Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Restorative Justice in Transitional Settings

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Environmental Restorative Justice

Abstract

Killean considers the applicability of Environmental Restorative Justice (ERJ) in transitional settings. Bringing critical transitional justice scholarship into dialogue with the emerging body of environmental restorative justice literature, this chapter argues that ERJ offers a challenge to two of the transitional justice field’s limitations. First, an ERJ approach offers a challenge to transitional justice’s anthropocentrism, by creating space for the recognition and representation of other-than-human victims of conflict. Second, ERJ offers a challenge to the field’s neo-colonial tendencies, by facilitating the design of mechanisms that are more inclusive of Indigenous harms and understandings of justice. By entrenching an ERJ ethos, the chapter argues that transitional justice may present one effective vehicle for rethinking relationships between diverse human communities and the natural world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See https://www.jep.gov.co/Paginas (last accessed 25 January 2022).

  2. 2.

    Minister del Interior, Decreto Ley No. 4633, DE 2011, Por medio del cual se dictan medidas de asistencia, atención, reparación integral y de restitución de derechos territoriales a las víctimas pertenecientes a los Pueblos y Comunidades indígenas.

  3. 3.

    Jurisdicción Especial Para la Paz, Reglamento General, Acuerdo No. 001 DE 2018, Por el cual se adopta el Reglamento General de la Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz; For a brief description of a harmonisation ritual see Cabrera (2019).

References

  • An-Na’im, A.A. (2013). Editorial note: From the neocolonial ‘transitional’ to Indigenous formations of justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 7(2), 197–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antkowiak, T. M. (2014). A dark side of virtue: The Inter-American Court and reparations for Indigenous peoples. Duke Journal of Comparative and International Law, 25(1), 1–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balint, J., Evans, J., & McMillan, N. (2014). Rethinking transitional justice, redressing Indigenous harm: A new conceptual approach. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 8(2), 194–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barume, A. (2017). Unaccounted for: Indigenous peoples as victims of conflict in Africa. In E. Stamatopoulou (Ed.), Indigenous peoples’ rights and unreported struggles (pp. 55–67). New York: Colombia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, C. & O’Rourke, C. (2007). The people’s peace? Peace agreements, civil society and participatory democracy. International Political Science Review, 28(3), 293–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benyera, E. (2019). Indigenous, traditional, and non-state transitional justice in Southern Africa. Washington D.C.: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blagg, H. (1997). A just measure of shame? Aboriginal youth and conferencing in Australia. British Journal of Criminology, 37 (4), 481–501.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borda, A.Z. (2020). History in international criminal trials: The ‘crime-driven lens’ and its blind spots. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 18(3), 533–546.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bothe, M. (2017). The ILC’s Special Rapporteur’s preliminary report on the protection of the environment in relation to armed conflict: An important step in the right direction. In P. Acconci et al. (Eds.), International law and the protection of humanity. Essays in honor of Flavia Latanzi (pp. 211–224). Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1999). Restorative justice: Assessing optimistic and pessimistic accounts. Crime and Justice, 25, 1–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J., Forsyth, M., & Cleland, D. (2019). Restorative environmental justice: An introduction. In E. Biffi & B. Pali (Eds.), Environmental justice restoring the future: Towards a restorative environmental justice praxis (pp. 8–12). Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinton Lykes, M. & Van Der Merwe, H. (2017). Exploring/expanding the reach of transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 11(3), 371–377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrera, A. (2019). En ritual de armonización la JEP recibe acreditación de las víctimas de los pueblos indígenas. Radio Santa Fe. Retrieved from https://www.radiosantafe.com/2019/12/07/en-ritual-de-armonizacion-la-jep-recibe-acreditacion-de-las-victimas-de-los-pueblos-indigenas/ (last accessed 25 January 2022).

  • Christie, N. (1977). Conflicts as property. British Journal of Criminology, 17(1), 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clamp, K. (Ed). (2016). Restorative justice in transitional settings. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clamp, K. (2014) Restorative justice in transition. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, P. (2010). The Gacaca courts, post-genocide justice and reconciliation in Rwanda: Justice without lawyers. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Colombian Legislative Decree No. 4633 of 3 December 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crosby, A. & Brinton Lykes, M. (2011). Mayan women survivors speak: The gendered relations of truth telling in postwar Guatemala. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 5(3), 456–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumes, A. (2019). “Lo indígena” como circo en el regreso de la interculturalidad. Retrieved from: https://tujaal.org/lo-indigena-como-circo-en-el-regreso-de-la-interculturalidad/ (last accessed 16 August 2021).

  • Cunneen, C. (2002). Restorative justice and the politics of decolonisation. In E. G. M. Weitekamp & H. Kerner (Eds.), Restorative justice: Theoretical foundations (pp. 32–49). Devon: Willan Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cusato, E. (2017). Back to the future? Confronting the role(s) of natural resources in armed conflict through the lenses of Truth and Reconciliation Commissions. International Community Law Review, 19(4–5), 373–400.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusato, E. (2020). International law, the paradox of plenty and the making of resource-driven conflict. Leiden Journal of International Law, 33(3), 649–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doak, J. (2016). Stalking the state: The state as a stakeholder in post-conflict restorative justice. In K. Clamp (Ed.), Restorative justice in transitional settings (pp. 74–94). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drumbl, M. (1998). Waging war against the world: The need to move from war crimes to environmental crimes. Fordham International Law Journal, 22(1), 122–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eichler, L.J. (2020). Ecocide is genocide: Decolonising the definition of genocide. Genocide Studies and Prevention: An International Journal, 14(2), 104–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcón, S. (2018). Intersectionality and the arts: Counterpublic memory-making in post-conflict Peru. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(1), 26–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, S. (2020). Islamic ethics and Truth Commissions in the Muslim world: Towards a just and ecologically sustainable peace? In J. Camilleri & D. Guess (Eds.), Towards a justice and ecologically sustainable peace (pp.135–165). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, L. & Weinstein, H. (2018). How power dynamics influence the “North-South” gap in transitional justice. Berkeley Journal of International Law, 36 (2), 190–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, M., Cleland, D., Tepper, F., Hollingworth, D., Soares, M., Nairn, A., & Wilkinson, C. (2021). A future agenda for environmental restorative justice? The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 4(1), 17–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeland, S. (2005). Human rights, the environment and conflict: Addressing crimes against the environment. International Journal on Human Rights, 2(2), 113–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • García-Godos, J. & Lid, K. (2010). Transitional justice and victims’ rights before the end of a conflict: The unusual case of Colombia. Journal of Latin American Studies, 42(3), 487–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garzón, P. (2019). Legal pluralism, Indigenous law and legal coloniality: Rethinking law from the coloniality of power. Ius Inkarri. Journal of the Faculty of Law and Political Science, 8, 215–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gheciu, A., & Welsh, J. (2009). The imperative to rebuild: Assessing the normative case for post-conflict reconstruction. Ethics and International Affairs, 23, 121–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, M. (2017). Eco-struggles. In C. Stahn, J. Iverson & J. Easterday (Eds.), Environmental protection and transitions from conflict to peace (pp. 220–253). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guess, D. (2020). Introduction. In J. Camilleri, & D. Guess (Eds.), Towards a justice and ecologically sustainable peace (pp.1–16). Singapore: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M. (2021). Environmental crime and restorative justice. Palgrave Studies in Green Criminology, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Harwell, E. (2016). Building momentum and constituencies for peace: The role of natural resources in transitional justice and peacebuilding. In C. Bruch, C. Muffett, & S. Nichols (Eds.), Governance, natural resources and post-conflict peacebuilding (pp.633–664). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwell, E. & Le Billon, P. (2009). Natural connections: Linking transitional justice and development through a focus on natural resources. In P. De Grieff & R. Duthie (Eds.), Transitional justice and development: Making connections (pp. 283–330). New York: Social Science Research Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, P. (2010). Eradicating ecocide. London: Shepheard-Walwyn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, P., Short, D., & South, N. (2013). Protecting the planet: A proposal for a law of ecocide. Crime, Law and Social Change, 59(3), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, K. (2017). Using a framework of human rights and transitional justice for post-conflict environmental protection and remediation. In C. Stahn, J. Iverson & J. Easterday (Eds.), Environmental protection and transitions from conflict to peace (pp.119–142). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huneeus, A. (2020). Territory as a victim of Colombia’s war. EJIL: Talk! 7 May 2020. Retrieved from: www.ejiltalk.org/territory-as-a-victim-of-colombias-war/#:~:text=In%20two%20recent%20resolutions%2C%20Colombia’s,Colombia’s%2050%2Dyear%20civil%20war. (last accessed 16 August 2021).

  • Huneeus, A., & Rueda Sáiz, P. (2021). Territory as a victim of armed conflict. International Journal of Transitional Justice. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijab002

  • ICC (2016). Office of the Prosecutor Policy Paper on Case Selection and Prioritisation, 15 September 2016. Retrieved from: www.icc-cpi.int/itemsDocuments/20160915_OTP-Policy_Case-Selection_Eng.pdf (last accessed 16 August 2021).

  • International Committee of the Red Cross. (1994). Guidelines for Military Manuals and Instructions on the Protection of the Environment in Times of Armed Conflict, endorsed by UN GA Res. 49/50 (Geneva: ICRC, 1994, updated 2021).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ide, T., Bruch, C., Carius, A., Conca, K., Dabelko, G. D., Matthew, R., & Weinthal, E. (2021). The past and future(s) of environmental peacebuilding. International Affairs, 97(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ICRC (2020). Guidelines on the Protection of the Natural Environment in Armed Conflict: Rules and Recommendations Relating to the Protection of the Natural Environment under International Humanitarian Law, with Commentary. Geneva: ICRC. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/guidelines-protection-natural-environment-armed-conflict-rules-and-recommendations (last accessed 25 January 2022).

  • Izquierdo, B. & Viaene, L. (2018). Decolonising transitional justice from Indigenous territories. Peace in Progress, 34, 11–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankowitz, S. (2018). The ‘hierarchy of victims’ in Northern Ireland: A framework for critical analysis. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(2), 216–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kershen, L. (2019) Implementing restorative justice to environmental harm. In E. Biffi & B. Pali (Eds.), Environmental justice restoring the future (pp. 40–53). Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Killean, R., & Dempster, L. (2022, forthcoming). Greening transitional justice? In M. Evans (Ed.), Beyond transitional justice? Transformative justice and the state of the field (or non-field). London: Routledge. Accepted version available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3769180.

  • Killean, R. (2021). From ecocide to eco-sensitivity: ‘Greening’ reparations at the International Criminal Court. International Journal of Human Rights, 25(2), 323–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killean, R., & Moffett, L. (2017). Victim legal representation before the ICC and the ECCC. Journal of International Criminal Justice, 15(4), 713–740.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Killean, R., & Moffett, L. (2020). “What’s in a Name? Reparations at the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia”. Melbourne Journal of International Law, 21(1), 115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kipuri, N. (2017). Indigenous peoples’ rights, conflict and peace building: Experiences from East Africa. In E. Stamatopoulou (Ed.), Indigenous peoples’ rights and unreported struggles (pp. 68–79). New York: Colombia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komatsubara, O. (2021). Imagining a community that includes non-human beings: The 1990s Moyainaoshi Movement in Minamata, Japan. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 4(1), 123–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Komatsubara, O. (2019). Restorative justice and environmental crime: The case of Minamata disease in Japan in 1970. In E. Biffi and B. Pali (Eds.), Environmental Justice Restoring the Future (pp. 67–71). Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambourne, W. (2009). Transitional justice and peacebuilding after mass violence. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 3(1), 28–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambourne, W. (2010). Transitional justice after mass violence: Reconciling retributive and restorative justice. In H Irving, J Mowbray & K Walton (Eds.), Julius Stone: A study in influence (214–237). Sydney: Generation Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambourne, W. (2016). Restorative justice and reconciliation: The missing link in transitional justice. In K. Clamp (Ed.), Restorative justice in transitional settings (pp. 56–73). London: Routledge.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence, J. C., & Heller, K. J. (2007). The first ecocentric environmental war crime: The limits of Article 8(2)(b)(iv) of the Rome Statute. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 20(1), 61–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawry-White, M. (2017). Victims of environmental harm during conflict: The potential for justice. In C. Stahn, J. Iverson & J.S. Easterday (Eds.), Environmental protection and transitions from conflict to peace (pp. 367–395). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madlingozi, T. (2010). On transitional justice entrepreneurs and the production of victims. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 2(2), 208–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsunaga, J. (2016). Two faces of transitional justice: Theorising the incommensurability of transitional justice and decolonisation in Canada. Decolonisation: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 5(1), 24–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, K. (2007). Beyond legalism: Towards a thicker understanding of transitional justice. Journal of Law and Society, 34(4), 411–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy K. & McConacchie, K. (2013). Victims and transitional justice: Voice, agency and blame. Social and Legal Studies, 22(4), 489–513.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, K. & Mika, H. (2001). Punishment, policing and praxis: Restorative justice and non-violence alternatives to paramilitary punishments in Northern Ireland. Policing and Society, 11(3–4), 359–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, K. & McGregor, L. (2008). Transitional justice from below. In K. McEvoy & L. McGregor (Eds.), Transitional justice from below: Grassroots activism and the struggle for change (pp. 1–14). Oxford: Hart Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEvoy, K. & Newburn, T., (2003). Criminology, conflict resolution and restorative justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, M. & Rigney, S. (2018). Race, reconciliation and justice in Australia. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 41(4), 759–777.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milburn, R. (2014). The roots to peace in the DRC: Conservation as a platform for green development. International Affairs, 90, 871–887.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Minguet, A. (2021). Environmental justice movements and restorative justice. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 4(1), 60–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, A. (2014). Only human? A worldly approach to security. Security Dialogue, 45(1), 5–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Motupalli, C. (2018). Intergenerational justice, environmental law, and restorative justice. Washington Journal of Environmental Law and Politics, 8(2), 333–361.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murdock, E. (2018). Storied with land: ‘transitional justice’ on Indigenous lands. Journal of Global Ethics, 14(2), 232–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagy, R. (2008). Transitional justice as global project: Critical reflections. Third World Quarterly, 29(2), 275–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L. (2005). The agency of nature or the nature of agency? Environmental History, 10(1), 67–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natalya Clark, K. (2008). The three Rs: Retributive justice, restorative justice and reconciliation. Contemporary Justice Review, 11(4), 331–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natalya Clark, J. (2016). Are there “greener” ways of doing transitional justice? International Journal of Transitional Justice, 20(8), 1199–1218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natalya Clark, J. (2020). Re-thinking memory and transitional justice. Memory Studies, 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols, S. (2014). Reimagining transitional justice for an enduring peace. Accounting for natural resources in conflict. In D. Sharp (Ed.), Justice and Economic Violence in Transition (pp. 203–231). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okello, M.C. (2012). Where law meets reality: Forging African transitional justice. Nairobi: Pambazuka Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ong, D. M. (2017). Prospects for transitional environmental justice in the socio-economic reconstruction of Kosovo. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 30(2), 217–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pali, B. (2019). Restorative responses to environmental harm? Yes, we must! In E. Biffi & B. Pali (Eds.), Environmental Justice Restoring the Future (pp. 13–17). Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pali, B. & Aersten, I. (2021). Inhabiting a vulnerable and wounded earth: Restoring response-ability. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 4(1), 3–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, A.S.J. (2020). Settler colonialism, decolonisation and radicalising transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 14(2), 260–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pavlich, G. (2005). Governing paradoxes of restorative justice. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelizzon, A. (2015). Transitional justice and ecological jurisprudence in the midst of an ever-changing climate. In N. Szablewska & S.D Bachmann (Eds.), Current issues in transitional justice (pp. 317–338). Springer Series in Transitional Justice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston, B. J., (2011). The use of restorative justice for environmental crime. Criminal Law Journal, 35, 136–161.

    Google Scholar 

  • Randazzo, S. (2019). Interview to Angèle Minguet. In E. Biffi & B. Pali (Eds.), Environmental Justice Restoring the Future (pp. 29–34). Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roht-Arriaza, N. (2006). The new landscape of transitional justice. In N. Roht-Arriaza & J. Mariecurrena (Eds.), Transitional justice in the twenty-first century (pp.1–16). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rooney, E., & Ní Aoláin. F. (2018). Transitional justice from the margins: Intersections of identities, power and human rights. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 12(1), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Serna, D. (2017). Territory as victim. Political ontology and the laws for victims of Indigenous and Afrodescendant communities in Colombia. Colombian Journal of Anthropology, 53(2), 85–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shakya, P. (2014). Indigenous peoples: Expanding the realm of justice. Peace Insight, 26 March 2014, https://www.peaceinsight.org/en/articles/indigenous-peoples-expanding-realm-justice/?location=&theme=human-rights. Accessed 16 August 2021.

  • Sharp, D. N. (2019). What would satisfy us? Taking stock of critical approaches to transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 13, 570–589.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sium, A., Desai, C., & Ritskes, E. (2012). Towards the ‘tangible unknown’: Decolonisation and the Indigenous future. Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1(1), I-XIII.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, L.T. (2007). Getting the story right—Telling the story well, Indigenous activism—Indigenous research. In A. Te Pareake Mead & S. Ratuva (Eds.), Pacific genes and life patents: Pacific Indigenous experiences and analysis of the commodification and ownership of life (pp.74–81). Call of the Earth LLamado de la Tierra and The United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stahn, C., Iverson, J., & Easterday, J. (2017). Environmental protection and transitions from conflict to peace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, A., (2016). Environmental restorative justice. Pepperdine Dispute Resolution Law Journal, 16(3), 435–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, C. D. (1972). Should trees have standing? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stop Ecocide Foundation. (2021). Independent Expert Panel for the Legal Definition of Ecocide: Commentary and Core Text, June 2021. Retrieved from: https://www.stopecocide.earth/legal-definition (last accessed 25 January 2022).

  • Suarez, A., Arias-Arevalo, P., & Martinez-Mera, E. (2018). Environmental sustainability in post-conflict countries: Insights for rural Colombia. Environmental Development Sustainability, 20, 997–1015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tauli-Corpuz, V. (2017). Conflict, peace and the human rights of Indigenous peoples. In E. Stamatopoulou (Ed.), Indigenous peoples’ rights and unreported struggles (pp.1–19). New York: Colombia University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauri, J. M. (2018). Restorative justice as a colonial project in the disempowerment of Indigenous peoples. In T. Gavrielides (Ed.) Routledge International Handbook of Restorative Justice (pp. 342–358). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Teitel, R. G., (2003). Transitional justice genealogy. Harvard Human Rights Journal, 69–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutu, D. (1999). No future without forgiveness. New York: Doubleday.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • UNSG (2004). Report on the rule of law and transitional justice in conflict and post-conflict societies. Report of the United Nations Secretary General, 23 August 2004, Un Doc. S/2004/616.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2003). Afghanistan: Post-conflict environmental assessment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2007). Sudan: Post-conflict environmental assessment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2009a). Environmental assessment of the Gaza Strip following the escalation of hostilities in December 2008–January 2009. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2009b). From conflict to peacebuilding: The role of natural resources and the environment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP (2015). Côte d’Ivoire: Post-conflict environmental assessment. Nairobi: United Nations Environment Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Merwe, H., & Brinton Lykes, M. (2021). Racism and transitional justice. International Journal of Transitional Justice, 14(3), 415–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varona, G. (2021). Why an atmosphere of transhumanism undermines green restorative justice concepts and tenets. The International Journal of Restorative Justice, 4(1), 41–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varona, G. (2020). Restorative pathways after mass environmental victimisation: Walking in the landscapes of past ecocides. Oñati Socio-Legal Series, 10(3), 664–685.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viaene, L. (2020). Transitional justice, dialogue and critical reflexivity: weaving thoughts. Eunomics. Journal on Culture of Legality, 18, 416–423.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R., Westerhuis, D.S., & Wyatt, T. (Eds.) (2013). Emerging issues in green criminology. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, V. (2013). Indigenous place-thought and agency amongst humans and non-humans (first woman and sky woman go on a European world tour!). Decolonisation: Indigeneity, Education and Society, 2(1), 20–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein, T. (2005). Prosecuting attacks that destroy the environment. Georgetown International Environmental Law Review, 17(4), 697–722.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2018). Green victimology and non-human victims. International Review of Victimology, 24 (2), 239–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2017). The four ways of eco-global criminology. International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy, 6 (1), 8–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2014a/2015). Indigenous communities, environmental protection and restorative justice. Australian Indigenous Law Review, 18(2), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, R. (2014b). Environmental harm: An eco-justice perspective. Bristol: Policy Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijdekop, F. (2019). Restorative justice responses to environmental harm. Amsterdam: IUCN.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijdekop, F., & van Hoek, A. (2019). Green criminology and restorative justice: Natural allies? In E. Biffi & B. Pali (Eds.), Environmental Justice Restoring the Future (pp.18–25). Leuven: European Forum for Restorative Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zernova, M. (2017). Restorative justice in the Basque peace process: Some experiments and their lessons. Contemporary Justice Review, 20(3), 363–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zunino, M. (2019). Justice framed: A genealogy of transitional justice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The University of Sydney Law School, Sydney, NSW, Australia

    Rachel Killean

Authors
  1. Rachel Killean
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rachel Killean .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Social and Cultural Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium

    Brunilda Pali

  2. RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Miranda Forsyth

  3. RegNet School of Regulation and Global Governance, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT, Australia

    Felicity Tepper

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Killean, R. (2022). Environmental Restorative Justice in Transitional Settings. In: Pali, B., Forsyth, M., Tepper, F. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Environmental Restorative Justice. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04223-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04223-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04222-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04223-2

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation