Skip to main content
Book cover

Mapping LGBTQ Spaces and Places pp 341–370Cite as

Space and Identity: Comparing the Production of Queer Spaces in Amsterdam and Hong Kong

  • 465 Accesses

Abstract

Queer (LGBTQ+) subjectivities and the production of space is well researched in the U.S. context. This chapter investigates the link between queer identity movements and their urban context to explain the formation of queer spaces. A framework for analyzing the production of space is detailed, developed through comparing the U.S. with two novel cases: Amsterdam, Netherlands and Hong Kong, China. Five dimensions are identified: identity, spatial, social, economic and governance. This chapter argues that a focus on capitalism has obfuscated the importance of other variables in the production of space. A holistic perspective acknowledges the path-dependent context embedded within a globalized world, exposing an over-reliance on economic explanations in contemporary research on the production of space and illuminating the crucial and neglected relationship between identity and governance.

Keywords

  • Queer
  • Amsterdam
  • Hong Kong
  • Production of space
  • Identity

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • DOI: 10.1007/978-3-031-03792-4_21
  • Chapter length: 30 pages
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
eBook
USD   169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • ISBN: 978-3-031-03792-4
  • Instant PDF download
  • Readable on all devices
  • Own it forever
  • Exclusive offer for individuals only
  • Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout
Hardcover Book
USD   219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
Learn about institutional subscriptions
Fig. 21.1
Fig. 21.2
Fig. 21.3
Fig. 21.4

References

  • Adam, B. D. (1995). The rise of the gay and lesbian movement. Twayne Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacker, K. B., & Morrow-Jones, H. A. (2005). Neighborhood factors associated with same-sex households in U.S. cities. Urban Geography, 26(5), 385–409.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Andrucki, M. J., & Elder, G. S. (2007). Locating the state in queer space: GLBT non-profit organizations in Vermont, USA. Social & Cultural Geography, 8(1), 89–104.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong, E. A., & Crage, S. M. (2006). Movements and memory: The making of the stonewall myth. American Sociological Review, 71(5), 724–751.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Badgett, M. V. L, Choi, S. K., & Wilson, B. D. M. (2019). LGBT poverty in the United States a study of differences between sexual orientation and gender identity groups. UCLA School of Law Williams Institute. https://williamsinstitute.law.ucla.edu/publications/lgbt-poverty-us/

  • Barber, L. G. (2002). Marching on Washington: The forging of an American political tradition. University of California Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., & Binnie, J. (2004). Authenticating queer space: Citizenship, urbanism and governance. Urban Studies, 41(9), 1807–1820.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D., & Valentine, G. (1995). Mapping desire: Geographies of sexualities. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bérubé, A. (1990). Coming out under fire: The history of gay men and women in world war II. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, G. (2012). Homonormativity: A metropolitan concept that denigrates “ordinary” gay lives. Journal of Homosexuality, 59(7), 1065–1072.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. (2014). Gender and sexuality II: There goes the gayborhood? Progress in Human Geography, 38(3), 457–465.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burger, A., & Veldheer, V. (2001). The growth of the nonprofit sector in the Netherlands. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(2), 221–246.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Burawoy, M. (1998). The extended case method. Theory, 16(1), 4–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1983). The city and the grassroots: A cross-cultural theory of urban social movements. University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M., & Murphy, K. (1982). Cultural identity and urban structure: The spatial organization of San Francisco’s gay community. In N. I. Fainstein & S. F. Fainstein (Eds.), Urban policy under capitalism (pp. 237–259). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Census and Statistics Department Hong Kong. (2020). Table E001: Number of domestic households by monthly household income and type of housing. Retrieved 29 Mar 2021: https://www.censtatd.gov.hk/hkstat/sub/sp150.jsp?productCode=D5250001

  • De Craene, V. (2017). Fucking geographers! Or the importance of neglecting the lusty researcher’s body. Gender, Place and Culture, 24(3), 449–464.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, P. C. W. (2004). The gay age of consent in Hong Kong. Criminal Law Forum, 15, 273–299.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Chan, P. C. W. (2008). Stonewalling through schizophrenia: An anti-gay rights culture in Hong Kong? Sexuality & Culture, 12, 71–87.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • City of Amsterdam (Gemeente Amsterdam). (2021). Policy: Diversity. Retrieved 29 Mar 2021: https://www.amsterdam.nl/en/policy/policy-diversity/

  • Davidson, R. J. (2015). Cultural corporatism and the COC: Gay and lesbian social movement advocacy in the Netherlands and Dutch political culture, 1986–1994. Tijdschrift voor Gender studies, 18(2), 153–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Emilio, J. (1983). Sexual politics, sexual communities: The making of a homosexual minority in the United States, 1940–1970. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Emilio, J. (2002). The world turned: Essays on gay history, politics, and culture. Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Doan, P. L., & Higgins, H. (2011). The demise of queer space? Resurgent gentrification and the assimilation of LGBT neighborhoods. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 31(1), 6–25.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Duberman, M. (1993). Stonewall. Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duggan, L. (2002). The new homonormativity: The sexual politics of neoliberalism. In R. Castronovo & D. D. Nelson (Eds.), Materializing democracy: Toward are vitalized cultural politics (pp. 175–194). Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyvendak, J. W. (1996). The depoliticization of the Dutch gay identity, or: Why Dutch gays aren’t queer. In S. Seidman (Ed.), Queer theory/sociology (pp. 421–438). Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duyvendak, J. W. (2016). The pitfalls of normalization: The Dutch case and the future of equality. In C. A. Ball (Ed.), After marriage equality: The future of LGBT rights (pp. 288–305). New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist Intelligence Unit. (2020). Worldwide Cost of Living Survey 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekenhorst, M., & van Aalst, I. (2019). Lesbian night life in Amsterdam: An explorative study of the shift from ‘queer-only’ to ‘queer-friendly’ spaces. Fennia, 197(2), 200–214.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Fainstein, S. (2010). The just City. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1996). “Friendship as a Way of Life.” In S. Lotringer (Ed.), Foucault live: Collected interviews, 1961–1984, p. 310. New York: Semiotext.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida, R., et al. (2020). How life in our cities will look after the coronavirus pandemic. Foreign Policy. Accessed 01 May 2020: https://foreignpolicy.com/2020/05/01/future-of-cities-urban-life-after-coronavirus-pandemic/

  • FRA. (2014). EU LGBT survey: European Union lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender survey; Main results. Equality. Publication Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghaziani, A. (2014). There goes the gayborhood? Princeton University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaziani, A. (2015). ‘Gay enclaves face prospect of being passé’: How assimilation affects the spatial expressions of sexuality in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(4), 756–771.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaziani, A., & Baldassarri, D. (2011). Cultural anchors and the organization of differences: A multi-method analysis of LGBT marches on Washington. American Sociological Review, 76(2), 179–206.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaziani, A., Taylor, V., & Stone, A. (2016). Cycles of sameness and difference in LGBT social movements. Annual Review of Sociology, 42(1), 165–183.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Gieryn, T. (2000). A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 26, 463–496.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2008). The right to the city. New Left Review, 53, 23–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanhardt, C. B. (2008). Butterflies, whistles, and fists: Gay safe street patrols and the new gay ghetto, 1976–1981. Radical History Review, 100(Winter), 60–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place : Transgender bodies, subcultural lives. New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekma, G. (2011). Queers and Muslims: The Dutch case. Mcalester International, 27(6), 27–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekma, G., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2011a). Queer Netherlands: A puzzling example. Sexualities, 14(6), 625–631.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Hekma, G., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2011b). Chapter 7: The Netherlands: Depoliticization of Homosexuality and Homosexualization of Politics. In M. Tremblay, D. Paternotte, & C. Johnson (Eds.), The lesbian and gay movement and the state. Comparative insights into a transformed relationship (pp. 103–117). Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heritage Foundation. (2021). Press release: 2021 index of economic freedom: Global economic freedom remains at all-time high, U.S. Drops To An All-Time Low. Retrieved: https://www.heritage.org/press/2021-index-economic-freedom-global-economic-freedom-remains-all-time-high-us-drops-all-time

  • HKSAR (2011). Policy address. Available at: http://www.policyaddress.gov.hk

  • Joslyn, H. (2019). Inside L.A. LGBT Center's $57 Million Campaign. The Chronicle of Philanthropy, 31(8), 40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Judgment. (2019). legalref.judiciary.hk. Retrieved 30 May 2019.

  • Knopp, L. (1992). Sexuality and the spatial dynamics of capitalism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 10(6), 651–669.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, T. S. K. (2012). A fading Tongzhi heterotopia: Hong Kong older gay men’s use of spaces. Sexualities, 15(8), 896–916.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, L. W. C. (2011). Discriminatory zoning in colonial Hong Kong. Property Management, 29(1), 50–86. Emerald Group Publishing.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, S. K. (1982). Society and politics in Hong Kong. The Chinese University of Hong Kong.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, C. and Lam, J. (2019, 10 June). New head of Hong Kong’s Equal Opportunities Commission to start drive to tackle anti-LGBT discrimination later this year. South China Morning Post.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lauria, M., & Knopp, L. (1985). Toward an analysis of the role of gay communities in the urban renaissance. Urban Geography, 6(2), 152–169.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, K.-M., & Law, K. Y. (2014). Colonialism, sinicization and ethnic minorities in Hong Kong. In N. Vasu, Y. Chin, & K.-y. Law (Eds.), Nations, national narratives and communities in the Asia-Pacific (pp. 111–141). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefèbvre, H. (1991). The production of space / Henri Lefebvre. Transl. [from the French 1974] by Donald Nicholson-Smith. Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1976). The Survival of Capitalism. Translated by Frank Bryant. New York: St. Martin’s Press. Politics & Society, 6(4), 520.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, N. M. (2016). Canaries in the mine? Gay community, consumption and aspiration in neoliberal Washington, DC. Urban Studies, 54(3), 695–712.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, F. (2000). From citizenship to queer counter public: Reading Taipei’s New Park. Communal/Plural, 8(1), 81–94.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Mattson, G. (2015). Style and the value of gay nightlife: Homonormative placemaking in San Francisco. Urban Studies, 52(16), 3144–3159.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nash, C. J., & Gorman-Murray, A. (2014). LGBT neighbourhoods and “New Mobilities:” Towards understanding transformations in sexual and gendered landscapes. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(3), 756–772.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaides, B., & Wiese, A. (2017). Suburbanization in the United States after 1945. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of American History.

    Google Scholar 

  • Netherlands Institute for Social Research. (2017). LGBTI equality in the Netherlands: Orange is always part of the rainbow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oswin, N. (2008). Critical geographies and the uses of sexuality: Deconstructing queer space. Progress in Human Geography, 32(1), 89–103.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, L. (2009). Cracking under pressure: Narrating the decline of the Amsterdam squatters' movement. Pennsylvania State University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peck, J. (2015). Cities beyond compare? Regional Studies, 49(1), 160–182.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Peng, R., & Wheaton, W. C. (1994). Effects of restrictive land supply on housing in Hong Kong: An econometric analysis. Journal of Housing Research, 5(2 Special Issue: Housing Market Research: An International Perspective), 263–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, C. J. (1997). Values in transition: The development of the Gay and Lesbian Rights Movement in Hong Kong. Loyola of L.A. International & Comparative Law Review, 19, 337–362.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podmore, J. (2013). Critical commentary: Sexualities landscapes beyond homonormativity. Geoforum, 49, 263–267.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Pruijt, H. (2003). Is the institutionalization of urban movements inevitable? A comparison of the opportunities for sustained squatting in New York City and Amsterdam. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 27(1), 133–157.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Puar, J. K. (2007). Terrorist assemblages: Homonationalism in queer times. Duke University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rich, A. (1980). Compulsory heterosexuality and lesbian existence. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 5(4), 631–660.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1984). Thinking sex: Notes for a radical theory of the politics of sexuality, in Vance, Carole. In Pleasure and Danger: Exploring Female Sexuality (pp. 267–320). Pandora.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, G. (1998). The miracle mile: South of market and gay male leather in San Francisco 1962–1996. In J. Brook, C. Carlsson, & N. Peters (Eds.), Reclaiming San Francisco: History, politics, culture (pp. 247–272). City Lights Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sibalis, M. (1999). Paris-Babylone/Paris-Sodome: Images of homosexuality in the nineteenth-century city. In J. West-Sooby (Ed.), Images of the city in nineteenth-century France (pp. 13–22). Boombana Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Small, A. (2018). From conflict to consensus: Reconciling the right to freedom of religion and LGBT rights. Alternative Law Journal, 43(3), 221–224.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Small, M. L. (2009). ‘How many cases do I need?’ On science and the logic of case selection in fieldbased research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Spring, A. L. (2012). Deconcentration of urban gay enclaves: Evidence from the 2000 and 2010 U.S. censuses. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the American Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spring, A. L. (2013). Declining segregation of same-sex partners: Evidence from census 2000 and 2010. Population Research and Policy Review, 32(5), 687–716.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, D. T.-S. (2011). Conditional spaces: Hong Kong lesbian desires and everyday life. Hong Kong University Press.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J. (2012). An actually existing just city? The fight for the right to the city in Amsterdam. In N. Brenner, P. Marcuse, & M. Mayer (Eds.), Cities for people, not for profit: Critical urban theory and the right to the city (pp. 197–214). Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uitermark, J. (2004). Framing urban injustices: The case of the Amsterdam squatter movement. Space and Polity, 8, 227–244.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Valentine, G. (2007). Theorizing and researching intersectionality: A challenge for feminist geography. The Professional Geographer, 59(1), 10–21.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • van Lisdonk, J., Nencel, L., & Keuzenkamp, S. (2018). Labeling same-sex sexuality in a tolerant society that values normality: The Dutch case. Journal of Homosexuality, 65(13), 1892–1915.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Weston, K. (1995). Get thee to a big city: Sexual imaginary and the great gay migration. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies, 2(3), 253–277.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, W. J. (1987). The truly disadvantaged: The inner city, the underclass, and public policy. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Population Review. (2020). Hong Kong and Amsterdam. Accessed: December 2020 at https://worldpopulationreview.com/

  • Yeung, R. L. A., Chiu, F. T. C., & Kwok, J. Y. C. (2017). Corporatist governance in Hong Kong: The case of the sports and arts functional constituency. Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration, 39(3), 163–176.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yue, A., & Leung, H. H.-S. (2017). Notes towards the queer Asian city: Singapore and Hong Kong. Urban Studies, 54(3), 747–764.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  • Zebracki, M. (2017). Homomonument as queer micropublic: An emotional geography of sexual citizenship. Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, 108(3), 345–355.

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Urban Studies Research Masters, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

    Katie Poltz

Authors
  1. Katie Poltz
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katie Poltz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Inst of Demography Campus Condorcet, Paris 1-Pantheon Sorbonne University, Aubervilliers cedex, France

    Assoc. Prof. Marianne Blidon

  2. Department of Geography, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA

    Prof. Stanley D. Brunn

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Poltz, K. (2022). Space and Identity: Comparing the Production of Queer Spaces in Amsterdam and Hong Kong. In: Blidon, M., Brunn, S.D. (eds) Mapping LGBTQ Spaces and Places. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03792-4_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-03792-4_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-03791-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-03792-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)