Skip to main content

Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Outcomes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Urologic Surgery

Abstract

Outcome assessment of radical cystectomy and subsequent urinary diversion can be subdivided into perioperative outcome including, quality of life, erectile function and continence (in case of orthotopic bladder substitution), and oncological outcome. Five randomized clinical trials with a total of 541 patients have assessed some of these parameters prospectively and compared them between robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) with extracorporeal urinary diversion (ECUD) and open radical cystectomy (ORC). Results from a limited number of large (>100 patients) retrospective cohort studies and one prospective not randomized comparative effectiveness trial comparing RARC with intracorporeal urinary diversion (ICUD) and ORC have recently been reported.

The mean estimated blood loss, transfusion rate, and hospital length of stay favors RARC while the operation time is shorter for ORC. In terms of perioperative parameters, ICUD appear to have further advantages compared to ECUD. Rates for any complication and high-grade (Clavien-Dindo III-V) events are similar for the open and robotic approach, although a trend toward less frequent high-grade complications for RARC with ICUD compared to ORC have been observed, once the initial learning curve has been overcome.

No difference in quality of life have been detected in prospective trials comparing RARC with ECUD and ORC by patient-reported outcome. Conflicting results regarding a superior outcome exists when it comes to RARC with ICUD. Functional outcome data for intracorporeal orthotopic bladder substitution is limited; reported results implicate a comparable or slightly inferior continence compared to an open approach.

The current evidence for long-term outcomes following RARC with ECUD shows acceptable oncological outcomes comparable to open series including recurrence-free survival data, positive surgical margin rates, and lymph node yields. However, evidence for RARC with ICUD is limited with one study indicating a slightly better overall-survival rate compared with ORC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Bagi P, Nordsten CB, Kehlet H. Cystectomy for bladder cancer in Denmark during the 2006–2013 period. Dan Med J. 2016;63(4):748.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Collins JW, Patel H, Adding C, Annerstedt M, Dasgupta P, Khan SM, et al. Enhanced recovery after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: EAU robotic urology section scientific working group consensus view. Eur Urol. 2016;70(4):649–60.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, Schumacher M, Laurin O, Khazaeli D, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):654–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Nix J, Smith A, Kurpad R, Nielsen ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results. Eur Urol. 2010;57(2):196–201.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Parekh DJ, Messer J, Fitzgerald J, Ercole B, Svatek R. Perioperative outcomes and oncologic efficacy from a pilot prospective randomized clinical trial of open versus robotic assisted radical cystectomy. J Urol. 2013;189(2):474–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, Gonzalgo ML, Woods ME, Svatek RS, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2525–36.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, Silberstein J, Keren Paz GE, Donat SM, et al. Comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: a randomized clinical trial. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1042–50.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Marzouk KH, Sjoberg DD, Lee J, Donat SM, et al. Randomized trial comparing open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted laparoscopic radical cystectomy: oncologic outcomes. Eur Urol. 2018;74(4):465–71.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Khan MS, Gan C, Ahmed K, Ismail AF, Watkins J, Summers JA, et al. A single-Centre early phase randomised controlled three-arm trial of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (CORAL). Eur Urol. 2016;69(4):613–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Khan MS, Omar K, Ahmed K, Gan C, Van Hemelrijck M, Nair R, et al. Long-term oncological outcomes from an early phase randomised controlled three-arm trial of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (CORAL). Eur Urol. 2020;77(1):110–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Satkunasivam R, Tallman CT, Taylor JM, Miles BJ, Klaassen Z, Wallis CJD. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy: a meta-analysis of oncologic, perioperative, and complication-related outcomes. Eur Urol Oncol. 2019;2(4):443–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kimura S, Iwata T, Foerster B, Fossati N, Briganti A, Nasu Y, et al. Comparison of perioperative complications and health-related quality of life between robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Urol. 2019;26(8):760–74.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bertolo R, Agudelo J, Garisto J, Armanyous S, Fergany A, Kaouk J. Perioperative outcomes and complications after robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal or extracorporeal ileal conduit urinary diversion: head-to-head comparison from a single-institutional prospective study. Urology. 2019;129:98–105.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lenfant L, Verhoest G, Campi R, Parra J, Graffeille V, Masson-Lecomte A, et al. Perioperative outcomes and complications of intracorporeal vs extracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a real-life, multi-institutional French study. World J Urol. 2018;36(11):1711–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hussein AA, May PR, Jing Z, Ahmed YE, Wijburg CJ, Canda AE, et al. Outcomes of intracorporeal urinary diversion after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol. 2018;199(5):1302–11.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang JH, Ericson KJ, Thomas LJ, Knorr J, Khanna A, Crane A, et al. Large single institution comparison of perioperative outcomes and complications of open radical cystectomy, intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy and robotic extracorporeal approach. J Urol. 2020;203(3):512–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Wijburg CJ, Michels CTJ, Hannink G, Grutters JPC, Rovers MM, Alfred Witjes J, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in bladder cancer patients: a multicentre comparative effectiveness study. Eur Urol. 2021;79(5):609–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Novara G, De Marco V, Aragona M, Boscolo-Berto R, Cavalleri S, Artibani W, et al. Complications and mortality after radical cystectomy for bladder transitional cell cancer. J Urol. 2009;182(3):914–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Novara G, Catto JW, Wilson T, Annerstedt M, Chan K, Murphy DG, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):376–401.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hosseini A, Mortezavi A, Sjoberg S, Laurin O, Adding C, Collins J, et al. Robot-assisted intracorporeal orthotopic bladder substitution after radical cystectomy: perioperative morbidity and oncological outcomes – a single-institution experience. BJU Int. 2020;126(4):464–71.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Koie T, Ohyama C, Yoneyama T, Nagasaka H, Yamamoto H, Imai A, et al. Robotic cross-folded U-configuration intracorporeal ileal neobladder for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: initial experience and functional outcomes. Int J Med Robot. 2018;14(6):e1955.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Asimakopoulos AD, Campagna A, Gakis G, Corona Montes VE, Piechaud T, Hoepffner JL, et al. Nerve sparing, robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal bladder substitution in the male. J Urol. 2016;196(5):1549–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Desai MM, Gill IS, de Castro Abreu AL, Hosseini A, Nyberg T, Adding C, et al. Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder during radical cystectomy in 132 patients. J Urol. 2014;192(6):1734–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Simone G, Papalia R, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Minisola F, Ferriero M, et al. Robotic intracorporeal Padua ileal bladder: surgical technique, perioperative, oncologic and functional outcomes. Eur Urol. 2018;73(6):934–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tan WS, Lamb BW, Tan MY, Ahmad I, Sridhar A, Nathan S, et al. In-depth critical analysis of complications following robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion. Eur Urol Focus. 2017;3(2–3):273–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schwentner C, Sim A, Balbay MD, Todenhofer T, Aufderklamm S, Halalsheh O, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal neobladder formation: on the way to a standardized procedure. World J Surg Oncol. 2015;13(3):1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Simone G, Tuderti G, Misuraca L, Anceschi U, Ferriero M, Minisola F, et al. Perioperative and mid-term oncologic outcomes of robotic assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder: results of a propensity score matched comparison with open cohort from a single-centre series. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2018;44(9):1432–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gok B, Atmaca AF, Canda AE, Asil E, Koc E, Ardicoglu A, et al. Robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal Studer pouch formation for bladder cancer: experience in ninety-eight cases. J Endourol. 2019;33(5):375–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Daza J, Jones T, Raven M, Charap A, Sfakianos JP, Mehrazin R, et al. Functional outcomes after robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal diversion: a systematic review. Bladder Cancer. 2020;6:329–42.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Tyritzis SI, Hosseini A, Collins J, Nyberg T, Jonsson MN, Laurin O, et al. Oncologic, functional, and complications outcomes of robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal neobladder diversion. Eur Urol. 2013;64(5):734–41.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Sim A, Balbay MD, Todenhofer T, Aufderklamm S, Halalsheh O, Mischinger J, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy and intracorporeal urinary diversion – safe and reproducible? Cent European J Urol. 2015;68(1):18–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Porreca A, Mineo Bianchi F, Romagnoli D, D’Agostino D, Corsi P, Giampaoli M, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with totally intracorporeal urinary diversion: surgical and early functional outcomes through the learning curve in a single high-volume center. J Robot Surg. 2020;14(2):261–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lee RK, Abol-Enein H, Artibani W, Bochner B, Dalbagni G, Daneshmand S, et al. Urinary diversion after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: options, patient selection, and outcomes. BJU Int. 2014;113(1):11–23.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Atmaca AF, Canda AE, Gok B, Akbulut Z, Altinova S, Balbay MD. Open versus robotic radical cystectomy with intracorporeal Studer diversion. JSLS. 2015;19(1):e201400193.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Satkunasivam R, Santomauro M, Chopra S, Plotner E, Cai J, Miranda G, et al. Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic neobladder: urodynamic outcomes, urinary function, and health-related quality of life. Eur Urol. 2016;69(2):247–53.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Jonsson MN, Adding LC, Hosseini A, Schumacher MC, Volz D, Nilsson A, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion in patients with transitional cell carcinoma of the bladder. Eur Urol. 2011;60(5):1066–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Goh AC, Gill IS, Lee DJ, de Castro Abreu AL, Fairey AS, Leslie S, et al. Robotic intracorporeal orthotopic ileal neobladder: replicating open surgical principles. Eur Urol. 2012;62(5):891–901.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tan WS, Sridhar A, Goldstraw M, Zacharakis E, Nathan S, Hines J, et al. Robot-assisted intracorporeal pyramid neobladder. BJU Int. 2015;116(5):771–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Mastroianni R, Tuderti G, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Brassetti A, Ferriero M, et al. Comparison of patient-reported health-related quality of life between open radical cystectomy and robot-assisted radical cystectomy with intracorporeal urinary diversion: interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Urol Focus. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.002.

  40. Messer JC, Punnen S, Fitzgerald J, Svatek R, Parekh DJ. Health-related quality of life from a prospective randomised clinical trial of robot-assisted laparoscopic vs open radical cystectomy. BJU Int. 2014;114(6):896–902.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Ost MC, Patel KP, Rastinehad AR, Chu PY, Anderson AE, Smith AD, et al. Pneumoperitoneum with carbon dioxide inhibits macrophage tumor necrosis factor-alpha secretion: source of transitional-cell carcinoma port-site metastasis, with prophylactic irrigation strategies to decrease laparoscopic oncologic risks. J Endourol. 2008;22(1):105–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Albisinni S, Fossion L, Oderda M, Aboumarzouk OM, Aoun F, Tokas T, et al. Critical analysis of early recurrence after laparoscopic radical cystectomy in a large cohort by the ESUT. J Urol. 2016;195(6):1710–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Nguyen DP, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Wu X, O’Malley P, Inoyatov IM, Ayangbesan A, et al. Recurrence patterns after open and robot-assisted radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. Eur Urol. 2015;68(3):399–405.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B, Chan K, Palou J, Stenzl A, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):402–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Rai BP, Bondad J, Vasdev N, Adshead J, Lane T, Ahmed K, et al. Robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;4:CD011903.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Elsayed AS, Gibson S, Jing Z, Wijburg C, Wagner AA, Mottrie A, et al. Rates and patterns of recurrences and survival outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the International Robotic Cystectomy Consortium. J Urol. 2021;205(2):407–13.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Collins JW, Hosseini A, Adding C, Nyberg T, Koupparis A, Rowe E, et al. Corrigendum re: “Early recurrence patterns following totally intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the EAU robotic urology section (ERUS) scientific working group” [Eur Urol 2017;71:723-6]. Eur Urol. 2017;72(3):e80.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Hautmann RE, de Petriconi RC, Pfeiffer C, Volkmer BG. Radical cystectomy for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder without neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapy: long-term results in 1100 patients. Eur Urol. 2012;61(5):1039–47.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Collins JW, Hosseini A, Adding C, Nyberg T, Koupparis A, Rowe E, et al. Early recurrence patterns following totally intracorporeal robot-assisted radical cystectomy: results from the EAU robotic urology section (ERUS) scientific working group. Eur Urol. 2017;71(5):723–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Wallmeroth A, Wagner U, Moch H, Gasser TC, Sauter G, Mihatsch MJ. Patterns of metastasis in muscle-invasive bladder cancer (pT2-4): an autopsy study on 367 patients. Urol Int. 1999;62(2):69–75.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Khetrapal P, Tan WS, Lamb B, Nathan S, Briggs T, Shankar A, et al. Port-site metastases after robotic radical cystectomy: a systematic review and management options. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2017;15(4):440–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hosseini, A., Mortezavi, A. (2022). Robotic-Assisted Radical Cystectomy Outcomes. In: Wiklund, P., Mottrie, A., Gundeti, M.S., Patel, V. (eds) Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_65

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-00362-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-00363-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics