Skip to main content

Step-by-Step Approach to Robot-Assisted Male Cystectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Urologic Surgery
  • 982 Accesses

Abstract

Robot-assisted radical cystectomy (RARC) has gained popularity as a minimally invasive alternative to the standard open approach, bringing to potential advantages in terms of lower intraoperative blood loss, postoperative blood transfusions, and morbidity, leading to a shorter hospital stay. Moreover, due to the enhanced three-dimensional (3D) visualization and high precision movements, the robotic approach seems to give significant advantages when performing a nerve-sparing surgery in male patients. In fact, several steps of the surgical procedure are at risk of nerve damage and may be performed respecting the neural periprostatic network. In this chapter, we describe the step-by-step surgical technique of both non-nerve-sparing and nerve-sparing RARC. We described the patient positioning, considering the differences in the docking step between da Vinci® X, Si, and Xi systems. Later on, the dissection of the ureters, posterior dissection, lateral dissection, anterior dissection, and the dissection of the urethra are described in both approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Professionals S-O. EAU Guidelines: muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer. Uroweb. https://uroweb.org/guideline/bladder-cancer-muscle-invasive-and-metastatic/. Accessed 25 May 2021.

  2. Novara G, Catto JWF, Wilson T, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):376–401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.12.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Musch M, Janowski M, Steves A, et al. Comparison of early postoperative morbidity after robot-assisted and open radical cystectomy: results of a prospective observational study. BJU Int. 2014;113(3):458–67. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.12374.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Prospective randomized controlled trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: perioperative and pathologic results – ClinicalKey. https://www.clinicalkey.com/#!/content/playContent/1-s2.0-S0302283809010288?returnurl=https:%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0302283809010288%3Fshowall%3Dtrue&referrer=https:%2F%2Fpubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov%2F. Accessed 25 May 2021.

  5. Desai MM, Gill IS. “The devil is in the details”: randomized trial of robotic versus open radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(6):1053–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.01.017.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parekh DJ, Reis IM, Castle EP, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy versus open radical cystectomy in patients with bladder cancer (RAZOR): an open-label, randomised, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2018;391(10139):2525–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30996-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Khan MS, Gan C, Ahmed K, et al. A single-centre early phase randomised controlled three-arm trial of open, robotic, and laparoscopic radical cystectomy (CORAL). Eur Urol. 2016;69(4):613–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2015.07.038.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Collins JW, Tyritzis S, Nyberg T, et al. Robot-assisted radical cystectomy: description of an evolved approach to radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2013;64(4):654–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2013.05.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nyame YA, Zargar H, Ramirez D, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic bilateral nerve sparing and apex preserving cystoprostatectomy in young men with bladder cancer. Urology. 2016;94:259–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2016.04.026.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Freeing ureter male definitieve versie + tekst (MP4 309222 kb)

Posterior dissection male volledige versie + tekst (MP4 231256 kb)

Lateral dissection non nerve sparing male dia+ volledige film + tekst (MP4 244142 kb)

Apical dissection male dia + volledige film + tekst (MP4 277652 kb)

Nerve sparing RARC (MOV 218205 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Palou, J., D’Hont, F., Annerstedt, M., Piana, A. (2022). Step-by-Step Approach to Robot-Assisted Male Cystectomy. In: Wiklund, P., Mottrie, A., Gundeti, M.S., Patel, V. (eds) Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_56

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_56

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-00362-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-00363-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics