawne, L., McCulloch, G.: Emoji as digital gestures. Lang. Internet 17(2) (2019)
Gesselman, A.N., Ta, V.P., Garcia, J.R.: Worth a thousand interpersonal words: emoji as affective signals for relationship-oriented digital communication. PloS ONE 14(8), e0221297 (2019)
Gibson, R.: Effects of photography on issue perception. In: Communication and Emotion, pp. 331–354. Routledge, London (2003)
Glanz, K., Rimer, B.K., Viswanath, K. (eds.): Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice. Wiley, New York (2008)
Gözüm, S., Aksayan, S.: The reliability and validity of Turkish form of the self-efficacy scale. J. Anatolia Nurs. Health Sci. 2(1), 21–32 (1999)
Helme, D.W., Donohew, R.L., Baier, M., Zittleman, L.: A classroom-administered simulation of a television campaign on adolescent smoking: testing an activation model of information exposure. J. Health Commun. 12(4), 399–415 (2007)
Ho, S.S., Peh, X., Soh, V.W.: The cognitive mediation model: factors influencing public knowledge of the H1N1 pandemic and intention to take precautionary behaviors. J. Health Commun. 18(7), 773–794 (2013)
Houts, P.S., Doak, C.C., Doak, L.G., Loscalzo, M.J.: The role of pictures in improving health communication: a review of research on attention, comprehension, recall, and adherence. Patient Educ. Couns. 61(2), 173–190 (2006)
Jaeger, S.R., Lee, S.M., Kim, K.O., Chheang, S.L., Roigard, C.M., Ares, G.: CATA and RATA questions for product-focused emotion research: five case studies using emoji questionnaires. Food Qual. Prefer. 68, 342–348 (2018)
Kaye, L.K., et al.: How emotional are emoji?: Exploring the effect of emotional valence on the processing of emoji stimuli. Comput. Hum. Behav. 116, 106648 (2021)
Kaye, S.A., White, M.J., Lewis, I.: The use of neurocognitive methods in assessing health communication messages: a systematic review. J. Health Psychol. 22(12), 1534–1551 (2017)
King, A.J., Lazard, A.J.: Advancing visual health communication research to improve infodemic response. Health Commun. 35(14), 1723–1728 (2020)
Koelen, M.A., Lindström, B.: Making healthy choices easy choices: the role of empowerment. Eur. J. Clin. Nutr. 59(1), S10–S16 (2005)
Kralj Novak, P., Smailović, J., Sluban, B., Mozetič, I.: Sentiment of emojis. PloS ONE 10(12), e0144296 (2015)
Lo, S.K.: The nonverbal communication functions of emoticons in computer-mediated communication. Cyberpsychol. Behav. 11(5), 595–597 (2008)
Lu, X., et al.: Learning from the ubiquitous language: an empirical analysis of emoji usage of smartphone users. In: Proceedings of the 2016 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive and Ubiquitous Computing, pp. 770–780, September 2016
Mackintosh, N.: Self-empowerment in health promotion: a realistic target? Br. J. Nurs. 4(21), 1273–1278 (1995)
Maibach, E., Flora, J.A., Nass, C.: Changes in self-efficacy and health behavior in response to a minimal contact community health campaign. Health Commun. 3(1), 1–15 (1991)
Marengo, D., Giannotta, F., Settanni, M.: Assessing personality using emoji: An exploratory study. Pers. Individ. Differ. 112, 74–78 (2017)
McClain, C., Rainie, L.: The challenges of contact tracing as US battles COVID-19| Pew Research Center. Technical report, October 2020 (2020). https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2020/10/30/the-challenges-of-contact-tracing-as-us-battles-covid-19
O’Connor, E.L., White, K.M.: Willingness to trial functional foods and vitamin supplements: the role of attitudes, subjective norms, and dread of risks. Food Qual. Prefer. 21(1), 75–81 (2010)
O’Keefe, D.J., Nan, X.: The relative persuasiveness of gain-and loss-framed messages for promoting vaccination: a meta-analytic review. Health Commun. 27(8), 776–783 (2012)
Pinto, V.R.A., et al.: Health beliefs towards kefir correlate with emotion and attitude: a study using an emoji scale in Brazil. Food Res. Int. 129, 108833 (2020)
Plous, S.: The Psychology of Judgment and Decision Making. Mcgraw-Hill Book Company, New York (1993)
Prati, G., Pietrantoni, L., Zani, B.: Influenza vaccination: the persuasiveness of messages among people aged 65 years and older. Health Commun. 27(5), 413–420 (2012)
Ray, E.C., Merle, P.F.: Disgusting face, disease-ridden place?: Emoji influence on the interpretation of restaurant inspection reports. Health Commun. 1–12 (2020)
Rimal, R.N., Lapinski, M.K., Turner, M.M., Smith, K.: The attribute-centered approach for understanding health behaviors: initial ideas and future research directions. Stud. Commun. Sci. 11(1), 15–34 (2011)
Robus, C.M., Hand, C.J., Filik, R., Pitchford, M.: Investigating effects of emoji on neutral narrative text: evidence from eye movements and perceived emotional valence. Comput. Hum. Behav. 109, 106361 (2020)
Rosenstock, I.M.: Historical origins of the health belief model. Health Educ. Monogr. 2(4), 328–335 (1974)
Rosenstock, I.M., Strecher, V.J., Becker, M.H.: Social learning theory and the health belief model. Health Educ. Q. 15(2), 175–183 (1988)
Rothman, A.J., Martino, S.C., Bedell, B.T., Detweiler, J.B., Salovey, P.: The systematic influence of gain-and loss-framed messages on interest in and use of different types of health behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 25(11), 1355–1369 (1999)
Rothman, A.J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., Martin, C.D.: The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 29(5), 408–433 (1993)
Sheeran, P., et al.: The impact of changing attitudes, norms, and self-efficacy on health-related intentions and behavior: a meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 35(11), 1178 (2016)
Smailović, J., Sluban, B., Mozetič, I.: Sentiment of emojis. PLoS ONE 10(12), e0144296 (2015)
Slovic, P., Peters, E., Finucane, M.L., MacGregor, D.G.: Affect, risk, and decision making. Health Psychol. 24(4S), S35 (2005)
Spinelli, S., Masi, C., Zoboli, G.P., Prescott, J., Monteleone, E.: Emotional responses to branded and unbranded foods. Food Qual. Prefer. 42, 1–11 (2015)
Stout, M.E., Christy, S.M., Winger, J.G., Vadaparampil, S.T., Mosher, C.E.: Self-efficacy and HPV vaccine attitudes mediate the relationship between social norms and intentions to receive the HPV vaccine among college students. J. Community Health 45(6), 1187–1195 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-020-00837-5
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481), 453–458 (1981)
Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. In: Wright, G. (ed.) Behavioral decision making, pp. 25–41. Springer, Boston (1985). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4613-2391-4_2
Weimer, D.L., Vining, A.R.: Policy Analysis: Concepts and Practice. Routledge, London (2017)
Witte, K., Allen, M.: A meta-analysis of fear appeals: implications for effective public health campaigns. Health Educ. Behav. 27(5), 591–615 (2000)
Ye, W., Li, Q., Yu, S.: Persuasive effects of message framing and narrative format on promoting COVID-19 vaccination: a study on chinese college students. Int. J. Environ. Res. Publ. Health 18(18), 9485 (2021)
Yu, N., Ahern, L.A., Connolly-Ahern, C., Shen, F.: Communicating the risks of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder: effects of message framing and exemplification. Health Commun. 25(8), 692–699 (2010)
Zajonc, R.B.: Feeling and thinking: preferences need no inferences. Am. Psychol. 35(2), 151 (1980)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lin, T.S., Luo, Y. (2022). Evaluating Intertwined Effects of Emoji and Message Framing to Vaccine Communication Strategy. In: Salvendy, G., Wei, J. (eds) Design, Operation and Evaluation of Mobile Communications. HCII 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13337. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05014-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-05013-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-05014-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)