Abstract
Public–Private Partnership (PPP) is deployed in road and highway development across the world. Following the global trend, India also deployed the PPP in its highway development program, which also includes the development of urban arterial roads. However, whether such urban road development PPP projects are successful is largely an empirical question. This chapter is an attempt to examine whether such urban arterial road projects developed under PPP are successful not only in terms of “cost-time-quality” metrics but also in terms of other project features like strategic planning, detailing, and implementation. It makes a case-comparative analysis of two urban arterial road projects located in two different metropolitan cities in India, which used the PPP into ring road development in a different manner. The study finds that while the strategic planning of urban ring road projects is essential for their success, such projects also require careful project planning (including financing) as well as process management (especially, land acquisition management) for them to become successful. There are more risks in urban arterial road development projects under PPP that affect the timely execution of projects while also leading to cost overruns. Although the PPP ring road projects are costlier and have more risks in execution, they offer better project outcomes such as superior built quality of asset to become “value for money.” The experience of both the urban road PPP projects in India, however, also underlines the importance of institutional capacity and adequate finances. The choice of appropriate PPP model is also important to achieve project success.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Fuel cess is mobilized through the levy of a fixed charge on every unit of fuel consumption (petrol and diesel) in the country that is raised at the time of fuel sale at the outlets.
- 2.
There is a revival of Engineering, Procurement, and Construction (EPC) model, a modified contracts type of PPP, in the recent times with the loss of attraction and appetite for BOT models.
- 3.
There are several risks associated with the PPP projects, which are categorized into (a) internal or contractual risks, (b) external or non-contractual risks. It is this larger set of risks that makes the PPP projects vulnerable to cancelations or stalling or failure (Kalidindi & Thomas, 2002).
- 4.
A comparative analysis involves comparing similar subjects, i.e., projects, areas, and economies. Comparative analysis is attempted recently in infrastructure sector as well, e.g., Shaikh and Narain (2011).
- 5.
Whereas AMC is the local government responsible for urban services within the city, the AUDA is an urban authority whose jurisdiction falls outside AMC limits and extends into the larger region. The jurisdiction of AMC is spread over 409.39 sq. km and that of the AUDA covers 1866.53 sq. km area outside AMC limits.
- 6.
The National Highways Fee (Determination of Rates and Collection) Rules, 2008, later replaced the NHAI Act, which specify the base rate of fee in terms of Rs per km length of road way for different categories of vehicles—light vehicles (car, jeep, van), light commercial vehicle, bus or truck, heavy vehicles or multi-axle load vehicles, and over-sized vehicles. It also gives a formula for revising the rate or fee to current level by using the WPI.
- 7.
For example, suppose a 60-acre TPS that covers a stretch of ring road and adjoining areas has 10 land owners with an equal holding area, i.e., 6 acres. Let the value of each land holding before TPS is Rs 2 mn per acre or Rs 12 million per each holding. If the ring road stretches over 5 acres of land, then the remaining area of holdings reduces to 5.5 acres per holding. But, with the land price rising by 9% after construction of roadway, the value of the holdings will rise to Rs 2.18 mn per acre and total value remains unchanged at Rs 12 million even after a reduction in the total land holding by each land owner. Loss of land is compensated by gain in land value due to the creation of an infrastructure asset like road way.
- 8.
While HMA is the metropolitan area governed by the HMDA, the central city of Hyderabad is governed by the Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation (GHMC).
- 9.
The NORR project also envisaged the development of 33 Radial Ring roads in 4/6/8 lanes (including the widening of some existing roads) during both the phases.
- 10.
The final cost estimates were pegged at Rs 6.99 billion ($107.54 mn) and Rs 67 billion ($1030.77 mn) for Phase I and Phase II, respectively (GoAP, 2012).
- 11.
In fact, the Land acquisition and Rehabilitation & Resettlement Bill, 2013, came much later, but it is comprehensive in coverage in terms of the assessment of compensation and R&R.
Abbreviations
- AMC:
-
Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation
- AUDA:
-
Ahmedabad Urban Development Authority
- BOOT:
-
Build, Own, Operate, and Toll/Transfer
- BOT:
-
Build, Own and Toll/Transfer
- BRTS:
-
Bus Rapid Transit System
- DP:
-
Development Plan
- DPR:
-
Detailed Project Report
- EPC:
-
Engineering, Procurement, and Construction
- FDI:
-
Foreign Direct Investment
- GHMC:
-
Greater Hyderabad Municipal Corporation
- GoAP:
-
Government of Andhra Pradesh
- GoI:
-
Government of India
- HGCL:
-
Hyderabad Growth Corridor Limited
- HMA:
-
Hyderabad Metropolitan Area
- HMDA:
-
Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority
- JICA:
-
Japan International Cooperation Agency
- JV:
-
Joint Venture
- LAA:
-
Land Acquisition Act
- MCA:
-
Model Concession Agreement
- MRTS:
-
Mass Rapid Transit System
- NH:
-
National Highway
- NHAI:
-
National Highways Authority of India
- NHDP:
-
National Highways Development Programme
- NORR:
-
Nehru Outer Ring Road
- PDF:
-
Project Development Fund
- PPP:
-
Public–Private Partnership
- QA:
-
Quality Assurance
- QC:
-
Quality Control
- R&R:
-
Rehabilitation & Resettlement
- RoW:
-
Right of Way
- SEZ:
-
Special Economic Zone
- SH:
-
State Highway
- SLNC:
-
State Level Nodal Committee
- SPPR:
-
Sardar Patel Ring Road
- SPRRIL:
-
Sardar Patel Ring Road Infrastructure Limited
- SPV:
-
Special Purpose Vehicle
- TOT:
-
Toll, Operate, and Transfer
- TPS:
-
Town Planning Scheme
- VFM:
-
Value For Money
- VGF:
-
Viability Gap Fund
- WPI:
-
Wholesale Price Index
- $ 1 (US dollar):
-
₹ 65 (Indian Rupee)
References
3i Network. (2004). India infrastructure report 2004: Ensuring value for money. Oxford University Press.
Agale, B., Chitale, P., & Khanapuri, V. B. (2015). Bandra-Worli sea link project: Learnings from time and cost overruns. In PMI conference proceedings on project management excellence education, research and practice. Project Management Institute (PMI).
Ballaney, S., & Patel, B. (2009). Chapter 24: Using the development plan—Town planning scheme mechanism to appropriate land and build infrastructure. In N. Mohanty, R. Sarkar, & A. Pandey (Eds.), India Infrastructure Report 2009. Oxford University Press.
Datta, A. (2009). Public-private partnerships in India: A case for reform? Economic and Political Weekly, XLIV(33), 73–78.
Devkar, G. A., & Laishram, B. (2015). Gearing up for project management challenges in Indian PPP projects. In PMI conference proceedings on project management excellence education, research and practice. Project Management Institute (PMI).
ESCAP. (2009). A guidebook on public-private partnerships in infrastructure. United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia Pacific (ESCAP).
GoAP. (2005). Policy on rehabilitation and resettlement for project affected families. Government of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP).
GoAP. (2012). Implementation status of infrastructure projects. Infrastructure and Investment Department, Government of Andhra Pradesh (GoAP).
GoI (2006). Minutes of the Empowered Institution held on 22.06.2016. New Delhi: Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, Government of India
Harris, C., & Tadimalla, S. K. (2008). Financing the boom in public-private partnerships in Indian infrastructure: Trends and policy implications (GRIDLINES Note No. 45). PPIAF of the World Bank.
HMDA. (2012). Hyderabad metropolitan development authority (HMDA) official website. www.hmda.gov.in/hgcl.html
Indian Express (2015). HGCL to Collect Toll on ORR from Today. Indian Express, September 4.
Kalidindi, S. N., & Thomas, A. V. (2002). Private sector participation in road projects in India: Assessment and allocation of critical risks. In A. Akintoye, M. Beck, & C. Hardcastle (Eds.), Public-private partnerships: Managing risks and opportunities. Blackwell Publishers.
Kundu, A. (2006). Trends and patterns of urbanisation. In India infrastructure report 2006. Oxford University Press.
Mahalingam, A. (2010). PPP experiences in Indian cities: Barriers, enablers and the way forward. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 134(4), 419–429.
Mahalingam, A. (2013). PPP experiences in Indian states: Bottlenecks, enablers and key issues. Indian Institute of Technology.
MGI. (2010). India’s urban awakening: Building inclusive cities and sustaining economic growth. McKinsey Global Institute (MGI).
Mishra, R. K., Janaki Krishna, P. S., & Rao, M. L. N. (2013). Public—Private partnerships: The sectoral dimensions in India. Bloomsbury Publishing India Pvt Ltd.
Nair, P., & Kumar, D. (2006). Public—Private partnerships: Issues and perspectives. The ICFAI University Press.
Nallathiga, R. (2007). Improving the state of Mumbai’s roads: Reform agenda and strategic framework. NICMAR Journal of Construction Management, XXVII(3), 24–30.
Nallathiga, R. (2009). Land based instruments for urban infrastructure development. In India infrastructure report 2009. Oxford University Press.
Nallathiga, R., & Shah, M. N. (2014). Public private partnerships in road sector in India. In R. K. Mishra, R. Gangakhedkar, S. Misra, & M. C. Sekhar (Eds.), Public private partnerships: The need of the hour. Bloomsbury Publishing India Private Limited.
Rajan, T. A., Gopinath, G., & Behera, M. (2014). PPPs and project overruns: Evidence from road projects in India. Journal of Construction Engineering and Project Management, 140(4), 797–826.
Road Traffic Technology. (2013). Hyderabad outer ring road, India. Road traffic technology project archives.
Sahni, S. (2015). Issues of road sector in India. Local Government Quarterly, LXXXV(2), 22–36.
Shaikh, R. K., & Narain, N. (2011). Comparative analysis of infrastructure PPP projects in BRICS nations. IPCSIT Volume, 20.
Singh, R. (2018). Public private partnerships vs. traditional road projects delivery time, costs and quality (Working paper No. 290). Centre for Development Economics, Delhi School of Economics.
Sivaramakrishnan, K. C., & Kundu, A. (2007). Handbook of urbanization in India. Oxford University Press.
ToI (2010). PVNR Expressway to take a toll on your pocket from Oct. Times of India (ToI), June 4
UMC. (2007). Public-private partnership for road infrastructure development. In Mega cities poised for change, leading practices catalogue 2007. Urban Management Centre (UMC).
World Bank. (2004). Reforming infrastructure: Privatisation, regulation and competition. The World Bank.
Yescombe, E. R. (2007). Public private partnerships: Principles of policy and finance. Butterworth-Heinemann.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nallathiga, R. (2022). Public–Private Partnerships in Roads Sector: A Study of Two Urban Road Projects in India. In: Hakim, S., Clark, R.M., Blackstone, E.A. (eds) Handbook on Public Private Partnerships in Transportation, Vol II. Competitive Government: Public Private Partnerships. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04628-5_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04628-5_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04627-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04628-5
eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)