Skip to main content

Exploring Entities in Event Detection as Question Answering

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS,volume 13185)

Abstract

In this paper, we approach a recent and under-researched paradigm for the task of event detection (ED) by casting it as a question-answering (QA) problem with the possibility of multiple answers and the support of entities. The extraction of event triggers is, thus, transformed into the task of identifying answer spans from a context, while also focusing on the surrounding entities. The architecture is based on a pre-trained and fine-tuned language model, where the input context is augmented with entities marked at different levels, their positions, their types, and, finally, their argument roles. Experiments on the ACE 2005 corpus demonstrate that the proposed model properly leverages entity information in detecting events and that it is a viable solution for the ED task. Moreover, we demonstrate that our method with different entity markers is particularly able to extract unseen event types in few-shot learning settings.

Keywords

  • Event detection
  • Question answering
  • Few-shot learning

This work has been supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grants 770299 (NewsEye) and 825153 (Embeddia), and by the ANNA and Termitrad projects funded by the Nouvelle-Aquitaine Region.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.ldc.upenn.edu/sites/www.ldc.upenn.edu/files/english-events-guidelines-v5.4.3.pdf.

  2. 2.

    In one view, the recent tasks titled MRC can also be seen as the extended tasks of question answering (QA).

  3. 3.

    We note here that event extraction generally depends on previous phases as, for example, named entity recognition, entity mention coreference, and classification. Thereinto, the named entity recognition is another hard task in the ACE evaluation and not the focus of this paper. Therefore, we will temporarily skip the phase and instead directly use the entities provided by ACE, following previous work [4, 7, 10, 12, 14, 15].

  4. 4.

    SQuAD v1.1 consists of reference passages from Wikipedia with answers and questions constructed by annotators after viewing the passage.

  5. 5.

    SQuADv2.0 augmented the SQuAD v1.1 collection with additional questions that did not have answers in the referenced passage.

  6. 6.

    https://catalog.ldc.upenn.edu/LDC2006T06.

  7. 7.

    http://stanfordnlp.github.io/CoreNLP/.

  8. 8.

    The code is available at https://github.com/nlpcl-lab/ace2005-preprocessing as it consists of the same pre-processing as utilized in several other papers [21, 23].

  9. 9.

    The sentence is lowercased for the uncased models.

References

  1. Baldini Soares, L., FitzGerald, N., Ling, J., Kwiatkowski, T.: Matching the blanks: distributional similarity for relation learning. In: Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 2895–2905. Association for Computational Linguistics, Florence, Italy (2019). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P19-1279, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P19-1279

  2. Boros, E., Moreno, J.G., Doucet, A.: Event detection with entity markers. In: Hiemstra, D., Moens, M., Mothe, J., Perego, R., Potthast, M., Sebastiani, F. (eds.) Advances in Information Retrieval - 43rd European Conference on IR Research, ECIR 2021, Virtual Event, 28 March–1 April 2021, Proceedings, Part II. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 12657, pp. 233–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-72240-1_20

  3. Brunner, G., Liu, Y., Pascual, D., Richter, O., Ciaramita, M., Wattenhofer, R.: On identifiability in transformers. In: International Conference on Learning Representations (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chen, Y., Xu, L., Liu, K., Zeng, D., Zhao, J.: Event extraction via dynamic multi-pooling convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 167–176 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Devlin, J., Chang, M.W., Lee, K., Toutanova, K.: BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805 (2018)

  6. Du, X., Cardie, C.: Event extraction by answering (almost) natural questions. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 671–683. Association for Computational Linguistics, Online (2020). https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/2020.emnlp-main.49

  7. Hong, Y., Zhang, J., Ma, B., Yao, J., Zhou, G., Zhu, Q.: Using cross-entity inference to improve event extraction. In: Proceedings of the 49th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, vol. 1, pp. 1127–1136. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hong, Y., Zhou, W., Zhang, J., Zhou, G., Zhu, Q.: Self-regulation: employing a generative adversarial network to improve event detection. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 515–526 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, L., Ji, H., Cho, K., Dagan, I., Riedel, S., Voss, C.: Zero-shot transfer learning for event extraction. In: Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), Melbourne, Australia, pp. 2160–2170. Association for Computational Linguistics (2018). https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/P18-1201, https://www.aclweb.org/anthology/P18-1201

  10. Ji, H., Grishman, R., et al.: Refining event extraction through cross-document inference. In: ACL, pp. 254–262 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Li, P., Zhu, Q., Zhou, G.: Argument inference from relevant event mentions in Chinese argument extraction. In: ACL, no. 1, pp. 1477–1487 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Li, Q., Ji, H., Huang, L.: Joint event extraction via structured prediction with global features. In: ACL, no. 1, pp. 73–82 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Li, W., Cheng, D., He, L., Wang, Y., Jin, X.: Joint event extraction based on hierarchical event schemas from FrameNet. IEEE Access 7, 25001–25015 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Liao, S., Grishman, R.: Using document level cross-event inference to improve event extraction. In: Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 789–797. Association for Computational Linguistics (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, J., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Bi, W., Liu, X.: Event extraction as machine reading comprehension. In: Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1641–1651 (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Liu, S., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Zhao, J.: Exploiting argument information to improve event detection via supervised attention mechanisms. In: Proceedings of the 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pp. 1789–1798 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Liu, S., Chen, Y., Liu, K., Zhao, J.: Exploiting argument information to improve event detection via supervised attention mechanisms. In: 55th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2017), Vancouver, Canada, pp. 1789–1798 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Liu, X., Luo, Z., Huang, H.: Jointly multiple events extraction via attention-based graph information aggregation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.09078 (2018)

  19. Madsen, A.: Visualizing memorization in RNNs. Distill (2019). https://doi.org/10.23915/distill.00016, https://distill.pub/2019/memorization-in-rnns

  20. Moreno, J.G., Doucet, A., Grau, B.: Relation classification via relation validation. In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Semantic Deep Learning (SemDeep-6), pp. 20–27 (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Nguyen, T.H., Cho, K., Grishman, R.: Joint event extraction via recurrent neural networks. In: Proceedings of NAACL-HLT, pp. 300–309 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Nguyen, T.H., Fu, L., Cho, K., Grishman, R.: A two-stage approach for extending event detection to new types via neural networks. ACL 2016, 158 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nguyen, T.H., Grishman, R.: Event detection and domain adaptation with convolutional neural networks. In: ACL, no. 2, pp. 365–371 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nguyen, T.H., Grishman, R.: Modeling skip-grams for event detection with convolutional neural networks. In: Proceedings of EMNLP (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nguyen, T.H., Grishman, R.: Graph convolutional networks with argument-aware pooling for event detection. In: Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2018) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rajpurkar, P., Jia, R., Liang, P.: Know what you don’t know: unanswerable questions for squad. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.03822 (2018)

  27. Rajpurkar, P., Zhang, J., Lopyrev, K., Liang, P.: Squad: 100,000+ questions for machine comprehension of text. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.05250 (2016)

  28. Vaswani, A., et al.: Attention is all you need. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 5998–6008 (2017)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, X., Han, X., Liu, Z., Sun, M., Li, P.: Adversarial training for weakly supervised event detection. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pp. 998–1008 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wu, Y., et al.: Google’s neural machine translation system: bridging the gap between human and machine translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.08144 (2016)

  31. Zhang, T., Ji, H., Sil, A.: Joint entity and event extraction with generative adversarial imitation learning. Data Intell. 1(2), 99–120 (2019)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emanuela Boros .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Boros, E., Moreno, J.G., Doucet, A. (2022). Exploring Entities in Event Detection as Question Answering. In: Hagen, M., et al. Advances in Information Retrieval. ECIR 2022. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 13185. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99736-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99735-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99736-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)