Skip to main content

Ultrasound Exposure in Mid-Air Haptics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Ultrasound Mid-Air Haptics for Touchless Interfaces

Part of the book series: Human–Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

In this chapter, we review the effects of exposure of the human body to ultrasonic waves and discuss the tolerance sound pressure levels reported in the literature. We then consider the theory of nonlinear absorption and discuss its implications for the optimal safety distance that should be maintained from ultrasonic devices during operation. The aims of this chapter are to provide insight into what is currently known about the safety of mid-air ultrasound and to highlight areas where more research is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barrera-Figueroa S (2019) Completing the traceability chain for airborne ultrasound. In: Proceedings of international congress on acoustics, pp 6381–6388

    Google Scholar 

  • Batista AD (2019) The effect of 40 kHz ultrasonic noise exposure on human hearing. In: Proceedings of international congress on acoustics, pp 4805–4810

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackstock DT (1964) On plane, spherical and cylindrical sound waves of finite amplitude in lossless fluids. J Acoust Soc Am 36:217–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carcagno S, Battista AD, Plack CJ (2019) Effects of high-intensity airborne ultrasound exposure on behavioural and electrophysiological measures of auditory function. Acta Acoust United Acust 105:1183–1197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration (FDA) (2019) Marketing clearance of diagnostic ultrasound systems and transducers

    Google Scholar 

  • Health Canada (1991) Guidelines for the safe use of ultrasound. Part II—Industrial and commercial applications, safety code 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi T, Ooka Y (2021) Experimental verification of nonlinear attenuation of airborne ultrasound. In: Proceedings of symposium on ultrasonic electronics (USE), vol 42, 3Pb4-2

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoshi T, Takahashi M, Iwamoto T, Shinoda H (2010) Noncontact tactile display based on radiation pressure of airborne ultrasound. IEEE Trans Haptics 3(3):155–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howard T, Gallagher G, LĂ©cuyer A, Pacchierotti C, Marchal M (2019) Investigating the recognition of local shapes using mid-air ultrasound haptics. In: Proceedings of IEEE world haptics conference (WHC), pp 503–508

    Google Scholar 

  • Ito K, Nakagawa S (2013) Bone-conducted ultrasonic hearing assessed by tympanic membrane vibration in living human beings. Acoust Sci Technol 34(6):413–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iwamoto T, Tatezono M, Shinoda H (2008) Non-contact method for producing tactile sensation using airborne ultrasound. In: Haptics: perception, devices and scenarios. 6th International conference, Eurohaptics 2008 proceedings. Lecture notes in computer science, pp 504–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawton BW (2001) Damage to human hearing by airborne sound of very high frequency or ultrasonic frequency. Health and safety executive contract research report, 343/2001

    Google Scholar 

  • Leighton TG (2016) Are some people suffering as a result of increasing mass exposure of the public to ultrasound in air? Proc Roy Soc A 472:20150624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizutani S, Fujiwara M, Makino Y, Shinoda H (2019) Thresholds of haptic and auditory perception in midair facial stimulation. In: IEEE International symposium on haptic audio-visual environments and games (HAVE), pp 1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagatani Y, Ishikawa H, Hoshi T, Nakagawa S (2021) A preliminary study of pitch matching between 40-kHz air-conducted ultrasonic wave and air-conducted audible sound. In: Proceedings of symposium on ultrasonic electronics (USE), vol 42, 1Pa4-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Occupational Health and Safety Administration (OSHA) (2013) Technical manual. Section III: Chapter 5 Noise. Appendix C—Ultrasound (updated)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudenko OV (1977) Theoretical foundations of nonlinear acoustics. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sussman C, Bates-Jensen B (ed) (2012) Wound care—a collaborative practice manual for health professionals, 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi R, Hasegawa K, Shinoda H (2020) Tactile stimulation by repetitive lateral movement of midair ultrasound focus. IEEE Trans Haptics 13(2):334–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wakabayashi N, Sakai A, Takada H, Hoshi T, Sano H, Ichinose S, Suzuki H, Ogawa R (2020) Noncontact phased-array ultrasound facilitates acute wound healing in mice. Plast Reconstr Surg 145:348e–359e

    Article  Google Scholar 

References Cited in Health Canada

  • Acton WI (1968) A criterion for the prediction of auditory and subjective effects due to airborne noise from ultrasonic sources. Ann Occup Hyg 11:227–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Acton WI (1974) The effects of industrial airborne ultrasound on humans. Ultrasonics 124–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Acton WI (1975) Exposure criteria for industrial ultrasound. Ann Occup Hyg 18:267–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Acton WI, Carson MB (1967) Auditory and subjective effects of airborne noise from industrial ultrasonic sources. Br J Ind Med 24:297–304

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen CH, Frings H, Rudnick I (1948) Some biological effects of intense high frequency airborne sound. J Acoust Soc Am 20:62–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • auf der Maur AN (1985) Limits of exposure to airborne ultrasound. Ann Am Conf Ind Hyg 12:177–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Crabtree RB, Forshaw SE (1977) Exposure to ultrasonic cleaner noise in the Canadian forces. DCIEM technical report #77X45. Available from DCIEM, 1133 Sheppard Ave. W., P.O. Box 2000, Downsview, Ontario M3M 3B9

    Google Scholar 

  • Dallos PJ, Linnell CO (1966) Subharmonic components in cochlear-microphonic potentials. J Acoust Soc Am 40:4–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Danner PA, Ackerman E, Frings HW (1954) Heating in haired and hairless mice in high-intensity sound fields from 6–22 kHz. J Acoust Soc Am 26:731–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H (1948) Biological and psychological effects of ultrasonics. J Acoust Soc Am 20:605–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobroserdov VK (1967) The effect of low frequency ultrasonic and high frequency sound waves on workers. Hygiene Sanitation 32:176–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Grigor’eva VM (1966) Effect of ultrasonic vibrations on personnel working with ultrasonic equipment. Sov Phys Acoust II:426–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzesik J, Pluta E (1980) Noise and airborne ultrasound exposure in the industrial environment. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international congress on noise as a public health problem. Freyburg, W. Germany, 25–29 Sept 1978. ASHA reports 10. The American Speech-Language-Hearing Association, Rockville, Maryland, Apr 1980, pp 657–661

    Google Scholar 

  • Grzesik J, Pluta E (1983) High frequency hearing risk of operators of industrial ultrasonic devices. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 53:77–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grzesik J, Pluta E (1986) Dynamics of high-frequency hearing loss of operators of industrial ultrasonic devices. Int Arch Occup Environ Health 57:137–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herbertz J (1984) Loudness of airborne ultrasonic noise. In: Ultrasonics international (1983) conference proceedings, S.226–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbertz J, Grunter K (1981) Untersuchungen zur hoerkurvenmaessigen Bewertung von Ultraschall in Luft. Fortschritte der Akustik-DAGA’81. VDE-Verlag, Berlin, pp 509–512

    Google Scholar 

  • Herman BA, Powell D (1981) Airborne ultrasound: measurement and possible adverse effects. HHS Publication (FDA) 81-8163, May 1981. Available from CDRH, Rockville, MD, USA, 20857

    Google Scholar 

  • International Radiation Protection Association (IRPA) (1984) Interim guidelines on limits of human exposure to airborne ultrasound. Health Phys 46:969–974

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight JJ (1968) Effects of airborne ultrasound on man. Ultrasonics 39–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Neppiras EA (1980) Acoustic cavitation thresholds and cyclic processes. Ultrasonics 201–209, 230

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrack HO (1966) Effect of air-borne ultrasound on humans. Int Audiol 5:294–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skillern CP (1965) Human response to measured sound pressure levels from ultrasonic devices. Ind Hyg J 26:132–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States Air Force (1976) Hazardous noise exposure. USAF Regulation 161-35

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Gierke HE (1949) Sound absorption at the surface of the body of man and animals. J Acoust Soc Am 21:55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Von Gierke HE (1950) Subharmonics generated in the ears of humans and animals at intense sound levels. In: Federation proceedings, vol 9, p 130(a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Gierke HE, Parrack HO, Eldredge DN (1952) Heating of animals by absorbed sound energy. J Cell Comp Physiol 39:487–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by the Adaptable and Seamless Technology Transfer Program through Target-driven R&D (A-STEP) from the Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST) Grant Number AS3015012R.

We would like to thank Editage (www.editage.com) for English language editing.

We would like to thank the members of the study group formed for the investigation of airborne ultrasound exposure, consisting of experts from Japan on noise problems and/or ultrasonics. We convened the study group in 2020 and held four meetings (in person in March and online in May, July, and September). This chapter is based on the discussion carried out by this study group. Table 4 presents the member list of the study group, and Fig. 10 displays the group photo of the meeting held on March 4, 2020, in Tokyo, Japan.

Table 4 Member list of the study group convened on airborne ultrasound exposure
Fig. 10
In a black and white group photograph of the fourteen members of the study group, one is on a computer screen, that convened on airborne ultrasound exposure.

Group photo of the first meeting of the study group convened on airborne ultrasound exposure

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takayuki Hoshi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hoshi, T. (2022). Ultrasound Exposure in Mid-Air Haptics. In: Georgiou, O., Frier, W., Freeman, E., Pacchierotti, C., Hoshi, T. (eds) Ultrasound Mid-Air Haptics for Touchless Interfaces. Human–Computer Interaction Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04043-6_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-04043-6_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-04042-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-04043-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics