Skip to main content

The Place to Be: Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate for Creativity

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Homo Creativus

Part of the book series: Creativity in the Twenty First Century ((CTFC))

  • 646 Accesses

Abstract

Contextual influences in the workplace have been increasingly acknowledged as being crucial for enhancing creativity. Among various factors in the context surrounding employees, organizational culture and organizational climate have gained much attention in creativity research over the last decades. However, still many challenges exist about the role of culture and climate on creativity. For example, the literature stresses the importance of the physical work environment but research addressing physical aspects of the organizational context has received little attention. This chapter attempts to provide an overview of existing knowledge by synthesizing previous literature on organizational culture and climate influencing creativity. We focus on key issues and major trends. We further discuss perspectives for future research and important questions that remain to be answered. Finally, the chapter suggests some practical recommendations for organizational promotion of creativity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbey, A., & Dickson, J. W. (1983). R&D work climate and innovation in semiconductors. The Academy of Management Journal, 26(2), 362–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agin, E., & Gibson, T. (2010). Developing an innovative culture. T+D, 64(7), 52–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., & Edwards, J. R. (2014). Methodological wishes for the next decade and how to make wishes come true. Journal of Management Studies, 51(1), 143–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aiello, J. R., DeRisi, D. T., Epstein, Y. M., & Karlin, R. A. (1977). Crowding and the role of interpersonal distance preference. Sociometry, 40, 271–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alencar, E. M. L. S., & Bruno-Faria, M. F. (1997). Characteristics of an organizational environment which stimulate and inhibit creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(4), 271–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. Springer-Verlag.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cumming (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 10, pp. 123–167). JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M. (1997). Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do. California Management Review, 40(1), 39–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1999). Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 630–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154–1184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Goldfarb, P., & Brackfleld, S. C. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal, 3(1), 6–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., & Gryskiewicz, S. S. (1987). Creativity in the R&D laboratory (Technical Report No. 30). Center for Creative Leadership.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Hadley, C. N., & Kramer, S. J. (2002b). Creativity under the gun. Harvard Business Review, Special Issue on the Innovative Enterprise: Turning Ideas into Profits, 80(8), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Amabile, T. M., Mueller, J. S., Simpson, W. B., Hadley, C. N., Kramer, S. J., & Fleming, L. (2002a). Time pressure and creativity in organizations: A longitudinal field study. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 02-073.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2004). The routinization of innovation research: A constructively critical review of the state-of-the-science. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 147–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, N., Potočnik, K., & Zhou, J. (2014). Innovation and creativity in organizations: A state-of-the-science review, prospective commentary, and guiding framework. Journal of Management, 40(5), 1297–1333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrew, S., & Pitt, M. (2009). Sustainable workplaces: Improving staff health and well-being using plants. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 11(1), 52–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C. (2001). Determinants of organizational creativity: A literature review. Management Decision, 39(10), 834–840.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andriopoulos, C., & Lowe, A. (2000). Enhancing organizational creativity: The process of perpetual challenging. Management Decision, 38(10), 734–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arad, S., Hanson, M. A., & Schneider, R. J. (1997). A framework for the study of relationships between organizational characteristics and organizational innovation. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 42–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth, B. E. (1985). Climate formation: Issues and extensions. The Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 837–847.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N. M., Broadfoot, L. E., & Falkus, S. (2000). Questionnaire measures of organizational culture. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M, Wilderom, & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture & climate (pp. 131–146). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Auernhammer, J., & Hall, H. (2014). Organizational culture in knowledge creation, creativity and innovation: Towards the Freiraum model. Journal of Information Science, 40(2), 154–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). The curvilinear relation between experienced creative time pressure and creativity: Moderating effects of openness to experience and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 91(4), 963–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer, M., Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (2003). Rewarding creativity: When does it really matter? The Leadership Quarterly, 14, 569–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, L. (1985). Autonomy in the industrial R&D lab. Human Resource Management, 24(2), 129–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltes, B. B., Zhdanova, L. S., & Parker, C. P. (2009). Psychological climate: A comparison of organizational and individual level referents. Human Relations, 62(5), 669–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boogerd, P., van Ruysseveldt, J., & van Dam, K. (2015). Creative under pressure: The role of time pressure, creative requirements and creative orientation in creative behavior. Gedrag & Organisatie, 28(2), 134–153.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bringslimark, T., Hartig, T., & Patil, G. G. (2009). The psychological benefits of indoor plants: A critical review of the experimental literature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 422–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brockbank, W. (1999). If HR were really strategically proactive: Present and future directions in HR’s contribution to competitive advantage. Human Resource Management, 38, 337–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caniëls, M. C. J., De Stobbeleir, K., & De Clippeleer, I. (2014). The antecedents of creativity revisited: A process perspective. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(2), 96–110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carmeli, A., Cohen-Meitar, R., & Elizur, D. (2007). The role of job challenge and organizational identification in enhancing creative behavior among employees in the workplace. Journal of Creative Behavior, 41(2), 75–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carr, J. Z., Schmidt, A. M., Ford, J. K., & DeShon, R. P. (2003). Climate perceptions matter: A meta-analytic path analysis relating molar climate, cognitive and affective states, and individual level work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 605–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carson, P. P., & Carson, K. D. (1993). Managing creativity enhancement through goal setting and feedback. Journal of Creative Behavior, 27, 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceylan, C., & Dul, J. (2007). Expert opinions on human resources practices for creativity stimulating work environments for innovation in Turkey, The Netherlands and Brazil. In Proceedings of the 9th International Human Resource Management Conference (IHRM2007): Changes in Society, Changes in Organizations, and the Changing Role of HRM: Managing International Human Resources in a Complex World, Tallinn, Estonia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ceylan, C., Dul, J., & Aytac, S. (2008). Can the office environment stimulate a manager’s creativity? Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing, 18(6), 589–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.-J., Shih, H.-A., & Yeh, Y.-C. (2011). Individual initiative, skill variety, and creativity: The moderating role of knowledge specificity and creative resources. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 22(17), 3447–3461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choo, C. W. (2013). Information culture and organizational effectiveness. International Journal of Information Management, 33, 775–779.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, F., & Augusto, M. (2010). Job characteristics and the creativity of frontline service employees. Journal of Service Research, 13(4), 426–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coelho, F., Augusto, M., & Lages, L. F. (2011). Contextual factors and the creativity of frontline employees: The mediating effects of role stress and intrinsic motivation. Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 31–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Çokpekin, Ö., & Knudsen, M. P. (2012). Does organizing for creativity really lead to innovation? Creativity and Innovation Management, 21(3), 304–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. Harper Perennial.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191–1201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Korte, E., Kuijt, L., & Van Der Kleij, R. (2011). Effects of meeting room interior design on team performance in a creativity task. Ergonomics and health aspects of work with computers (pp. 59–67). Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Delbridge, R., & Fiss, P. C. (2013). Editors’ comments: Styles of theorizing and the social organization of knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 38(3), 325–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Long, D. W., & Fahey, L. (2000). Diagnosing cultural barriers to knowledge management. The Academy of Management Executive, 14(4), 113–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1984). Bringing corporate culture to the bottom line. Organizational Dynamics, 13(2), 4–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R. (1996). What is the difference between organizational culture and organizational climate? A native’s point of view on a decade of paradigm wars. The Academy of Management Review, 21(3), 619–654.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. R., & Mishra, A. K. (1995). Toward a theory of organizational culture and effectiveness. Organization Science, 6(2), 204–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desphande, R., & Webster, F. E., Jr. (1989). Organizational culture and marketing: Defining the research agenda. The Journal of Marketing, 53(1), 3–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Spiegelaere, S., Van Gyes, G., De Witte, H., Niesen, W., & Van Hootegem, G. (2014). On the relation of job insecurity, job autonomy, innovative work behaviour and the mediating effect of work engagement. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 318–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811–831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewett, T. (2004). Employee creativity and the role of risk. European Journal of Innovation Management, 7(4), 257–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewett, T. (2007). Linking intrinsic motivation, risk taking, and employee creativity in an R&D environment. R&D Management, 37(3), 197–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diliello, T. C., Houghton, J. D., & Dawley, D. (2011). Narrowing the creativity gap: The moderating effects of perceived support for creativity. The Journal of Psychology, 145(3), 151–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dougherty, D. (2008). Bridging social constraint and social action to design organizations for innovation. Organization Studies, 29, 415–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sensemaking perspective. The Academy of Management Review, 24, 286–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexler, J. A. (1977). Organizational climate: Its homogeneity within organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(1), 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J. (2016). Necessary condition analysis (NCA). Logic and methodology of “Necessary but not sufficient” causality. Organizational Research Methods, 19, 10–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J. (2019). The physical environment and creativity. In J. C. Kaufman & R. J. Sternberg (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of creativity (2nd ed., pp. 481–510). Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2011). Work environments for employee creativity. Ergonomics, 54(1), 12–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., & Ceylan, C. (2014). The impact of a creativity-supporting work environment on a firm’s product innovation performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(6), 1254–1267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., Ceylan, C., & Jaspers, F. (2011). Knowledge workers’ creativity and the role of the physical work environment. Human Resource Management, 50(6), 715–734.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dul, J., Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J. C. (2020). Necessary condition analysis in creativity research. In Handbook of research methods on creativity (pp. 351–368). Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2012). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as predictors of work effort: The moderating role of achievement goals. British Journal of Social Psychology, 52, 412–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle, H. A. (2003). Building a workplace of choice: Using the work environment to attract and retain top talent. Journal of Facilities Management, 2, 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edvinsson, L. (1997). Developing intellectual capital at Skandia. Long Range Planning, 30(3), 366–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egan, T. M. (2005). Factors influencing individual creativity in the workplace: An examination of quantitative empirical research. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 160–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberger, R., & Rhoades, L. (2001). Incremental effects of reward on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(4), 728–741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ekvall, G. (1997). Organizational conditions and levels of creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 6(4), 195–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr, J. L. (1990). Facilitating individual role innovation. In M. A. West, & J. L. Farr (Eds.), Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 207–230). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M. (2007). Creativity in organizations. The Academy of Management Annals, 1(1), 439–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, J. M., & Zhou, J. (2001). When openness to experience and conscientiousness are related to creative behavior: An interactional approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 513–524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilson, L. L., Lim, H. S., D’Innocenzo, L., & Moye, N. (2012). One size does not fit all: Managing radical and ıncremental creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(3), 168–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glick, W. H. (1985). Conceptualizing and measuring organizational and psychological climate: Pitfalls in multilevel research. The Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 601–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gundry, L. K., Kickul, J. R., & Prather, C. W. (1994). Building the creative organization. Organizational Dynamics, 22(4), 22–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundry, L. K., Muñoz-Fernandez, A., Ofstein, L. F., & Ortega-Egea, T. (2016). Innovating in organizations: A model of climate components facilitating the creation of new value. Creativity and Innovation Management, 25(2), 223–238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, G. R. (1980). Work redesign. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn, M. H., Lee, K. C., & Lee, D. S. (2015). Network structure, organizational learning culture, and employee creativity in system integration companies: The mediating effects of exploitation and exploration. Computers in Human Behavior, 42, 167–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haner, U. (2005). Spaces for creativity and innovation in two established organizations. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(3), 288–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, S. G. (1994). Organizational culture and individual sensemaking: A schema-based perspective. Organization Science, 5(3), 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartig, T., & Evans, G. W. (1993). Psychological foundations of nature experience. In T. Gärling & R. G. Golledge (Eds.), Behavior and environment: Psychological and geographical approaches (pp. 427–457). North-Holland.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Heerwagen, I. H., & Orians, G. H. (1986). Adaptations to windowlessness: A study of the use of visual decor in windowed and windowless offices. Environment and Behavior, 18, 623–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff, E. V., & Öberg, N. K. (2015). The role of the physical work environment for creative employees—A case study of digital artists. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 26(14), 1889–1906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holman, D., Totterdell, P., Axtell, C., Stride, C., & Port, R. (2005, May). Individual innovation behaviours: The development of a measure and examination of antecedents. In XII European Congress of Organizational and Work Psychology. Istanbul, Turkey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hon, A. H. Y., Chan, W. W. H., & Lu, L. (2013). Overcoming work-related stress and promoting employee creativity in hotel industry: The role of task feedback from supervisor. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 33, 416–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsu, M. L. A., & Fan, H.-L. (2010). Organizational innovation climate and creative outcomes: Exploring the moderating effect of time pressure. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 378–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Dimensions of creative climate: A general taxonomy. The Korean Journal of Thinking & Problem Solving, 15(2), 97–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T., Bedell, K. E., & Mumford, M. D. (2007). Climate for creativity: A quantitative review. Creativity Research Journal, 19(1), 69–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, S. T., Cushenbery, L., & Friedrich, T. (2012). Hiring an innovative workplace: A necessary yet uniquely challenging endeavor. Human Resource Management Review, 22, 303–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2001). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the Situational Outlook Questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. A., & James, L. R. (1989). Integrating work environment perceptions: Explorations into the measurement of meaning. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74(5), 739–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, L. R., & Jones, A. P. (1974). Organizational climate: A review of theory and research. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 1096–1112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen, O. (2000). Job demands, perceptions of effort-reward fairness and innovative work behavior. Joumal of Occupational and Organisational Psychology, 73, 287–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jelinek, M., Smircich, L., & Hirsch, P. (1983). An introduction: A code of many colors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 331–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joo, B., Yang, B., & McLean, G. N. (2014). Employee creativity: The effects of perceived learning culture, leader–member exchange quality, job autonomy, and proactivity. Human Resource Development International, 17(3), 297–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joyse, W. F., & Slocum, J. W. (1984). Collective climate: Agreement as a basis for defining aggregate climates in organizations. The Academy of Management Journal, 27(4), 721–742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahn, K., & Dempsey, J. L. (2012). An investigation of centers for innovation. International Journal of Innovation Science, 4(2), 89–100.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kallio, T. J., Kallio, K.-M., & Blomberg, A. J. (2015). Physical space, culture and organisational creativity—A longitudinal study. Facilities, 33(5/6), 389–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanter, R. M. (1988). When a thousand flowers bloom: Structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 169–211.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, S. (1995). The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 169–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, R., & Kaplan, S. (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S., & Yoon, G. (2015). An innovation-driven culture in local government: Do senior manager’s transformational leadership and the climate for creativity matter? Public Personnel Management, 44(2), 147–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimberly, J. R., & Evanisko, M. J. (1981). Organizational Innovation: The influence of individual, organizational, and contextual factors on hospital adoption of technological and administrative innovations. The Academy of Management Journal, 24(4), 689–713.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knasko, S. (1992). Ambient odor’s effect on creativity, mood, and perceived health. Chemical Senses, 17(1), 27–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knez, I. (1995). Effects of indoor lighting on mood and cognition. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15(1), 39–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küller, R., Mikellides, B., & Janssens, J. (2009). Color, arousal, and performance. A comparison of three experiments. Color Research & Application, 34(2), 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurtessis, J. N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M. T., Buffardi, L. C., Stewart, K. A., & Adis, C. S. (2015). Perceived organizational support. A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 31, 874–900.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kwallek, N., Soon, K., & Lewis, C. M. (2007). Work week productivity, visual complexity, and individual environmental sensitivity in three offices of different color interiors. Color Research & Application, 32, 130–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwallek, N., Woodson, H., Lewis, C. M., & Sales, C. (1997). Impact of three interior color schemes on worker mood and performance relative to individual environmental sensitivity. Color Research & Application, 22, 121–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichtenfeld, S., Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A., & Pekrun, R. (2012). Fertile green: Green facilities creative performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(6), 784–797.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Liao, C., & Meuser, J. D. (2014). Servant leadership and serving culture: Influence on individual and unit performance. Academy of Management Journal, 57(5), 1434–1452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lone, J. A., Bjørklund, R. A., Østerud, K. B., Anderssen, L. A., Hoff, T., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2014). Assessing knowledge-intensive work environment: General versus situation-specific instruments. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23(3), 469–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukersmith, S., & Burgess-Limerick, R. (2013). The perceived importance and the presence of creative potential in the health professional’s work environment. Ergonomics, 56(6), 922–934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madjar, N., & Oldham, G. R. (2006). Task rotation and polychronicity: Effects on individuals’ creativity. Human Performance, 19(2), 117–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? The contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madjar, N., & Shalley, C. E. (2008). Multiple tasks’ and multiple goals’ effect on creativity: Forced incubation or just a distraction? Journal of Management, 34, 786–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Magadley, W., & Birdi, K. (2009). Innovation labs: An examination into the use of physical spaces to enhance organizational creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 18(4), 315–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malik, M. A. R., Butt, A. N., & Choi, J. N. (2015). Rewards and employee creative performance: Moderating effects of creative self-efficacy, reward importance, and locus of control. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 59–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E., & Martins, N. (2002). An organizational culture model to promote creativıity and innovation. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 28, 58–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martins, E. C., & Terblanche, F. (2003). Building organisational culture that stimulates creativity and innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 6, 64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathisen, G. E., & Einarsen, S. (2004). A review of instruments assessing creative and innovative environments within organizations. Creativity Research Journal, 16(1), 119–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May, D. R., Oldham, G. R., & Rathert, C. (2005). Employee affective and behavioral reactions to the spatial density of physical work environments. Human Resource Management, 44(1), 21–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCoy, J. M., & Evans, G. W. (2002). The potential role of the physical environment in fostering creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(3&4), 409–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDermott, R., & O’Dell, C. (2001). Overcoming cultural barriers to sharing knowledge. Journal of Knowledge Management, 5(1), 76–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, L. D. (2005). Organizational culture’s influence on creativity and innovation: A review of the literature and implications for human resource development. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 7, 226–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehta, R., Zhu, R. (Juliet), & Cheemals, A. (2012). Is noise always bad? Exploring the effects of ambient noise on creative cognition. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 784–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Michela, J. L., & Burke, W. W. (2000). Organizational culture and climate in transformations for quality and innovation. In N. M. Ashkanasy, C. P. M Wilderom & M. F. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of organizational culture & climate (pp. 225–244). Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikdashi, T. (1999). Constitutive meaning and aspects of work environment affecting creativity in Lebanon. Participation & Empowerment: an International Journal, 7(3), 47–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miron-Spektor, E., & Beenen, G. (2015). Motivating creativity: The effects of sequential and simultaneous learning and performance achievement goals on product novelty and usefulness. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 127, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moultrie, J., Nilsson, M., Dissel, M., & Haner, U.-E., Janssen, S., & Van der Lugt, R. (2007). Innovation spaces: Towards a framework for understanding the role of the physical environment in innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 16, 53–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mueller, J. S., & Kamdar, D. (2011). Why seeking help from teammates is a blessing and a curse: A theory of help seeking and individual creativity in team contexts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 263–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D. (2000). Managing creative people: Strategies and tactics for innovation. Human Resource Management Review, 10(3), 313–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Scott, G. M., Gaddis, B., & Strange, J. M. (2002). Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships. The Leadership Quarterly, 13, 705–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Whetzel, D. L., & Reiter-Palmon, R. (1997). Thinking creatively at work: Organization influences on creative problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 7–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noefer, K., Stegmaier, R., Molter, B., & Sonntag, K. (2009). A great many things to do and not a minute to spare: Can feedback from supervisors moderate the relationship between skill variety, time pressure, and employees’ innovative behavior? Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 384–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyström, H. (1990). Organizational innovation. In M. A. West & J. L Farr (Eds.), lnnovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies (pp. 143–161). John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., & Pluntke, F. (2006). Routinization, work characteristics and their relationships with creative and proactive behaviors. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27, 257–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. The Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, C. (1989). Corporations, culture, and commitment: Motivation and social control in organizations. California Management Review, 31(4), 9–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z. Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouchi, W. G., & Wilkins, A. L. (1985). Organizational culture. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 457–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, C. P., Baltes, B. B., Young, S. A., Huff, J. W., Altmann, R. A., Lacost, H. A., & Roberts, J. E. (2003). Relationships between psychological climate perceptions and work outcomes: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parry, M. E., Song, M., Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., & Visscher, K. (2009). The impact of NPD strategy, product strategy, and NPD process on perceived cycle time. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 26, 627–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, P. B. (2000). Groups, teams, and creativity: The creative potential of idea-generating groups. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 49(2), 237–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Payne, R., & Mansfield, R. (1978). Correlates of individual perceptions of organizational climate. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 51, 209–218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pettigrew, A. M. (1979). On studying organizational cultures. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24(4), 570–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitta, D. A., Wood, V. R., & Franzak, F. J. (2008). Nurturing an effective creative culture within a marketing organization. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 25, 137–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Price, I. (2009) Space to adapt: Workplaces, creative behaviour and organizational memetics. In T. Rickards, M. A. Runco, & S. Moger (Eds.), The Routledge companion to creativity. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2000). Fuzzy-set social science. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ragin, C. C. (2008). Redesigning social inquiry: Fuzzy sets and beyond (pp. 190–212). University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rank, J., Pace, V. L., & Frese, M. (2004). Three avenues for future research on creativity, innovation, and initiative. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 53(4), 518–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter, A. W., Hirst, G., van Knippenberg, D., & Baer, M. (2012). Creative self-efficacy and individual creativity in team contexts: Cross-level interactions with team informational resources. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(6), 1282–1290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roskes, M. (2015). Constraints that help or hinder creative performance: A motivational approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 197–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Runco, M. A. (2004). Creativity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 657–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sadi, M. A., & Al-Dubaisi, A. H. (2008). Barriers to organizational creativity. The marketing executives’ perspective in Saudi Arabia. Journal of Management Development, 27(6), 574–599.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sathe, V. (1983). Implications of corporate culture: A managers’ guide to action. Organizational Dynamics, 12(2), 5–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1985). Organizational culture and leadership. Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1990). Organizational culture. American Psychologist, 45(2), 109–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (2004). Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.). Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schepers, P., & van den Berg, P. T. (2007). Social factors of work environment creativity. Journal of Business and Psychology, 21(3), 407–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40, 437–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Brief, A. P., & Guzzo, R. A. (1996). Creating a climate and culture for sustainable organizational change. Organizational Dynamics, 24(4), 7–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Ehrhart, M. G., & Macey, W. H. (2013). Organizational climate and culture. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 361–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Gunnarson, S. K., & Niles-Jolly, K. (1994). Creating the climate and culture of success. Organizational Dynamics, 23(1), 17–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., & Reichers, A. E. (1983). On the etiology of climates. Personnel Psychology, 36(1), 19–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., Wheeler, J. K., & Cox, J. F. (1992). A passion for service: Using content analysis to explicate service climate. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(5), 705–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, B., White, S. S., & Paul, M. C. (1998). Linking service climate and customer perceptions of service quality: Tests of a causal model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(2), 150–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoen, J. L. (2015). Effects of implicit achievement motivation, expected evaluations, and domain knowledge on creative performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, 319–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, H., & Davis, S. M. (1981). Matching corporate culture and business strategy. Organizational Dynamics, 10(1), 30–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scopelliti, I., Cillo, P., Busacca, B., & Mazursky, D. (2014). How do financial constraints affect creativity? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(5), 880–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E. (1991). Effects of productivity goals, creativity goals, and personal discretion on individual creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 76(2), 179–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E. (1995). Effects of coaction, expected evaluation, and goal setting on creativity and productivity. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 483–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Gilson, L. L. (2004). What leaders need to know: A review of social and contextual factors that can foster or hinder creativity. The Leadership Quarterly, 15, 33–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., & Perry-Smith, J. E. (2008). The emergence of team creative cognition: The role of diverse outside ties, sociocognitive network centrality, and team evolution. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 2, 23–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalley, C. E., Zhou, J., & Oldham, G. R. (2004). The effects of personal and contextual characteristics on creativity: Where should we go from here? Journal of Management, 30(6), 933–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2001). Effects of indoor foliage plants on subjects’ recovery from mental fatigue. North American Journal of Psychology, 3, 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2002). Effects of the foliage plant on task performance and mood. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 265–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shibata, S., & Suzuki, N. (2004). Effects of an indoor plant on creative task performance and mood. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 45, 373–381.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shin, S. J., Kim, T.-Y., Lee, J.-Y., & Bian, L. (2012). Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: A cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, 55(1), 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sia, S. K., & Appu, A. V. (2015). Work autonomy and workplace creativity: Moderating role of task complexity. Global Business Review, 16(5), 772–784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sijbom, R. B. L., Janssen, O., & Van Yperen, N. W. (2015). Leaders’ receptivity to subordinates’ creative input: The role of achievement goals and composition of creative input. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24(3), 462–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. (1991). Developing products in half the time. Van Nostrand Reinhold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spivack, A. J., Askay, D. A., & Rogelberg, S. G. (2010). Contemporary physical workspaces: A review of current research, trends, and implications for future environmental psychology inquiry. Environmental psychology: New developments (pp. 37–62). Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steidle, A., & Werth, L. (2013). Freedom from constraints: Darkness and dim illumination promote creativity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 35, 67–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stetler, K. L., & Magnusson, M. (2015). Exploring the tension between clarity and ambiguity in goal setting for innovation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 24(2), 231–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokols, D., Clitheroe, C., & Zmuidzinas, M. (2010). Qualities of work environments that promote perceived support for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 137–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, N. J. (1998). Windows and environmental cues on performance and mood. Environment and Behavior, 30, 306–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, N. J. (2003). Environmental view and color for a simulated telemarketing task. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, 63–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, N. J., & Irvine, J. M. (1994). Direct and indirect window access, task type, and performance. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 14, 57–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sundgren, M., Dimenäs, E., Gustaffson, J.-E., & Selart, M. (2005). Drivers of organizational creativity: A path model of creative climate in pharmaceutical R&D. R&D Management, 35(4), 359–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, G. (1998). Managing creativity in organizations: A total system approach. Creativity and Innovation Management, 7(1), 23–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, C., Shang, J., Naumann, S. E., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2014). How team identification and expertise identification affect R&D employees’ creativity. Creativity and Innovation Management, 23(3), 276–289.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tesluk, P. E., Farr, J. L., & Klein, S. R. (1997). Influences of organizational culture and climate on individual creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 31(1), 27–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Törner, M., Pousette, A., Larsman, P., Eklöf, M., & Hemlin, S. (2015, September 23–25). Health and good fortune! Organizational climate for health, safety, team effectiveness and innovations. In 8th Conference Working on Safety, Porto, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. S. (1993). Biophilia, biophobia, and nature landscapes. In S. R. Kellert & E. O. Wilson (Eds.), The biophilia hypothesis (pp. 73–137). Island Press/Shearwater Book.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unsworth, K. L., & Clegg, C. W. (2010). Why do employees undertake creative action? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 83, 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyne, L., Jehn, K. A., & Cummings, A. (2002). Differential effects of strain on two forms of work performance: Individual employee sales and creativity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 57–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veitch, J. A., & Gifford, R. (1996). Choice, perceived control, and performance decrements in the physical environment. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 269–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbeke, W., Volgering, M., & Hessels, M. (1998). Exploring the conceptual expansion within the field of organizational behavior: Organizational climate and organizational culture. Journal of Management Studies, 35(3), 303–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verderber, S. (1986). Dimensions of person-window transactions in the hospital environment. Environment and Behavior, 18, 450–466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vithayathawornwong, S., Danko, S., & Tolbert, P. (2003). The role of the physical environment in supporting organizational creativity. Journal of Interior Design, 29(1&2), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Voordt, T. J. M., van der Meel, J., van Smulders, F., & Teurlings, S. (2003). Corporate culture and design. Environments by DESIGN, 4(2), 23–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, S. T., & Heuberger, E. (2009). The impact of natural odors on affective states in humans. Chemical Senses, 33(5), 441–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., & King, D. C. (1978). Organizational climate: Science or folklore? The Academy of Management Review, 3(4), 816–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. The Academy of Management Review, 18(2), 293–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo, S., Jang, S., Ho, Y., Seo, J., & Yoo, M. H. (2019). Fostering workplace creativity: Examining the roles of job design and organizational context. Asia Pacific Journal of Human Resources, 57, 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, H. J., Sung, S. Y., & Choi, J. N. (2015). Mechanisms underlying creative performance: Employee perceptions of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards for creativity. Social Behavior and Personality, 43(7), 1161–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. A., & Parker, C. P. (1999). Predicting collective climates: Assessing the role of shared work values, needs, employee interaction and work group membership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 1199–1218.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu, C., & Frenkel, S. J. (2013). Explaining task performance and creativity from perceived organizational support theory: Which mechanisms are more important? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 34, 1165–1181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, F., & Zhou, J. (2008). Differential effects of expected external evaluation on different parts of the creative idea production process and on final product creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 20(4), 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zamanou, S., & Glaser, S. R. (1994). Moving toward participation and involvement: Managing and measuring organizational culture. Group & Organization Management, 19(4), 475–502.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H., Li, F., & Reynolds, K. J. (2020). Creativity at work: Exploring role identity, organizational climate and creative team mindset. Current Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00908-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, Y., Long, L., & Zhang, J. (2015). Pay for performance and employee creativity. Management Decision, 53(7), 1378–1397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong, C.-B., & House, J. (2012). Hawthorne revisited: Organizational implications of the physical work environment. Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 3–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J. (2003). When the presence of creative coworkers is related to creativity: Role of supervisor close monitoring, developmental feedback, and creative personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(3), 413–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., & Shalley, C. E. (2003). Research on employee creativity: A critical review and directions for future research. In J. J. Martocchio & G. R. Ferris (Eds.), Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management, 22, 165–217.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, J., Wang, X. M., Song, L. J., & Wu, J. (2017). Is it new? Personal and contextual influences on perceptions of novelty and creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(2), 180–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Q., Hirst, G., & Shipton, H. (2012). Promoting creativity at work: The role of problem-solving demand. Applied Psychology: an International Review, 61(1), 56–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Y.-Q., Gardner, D. G., & Chen, H.-G. (2018). Relationships between work team climate, individual motivation, and creativity. Journal of Management, 44(5), 2094–2115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Canan Ceylan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Ceylan, C., Dul, J. (2022). The Place to Be: Organizational Culture and Organizational Climate for Creativity. In: Lubart, T., et al. Homo Creativus. Creativity in the Twenty First Century. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99674-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics