Abstract
In addition to critical thinking, which should be employed in any type of analysis, various analysis methods are used by analysts (Jones, 1998). Humans too often let emotions affect their rationality when thinking through problems or questions. Often we are content to settle for the first solution found. Other times, one element of a solution is acceptable so the fact that the rest of the solution is not suitable is ignored. In addition to critical thinking, a number of specific techniques can be used to structure our thinking and ensure that a number of objectives are considered. One of the most common techniques is Analysis of Competing Hypotheses (ACH) (Heuer, 1999). Using this method, the analyst considers a set of hypotheses, and then looks for evidence that supports or refutes the different hypotheses. Different mathematical methods can be used to score the evidence and determine which hypothesis has the strongest supporting evidence. Other techniques such as the Devil’s Advocate, the use of timelines, and decision/event trees are discussed in Jones (1998).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Scholtz, J. (2018). Analytic Methods. In: User-Centered Evaluation of Visual Analytics. Synthesis Lectures on Visualization. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02605-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02605-8_3
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-01477-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-02605-8
eBook Packages: Synthesis Collection of Technology (R0)eBColl Synthesis Collection 7