Skip to main content

How to Position pH-Impedance Probes in Pediatric Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children

Abstract

Background: Multichannel intraluminal-impedance (MII)—pH recording is used frequently for the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children. The location of the pH-sensor is essential to obtain a reliable recording. Positioning of the electrode through radiologic control is recommended as standard. In order to decrease radiation, different attempts have been made to develop equations to obtain a correct positioning of the probe without radiation.

Methods: We prospectively compared the location of the pH-sensor in 212 children according to a formula developed by our nurses (“distance (nose tip to ear canal) + (nose tip with head in neutral position to nipple line) in cm”) to the location determined by fluoroscopy at the seventh posterior rib, which is considered the gold standard. The probe was considered malpositioned if the distance of the formula differed more than 1 cm compared to fluoroscopic control. Statistical analyses were done using R version 4.0.3. Spearman correlation coefficients, mean error and 95% limits of agreement of Bland–Altman plots were calculated. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results: According to the overall results, the spearman correlation between the formula and fluoroscopic control was excellent (ρ = 0.91). In 67% of the patients, the location according to the formula was correct, if a difference of 1 cm above or below the exact location is accepted.

Conclusions: The formula adequately predicts the location of the MII-pH probe in 67% of the children (exact distance ±1 cm). In 9% of the children the difference was over 2 cm. Each center should decide: accept about 10% of dislocations of the pH-sensor of 2 cm or more or continue with the radiologic control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rosen R, Vandenplas Y, Singendonk M, Cabana M, DiLorenzo C, Gottrand F, et al. Pediatric Gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2018;66:516–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Strobel CT, Byrne WJ, Ament ME, Euler AR. Correlation of esophageal lengths in children with height: application to the Tuttle test without prior esophageal manometry. J Pediatr. 1979;94:81–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moreau B, Kambites S, Lévesque D. Esophageal length: esophageal manometry remains superior to mathematical equations. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2013;57:236–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Staiano A, Clouse RE. Value of subject height in predicting lower esophageal sphincter location. Am J Dis Child. 1991;145:1424–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Molina A, Villar ME, Pérez A, Ayuso L, Hernández S, Goñi C. Placement of pH-monitoring probes using height-related formulas. Is it an applicable method to adults? Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;39:261–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mutalib M, Sintusek P, Punpanich D, Thapar N, Lindley K. A new method to estimate catheter length for esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance monitoring in children. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2015;27:728–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nowak J, Jonczyk-Potoczna K, Adamczak D, Lisowska A, Walkowiak J. Esophageal pH monitoring in children: a simple mathematical formula for pH probe positioning. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;61:212–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schwend RM, Schmidt JA, Reigrut JL, Blakemore LC, Akbarnia BA. Patterns of rib growth in the human child. Spine Defomrity. 2015;3:297–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yvan Vandenplas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Vandenplas, Y., Van De Maele, K., Ernst, C., Leus, A., Huysentruyt, K. (2022). How to Position pH-Impedance Probes in Pediatric Patients. In: Vandenplas, Y. (eds) Gastroesophageal Reflux in Children. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99067-1_18

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-99067-1_18

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-99066-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-99067-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics