Skip to main content

The Use of Augmented Reality as an Aid in the Perception and Learning of Human Body Anatomical Structures by Students of Medical Schools

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems ((LNNS,volume 456))

  • 948 Accesses

Abstract

The study of the human body and human anatomy has great importance for future physicians. The use of cadavers to study the body has been one of the most traditional ways to learn about this subject, however it involves several practical, ethical and moral issues. In this work, an integrative literature review was carried out on the use of augmented reality for learning and understanding the human body in the field of medicine. This literature review has the following research question: How is Augmented Reality transforming learning and facilitating understanding about the human body in the field of medicine? And was adopted a methodology that encompasses the following steps: definition of the scope of the work and formulation of the research question of the review (stated above); establishment of exclusion and inclusion criteria for literature search in the databases; identification of pre-selected studies with a careful reading of its titles, abstracts and keywords in order to verify their adequacy to the exclusion and inclusion criteria; categorization of studies in order to summarize and document the information extracted from the papers; and finally, the analysis and interpretation of the data obtained with the papers. A lot of research is being done about the subject and augmented reality is changing the traditional way that students learning human anatomy—books, usage of guinea pigs and cadavers are being replaced by simulations, avatars and different devices. Many studies still have shown that augmented reality appears to have greater learning potential than traditional methods. The knowledge retention is improved when students are actively involved in their learning experience. Active, problem-oriented learning stimulates students’ interest and helps to solve problems. In the field of medicine, critical thinking and long-term knowledge retention are very important for identifying anatomically the structures of the body. So, educational tools enhanced by technology, in special Augmented Reality, can greatly enhance student involvement and the learning of human anatomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Albrecht UV, Noll C, Von Jan U (2013) Explore and experience: mobile augmented reality for medical training. Stud Health Technol Inform 192:382–396

    Google Scholar 

  2. Almenara JC, Osuna JB, Obrador M.(2017) Realidad aumentada aplicada a la enseñanza de la medicina. Educación Médica 18(3):203–208

    Google Scholar 

  3. Azuma RT (1997) A survey of augmented reality. MIT Press, Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4):355–385

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bach F, Schmitz B, Maaß H, Cakmak HK, Diers M, Bodmann RB, Kamping S, Flor H (2010) Using interactive immersive VR/AR for the therapy of phantom limb pain. In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on humans and computers (HC 2010), Aizu-Wakamatsu + Hamamatsu, J, Düsseldorf, pp 183–187

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barmaki R et al (2019) Enhancement of anatomical education using augmented reality: an empirical study of body painting. Anat Sci Educ 12(6):599–609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bergman EM, Prince KJ, Drukker J, Van der Vleuten CP, Scherpbier AJ (2008) How much anatomy is enough? Anat Sci Educ 1:184–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Botelho L, Cunha CJCA, Macedo M (2011) O método da revisão integrativa nos estudos organizacionais. Gestão e Sociedade. Belo Horizonte 5(11):121–136, maio-ago

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brewer DN, Wilson TD, Eagleson R, De Ribaupierre S (2012) Evaluation of neuroanatomical training using a 3D visual reality model. Stud Health Technol Inform, 173:85–91

    Google Scholar 

  9. Busarello RI (2016) Verificação da aprendizagem de operações matemáticas a partir de jogos interativos multimídia: o caso dos alunos da Casa São José. PHD Thesis, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brasil. 352p

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cabero Almenara J, Barroso OJ, Obrador M (2017) Augmented reality applied to the teaching of medicine. Educacion Medica 18(3):203–208

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cakmak YO, Danie BK, Hammer N, Yilmaz O, Irmak EC, Khwaounjoo P (2020) The human muscular arm avatar as an interactive visualization tool in learning anatomy: medical students’ perspectives. In Proceedings of the IEEE transactions on learning technologies, vol 13, n 3, pp 593–603

    Google Scholar 

  12. Campos-Sánchez A, López-Núnez JA, Carriel V, Martín-Piedra MA, Sola T, Alaminos M (2014) Motivational component profiles in university students learning histology: a comparative study between genders and different health science curricula. BMC Med Educ 10(14):23–46

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chariker JH, Naaz F, Pani JR (2012) Item difficulty in the evaluation of computer- based ınstruction: an example from neuroanatomy. Anat Sci Educ 5:63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chiang T, Yang S, Hwang GJ (2014) An augmented reality-based mobile learning system to improve students’ learning achievements and motivations in natural science inquiry activities. Educ Technol Soc 17(4):352–365

    Google Scholar 

  15. Eccles JS, Wigfield A (2002) Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annu Rev Psychol 14:109–132. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ferrer TJ, Torralba-Estelles J, Rodríguez MÁ, García S, Barcia J (2015) ARBOOK: development and assessment of a tool based on augmented reality for anatomy. J Sci Educ Technol 24:119–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9526-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Glynn SM, Brickman P, Armstrong N, Taasoobshirazi G (2011) Science motivation questionnaire II: validation with science majors and nonscience majors. J Res Sci Teach 14:1159–1176. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gouveia Júnior M (2014) Segurança ou Liberdade? O pensamento de Bauman e as relações de mediação nos Sistemas de Informação. Revista PRISMA.COM 24:12–28

    Google Scholar 

  19. Jamali SS, Shiratuddin MF, Wong KW, Oskam CL (2015) Utilising mobile-augmented reality for learning human anatomy. In Proceedings of the Procedia—social and Behavioral sciences, Vol 197, pp 659–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.054

  20. Kenski VM (2008) Educação e Tecnologias: o novo ritmo da informação. Campinas, São Paulo: Papirus

    Google Scholar 

  21. Küçük S, Kapakin S, Göktaş Y (2016) Learning anatomy via mobile augmented reality: effects on achievement and cognitive load. Anat Sci Educ 9(5):411–421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ma M, Fallavollita P, Seelbach I, Von Der Heide AM, Euler E, Waschke J, Navab N (2016) Personalized augmented reality for anatomy education. Clin Anat 29(4):446–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.22675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohammed N, Idrus JB (2019) Study on heart rate visualisation using combination of real time heart rate detection and augmented reality. Indian J Public Health Res Dev 10(4):1236–1242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Morán JM (2015) Mudando a educação com metodologias ativas. In:Souza, CA. De, Morales, O ET. (Eds.) Coleção Mídias Contemporâneas. Convergências Midiáticas, Educação e Cidadania: aproximações jovens. Vol. II. PG: Foca Foto-PROEX/UEPG. http://www2.eca.usp.br/moran/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/mudando_moran.pdf. Access in: 13 jun. 2020

  25. Moro C, Stromberga Z, Raikos A, Stirling A (2016) Combining virtual (oculus rift & gear VR) and augmented reality with interactive applications to enhance tertiary medical and biomedical curricula. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH ASIA 2016 Symposium on Education: Talks. Macao, Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. pp 342–364 . https://doi.org/10.1145/2993363.2993364

  26. Paavilainen J, Korhonen H, Alha K, Stenros J, Koskinen E, Mayra F (2017) The Pokémon GO experience: a location-based augmented reality mobile game goes mainstream. In: Proceedings of the 2017 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 2493–2498. https://doi.org/10.1145/3025453.3025871

  27. Pelargos PE, Nagasawa DT, Lagman C, Tenn .S, Demos JV, Lee SJ, Bui TT, Barnette NE, Bhatt NS, Ung N, Bari A, Martin NA, Yang I (2017) Utilizing virtual and augmented reality for educational and clinical enhancements in neurosurgery. Clin Neurosci (35):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  28. Petticrew M, Roberts H (2008) Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. John Wiley & Sons

    Google Scholar 

  29. Prensky M (2010) Teaching digital natives: partnering for real learning, 1st edn. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA, p 224

    Google Scholar 

  30. Romand M et al. (2020) Mixed and augmented reality tools in the medical anatomy curriculum Studies in Health Technology and Informatics. https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85086922721&doi=10.3233%2FSHTI200175&partnerID=40&md5=bf5674afa6f35b2c45b010c0dad96b5c

  31. Samosky JT et al (2012) BodyExplorerAR: enhancing a mannequin medical simulator with sensing and projective augmented reality for exploring dynamic anatomy and physiology. In: Proceedings of the sixth international conference on tangible, embedded and embodied interaction (TEI ‘12). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, pp 263–270. https://doi.org/10.1145/2148131.2148187

  32. See ZS, Billinghurst M, Rengganaten, V, Soo S (2016) Medical learning murmurs simulation with mobile audible augmented reality. In: Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH ASIA mobile graphics and interactive applications, ACM, pp 4–16

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shaffer K (2004) Teaching anatomy in the digital world. N Engl J Med 351:1279–1291. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp048100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spitzer VM, Scherzinger AL (2006) Virtual anatomy: an anatomist’s playground. Clin Anat 19:192–203. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.20330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Souza MT, Da Silva DS, Carvalho R (2010) Revisão integrativa: o que é e como fazer. Einstein, 8(1):14–28, São Paulo. Jan/Mar

    Google Scholar 

  36. Sugand K, Abrahams P, Khurana A (2010) The anatomy of anatomy: a review for its modernization. Anat Sci Educ 3:83–93

    Google Scholar 

  37. Torraco RJ (2005) Writing integrative literature reviews: guidelines and examples. Hum Resour Dev Rev 4(3):356–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Tori R, Kirner C, Siscoutto RA (2006). Fundamentos e tecnologia de realidade virtual e aumentada. Porto Alegre: Editora SBC

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tori R, Hounsell MS (2018) Introdução a Realidade Virtual e Aumentada. Porto Alegre: Editora SBC

    Google Scholar 

  40. Turney BW (2007) Anatomy in a modern medical curriculum. In: Proceedings of the royal college of surgeons of England, v 89, n 2, pp 104–111

    Google Scholar 

  41. Vanzin T, Palazzo LAM (2018) Visões da Cibersociedade: o controle pela conexão. In: Vanzin T., Palazzo LAM. (Eds.), Cibersociedade e novas tecnologias, Deviant, Erechim RS, pp 11–28

    Google Scholar 

  42. Whittemore R, Knafl K (2005) The integrative review: updated methodology. J Adv Nurs 52(5):546–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Wu HK, Lee SWY, Chang HY, Liang JC (2013) Current status, opportunities and challenges of augmented reality in education. Cmput Educ 62:41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bianca Antonio Gomes .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Antonio Gomes, B., Ribas Ulbricht, V., Vanzin, T. (2022). The Use of Augmented Reality as an Aid in the Perception and Learning of Human Body Anatomical Structures by Students of Medical Schools. In: Auer, M.E., Pester, A., May, D. (eds) Learning with Technologies and Technologies in Learning. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 456. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04286-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics