Skip to main content

Lalela uLwandle: An Experiment in Plural Governance Discussions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Palgrave Handbook of Blue Heritage

Abstract

Symbolic, cultural and spiritual meanings of the oceans, whilst different depending on positionality, are important aspects of understanding humans’ relationship with the oceans. Currently in South Africa, cultural, social and spiritual meanings of the oceans are given little consideration in the rush for the Blue Economy and ocean governance frameworks. Neither are they widely considered in environmental conservation and management. This chapter argues that for inclusive ocean governance it is necessary to create more equitable listening forums for how different epistemologies makes sense of the oceans. The chapter draws from the research-based theatre project called Lalela uLwandle performed along the KwaZulu-Natal Coast. The chapter explores what is lost when knowledge systems are conceived as incommensurable and how this serves hegemonic interests. Importantly, it also explores what might be gained when we embody more fluid and plural epistemologies that can mould, expand, broaden and enrich our decision-making process on the ocean.

The research presented in this chapter is prepared under the One Ocean Hub, a collaborative research for sustainable development project funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI) through the Global Challenges Research Fund (GCRF) (Grant Ref: NE/S008950/1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bähr, U. (2017). Ocean Atlas: Facts and figures on the threats to our marine ecosystems. Heinrich Böll Foundation Schleswig-Holstein, the Heinrich Böll Foundation (national foundation), and the University of Kiel’s Future Ocean Cluster of Excellence.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. J., Govan, H., & Satterfield, T. (2015). Ocean grabbing. Marine Policy, 57, 61–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, N. J., Blythe, J., White, C. S., & Campero, C. (2021). Blue growth and blue justice: Ten risks and solutions for the ocean economy. Marine Policy, 125, 104387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bond, P. (2019). Blue Economy threats, contradictions and resistances seen from South Africa. Journal of Political Ecology, 26(1), 341–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boswell, R., & Thornton, J. L. (2021). Including the Khoisan for a more inclusive Blue Economy in South Africa. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region. https://doi.org/1080/19480881.2021.1935523

  • Bremer, S., & Glavovic, B. (2013). Mobilizing knowledge for coastal governance: Re-framing the science–policy interface for integrated coastal management. Coastal Management, 41(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cock, J. (2018). Writing the ancestral river: A biography of the Kowie. Wits University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cocks, M. L., Dold, T., & Vetter, S. (2012). ’God is my forest’—Xhosa cultural values provide untapped opportunities for conservation. South African Journal of Science, 108(5), 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppen, N. (2019). Into Ulwembu: Exploring collaborative methodologies in a research-based theatre production on street-level drug use in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Master thesis, University of KwaZulu-Natal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coppen, N., Walne, H., Mahlope, G., Mthombeni, M., McGarry, D., Pereira, T., & Erwin, K. (2019). Lalela uLwandle. Play script.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corrigan, C., & Hay-Edie, T. (2013). A toolkit to support conservation by indigenous peoples and local communities: Building capacity and sharing knowledge for indigenous peoples and community conserved territories and areas (iccas). UNEP-WCMC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crandall, S. G., Ohayon, J. L., de Wit, L. A., Hammond, J. E., Melanson, K. L., Moritsch, M. M., & Parker, I. M. (2018). Best practices: Social research methods to inform biological conservation. Australasian Journal of Environmental Management, 25(1), 6–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Wet, E., & Du Plessis, A. (2010). The meaning of certain substantive obligations distilled from international human rights instruments for constitutional environmental rights in South Africa. African Human Rights Law Journal, 10(2), 345–376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erwin, K. (2020). Storytelling as a political act: Towards a politics of complexity and counter-hegemonic narratives. Critical African Studies, 13, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Findlay, K. (2018). Operation Phakisa and unlocking South Africa’s ocean economy. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 14(2), 248–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, W., & McAteer, B. (2020). Assessing marine spatial planning governmentality. Maritime Studies, 19, 269–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flannery, W., Ellis, G., Nursey-Bray, M., van Tatenhove, J. P., Kelly, C., Coffen-Smout, S., Fairgrieve, R., Knol, M., Jentoft, S., Bacon, D., & O’Hagan, A. M. (2016). Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/Marine spatial planning: Cui bono?/“More than fishy business”: Epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/Marine spatial planning: Power and scaping/Surely not all planning is evil?/Marine spatial planning: A Canadian perspective/Maritime spatial planning–“ad utilitatem omnium”/Marine spatial planning: “It is better to be on the train than being hit by it”/Reflections from the perspective of recreational anglers and boats for hire/Maritime spatial planning and marine renewable energy. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 121–151.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franke, A., Blenckner, T., Duarte, C. M., Ott, K., Fleming, L. E., Antia, A., Reusch, T. B., Bertram, C., Hein, J., Kronfeld-Goharani, U., & Dierking, J. (2020). Operationalizing ocean health: Toward integrated research on ocean health and recovery to achieve ocean sustainability. One Earth, 2(6), 557–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallois, S., & Duda, R. (2016). Beyond productivity: The socio-cultural role of fishing among the Baka of southeastern Cameroon. Revue d’ethnoécologie (10).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, M. (2013). New geographies of conservation and globalisation: The spatiality of development for conservation in the iSimangaliso Wetland Park, South Africa. Journal of Contemporary African Studies, 31(3), 481–502. https://doi.org/10.1080/02589001.2013.807566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoegh-Guldberg, O., Northrop, E., & Lubchenco, J. (2019). The ocean is key to achieving climate and societal goals. Science, 365(6460), 1372–1374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofmeyr, I. (2020). Imperialism above and below the water line: Making space up (and down) in a Colonial Port City. Interventions, 22(8), 1032–1044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Infield, M. (2001). Cultural values: A forgotten strategy for building community support for protected areas in Africa. Conservation Biology, 15(3), 800–802.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, S. E. (1995). The water is not empty: Cross-cultural issues in conceptualising sea space. Australian Geographer, 26(1), 87–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kepe, T. (2009). Shaped by race: Why “race” still matters in the challenges facing biodiversity conservation in Africa. Local Environment, 14(9), 871–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maggs, J. Q., Mann, B. Q., & Cowley, P. D. (2013). Contribution of a large no-take zone to the management of vulnerable reef fishes in the South-West Indian Ocean. Fisheries Research, 144, 38–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, G., Corner, A., Roberts, O., & Clarke, J. (2016). Faith & climate change: A guide to talking with the five major faiths. Climate Outreach. Retrieved April 29, 2022 from https://jliflc.com/resources/faith-climate-change-a-guide-to-talking-with-the-five-major-faiths/

  • Mbatha, N. (2018). The influence of plural governance systems on rural coastal livelihoods: The case of Kosi Bay. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cape Town. https://open.uct.ac.za/handle/11427/29768

  • Mouffe, C. (2013). Agonistics: Thinking the world politically. Verso Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nadel-Klein, J. (2020). Fishing for heritage: Modernity and loss along the Scottish coast. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ntona, M., & Schröder, M. (2020). Regulating oceanic imaginaries: The legal construction of space, identities, relations and epistemological hierarchies within marine spatial planning. Maritime Studies, 19(3), 241–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2016). The ocean economy in 2030. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Reilly, J., Isenhour, C., McElwee, P., & Orlove, B. (2020). Climate change: Expanding anthropological possibilities. Annual Review of Anthropology, 49, 13–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parsons, M., & Taylor, L. (2021). The conversation: Why indigenous knowledge should be an essential part of how we govern the world’s oceans. Geography Bulletin, 53(3), 15–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Polletta, F., Chen, P. C. B., Gardner, B. G., & Motes, A. (2011). The sociology of storytelling. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 109–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poloczanska, E., Mintenbeck, K., Portner, H. O., Roberts, D., & Levin, L. A. (2018). The IPCC special report on the ocean and cryosphere in a changing climate. In 2018 Ocean Sciences Meeting. AGU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Routledge, P., & Derickson, K. D. (2015). Situated solidarities and the practice of scholar-activism. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(3), 391–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2004). Peace and the new corporate liberation theology [2004 City of Sydney Peace Prize Lecture]. Available at: Peace & The New Corporate Liberation Theology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudolph, T. B., Ruckelshaus, M., Swilling, M., Allison, E. H., Österblom, H., Gelcich, S., & Mbatha, P. (2020). A transition to sustainable ocean governance. Nature Communications, 11(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schutter, M. S., Hicks, C. C., Phelps, J., & Waterton, C. (2021). The blue economy as a boundary object for hegemony across scales. Marine Policy, 132, 104673.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soudien, C. (2013). Unscripted modernities: Critical questions in working with indigenous knowledges in a time of bounded cultural hegemony. Education as Change, 17(1), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • South African Budget Review. (2021). National Treasury, Republic of South Africa. http://www.treasury.gov.za/documents/national%20budget/2021/review/FullBR.pdf

  • Sowman, M., & Sunde, J. (2018). Social impacts of marine protected areas in South Africa on coastal fishing communities. Ocean & Coastal Management, 157, 168–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowman, M., & Sunde, J. (2021). A just transition? Navigating the process of policy implementation in small-scale fisheries in South Africa. Marine Policy, 132, 104683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunde, J. (2014). Marine protected areas and small-scale fisheries in South Africa: Promoting governance, participation, equity and benefit sharing. International Collective in Support of Fishworkers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunde, J., & Erwin, K. (2020). Cast out: The systematic exclusion of the KwaZulu Natal Subsistence Fishers from the fishing rights regime in South Africa Policy Research Report. SDCEA Policy Research Report.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urquhart, J., & Acott, T. (2013). People, place and fish: Exploring the social and cultural meanings of small-scale fisheries through photography and sense of place.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vierros, M. K., Harrison, A. L., Sloat, M. R., Crespo, G. O., Moore, J. W., Dunn, D. C., Ota, Y., Cisneros-Montemayor, A. M., Shillinger, G. L., Watson, T. K., & Govan, H. (2020). Considering Indigenous peoples and local communities in governance of the global ocean commons. Marine Policy, 119, 104039.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wals, A. E., van der Hoeven, E. M., & Blanken, H. (2009). The acoustics of social learning: Designing learning processes that contribute to a more sustainable world. Wageningen Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dylan McGarry .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Erwin, K., Pereira, T., McGarry, D., Coppen, N. (2022). Lalela uLwandle: An Experiment in Plural Governance Discussions. In: Boswell, R., O’Kane, D., Hills, J. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Blue Heritage. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99347-4_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99347-4_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99346-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99347-4

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics