Skip to main content

Robotic Simple Prostatectomy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Urologic Surgery
  • 953 Accesses

Abstract

Robotic simple prostatectomy is indicated in patients with enlarged glands (>80 g) who present with lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia. Currently, the robotic approach affords better perioperative outcomes over the open approach with more favorable estimated blood loss, length of stay, duration of catheterization, and elimination of continuous bladder irrigation. The robotic approach can be performed via a variety of approaches. Herein, we describe our technique in performing a robotic simple prostatectomy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. McConnell JD, Roehrborn CG, Bautista OM, et al. The long-term effect of doxazosin, finasteride, and combination therapy on the clinical progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(25):2387–98.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Foster HE, Barry MJ, Dahm P, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline. J Urol. 2018;200:612.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pathak RA, Broderick GA, Igel TC, et al. Impact of minimally invasive benign prostatic hyperplasia therapies on 30- and 90-day postoperative office encounters. Urology. 2017;99:186–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Parsons JK, Dahm P, Kohler TS, et al. Surgical management of lower urinary tract symptoms attributed to benign prostatic hyperplasia: AUA Guideline amendment 2020. J Urol. 2020;204:799.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Mariano MB, Graziottin TM, Tefilli MV. Laparoscopic prostatectomy with vascular control for benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol. 2002;167:2528–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Baumert H, Ballaro A, Dugardin F, et al. Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: a comparative study. J Urol. 2006;175:1691–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. McCullough TC, Heldwein FL, Soon SJ, et al. Laparoscopic versus open simple prostatectomy: an evaluation of morbidity. J Endourol. 2009;23:129–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Sotelo R, Clavijo R, Carmona O, et al. Robotic simple prostatectomy. J Urol. 2008;179:513–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dubey D, Hemal AK. Robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy with complete urethrovesical reconstruction. Indian J Urol. 2012;28:231–2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Patel MN, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted laparoscopic simple anatomic prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am. 2013;31:385–92.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Autorino R, Zargar H, Mariano M, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotic and laparoscopic simple prostatectomy: a European-American multi-institutional analysis. Eur Urol. 2014;68:86–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Moschovas MC, Timoteo F, Lins L, et al. Robotic surgery techniques to approach benign prostatic hyperplasia disease: a comprehensive literature review and the state of art. Asian J Urol. 2021;8:81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pathak RA, Patel M, Hemal AK. Comprehensive approach to port placement templates for robot-assisted laparoscopic urologic surgeries. J Endourol. 2017;31:1269–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kaouk J, Sawczyn G, Wilson C, et al. Single-port percutaneous transvesical simple prostatectomy using the SP robotic system: initial clinical experience. Urology. 2020;141:171–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gratzke C, Schlenker B, Seitz M, et al. Complications and early postoperative outcome after open prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic enlargement: results of a prospective multicenter study. J Urol. 2007;177:1419–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Mariano M, Tefilli M, Graziottin T, et al. Laparoscopic prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia – a six-year experience. Eur Urol. 2005;49:127–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Singh I, Hudson J, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy for a giant prostate with retrieval of vesical stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2010;42:615–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Coelho RF, Chauhan S, Sivaraman A, et al. Modified technique of robotic-assisted simple prostatectomy: advantages of a vesico-urethral anastomosis. BJU Int. 2012;109:426–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pariser J, Pearce S, Patel S, et al. National trends of simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia with an analysis of risk factors for adverse perioperative outcomes. Urology. 2015;86:721–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Liu S, Pathak RA, Hemal AK. Robot-assisted laparoscopic bladder diverticulectomy: adaptation of techniques for a variety of clinical presentations. Urology. 2021;147:311–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Davidiuk AJ, Meschia C, Young P, et al. Robotic-assisted bladder diverticulectomy: assessment of outcomes and modifications of technique. Urology. 2015;85:1347–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Otsubo S, Yokomizo A, Mochida O, et al. Significant of prostate-specific antigen-related factors in incidental prostate cancer treated by holmium laser enucleation of the prostate. World J Urol. 2015;33:329–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tan H, Marks L, Hoyt M, et al. The relationship between intolerance of uncertainly and anxiety in men on active surveillance for prostate cancer. J Urol. 2016;195:1724–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Pathak RA, Hemal AK. Management of low-risk prostate cancer in patients with enlarged glands and lower urinary tract symptoms: Robotic total prostatectomy, a novel technique. World J Urol. 2020;38(4):829–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moschovas MC, Bhat S, Fikret O, et al. Modified simple prostatectomy: an approach to address large volume BPH and associated prostate cancers. J Robot Surg. 2020;14:543–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kaouk J, Sawczyn G, Wilson C, et al. Single-port percutaneous transvesical simple prostatectomy using the SP robotic system: initial clinical experience. Urology. 2020;141:173–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Pathak, R.A., Moschovas, M.C., Thiel, D.D., Hemal, A.K. (2022). Robotic Simple Prostatectomy. In: Wiklund, P., Mottrie, A., Gundeti, M.S., Patel, V. (eds) Robotic Urologic Surgery. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00363-9_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-00362-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-00363-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics