Abstract
In this chapter, we review the effects of exposure of the human body to ultrasonic waves and discuss the tolerance sound pressure levels reported in the literature. We then consider the theory of nonlinear absorption and discuss its implications for the optimal safety distance that should be maintained from ultrasonic devices during operation. The aims of this chapter are to provide insight into what is currently known about the safety of mid-air ultrasound and to highlight areas where more research is needed.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barrera-Figueroa S (2019) Completing the traceability chain for airborne ultrasound. In: Proceedings of international congress on acoustics, pp 6381–6388
Batista AD (2019) The effect of 40 kHz ultrasonic noise exposure on human hearing. In: Proceedings of international congress on acoustics, pp 4805–4810
Blackstock DT (1964) On plane, spherical and cylindrical sound waves of finite amplitude in lossless fluids. J Acoust Soc Am 36:217–219
Carcagno S, Battista AD, Plack CJ (2019) Effects of high-intensity airborne ultrasound exposure on behavioural and electrophysiological measures of auditory function. Acta Acoust United Acust 105:1183–1197
Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2019) Marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers
Health Canada (1991) Guidelines for the safe use of ultrasound. Part II—Industrial and commercial applications, safety code 24
Hoshi T, Ooka Y (2021) Experimental verification of nonlinear attenuation of airborne ultrasound. In: Proceedings of symposium on ultrasonic electronics (USE), vol 42, 3Pb4-2
Hoshi T, Takahashi M, Iwamoto T, Shinoda H (2010) Noncontact tactile display based on radiation pressure of airborne ultrasound. IEEE Trans Haptics 3(3):155–165
Howard T, Gallagher G, Lécuyer A, Pacchierotti C, Marchal M (2019) Investigating the recognition of local shapes using mid-air ultrasound haptics. In: Proceedings of IEEE world haptics conference (WHC), pp 503–508
Ito K, Nakagawa S (2013) Bone-conducted ultrasonic hearing assessed by tympanic membrane vibration in living human beings. Acoust Sci Technol 34(6):413–423
Iwamoto T, Tatezono M, Shinoda H (2008) Non-contact method for producing tactile sensation using airborne ultrasound. In: Haptics: perception, devices and scenarios. 6th International conference, Eurohaptics 2008 proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science, pp 504–513
Lawton BW (2001) Damage to human hearing by airborne sound of very high frequency or ultrasonic frequency. Health and safety executive contract research report, 343/2001
Leighton TG (2016) Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air? Proc Roy Soc A 472:20150624
Mizutani S, Fujiwara M, Makino Y, Shinoda H (2019) Thresholds of haptic and auditory perception in midair facial stimulation. In: IEEE International symposium on haptic audio-visual environments and games (HAVE), pp 1–6
Nagatani Y, Ishikawa H, Hoshi T, Nakagawa S (2021) A preliminary study of pitch matching between 40-kHz air-conducted ultrasonic wave and air-conducted audible sound. In: Proceedings of symposium on ultrasonic electronics (USE), vol 42, 1Pa4-3
Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) (2013) Technical manual. Section III: Chapter 5 Noise. Appendix C—Ultrasound (updated)
Rudenko OV (1977) Theoretical foundations of nonlinear acoustics. Springer, Berlin
Sussman C, Bates-Jensen B (ed) (2012) Wound care—a collaborative practice manual for health professionals, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer
Takahashi R, Hasegawa K, Shinoda H (2020) Tactile stimulation by repetitive lateral movement of midair ultrasound focus. IEEE Trans Haptics 13(2):334–342
Wakabayashi N, Sakai A, Takada H, Hoshi T, Sano H, Ichinose S, Suzuki H, Ogawa R (2020) Noncontact phased-array ultrasound facilitates acute wound healing in mice. Plast Reconstr Surg 145:348e–359e
References Cited in Health Canada
Acton WI (1968) A criterion for the prediction of auditory and subjective effects due to airborne noise from ultrasonic sources. Ann Occup Hyg 11:227–234
Acton WI (1974) The effects of industrial airborne ultrasound on humans. Ultrasonics 124–128
Acton WI (1975) Exposure criteria for industrial ultrasound. Ann Occup Hyg 18:267–268
Acton WI, Carson MB (1967) Auditory and subjective effects of airborne noise from industrial ultrasonic sources. Br J Ind Med 24:297–304
Allen CH, Frings H, Rudnick I (1948) Some biological effects of intense high frequency airborne sound. J Acoust Soc Am 20:62–65
auf der Maur AN (1985) Limits of exposure to airborne ultrasound. Ann Am Conf Ind Hyg 12:177–181
Crabtree RB, Forshaw SE (1977) Exposure to ultrasonic cleaner noise in the Canadian forces. DCIEM technical report #77X45. Available from DCIEM, 1133 Sheppard Ave. W., P.O. Box 2000, Downsview, Ontario M3M 3B9
Dallos PJ, Linnell CO (1966) Subharmonic components in cochlear-microphonic potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 40:4–11
Danner PA, Ackerman E, Frings HW (1954) Heating in haired and hairless mice in high-intensity sound fields from 6–22 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am 26:731–739
Davis H (1948) Biological and psychological effects of ultrasonics. J Acoust Soc Am 20:605–607
Dobroserdov VK (1967) The effect of low frequency ultrasonic and high frequency sound waves on workers. Hygiene Sanitation 32:176–181
Grigor’eva VM (1966) Effect of ultrasonic vibrations on personnel working with ultrasonic equipment. Sov Phys Acoust II:426–427
Grzesik J, Pluta E (1980) Noise and airborne ultrasound exposure in the industrial environment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international congress on noise as a public health problem. Freyburg, W. Germany, 25–29 Sept 1978. ASHA reports 10. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, Maryland, Apr 1980, pp 657–661
Grzesik J, Pluta E (1983) High frequency hearing risk of operators of industrial ultrasonic devices. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 53:77–78
Grzesik J, Pluta E (1986) Dynamics of high-frequency hearing loss of operators of industrial ultrasonic devices. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 57:137–142
Herbertz J (1984) Loudness of airborne ultrasonic noise. In: Ultrasonics international (1983) conference proceedings, S.226–231
Herbertz J, Grunter K (1981) Untersuchungen zur hoerkurvenmaessigen Bewertung von Ultraschall in Luft. Fortschritte der Akustik-DAGA’81. VDE-Verlag, Berlin, pp 509–512
Herman BA, Powell D (1981) Airborne ultrasound: measurement and possible adverse effects. HHS Publication (FDA) 81-8163, May 1981. Available from CDRH, Rockville, MD, USA, 20857
International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) (1984) Interim guidelines on limits of human exposure to airborne ultrasound. Health Phys 46:969–974
Knight JJ (1968) Effects of airborne ultrasound on man. Ultrasonics 39–42
Neppiras EA (1980) Acoustic cavitation thresholds and cyclic processes. Ultrasonics 201–209, 230
Parrack HO (1966) Effect of air-borne ultrasound on humans. Int Audiol 5:294–308
Skillern CP (1965) Human response to measured sound pressure levels from ultrasonic devices. Ind Hyg J 26:132–136
United States Air Force (1976) Hazardous noise exposure. USAF Regulation 161-35
Von Gierke HE (1949) Sound absorption at the surface of the body of man and animals. J Acoust Soc Am 21:55
Von Gierke HE (1950) Subharmonics generated in the ears of humans and animals at intense sound levels. In: Federation proceedings, vol 9, p 130(a)
Von Gierke HE, Parrack HO, Eldredge DN (1952) Heating of animals by absorbed sound energy. J Cell Comp Physiol 39:487–505
Acknowledgements
This work was partially supported by the Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D (A-STEP) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Grant Number AS3015012R.
We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.
We would like to thank the members of the study group formed for the investigation of airborne ultrasound exposure, consisting of experts from Japan on noise problems and/or ultrasonics. We convened the study group in 2020 and held four meetings (in person in March and online in May, July, and September). This chapter is based on the discussion carried out by this study group. Table 4 presents the member list of the study group, and Fig. 10 displays the group photo of the meeting held on March 4, 2020, in Tokyo, Japan.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Hoshi, T. (2022). Ultrasound Exposure in Mid-Air Haptics. In: Georgiou, O., Frier, W., Freeman, E., Pacchierotti, C., Hoshi, T. (eds) Ultrasound Mid-Air Haptics for Touchless Interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04043-6_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04043-6_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04042-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04043-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)