Abstract
The starting premise of this chapter is the insight made by some theorists of vulnerability, that responses to vulnerability should, to the greatest extent possible promote the agency of others through non-paternalistic forms of care. We use this as an injunction to discuss the role of vulnerability as a dimension of children’s well-being. Drawing upon two multi-stage qualitative studies with children, 8–16 years, in New South Wales Australia, on children’s well-being, the chapter proceeds by discussing the relationship between vulnerability and autonomy in children’s discussions of what is important to their well-being. We suggest, from an analysis of children’s discussions of safety, that safety is associated with well-being when it also promotes a sense of autonomy. We discuss two aspects of safety—‘rule safety’ and ‘metaphorical safety’, as autonomy promoting. We go on to show, from children’s discussion of self-determination, that expressions of self-determination important to children’s well-being include children providing care to others (practical care) and demonstrating concern about other people and causes (abstract care). We discuss some implications of the interrelatedness between protection/autonomy and self-determination/care for social work theory and practice, arguing that social work practice with children must provide opportunities for self-determination and secondly, that children, as well as being care recipients (those being protected) must also be recognised as being agents who have the capacity to care, and that this is often an expression of their self-determination.
We would like to thank Michel Edenborough for her valuable contributions to this chapter. In particular her involvement in discussions about early drafts of this paper and in being part of the fieldwork team for this project.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The names of the suburbs, like those of the participants, are pseudonyms.
References
Ariès, P. (1962 [1960]) Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. Penguin.
Australian Association of Social Workers. (2020). Australian Association of Social Workers Code of ethics. Melbourne.
Benninger, E., & Savahl, S. (2017). Children’s discursive constructions of the ‘self’. Child Indicators Research, 10(4), 899–927.
Berger, P. L., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Doubleday & Company.
Bessell, S. (2011). Participation in decision-making in out-of-home care in Australia: What do young people say? Children and Youth Services Review, 33(4), 496–501.
Brown, K., Ecclestone, K., & Emmel, N. (2017). The many faces of vulnerability. Social Policy and Society, 16(3), 497–510.
Collings, S., & Davies, L. (2008). ‘For the sake of the children’: Making sense of children and childhood in the context of child protection. Journal of Social Work Practice, 22(2), 181–193.
Council of Australian Governments (COAG). (2009). Protecting children is Everyone’s business: National Framework for protecting Australia’s children 2009–2020. Commonwealth of Australia.
Daniel, B. (2010). Concepts of adversity, risk, vulnerability and resilience: A discussion in the context of the ‘child protection system. Social Policy & Society, 9(2), 231–241.
Dobrowolsky, A., & Lister, R. (2008). Social investment: The discourse and the dimensions of change. In M. Powell (Ed.), Modernising the welfare state: The Blair legacy (pp. 125–142). The Policy Press.
Erikson, E. (1950). Childhood and society (1st ed.). Norton.
Fattore, T., Fegter, S., & Hunner-Kreisel (Eds.). (2021). Children’s concepts of Well-being: Challenges in international comparative qualitative research. Springer.
Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2016). Children and Well-being: Towards a child standpoint. Springer.
Fawcett, B. (2009). Vulnerability questioning the certainties in social work and health. International Social Work, 52(4), 473–484.
Fine, M. D. (2019). Care and caring. In M. Payne & E. Reith-Hall (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of social work theory (pp. 83–94). Routledge.
Fineman, M. A. (2013). Equality, autonomy and the vulnerable subject in law and politics. In M. A. Fineman & A. Grear (Eds.), Vulnerability: Reflections on a new ethical Foundation for law and Politics (pp. 13–27). Ashgate.
Graham, H. (1983). Caring: A labour of love. In J. Finch & D. Groves (Eds.), A labour of love: Women, work and caring. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Grimwood, T. (2019). Autonomy and dependence. In E. Reith-Hall (Ed.), Payne, M (pp. 95–108). Routledge.
Guignon, C. (2004). On being authentic. Routledge.
Harden, J. (2000). There’s no place like home: The public/private distinction in children’s theorizing of risk and safety. Childhood, 7(1), 43–59.
Hutchby, I., & Moran-Ellis, J. (Eds.). (1998). Children and social competence: Arenas of action. The Falmer Press.
Jackson, S., & Scott, S. (1999). Risk anxiety and the social construction of childhood. In D. Lupton (Ed.), Risk and sociocultural theory: New directions and perspectives (pp. 86–107). Cambridge University Press.
Juul, S. (2010). Solidarity and social cohesion in late modernity: A question of recognition, justice and judgement in situation. European Journal of Social Theory, 13(2), 253–269.
Katz, C. (2008). Childhood as spectacle: Relays of anxiety and the reconfiguration of the child. Cultural Geographies, 15, 5–17.
Keddell, E. (2018). The vulnerable child in neoliberal contexts: The construction of children in the Aotearoa New Zealand child protection reforms. Childhood, 25(1), 93–108.
Kittay, E. F. (1999). Love’s labor: Essays on women, equality, and dependency. Routledge.
Lee, N. (2001). Childhood and society: Growing up in an age of uncertainty. Open University Press.
Mackenzie, C., Rogers, W., & Dodds, S. (2013). Vulnerability: New essays in ethics and feminist philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Miller, S. C. (2012). The ethics of need: Agency, dignity and obligation. Routledge.
Montreuil, M., Noronha, C., Floriani, N., & Carneval, F. A. (2018). Children’s moral agency: An interdisciplinary scoping review. Journal of Childhood Studies, 43(2), 17–30.
Morris, J. (2001). Impairment and disability: Constructing an ethics of care that promotes human rights. Hypatia, 16(4), 1–16.
Munro, E. (2007). Child protection. Sage.
Oliver, M., & Barnes, C. (1998). Disabled people and social policy: From exclusion to inclusion. Longman.
Padgett, D. (2007). There’s no place like (a)home: Ontological security among persons with serious mental illness in the United States. Social Science & Medicine, 64(9), 1925–1936.
Parton, N. (2006). Safeguarding childhood: Early intervention and surveillance in a late modern society. Palgrave Macmillan.
Shakespeare, T. (2000). The social relations of care. In G. Lewis, S. Gewiriz, & J. Clarke (Eds.), Rethinking social policy (pp. 52–65). Sage.
Shmueli, B., & Blecher, A. P. (2011). Privacy for children. Columbia Human Rights Law Review, 42, 759–795.
Thoits, P. A. (1990). Emotional deviance: Research agendas. In T. D. Kemper (Ed.), Research agendas in the sociology of emotions. State University of New York Press.
Turner, B. S., & Rojek, C. (2001). Society & Culture: Principles of scarcity and solidarity. Sage.
van Bijleveld, G. G., Dedding, C. W. M., & Bunders-Aelen, J. F. G. (2015). Children’s and young people’s participation within child welfare and child protection services: A state-of-the-art review. Child & Family Social Work, 20, 129–138.
Virokannas, E., Liuski, S., & Kuronen, M. (2020). The contested concept of vulnerability—A literature review. European Journal of Social Work, 23(2), 327–339.
Williams, F. (2001). In and beyond new labour: Towards a new political ethics of care. Critical Social Policy, 21(4), 467–493.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drake, G., Falloon, J., Fattore, T., Felton, R., Mason, J., Mogensen, L. (2022). Children’s Standpoint on Vulnerability: Implications for Social Work Practice with Children and Young People. In: Tiliouine, H., Benatuil, D., Lau, M.K.W. (eds) Handbook of Children’s Risk, Vulnerability and Quality of Life. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01783-4_24
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-01783-4_24
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-01782-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-01783-4
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)