Skip to main content

Review for Meta-Heuristic Optimization Propels Machine Learning Computations Execution on Spam Comment Area Under Digital Security Aegis Region

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Meta-Heuristics and Machine Learning for Real-World Optimization Problems

Abstract

In the redesign field, popularly known as optimization, such difficulties degenerate the exordium of smoothing out appraisals that performed well on benchmark cutoff focuses or essential setting-centered evaluations. To visually examine the commencement of techniques procured for smoothing out those conditions, scientists and experts felt a need to agnize the difficulties and break harmonious changes, modifications, and amendments in the evaluations to oversee such hardships. As of tardy, there has been actuating examination interest in orchestrating machine learning (ML) strategies into meta-heuristics for managing combinatorial smoothing out conditions. This joining betokens meta-heuristics towards a capable, abundant, and exuberant seek after. It also transmutes their exhibition much indistinguishably commensurate to procedure quality, cumulation rate, and energy. Since sundry getting procedures together with sundry purposes, we have incited an objective to review the early advances in utilizing ML techniques to revise meta-heuristics. To fill up this gap survey gives such an audit on the utilization of AI methods in the approach of sundry components of meta-heuristics for purposes behind computation winnows utilizing absolute execution limits. The adequacy of move and quantify is transmuted by refreshing ML evaluations using meta-heuristic redressment computations. In the review, seventeen ML-predicated evaluations we have applied for benchmarking datasets and conspicuous legitimate time tests for tasks and figures we have imparted. Pushing toward portions covers the energy-moving assessment subjects coordinating progressed ML-predicated seventeen evaluations execution and gives examiners some spellbinding pieces of erudition to utilize in their generous applications spaces of pay. This book region causes assembled well-kenned ML approaches to dissever the spam and ham comments. There may be so many obstacles in cyber security, such as Malware, Worm, viruses, SQL Injection, etc. One of them is Spam. It is a typical binary case where the output must be binary. We will examine from a large dataset through the meta-heuristic function, which one among 17 applied algorithms is the optimized one for the binary cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 119.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. M. Hasan, M.M. Islam, M.I.I. Zarif, M.M.A. Hashem, Attack and anomaly detection in IoT sensors in IoT sites using machine learning approaches. Internet Things 7, 100059 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.100059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. M. El-Dairi, R.J. House, Optic nerve hypoplasia, in Handbook of Pediatric Retinal OCT and the Eye-Brain Connection (2019), pp. 285–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-60984-5.00062-7

  3. A. Benussi et al., Classification accuracy of TMS for the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment. Brain Stimul. 14(2), 241–249 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brs.2021.01.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. Rao, A.K. Verma, T. Bhatia, A review on social spam detection: challenges, open issues, and future directions. Expert Syst. Appl. 186, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.115742

  5. A. Mewada, R.K. Dewang, Research on false review detection methods: a state-of-the-art review, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2021.07.021

  6. R. Kaur, S. Singh, H. Kumar, Rise of spam and compromised accounts in online social networks: a state-of-the-art review of different combating approaches. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 112, 53–88 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2018.03.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. R.M.K. Saeed, S. Rady, T.F. Gharib, An ensemble approach for spam detection in Arabic opinion texts. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2019.10.002

  8. R. Kumar et al., Smart city and cyber-security; technologies used, leading challenges and future recommendations. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. 7, 7999–8012 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.813

  9. C. Feltus, Current and future RL’s contribution to emerging network security. Procedia Comput. Sci. 177, 516–521 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2020.10.071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. N. Gupta, V. Jindal, P. Bedi, LIO-IDS: handling class imbalance using LSTM and improved one-vs-one technique in intrusion detection system. Comput. Netw. 192, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2021.108076

  11. J.I. Alcaide, R.G. Llave, Critical infrastructures cybersecurity and the maritime sector. Transp. Res. Procedia 45, 547–554 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2020.03.058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. K.K. Tho, S. Swaddiwudhipong, Z.S. Liu, J. Hua, Artificial neural network model for material characterization by indentation. Model. Simul. Mater. Sci. Eng. (2004). https://doi.org/10.1088/0965-0393/12/5/019

  13. M.A. Jan et al., Security and blockchain convergence with internet of multimedia things: current trends, research challenges and future directions. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 175, 102918 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnca.2020.102918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. K.O. Lye, S. Mishra, D. Ray, P. Chandrashekar, Iterative surrogate model optimization (ISMO): an active learning algorithm for PDE constrained optimization with deep neural networks. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng. 374, 113575 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cma.2020.113575

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. A. Shokry, S. Medina-González, P. Baraldi, E. Zio, E. Moulines, A. Espuña, A machine learning-based methodology for multi-parametric solution of chemical processes operation optimization under uncertainty. Chem. Eng. J. 425, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2021.131632

  16. Y. Morita, S. Rezaeiravesh, N. Tabatabaei, R. Vinuesa, K. Fukagata, P. Schlatter, Applying Bayesian optimization with Gaussian process regression to computational fluid dynamics problems. J. Comput. Phys. 449, 110788 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2021.110788

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. B.S. Oh, J. Cho, B. Choi, H.W. Choi, M.S. Kim, G. Lee, Application of heuristic algorithms for design optimization of industrial heat pump. Int. J. Refrig. (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrefrig.2021.11.002

  18. M.M. Rahman, G. Szabó, Multi-objective urban land use optimization using spatial data: a systematic review. Sustain. Cities Soc. 74, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103214

  19. D. Ahamad, S. Alam Hameed, M. Akhtar, A multi-objective privacy preservation model for cloud security using hybrid Jaya-based shark smell optimization. J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksuci.2020.10.015

  20. S. Thakur, A. Chakraborty, R. De, N. Kumar, R. Sarkar, Intrusion detection in cyber-physical systems using a generic and domain specific deep autoencoder model. Comput. Electr. Eng. 91, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107044

  21. S. Gupta, J. Sarkar, A. Banerjee, N.R. Bandyopadhyay, S. Ganguly, Grain boundary detection and phase segmentation of SEM ferrite-pearlite microstructure using SLIC and skeletonization. J. Inst. Eng. Ser. D 100(2), 203–210 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40033-019-00194-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. G. Baldini, R. Giuliani, M. Gemo, F. Dimc, On the application of sensor authentication with intrinsic physical features to vehicle security. Comput. Electr. Eng. 91, (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2021.107053

  23. M. Orabi, D. Mouheb, Z. Al Aghbari, I. Kamel, Detection of bots in social media: a systematic review. Inf. Process. Manag. 57(4), 102250 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2020.102250

  24. S. Gupta, Chan-Vese segmentation of SEM ferritepearlite microstructure and prediction of grain boundary. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. 8(10), 1495–1498 (2019). https://doi.org/10.35940/ijitee.A1024.0881019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. S. Gupta et al., Modelling the steel microstructure knowledge for in-silico recognition of phases using machine learning. Mater. Chem. Phys. 252, 123286 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matchemphys.2020.123286

  26. I.H. Sarker, CyberLearning: effectiveness analysis of machine learning security modeling to detect cyber-anomalies and multi-attacks. Internet Things 14, 100393 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2021.100393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. N. Al-Azzam, I. Shatnawi, Comparing supervised and semi-supervised machine learning models on diagnosing breast cancer. Ann. Med. Surg. 62(January), 53–64 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.043

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. E.G. Dada, J.S. Bassi, H. Chiroma, S.M. Abdulhamid, A.O. Adetunmbi, O.E. Ajibuwa, Machine learning for email spam filtering: review, approaches and open research problems. Heliyon 5(6), (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01802

  29. A. Ligthart, C. Catal, B. Tekinerdogan, Analyzing the effectiveness of semi-supervised learning approaches for opinion spam classification. Appl. Soft Comput. 101, 107023 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2020.107023

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. S. Padmavathi, E. Ramanujam, Naïve Bayes classifier for ECG abnormalities using multivariate maximal time series motif. Procedia Comput. Sci. 47(C), 222–228 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.03.201

  31. J. Gola et al., Advanced microstructure classification by data mining methods. Comput. Mater. Sci. 148, 324–335 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. H.E. Kiziloz, Classifier ensemble methods in feature selection. Neurocomputing 419, 97–107 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2020.07.113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. S.M. Piryonesi, T.E. El-Diraby, Role of data analytics in infrastructure asset management: overcoming data size and quality problems. J. Transp. Eng. Part B Pavements 146(2), 04020022 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1061/jpeodx.0000175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. I.H. Sarker, Y.B. Abushark, F. Alsolami, A.I. Khan, IntruDTree: a machine learning based cyber security intrusion detection model. Symmetry (Basel) 12(5), (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/SYM12050754

  35. I. Stellios, P. Kotzanikolaou, C. Grigoriadis, Assessing IoT enabled cyber-physical attack paths against critical systems. Comput. Secur. 107, 102316 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. I.H. Sarker, A machine learning based robust prediction model for real-life mobile phone data. Internet Things 5, 180–193 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iot.2019.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. B. Ning, W. Junwei, H. Feng, Spam message classification based on the Naïve Bayes classification algorithm. IAENG Int. J. Comput. Sci. 46(1), (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  38. S. Gupta, J. Sarkar, M. Kundu, N.R. Bandyopadhyay, S. Ganguly, Automatic recognition of SEM microstructure and phases of steel using LBP and random decision forest operator. Measurement 151, 107224 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2019.107224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. A. Shahim, Security of the digital transformation. Comput. Secur. 108, 102345 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102345

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Subir Gupta .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Mondal, B., Chakraborty, D., Bhattacherjee, N.K., Mukherjee, P., Neogi, S., Gupta, S. (2022). Review for Meta-Heuristic Optimization Propels Machine Learning Computations Execution on Spam Comment Area Under Digital Security Aegis Region. In: Houssein, E.H., Abd Elaziz, M., Oliva, D., Abualigah, L. (eds) Integrating Meta-Heuristics and Machine Learning for Real-World Optimization Problems. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 1038. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99079-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics