Skip to main content

Effects of Students’ Interaction Patterns on Cognitive Processes in Blended Learning

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education (ICCSEEA 2022)

Abstract

In the blended learning context, learners’ interactive and cognitive processes are dynamically intertwined. Using content analysis, Social Network Analysis (SNA), and Epistemic Network Analysis (ENA), this study investigated the interplay of interaction patterns and cognitive processes by integrated online and offline learning traces data. The research participants were 75 undergraduate students. The results revealed that, as well as social interaction patterns in the discussion forum, the learner-content interaction affects the cognitive stages and learning performance. There were significant differences in learners’ interactive and cognitive processes between high- and low-performance groups. High-performance groups with higher cognitive stages seem to engage more actively in viewing extended readings, watching lecture videos, and peer interaction. However, low-performance groups preferred to access the learning guideline and participate in answering the teacher’s questions. These findings offer a fresh perspective on the interplay between the interactive and cognitive processes in BL.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Dziuban, C., Graham, C.R., Moskal, P.D., Norberg, A., Sicilia, N.: Blended learning: the new normal and emerging technologies. Int. J. Educ. Technol. High. Educ. 15(1), 1–16 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Matheos, K., Cleveland-Innes, M.: Blended learning: enabling higher education reform. Revista Eletrnica deEducao 12(1), 238–244 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang, S., Liu, Q., Chen, W., et al.: Interactive networks and social knowledge construction behavioral patterns in primary school teachers’ online collaborative learning activities. Comput. Educ. 104(Jan), 1–17 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Njenga, S.T., Oboko, R.O., Omwenga, E.I., Maina, E.M.: Use of intelligent agents in collaborative m-learning: case of facilitating group learner interactions. Int. J. Mod. Educ. Comput. Sci. (IJMECS) 9(10), 18–28 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Garrison, D.R., Shale, D.: Education at a distance: from issues to practice. R.E. Krieger Pub. Co. (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Siemens, G.: Connectivism: a learning theory for the digital age. Int. J. Instr. Technol. Distance Learn. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zacharis, N.Z.: Classification and regression trees (CART) for predictive modeling in blended learning. Int. J. Intell. Syst. Appl. (IJISA) 10(3), 1–9 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gunawardena, C.N., Lowe, C.A., Anderson, T.: Analysis of a global online debate and the development of an interaction analysis model for examining social construction of knowledge in computer conferencing. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 17(4), 397–431 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sharma, S., Purohit, G.N.: A new centrality measure for tracking online community in social network. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Comput. Sci. (IJITCS) 4(4), 47–53 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shaffer, D.W., Collier, W., Ruis, A.R.: A tutorial on epistemic network analysis: analyzing the structure of connections in cognitive, social, and interaction data. J. Learn. Anal. 3(3), 9–45 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shaffer, D.W., Ruis, A.R.: Epistemic network analysis: a worked example of theory-based learning analytics. In: Handbook of Learning Analytics (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Siebert-Evenstone, A., Arastoopour Irgens, G., Collier, W., Swiecki, Z., Ruis, A.R., Williamson Shaffer, D.: In search of conversational grain size: modelling semantic structure using moving stanza windows. J. Learn. Anal. 4(3), 123–139 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hod, Y., Katz, S., Eagan, B.: Refining qualitative ethnographies using epistemic network analysis: a study of socioemotional learning dimensions in a humanistic knowledge building community. Comput. Educ. 156, 103943 (2020)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

This work is supported by the Project of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [number: 61977036].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wenhui Peng .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Wang, Z., Peng, W. (2022). Effects of Students’ Interaction Patterns on Cognitive Processes in Blended Learning. In: Hu, Z., Dychka, I., Petoukhov, S., He, M. (eds) Advances in Computer Science for Engineering and Education. ICCSEEA 2022. Lecture Notes on Data Engineering and Communications Technologies, vol 134. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04812-8_39

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics