Skip to main content

Europe or Homeland? How Populist Right-Wing Parties in National Governments Campaigned on Facebook in the 2019 European Elections

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 201 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter focuses on parties belonging to the populist right-wing I&D family, and specifically those who were in national government at the time of the campaign. While these parties did express Eurosceptic sympathies, they did not focus their campaign messaging on the EU having now taken office; in fact, these politicians appeared more preoccupied than might have been expected with domestic politics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    We use these labels as synonyms in this chapter.

  2. 2.

    Besides the above-mentioned Lega, the FPÖ got three seats, while EKRE got only one.

  3. 3.

    Table 13.1A in the Appendix provides a summary table of frequencies.

  4. 4.

    We consider the party classification based on the Capel Hill Expert Survey (Bakker et al. 2020).

References

  • Al-Serori, L., Das Gupta, O., Münch, P., Obermaier, F., & Obermayer, B. (2019). Caught in the Trap. Retrieved from https://projekte.sueddeutsche.de/artikel/politik/caught-in-the-trap-e675751/.

  • Bakker, R., Hooghe, L., Jolly, S., Marks, G., Polk, J., Rovny, J., Steenbergen, M., & Vachudova, M.A. (2020). 1999–2019 Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File. Version 1.0. Available on chesdata.eu.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brunazzo, M., & Gilbert, M. (2017). Insurgents against Brussels: Euroscepticism and the Right-Wing Populist Turn of the Lega Nord since 2013. Journal of Modern Italian Studies 22 (5): 624–641. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354571X.2017.1389524.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Budge, I. (2015). Issue Emphases, Saliency Theory and Issue Ownership: A Historical and Conceptual Analysis. West European Politics 38(4): 761–777.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaramonte A., Emanuele V., Maggini N., & Paparo A. (2018). Populist Success in a Hung Parliament: The 2018 General Election in Italy. South European Society and Politics 23(4): 479–501.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C. E. & Hobolt, S. B. (2012). When dimensions collide: The electoral success of issue entrepreneurs. European Union Politics 13(2): 246–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vries, C. E. & Hobolt, S. B. (2020). Challenger parties and populism. LSE Public Policy Review 1(1): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernst, N., Engesser, S., Büchel, F., Blassnig, S., & Esser, F. (2017). Extreme parties and populism: an analysis of Facebook and Twitter across six countries, Information, Communication & Society 20(9): 1347–1364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fallend, F. (2008). Euroscepticism in Austrian Political Parties: Ideologically Rooted or Strategically Motivated?, in Szczerbiak, A. & Taggart, P. (eds.), Opposing Europe? The Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Vol. I: Case Studies and Country Surveys. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–220.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, F., & Weishaupt, J. T. (2004). Get your Act Together: Party Performance in European Parliament Elections. European Union Politics 5(3): 283–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinisch, R., McDonnell, D. & Werner A. (2021). Equivocal Euroscepticism: How Populist Radical Right Parties Can Have Their EU Cake and Eat It. Journal of Common Market Studies 59(2): 189–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hix S., Noury, A. & Roland, G. (2007) Democratic Politics in the European Parliament. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. (1999). Dimensions and alignments in European Union politics: Cognitive constraints and partisan responses. European Journal of Political Research 35(1): 69–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S. & Lord C. (1997). Political parties in the European Union. London: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hix, S., Noury A., & Roland G. (2005). Power to the Parties: Cohesion and Competition in the European Parliament, 1979–2001. British Journal of Political Science 35(02): 209–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B. & De Vries C.E. (2015). Issue entrepreneurship and multiparty competition. Comparative Political Studies 48(9): 1159–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hobolt, S. B. & Wratil, C. (2020). Contestation and responsiveness in EU Council deliberations. Journal of European Public Policy 27(3): 362–381.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoeglinger, D. (2016a). The politicisation of European integration in domestic election campaigns. West European Politics 39(1): 44–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2016b). Politicizing European integration: Struggling with the awakening giant. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. & Marks G. (1999). Making of a polity: The struggle over European integration. In Kitschelt, H., Lange, P., Marks, G. and J. Stephens (eds.), Continuity and change in contemporary capitalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (70–97).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooghe, L. & Marks, G. (2009). A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus. British Journal of Political Science 39(1): 1–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, S. & Grande E. (2014). Politicizing Europe in the National Electoral Arena: A Comparative Analysis of Five West European Countries, 1970–2010. Journal of Common Market Studies 52(5): 1002–1018.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutter, S., Grande, E. & Kriesi, H. (Eds.) (2016). Politicising Europe: Integration and Mass Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenny, M. (2020), Austria: Political Developments and Data in 2019. European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook, 59: 19–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Katz, R. S. (2008). Euroscepticism in Parliament: A comparative analysis of the European and national parliaments. In Szczerbiak, A. & P. Taggart (ed.), Opposing Europe? The ‘Comparative Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Volume 2: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press (151–180).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kriesi, H., Grande, E., Dolezal, M., Helbling, M., Höglinger, D., Hutter, S. & Wüest, B. (2012). Political Conflict in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lilleker, D. G., Koc-Michalska, K., Negrine, R., Gibson, R., Vedel, T., & Strudel, S. (2017). Social media campaigning in Europe: Mapping the terrain, Journal of Information Technology & Politics 14(4): 293–298.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, C. J. (2010). The Aggregating Function of Political Parties in EU Decision-Making. Living Review of European Governance 5(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Magin, M., Podschuweit, N., Haßler, J. & Russmann, U. (2017). Campaigning in the Fourth Age of Political Communication. A Multi-Method Study on the Use of Facebook by German and Austrian Parties in the 2013 National Election Campaigns. Information, Communication & Society 20(11): 1698–1719.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. & Steenbergen, M. (2002). Understanding political contestation in the European Union. Comparative Political Studies 35(8): 879–892.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. & Steenbergen, M. (eds.) (2004). European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, G. & Wilson, C. (2000). The Past in the Present: a cleavage theory of party positions on European integration. British Journal of Political Science 30: 433–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonnell, D. & Werner, A. (2018). Respectable Radicals: Why Some Radical Right Parties in the European Parliament Forsake Policy Congruence. Journal of European Public Policy 25(5): 747–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • McElroy, G. & Benoit, K. (2010). Party Policy and Group Affiliation in the European Parliament. British Journal of Political Science 40(2): 377–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merlingen, M., Mudde, C. & Sedelmeier, U. (2001), The Right and the Righteous? European Norms, Domestic Politics and the Sanctions Against Austria. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39: 59–77. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00276.

  • Mölder, M. (2020), Estonia: Political Developments and Data in 2019. European Journal of Political Research Political Data Yearbook 59: 119–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passarelli G. & Tuorto D. (2018) La Lega di Salvini. Bologna: Il Mulino.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petsinis, V. (2019). Identity Politics and Right-Wing Populism in Estonia: The Case of EKRE, Nationalism and Ethnic Politics, 25(2): 211–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rauh, C., Bes, B. J. & M. Schoonvelde (2020). Undermining, defusing or defending European integration? Assessing public communication of European executives in times of EU politicisation. European Journal of Political Research 59(2): 397–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rohrschneider, R. & Whitefield, S. (2016) Responding to growing European Union-skepticism? The stances of political parties toward European integration in Western and Eastern Europe following the financial crisis. European Union Politics 17(1): 138–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rooduijn, M. & van Kessel, S. (2019). Populism and Euroskepticism in the European Union. Oxford: Research Encyclopedias.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitter, N. (2001). The politics of opposition and European integration in Scandinavia: Is Euro-scepticism a government-opposition dynamic? West European Politics 24(4): 22–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spoon, J.-J. (2012). How salient is Europe? An analysis of European election manifestos, 1979–2004. European Union Politics, 13(4), 558–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spöri T. & Stadlmair J. (2020). European Parliamentary Elections in Austria “Gone Ibiza”. in 2019 European Elections. The EU Party Democracy and the Challenge of National Populism, Carp, R. & Matiuța, C. (eds.). Leiden: Brill, 138–154.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, S., Bleier, A., Lietz, H. & Strohmaier, M. (2018). Election Campaigning on Social Media: Politicians, Audiences, and the Mediation of Political Communication on Facebook and Twitter, Political Communication 35(1): 50–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szczerbiak, A. & Taggart, P. (eds.) (2008). The Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Volume 1: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. & Szczerbiak, A. (eds.) (2008). The Party Politics of Euroscepticism. Volume 2: Comparative and Theoretical Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taggart, P. & Pirro, A.L.P. (2021). European Populism before the Pandemic: Ideology, Euroscepticism, Electoral Performance, and Government Participation of 63 Parties in 30 Countries. Italian Political Science Review / Rivista Italiana Di Scienza Politica, 51(3): 281–304.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tosun, J. & Debus, M. (2008). Parteien, Regierungen und Europäische Integration: Welche Faktoren bestimmen die europapolitischen Positionen nationaler politischer Akteure? Österreichische Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft, 37(3): 315–335.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treib, O. (2014). The voter says no, but nobody listens: causes and consequences of the Eurosceptic vote in the 2014 European elections. Journal of European Public Policy 21(10): 1541–1554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. (2021). Euroscepticism Is Here to Stay: What Cleavage Theory Can Teach Us about the 2019 European Parliament Elections. Journal of European Public Policy 28(2): 174–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Wardt, M., De Vries, C. E. & Hobolt, S. B. (2014). Exploiting the Cracks: Wedge Issues in Multiparty Competition. The Journal of Politics 76(4): 986–999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolinetz, S. B. & Zaslove, A. (eds.) (2018). Absorbing the Blow: Populist Parties and Their Impact on Parties and Party Systems. Colchester: ECPR Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zulianello, M., Albertini, A., & Ceccobelli, D. (2018). A Populist Zeitgeist? The Communication Strategies of Western and Latin American Political Leaders on Facebook. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 23(4), 439–457.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lore Hayek .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Hayek, L., Jenny, M., Mariotto, C. (2022). Europe or Homeland? How Populist Right-Wing Parties in National Governments Campaigned on Facebook in the 2019 European Elections. In: Novelli, E., Johansson, B., Wring, D. (eds) The 2019 European Electoral Campaign. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98993-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics