Abstract
This chapter summarises the contribution of this book to research on asylum policies, NGO-state relations, post-communist administration, and transfer. Diverse actors shape international transfer processes and outcomes. Some actors shift their role from norm addressees to norm promoters, and vice versa. As norm promoters they select, translate, and disseminate norms, choosing transfer methods, allies, and targets. As norm addressees, they express contestation or approval, resist or support, use and translate the norms. Engaging in multi-scalar activities, these transfer actors construct and renegotiate relations and scales, changing society and state beyond the normative effects of transfer. The practical effects of norm transfer are heterogeneous and unstable for several reasons. First, transfer involves numerous transfer actors who all enjoy leeway. Second, many of the multiple transfer approaches target individuals. Finally, top-down control over policy implementation is limited.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
As this book is a case study of multi-scalar transfer processes before being a study of asylum policies in Ukraine, it covered a large variety of actors. This means that it does not offer the same depth and detail on specific phenomena as research that focused specifically on a single site, actor, or issue of a national asylum regime, such as Spire (2008) or Fischer (2009a, 2009b).
- 3.
With growing academic criticism of the category of a supposedly homogenous post-communist, post-socialist, or post-Soviet space (Müller, 2019; Sucală, 2022; Thelen, 2012), increasing time passed since the end of the Soviet Union, and the strong orientation of Ukraine towards the EU and North America especially since 2014, research should not limit itself to comparing the Ukrainian administration to other former Soviet republics but include comparisons to other states. Rather than presupposing persisting similarities among the former Soviet republics this is an open question that needs to be studied.
References
Allen, J., & Cochrane, A. (2010). Assemblages of state power: Topological shifts in the organization of government and politics. Antipode, 42(5), 1071–1089. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00794.x
Ansell, C., Boin, A., & Keller, A. (2010). Managing transboundary crises: Identifying the building blocks of an effective response system Chris Ansell, Arjen Boin and Ann Keller managing transboundary crises. Journal of Contingencies & Crisis Management, 18(4), 195–207.
Ayoub, P. M. (2013). Cooperative transnationalism in contemporary Europe: Europeanization and political opportunities for LGBT mobilization in the European Union. European Political Science Review, 5(2), 279–310. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1755773912000161
Bierschenk, T., & de Sardan, J.-P. O. (2014). States at work: Dynamics of African bureaucracies. BRILL.
Blankenburg, E. (1986). La recherche de l’efficacité de la loi. Réflexions sur l’étude de la mise en œuvre (Le concept «d’implementation»). Droit Et Société, 2, 73–94.
Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. https://doi.org/10.1191/030913201682688959
Buzogány, A. (2013). Selective adoption of EU environmental norms in Ukraine. Convergence á La Carte. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(4), 609–630. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.766039
Callon, M. (1986). Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction: La domestication des coquilles St-Jacques et des marins pêcheurs dans la baie de St. Brieuc. L’Année Sociologique, 36 numéro spécial La sociologie des Sciences et des Techniques, 169–208.
Cîrstocea, I. (2015). «Se faire une voix». La production internationale du féminisme est-européen des années 1990–2000 L’homme & La Société, 198, 73–94. https://doi.org/10.3917/lhs.198.0073
Darley, M. (2014). Les coulisses de la nation. Sociétés Contemporaines, 94(2), 19–40.
Delcour, L. (2016). The EU’s policy transfer to the post-Soviet space: Domestic responses, (Post)-soviet legacies and Russia’s policies [HDR]. Institut d’études politiques de Paris.
Dimitrova, A., & Buzogány, A. (2014). Post-accession policy-making in Bulgaria and Romania: Can non-state actors use EU rules to promote better governance? post-accession policy-making in Bulgaria and Romania. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 52(1), 139–156. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12084
Dimitrova, A., & Dragneva, R. (2013). Shaping convergence with the EU in foreign policy and state aid in post-orange Ukraine: Weak external incentives. Powerful Veto Players. Europe-Asia Studies, 65(4), 658–681.
Dumoulin, L., & Saurugger, S. (2010). Les policy transfer studies: Analyse critique et perspectives. Critique Internationale, 48(3), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.3917/crii.048.0009
Eckhard, S., Lenz, A., Seibel, W., Roth, F., & Fatke, M. (2020). Latent hybridity in administrative crisis management: The German refugee crisis of 2015/16. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muaa039
Fassin, D., & Kobelinsky, C. (2012). Comment on juge l’asile. Revue Française De Sociologie, 53(4), 657–688.
Fischer, N. (2009a). Jeux de regards. Surveillance disciplinaire et contrôle associatif dans les centres de rétention administrative. Genèses, 75, 45–65. https://doi.org/10.3917/gen.075.0045
Fischer, N. (2009b). Une frontière «négociée» Politix, 87, 71–92.
Genova, N. D. (2016). The incorrigible subject: The autonomy of migration and the US immigration stalemate. In A. Oberprantacher & A. Siclodi (Eds.), Subjectivation in Political Theory and Contemporary Practices (pp. 267–285). Palgrave Macmillan UK. https://doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-51659-6_14
Grødeland, Å. B., & Aasland, A. (2011). Civil society in post-communist Europe: Perceptions and use of contacts. Journal of Civil Society, 7(2), 129–156.
Halluin-Mabillot, E. (2012). Les épreuves de l’asile. Associations et réfugiés face aux politiques du soupçon. EHESS - En temps & lieux.
Knill, C., & Tosun, J. (2009). Post-Accession transposition of EU law in the new member states: A cross-country comparison. SSRN Scholarly Paper, ID 1562628. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=1562628
Kobelinsky, C. (2012). ‘Sont-ils de vrais réfugiés?’ Les tensions morales dans la gestion quotidienne de l’asile. In D. Fassin (Ed.), Economies morales contemporaines (pp. 155–173). La Découverte.
Lacroix, T. (2022). The transnational state and migration: Reach, flows and Policies. Political Geography, 94, 102571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polgeo.2021.102571
Langbein, J. (2015). Transnationalization and regulatory change in the EU’s Eastern neighbourhood (Routledge/UACES Contemporary European Studies).
Mezzadra, S. (2010). The gaze of autonomy: Capitalism, migration and social struggles. In The contested politics of mobility (pp. 121–142). Routledge.
Miaz, J. (2017). Politique d’asile et sophistication du droit: Pratiques administratives et défense juridique des migrants en Suisse (1981–2015). Strasbourg. http://www.theses.fr/2017STRAG010
Müller, M. (2019). Goodbye, postsocialism! Europe-Asia Studies, 71(4), 533–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2019.1578337
Mützelburg, I. (2018). L’empowerment par des financements internationaux ? Comment les donateurs créent un secteur non étatique en Ukraine. Revue Gouvernance, 15(1), 63–85.
Pridham, G. (2008). The EU’s political conditionality and post-accession tendencies: Comparisons from Slovakia and Latvia. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 46(2), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2007.00780.x
Sasse, G. (2008). The politics of EU conditionality: The norm of minority protection during and beyond EU accession. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 842–860.
Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2013). Resisting EU norms. A framework for analysis. Sciences Po Grenoble Working Paper, n°2.
Sedelmeier, U. (2008). After conditionality: Post-accession compliance with EU law in East Central Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 15(6), 806–825. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760802196549
Spire, A. (2007). L’asile au guichet: La dépolitisation du droit des étrangers par le travail bureaucratique. Actes De La Recherche En Sciences Sociales, 169(4), 4.
Spire, A. (2008). Accueillir ou reconduire: Enquête sur les guichets de l’immigration. Raisons d’agir.
Steunenberg, B., & Dimitrova, A. L. (2007). Compliance in the EU enlargement process: The limits of conditionality. EIoP, 11(5). https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=995976
Stubbs, P. (2005). Stretching concepts too far? Multi-level governance, policy transfer and the politics of scale in south-eastern Europe. South East European Politics, 6(2), 66–87.
Sucală, V. I. (2022). Is post-communism still relevant today? Post-Communist Economies, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631377.2022.2028479
Teteriuk, M. (2015). Gay rights and Europeanization processes in Eastern Europe: The case of bill 2342 “On amendments to some legislative acts of Ukraine concerning the prevention and combating of discrimination in Ukraine”. Emecon Employment and Economy in Central and Eastern Europe, 1. http://www.emecon.eu/current-issue/1-2015/maria-teteriuk/
Thelen, T. (2012). Economic concepts, common grounds and ‘new’ diversity in the anthropology of post-socialism: Reply to Dunn and Verdery. Critique of Anthropology, 32(1), 87–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308275X11430874
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mützelburg, I. (2022). Conclusion. In: Transferring Asylum Norms to EU Neighbours. The European Union in International Affairs. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04528-8_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04528-8_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04527-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04528-8
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)