Skip to main content

A Vision of Applied Ethics in Industrial Cyber-Physical Sytems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future (SOHOMA 2021)

Abstract

Industrial cyber-physical systems integrate learning capacities and are intended to interact and cooperate with humans. These characteristics contribute to their complexity and harden their engineering process. More, their evolving knowledge increases the difficulty of their validation during research and development stages. In this paper, the difficulties encountered during the engineering of these systems are underlined. A specific focus is set on ethical considerations, which must be addressed along their design and use. We study more precisely the application of ethical paradigms and types in the context of industrial cyber-physical systems. An overview of the main approaches is proposed and a vision of what could be the concept of applied ethics in industrial cyber-physical systems is suggested. From that vision, a set of questionings regarding different stakeholders is constructed as an illustration. This proposal shows the diversity and the complexity of the ethical questions, which could help raising the awareness of researchers, designers and engineers working on industrial cyber-physical systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 189.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lee, E.A.: The past, present and future of cyber-physical systems: a focus on models. Sensors 15, 4837–4869 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s150304837

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cardin, O.: Classification of cyber-physical production systems applications: proposition of an analysis framework. Comput. Ind. 104, 11–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jonas, H.: In: The Imperative of Responsibility, University of Chicago Press (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ricoeur, P.: In: Soi-même comme un autre, Seuil (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  5. INCOSE: In: Systems Engineering Handbook, Wiley (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  6. NASA: In: Systems Engineering Handbook (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  7. ISO/IEC/IEEE: Systems and software engineering—System life cycle processes (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Basselot, V., Berger, T., Sallez, Y.: Information chain modeling from product to stakeholder in the use phase—application to diagnoses in railway transportation. Manuf. Lett. 20, 22–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.03.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Stevens, R.: Profiling complex systems. In: 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference. pp. 1–6. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519017

  10. Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Trentesaux, D.: Ethical risks of human-machine symbiosis in industry 4.0: insights from the human-machine cooperation approach. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, pp. 19–24. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.077

  11. Trentesaux, D., Caillaud, E.: Ethical stakes of industry 4.0. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, pp. 17002–17007. Elsevier, Berlin (2020)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ford, R.C., Richardson, W.D.: Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. J. Bus. Ethic 13, 205–221 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Encyclopaedia of Applied Ethics—2nd Edition (2018). https://www.elsevier.com/books/encyclopedia-of-applied-ethics/chadwick/978-0-12-373632-1. Last Accessed 18 June 2021

  14. Goel, M., Ramanathan, Ms. P.E.: Business ethics and corporate social responsibility—is there a dividing line?. Proc. Econom. Finan. 11, 49–59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0

  15. Bird, S.J., Spier, R.: Welcome to science and engineering ethics. Sci. Eng. Ethics 1, 2–4 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628692

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Baura, G.: In: Engineering Ethics: An Industrial Perspective, Academic Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bonnemains, V., Saurel, C., Tessier, C.: Embedded ethics: some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20, 41–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9444-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tham, J.: Applied ethics. In: Ten Have, H. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Global Bioethics, pp. 1–12. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_26-1

  19. Chan, J.K.H.: Design ethics: reflecting on the ethical dimensions of technology, sustainability, and responsibility in the anthropocene. Des. Stud. 54, 184–200 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Barnard, C.I.: In: The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  21. van Gorp, A.: Ethical issues in engineering design processes; regulative frameworks for safety and sustainability. Des. Stud. 28, 117–131 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gasparski, W.W.: Designer’s responsibility: methodological and ethical dimensions. Autom. Constr. 12, 635–640 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00051-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hurlburt, G.: Toward applied cyberethics. Computers 51, 80–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3620959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Schutte, M.: Handbook of research on technoethic. Online Inf. Rev. 33, 619–620 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910970031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Guest Editors’ introduction: machine ethics. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 10–11 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Winfield, A.F., Michael, K., Pitt, J., Evers, V.: Machine ethics: the design and governance of ethical AI and autonomous systems [Scanning the Issue]. Proc. IEEE 107, 509–517 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2900622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, P., Abney, K., Bekey, G.A.: Roboethics: the applied ethics for a new science. In: Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, pp. 347–360. MIT Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Trentesaux, D., Karnouskos, S.: Ethical behaviour aspects of autonomous intelligent cyber-physical systems. In: Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, vol. 853. pp. 55–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27477-1_5

  29. Trentesaux, D., Karnouskos, S.: Engineering ethical behaviors in autonomous industrial cyber-physical human systems. Cogn. Tech. Work. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00657-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Berrah, L., Trentesaux, D.: Decision-making in future industrial systems: is ethics a new performance indicator? In: Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, pp. 231–245. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69373-2_16

  31. Murphy, P.E., Schlegelmilch, B.B.: Corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility: Introduction to a special topic section. J. Bus. Res. 66, 1807–1813 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Trentesaux, D., Caillaud, E., Rault, R.: A framework fostering the consideration of ethics during the design of industrial cyber-physical systems. In: 11th International Workshop on Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, Cham (2021)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Trentesaux, D.: Ensuring ethics of cyber-physical and human systems: a guideline. In: Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, Proceedings SOHOMA 2020, pp. 223–233. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80906-5_15

Download references

Acknowledgements

Parts of the work presented in this paper are carried out in the context of the HUMANISM No ANR-17-CE10-0009 research program; the project “Droit des robots et autres avatars de l’humain”, IDEX “Université et Cité” of Strasbourg University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Damien Trentesaux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Trentesaux, D., Caillaud, E., Rault, R. (2022). A Vision of Applied Ethics in Industrial Cyber-Physical Sytems. In: Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Leitão, P., Cardin, O., Joblot, L. (eds) Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future. SOHOMA 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99108-1_23

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics