Abstract
Industrial cyber-physical systems integrate learning capacities and are intended to interact and cooperate with humans. These characteristics contribute to their complexity and harden their engineering process. More, their evolving knowledge increases the difficulty of their validation during research and development stages. In this paper, the difficulties encountered during the engineering of these systems are underlined. A specific focus is set on ethical considerations, which must be addressed along their design and use. We study more precisely the application of ethical paradigms and types in the context of industrial cyber-physical systems. An overview of the main approaches is proposed and a vision of what could be the concept of applied ethics in industrial cyber-physical systems is suggested. From that vision, a set of questionings regarding different stakeholders is constructed as an illustration. This proposal shows the diversity and the complexity of the ethical questions, which could help raising the awareness of researchers, designers and engineers working on industrial cyber-physical systems.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Lee, E.A.: The past, present and future of cyber-physical systems: a focus on models. Sensors 15, 4837–4869 (2015). https://doi.org/10.3390/s150304837
Cardin, O.: Classification of cyber-physical production systems applications: proposition of an analysis framework. Comput. Ind. 104, 11–21 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2018.10.002
Jonas, H.: In: The Imperative of Responsibility, University of Chicago Press (1985)
Ricoeur, P.: In: Soi-même comme un autre, Seuil (1990)
INCOSE: In: Systems Engineering Handbook, Wiley (2015)
NASA: In: Systems Engineering Handbook (2007)
ISO/IEC/IEEE: Systems and software engineering—System life cycle processes (2015)
Basselot, V., Berger, T., Sallez, Y.: Information chain modeling from product to stakeholder in the use phase—application to diagnoses in railway transportation. Manuf. Lett. 20, 22–26 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mfglet.2019.03.001
Stevens, R.: Profiling complex systems. In: 2008 2nd Annual IEEE Systems Conference. pp. 1–6. (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/SYSTEMS.2008.4519017
Pacaux-Lemoine, M.-P., Trentesaux, D.: Ethical risks of human-machine symbiosis in industry 4.0: insights from the human-machine cooperation approach. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, vol. 52, pp. 19–24. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.12.077
Trentesaux, D., Caillaud, E.: Ethical stakes of industry 4.0. In: IFAC-PapersOnLine, pp. 17002–17007. Elsevier, Berlin (2020)
Ford, R.C., Richardson, W.D.: Ethical decision making: a review of the empirical literature. J. Bus. Ethic 13, 205–221 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02074820
Encyclopaedia of Applied Ethics—2nd Edition (2018). https://www.elsevier.com/books/encyclopedia-of-applied-ethics/chadwick/978-0-12-373632-1. Last Accessed 18 June 2021
Goel, M., Ramanathan, Ms. P.E.: Business ethics and corporate social responsibility—is there a dividing line?. Proc. Econom. Finan. 11, 49–59 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(14)00175-0
Bird, S.J., Spier, R.: Welcome to science and engineering ethics. Sci. Eng. Ethics 1, 2–4 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02628692
Baura, G.: In: Engineering Ethics: An Industrial Perspective, Academic Press (2006)
Bonnemains, V., Saurel, C., Tessier, C.: Embedded ethics: some technical and ethical challenges. Ethics Inf. Technol. 20, 41–58 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9444-x
Tham, J.: Applied ethics. In: Ten Have, H. (ed.) Encyclopaedia of Global Bioethics, pp. 1–12. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_26-1
Chan, J.K.H.: Design ethics: reflecting on the ethical dimensions of technology, sustainability, and responsibility in the anthropocene. Des. Stud. 54, 184–200 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2017.09.005
Barnard, C.I.: In: The Functions of the Executive, Harvard University Press (1968)
van Gorp, A.: Ethical issues in engineering design processes; regulative frameworks for safety and sustainability. Des. Stud. 28, 117–131 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2006.11.002
Gasparski, W.W.: Designer’s responsibility: methodological and ethical dimensions. Autom. Constr. 12, 635–640 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-5805(03)00051-7
Hurlburt, G.: Toward applied cyberethics. Computers 51, 80–84 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2018.3620959
Schutte, M.: Handbook of research on technoethic. Online Inf. Rev. 33, 619–620 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1108/14684520910970031
Anderson, M., Anderson, S.L.: Guest Editors’ introduction: machine ethics. IEEE Intell. Syst. 21, 10–11 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2006.70
Winfield, A.F., Michael, K., Pitt, J., Evers, V.: Machine ethics: the design and governance of ethical AI and autonomous systems [Scanning the Issue]. Proc. IEEE 107, 509–517 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2019.2900622
Lin, P., Abney, K., Bekey, G.A.: Roboethics: the applied ethics for a new science. In: Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics, pp. 347–360. MIT Press (2012)
Trentesaux, D., Karnouskos, S.: Ethical behaviour aspects of autonomous intelligent cyber-physical systems. In: Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, vol. 853. pp. 55–71 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27477-1_5
Trentesaux, D., Karnouskos, S.: Engineering ethical behaviors in autonomous industrial cyber-physical human systems. Cogn. Tech. Work. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10111-020-00657-6
Berrah, L., Trentesaux, D.: Decision-making in future industrial systems: is ethics a new performance indicator? In: Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, pp. 231–245. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-69373-2_16
Murphy, P.E., Schlegelmilch, B.B.: Corporate social responsibility and corporate social irresponsibility: Introduction to a special topic section. J. Bus. Res. 66, 1807–1813 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.02.001
Trentesaux, D., Caillaud, E., Rault, R.: A framework fostering the consideration of ethics during the design of industrial cyber-physical systems. In: 11th International Workshop on Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, Studies in Computational Intelligence, Springer, Cham (2021)
Trentesaux, D.: Ensuring ethics of cyber-physical and human systems: a guideline. In: Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-Agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future, Proceedings SOHOMA 2020, pp. 223–233. Springer International Publishing, Cham (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80906-5_15
Acknowledgements
Parts of the work presented in this paper are carried out in the context of the HUMANISM No ANR-17-CE10-0009 research program; the project “Droit des robots et autres avatars de l’humain”, IDEX “Université et Cité” of Strasbourg University.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Trentesaux, D., Caillaud, E., Rault, R. (2022). A Vision of Applied Ethics in Industrial Cyber-Physical Sytems. In: Borangiu, T., Trentesaux, D., Leitão, P., Cardin, O., Joblot, L. (eds) Service Oriented, Holonic and Multi-agent Manufacturing Systems for Industry of the Future. SOHOMA 2021. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1034. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99108-1_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99108-1_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99107-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99108-1
eBook Packages: Intelligent Technologies and RoboticsIntelligent Technologies and Robotics (R0)