Skip to main content

Conclusion

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Transferring Asylum Norms to EU Neighbours

Abstract

This chapter summarises the contribution of this book to research on asylum policies, NGO-state relations, post-communist administration, and transfer. Diverse actors shape international transfer processes and outcomes. Some actors shift their role from norm addressees to norm promoters, and vice versa. As norm promoters they select, translate, and disseminate norms, choosing transfer methods, allies, and targets. As norm addressees, they express contestation or approval, resist or support, use and translate the norms. Engaging in multi-scalar activities, these transfer actors construct and renegotiate relations and scales, changing society and state beyond the normative effects of transfer. The practical effects of norm transfer are heterogeneous and unstable for several reasons. First, transfer involves numerous transfer actors who all enjoy leeway. Second, many of the multiple transfer approaches target individuals. Finally, top-down control over policy implementation is limited.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    While Allen and Cochrane (2010) criticise scalar approaches, opposing to them their concept of “reach”, I consider that scales and reach can be complementary (Lacroix, 2022, p. 4).

  2. 2.

    As this book is a case study of multi-scalar transfer processes before being a study of asylum policies in Ukraine, it covered a large variety of actors. This means that it does not offer the same depth and detail on specific phenomena as research that focused specifically on a single site, actor, or issue of a national asylum regime, such as Spire (2008) or Fischer (2009a, 2009b).

  3. 3.

    With growing academic criticism of the category of a supposedly homogenous post-communist, post-socialist, or post-Soviet space (Müller, 2019; Sucală, 2022; Thelen, 2012), increasing time passed since the end of the Soviet Union, and the strong orientation of Ukraine towards the EU and North America especially since 2014, research should not limit itself to comparing the Ukrainian administration to other former Soviet republics but include comparisons to other states. Rather than presupposing persisting similarities among the former Soviet republics this is an open question that needs to be studied.

References

  • Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2010). Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antipode, 42(5), 1071–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x

  • Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Keller, A. (2010). Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system Chris Ansell, Arjen Boin and Ann Keller managing transboundary crises. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 18(4), 195–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayoub, P. M. (2013). Cooperative transnationalism in contemporary Europe: Europeanization and political opportunities for LGBT mobilization in the European Union. European Political Science Review, 5(2), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bierschenk, T., & de Sardan, J.-P. O. (2014). States at work: Dynamics of African bureaucracies. BRILL.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blankenburg, E. (1986). La recherche de l’efficacité de la loi. Réflexions sur l’étude de la mise en œuvre (Le concept «d’implementation»). Droit Et Société, 2, 73–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688959

  • Buzogány, A. (2013). Selective adoption of EU environmental norms in Ukraine. Convergence á La Carte. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(4), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.766039

  • Callon, M. (1986). Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: La domestication des coquilles St-Jacques et des marins pêcheurs dans la baie de St. Brieuc. L’Année Sociologique, 36 numéro spécial La sociologie des Sciences et des Techniques, 169–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cîrstocea, I. (2015). «Se faire une voix». La production internationale du féminisme est-européen des années 1990–2000 L’homme & La Société, 198, 73–94. https://doi.org/10.3917/lhs.198.0073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darley, M. (2014). Les coulisses de la nation. Sociétés Contemporaines, 94(2), 19–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delcour, L. (2016). The EU’s policy transfer to the post-Soviet space: Domestic responses, (Post)-soviet legacies and Russia’s policies [HDR]. Institut d’études politiques de Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dimitrova, A., & Buzogány, A. (2014). Post-accession policy-making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can non-state actors use EU rules to promote better governance? post-accession policy-making in Bulgaria and Romania. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12084

  • Dimitrova, A., & Dragneva, R. (2013). Shaping convergence with the EU in foreign policy and state aid in post-orange Ukraine: Weak external incentives. Powerful Veto Players. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(4), 658–681.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dumoulin, L., & Saurugger, S. (2010). Les policy transfer studies: Analyse critique et perspectives. Critique Internationale, 48(3), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.048.0009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eckhard, S., Lenz, A., Seibel, W., Roth, F., & Fatke, M. (2020). Latent hybridity in administrative crisis management: The German refugee crisis of 2015/16. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa039

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fassin, D., & Kobelinsky, C. (2012). Comment on juge l’asile. Revue Française De Sociologie, 53(4), 657–688.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, N. (2009a). Jeux de regards. Surveillance disciplinaire et contrôle associatif dans les centres de rétention administrative. Genèses, 75, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.3917/gen.075.0045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, N. (2009b). Une frontière «négociée» Politix, 87, 71–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Genova, N. D. (2016). The incorrigible subject: The autonomy of migration and the US immigration stalemate. In A. Oberprantacher & A. Siclodi (Eds.), Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices (pp. 267–285). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51659-6_14

  • Grødeland, Å. B., & Aasland, A. (2011). Civil society in post-communist Europe: Perceptions and use of contacts. Journal of Civil Society, 7(2), 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halluin-Mabillot, E. (2012). Les épreuves de l’asile. Associations et réfugiés face aux politiques du soupçon. EHESS - En temps & lieux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2009). Post-Accession transposition of EU law in the new member states: A cross-country comparison. SSRN Scholarly Paper, ID 1562628. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1562628

  • Kobelinsky, C. (2012). ‘Sont-ils de vrais réfugiés?’ Les tensions morales dans la gestion quotidienne de l’asile. In D. Fassin (Ed.), Economies morales contemporaines (pp. 155–173). La Découverte.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lacroix, T. (2022). The transnational state and migration: Reach, flows and Policies. Political Geography, 94, 102571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langbein, J. (2015). Transnationalization and regulatory change in the EU’s Eastern neighbourhood (Routledge/UACES Contemporary European Studies).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mezzadra, S. (2010). The gaze of autonomy: Capitalism, migration and social struggles. In The contested politics of mobility (pp. 121–142). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miaz, J. (2017). Politique d’asile et sophistication du droit: Pratiques administratives et défense juridique des migrants en Suisse (1981–2015). Strasbourg. http://www.theses.fr/2017STRAG010

  • Müller, M. (2019). Goodbye, postsocialism! Europe-Asia Studies, 71(4), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1578337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mützelburg, I. (2018). L’empowerment par des financements internationaux ? Comment les donateurs créent un secteur non étatique en Ukraine. Revue Gouvernance, 15(1), 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pridham, G. (2008). The EU’s political conditionality and post-accession tendencies: Comparisons from Slovakia and Latvia. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00780.x

  • Sasse, G. (2008). The politics of EU conditionality: The norm of minority protection during and beyond EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 842–860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2013). Resisting EU norms. A framework for analysis. Sciences Po Grenoble Working Paper, n°2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedelmeier, U. (2008). After conditionality: Post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 806–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802196549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spire, A. (2007). L’asile au guichet: La dépolitisation du droit des étrangers par le travail bureaucratique. Actes De La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 169(4), 4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spire, A. (2008). Accueillir ou reconduire: Enquête sur les guichets de l’immigration. Raisons d’agir.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steunenberg, B., & Dimitrova, A. L. (2007). Compliance in the EU enlargement process: The limits of conditionality. EIoP, 11(5). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=995976

  • Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far? Multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in south-eastern Europe. South East European Politics, 6(2), 66–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sucală, V. I. (2022). Is post-communism still relevant today? Post-Communist Economies, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2022.2028479

  • Teteriuk, M. (2015). Gay rights and Europeanization processes in Eastern Europe: The case of bill 2342 “On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine concerning the prevention and combating of discrimination in Ukraine”. Emecon Employment and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 1. http://www.emecon.eu/current-issue/1-2015/maria-teteriuk/

  • Thelen, T. (2012). Economic concepts, common grounds and ‘new’ diversity in the anthropology of post-socialism: Reply to Dunn and Verdery. Critique of Anthropology, 32(1), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X11430874

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Irina Mützelburg .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mützelburg, I. (2022). Conclusion. In: Transferring Asylum Norms to EU Neighbours. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04528-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics