Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bazerman, C. (1988). Shaping written knowledge: The genre and activity of the experimental article in science. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
Bazerman, C., Little, J., Bethel, L., Chavkin, T., Fouquette, D., & Garufis, J. (2005). Reference guide to writing across the curriculum. W. Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
Beaufort, A. (2007). College writing and beyond: A new framework for university writing instruction. Logan, UT: Utah State UP.
Brown, B. A., Reveles, J. M., & Kelly, G. J. (2005). Scientific literacy and discursive identity: A theoretical framework for understanding science learning. Science Education, 89, pp. 779–802. doi:10.1002/sce.20069
Carroll, L. A. (2002). Rehearsing new roles: How college students develop as writers. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UP.
Chan, L. Y., Kosuri, S., & Endy, D. (2005). Refactoring bacteriophage T7. Molecular Systems Biology, 1, p. 2005.0018. doi:10.1038/msb4100025
Craig, J. L., Poe, M., & Lerner, N. (2008). Innovation across the curriculum: Three case studies in teaching science and engineering communication. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication, 51.3, pp. 1–22.
Gee, J. P. (2000-2001). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Educational Research, 25, pp. 99–125. doi:10.2307/1167322
Hanauer, D. I., Jacobs-Sera, D., Pedulla, M. L., Crewsawn, S. G., Hendrix, R. W., & Hatfull, G. F. (2006). Teaching scientific inquiry. Science, 314, pp. 1880–1881. doi:10.1126/science .1136796
Hodson, D. (1998). Is this really what scientists do? Seeking a more authentic science and beyond the school laboratory. In J. Wellington (Ed.), Practical work in school science: Which way now? (pp. 93–108). London: Routledge.
Lave, J. (1996). Teaching, as learning, in practice. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 3.3, pp. 149–164. doi:10.1207/s15327884mca0303_2 Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge UP.
Lerner, N. (2009). The idea of a writing laboratory. Urbana: Southern Illinois UP.
Light, R. (2001). Making the most of college: Students speak their minds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.
Office of the Communication Requirement (2008). About the Requirement. MIT Undergraduate Communication requirement. Retrieved February 1, 2008, from http://web.mit.edu/commreq/background.html.
Sternglass, M. S. (1997). Time to know them: A longitudinal study of writing and learning at the college level. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2009 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuldell, N., Lerner, N. (2009). Writing and Speaking as Biological Engineers. In: Genome Refactoring. Synthesis Lectures on Synthetic Biology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02569-3_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02569-3_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-01441-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-02569-3
eBook Packages: Synthesis Collection of Technology (R0)eBColl Synthesis Collection 2