Skip to main content

Employee Motivation According to Amoeba Principles in a Production Company

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Manufacturing III (MANUFACTURING 2022)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering ((LNME))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 441 Accesses

Abstract

Every production system consists of three elements: people, infrastructure (machines, tools) and work items (raw materials, materials). Without any of them, it is impossible to start production. People are the most important element of the production system because they decide about its creation, goals and tasks [1]. The article discusses the problem of assessing the effectiveness and efficiency of activities related to human resource management and motivation in Amoeba Management system. Motivating and communicating techniques were used as criteria to assess the effectiveness and completeness of this approach. Amoeba principles are described in the first part of the article. Motivating and communicating techniques were used as criteria to assess the effectiveness and completeness of this approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Grabowska, M., Takala, J.: Assessment of quality management system maturity. In: Hamrol, A., Ciszak, O., Legutko, S., Jurczyk, M. (eds.) Advances in Manufacturing. LNME, pp. 889–898. Springer, Cham (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-68619-6_86

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Pająk, E.: Production Management. PWN Publishing House, Warsaw (2011). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Fertsch, M.: Optimization Methodology in Adaptive Design of Production Systems. Poznan University of Technology Publishing House (1993). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lachiewicz, S., Matejun, M.: Contemporary Concepts of Production, Logistics and Quality Management. Lodz University of Technology Publishing House (2010). (in Polish) 

    Google Scholar 

  5. Aqulan, F., Al-Fandi, L.: Prioritizing process improvement initiatives in manufacturing environments. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 196, 261–268 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hamrol, A.: A new look at some aspects of maintenance and improvement of production processes. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 9(1), 34–43 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Jurburg, D., Viles, E., Tanco, M., Mateo, R.: What motivates employees to participate in continuous improvement activities? Total Qual. Manag. Bus. Excell. 28(13–14), 1469–1488 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kazuo, I.: Ameba Management. Poznan, Shinsei Consulting (2014). (in Polish)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kanert, M .: How the Japanese healed their airlines. Poznan (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kazuo, I.: Amoeba Management. The Dynamic Management System for Rapid Market Response, CRC Press, Boca Raton (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Adler, R.W., Hiromoto, T.: Amoeba management: lessons from Japan’s Kyocera. MIT Sloan Manag. Rev. 54(1), 83–89 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Zeleny, M.: Amoeba: the new generation of selfmanaging human systems. Hum. Syst. Manag. 9(2), 57–59 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hamada, K., Monden, Y.: Profit management at Kyocera corporation: the amoeba system. In: Monden, Y., Sakurai, M. (eds.) Japanese Management Accounting – A World Class Approach to Profit Management, pp. 197–210. Productivity Press, Cambridge (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Adler, R., Hiromoto, T., Suzuki, H.: Amoeba management and organizational ambidexterity: similarities, differences, and implications for organizational fit and success. Int. J. Product. Perform. Manag. 69(2), 405–427 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1108/IJPPM-07-2018-0254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yang, F.: The operation mechanism of amoeba’s organizational model. Open J. Bus. Manag. 6, 462–469 (2018). https://doi.org/10.4236/ojbm.2018.62034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Kusrini, E., Arifsa, F.S.: Design of amoeba management system in training and consulting services companies: a case study in a training & consulting company in Indonesia. In: 2019 8th International Conference on Industrial Technology and Management (ICITM) (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITM.2019.8710723

  17. Urban, W.: Amoeba management system transformation in the light of organisational change literature. Manag. Prod. Eng. Rev. 8(1), 16–23 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kyocera Corp., Consolidated Financial Data (1997–2016)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Halawi, L., McCarthy, R., Aronson, J.: Knowledge management and the competitive strategy of the firm. Learn. Organ. 4(13), 384–397 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Robbins, S.P.: Organizational Behaviour: Concepts, Controversies, Applications. Prentice Hall, Toronto (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Dźwigoł-Barosz, M .: Roles of business leaders in modern enterprises. Sci. J. Silesian Univ. Technol. Organ. Manag. 70, 105–118 (2014). Publishing House of the Silesian University of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  22. Armstrong, M., Taylor, S.: Armstrong’s Handbook of Human Resource Management Practice. British Library, London (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Argote, L., Miron-Spektor, E.: Organizational learning: from experience to knowledge. Organ. Sci. 5(22), 1123–1137 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kuo, T.: How to improve organizational performance through learning and knowledge? Int. J. Manpower 5/6(32), 581–603 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Singh, J.B.: Changes in the contents of corporate codes of ethics: an institutional interpretation. Eur. Bus. Rev. 27(4), 369–388 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marta Grabowska .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Grabowska, M., Żywicki, K., Biegała, M. (2022). Employee Motivation According to Amoeba Principles in a Production Company. In: Hamrol, A., Grabowska, M., Maletič, D. (eds) Advances in Manufacturing III. MANUFACTURING 2022. Lecture Notes in Mechanical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00218-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-00218-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-031-00166-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-031-00218-2

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics