Abstract
The recently experienced hype concerning the so-called “4th Industrial Revolution” of production systems has prompted several papers of various subtopics regarding Cyber-Physical Production Systems (CPPS). However, important aspects such as the modeling of CPPS to understand the theory regarding the performance of highly non-ergodic and non-deterministic flexible manufacturing systems in terms of exit rate (ER), manufacturing lead time (MLT), and on-time delivery (OTD) have not yet been examined systematically and even less modeled analytically.
This chapter mainly bases on the paper: Exploiting Virtual Elasticity of Production Systems to Respect OTD—Part 3: Basic Considerations for Modeling CPPS Characterized by Non-ergodic Order Entry and Non-deterministic Product-mix for Fully Flexible Addressable Workstations, AJOR, 2022, 12, 19–63.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Rüttimann, Stöckli. 2020. From batch & queue to industry 4.0-type manufacturing systems: A taxonomy of alternative production models. JSSM 13: 299–316.
Rüttimann. 2017. Lean Compendium—Introduction to Modern Manufacturing Theory, Springer.
Rüttimann, Stöckli. 2021. Considerations on present production science theory and didactics: The evident lack of a rational manufacturing theory. JSSM 14: 482–501.
Rüttimann, Stöckli. 2020. Exploiting virtual elasticity of production systems to respecting OTD—Part1: Post-optimality conditions for ergodic order arrivals in fixed capacity regimes. AJOR 10: 321–342.
Rüttimann, Stöckli. 2021. Exploiting virtual elasticity of manufacturing systems to respect OTD—Part2: Post-optimality conditions for the cases of ergodic and non-ergodic order rate with deterministic product-mix. AJOR 11: 141–165.
Kagermann et al. 2013. Umsetzungsempfehlungen für das Zukunftsprojekt Industrie 4.0—Abschlussbericht des Arbeitskreises Industrie 4.0, April 2013, internet www.acatech.de
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Zukunftsbild Industrie 4.0, internet www.plattform-i40.de
Jones, Snider, Nassehi, Yon, Hicks. 2019. Characterising the digital twin: A systematic literature review. CIRPJ 544.
Ding, Chan, Zhang, Zhou, Zhang. 2019. Defining a digital twin-based cyber-physical production system for autonomous manufacturing in smart shop floors. International Journal of Production Research.
Park, Lee, Kim, Noh. 2019. Digital twin-based cyber physical production system architectural framework for personalized production. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology.
Asadollahi-Yazdi, E., P. Couzon, N. Nguyen, Y. Ouazene, and F. Yalaoui. 2020. Industry 4.0: Revolution or evolution? American Journal of Operations Research 10: 241–268.
Schwede, C., L. Gehrke. 2015. SMART FACE—Industry 4.0 in car manufacturing. Towards a new paradigm for production and logistics, Fraunhofer IML/Volkswagen Group, presentation Munich December 1st, www.iml.fraunhofer.de
Rüttimann, Stöckli. 2016. Lean and industry 4.0—Twins, partners, or contenders? A Due Clarification Regarding the Supposed Clash of Two Production Systems, JSSM 9: 485–500.
Rüttimann. 2015. Discourse about linear programming and lean manufacturing: Two different approaches with a similar converging rational. JSSM 8: 85–91.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rüttimann, B.G., Stöckli, M.T. (2022). Flexibility and the One-Off Product Challenge of CPPS. In: Elements of Advanced Manufacturing Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02047-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-02047-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-02046-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-02047-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)