Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Integration of Ontologies with Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Development: A Systematic Literature Review

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Metadata and Semantic Research (MTSR 2021)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1537))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper presents a systematic literature review of the integration of ontologies into the Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) development process. The review extracted data from 34 primary studies dealing with ontologies in the blockchain domain. DAO has become a key concept for the development of blockchain-based decentralized software systems. DAOs are seen as a positive alternative for organizations interested in the adoption of decentralized, reliable and transparent governance, as well as attracting the interest of academic research. However, there is no common understanding or generally accepted formal definition of a DAO, and the guidelines that provide support for the adoption and development of DAOs are limited to a few key references that lack the computational semantics needed to enable their automated validation, simulation or execution. Thus, the objective of this paper is to provide an unbiased and up-to-date review related to the integration of ontologies within DAOs which helps to identify new research opportunities and take advantage of this integration from a blockchain-based decentralized perspective.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 89.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.americancryptofed.org/.

References

  1. America’s First Legal DAO Approved in Wyoming, 5 July 2021. https://decrypt.co/75222/americas-first-dao-approved-in-wyoming. Accessed 16 Aug 2021

  2. Buterin, V.: A next-generation smart contract and decentralized application platform. https://blockchainlab.com/pdf/Ethereum_white_paper-a_next_generation_smart_contract_and_decentralized_application_platform-vitalik-buterin.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2021

  3. Hassan, S.: P2P Models white paper. Decentralized Blockchain-based Organizations for Bootstrapping the Collaborative Economy (2017). https://p2pmodels.eu/wp-content/uploads/whitepaper_p2pmodels.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2021

  4. Hassan, S., De Filippi, P.: Decentralized autonomous organization. Internet Policy Rev. 10(2) (2021). https://doi.org/10.14763/2021.2.1556

  5. El Faqir, Y., Arroyo, J., Hassan, S.: An overview of decentralized autonomous organizations on the blockchain. In: Proceedings of the 16th International Symposium on Open Collaboration (OpenSym 2020), New York, NY, USA, Article 11, pp. 1–8. Association for Computing Machinery (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3412569.3412579

  6. Liu, L., Zhou, S., Huang, H., Zheng, Z.: From technology to society: an overview of blockchain-based DAO. IEEE Open J. Comput. Soc. 2(1), 204–215. (2021). https://doi.ieeecomputersociety.org/10.1109/OJCS.2021.3072661

  7. MolochDAO. https://molochdao.com/. Accessed 16 Aug 2021

  8. Aragon. https://aragon.org/. Accessed 16 Aug 2021

  9. Guarino, N.: Formal Ontology and Information Systems (1998). http://www.loa.istc.cnr.it/old/Papers/FOIS98.pdf. Accessed 16 Aug 2021

  10. Norta, A., Othman, A.B., Taveter, K.: Conflict-resolution lifecycles for governed decentralized autonomous organization collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2015 2nd International Conference on Electronic Governance and Open Society: Challenges in Eurasia - EGOSE 2015, St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, pp. 244–257. ACM Press. (2015). https://doi.org/10.1145/2846012.2846052

  11. Kim, H.M., Laskowski, M.: Towards an ontology-driven blockchain design for supply chain provenance. Int. Syst. Account. Finance Manag. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/isaf.1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kim, H.M., Laskowski, M., Nan, N.: A first step in the co-evolution of blockchain and ontologies: towards engineering an ontology of governance at the blockchain protocol level. arXiv:180102027 (2018)

  13. Silva, D., Guerreiro, S., Sousa, P.: Decentralized enforcement of business process control using blockchain. In: Aveiro, D., Guizzardi, G., Guerreiro, S., Guédria, W. (eds.) EEWC 2018. LNBIP, vol. 334, pp. 69–87. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-06097-8_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Kitchenham, B.: Guidelines for performing systematic literature reviews in software engineering (Version 2.3). EBSE Technical report: EBSE-2007-01. Software Engineering Group, School of Computer Science and Mathematics, Keele University, Staffordshire (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Third, A., Domingue, J.: Linked data indexing of distributed ledgers. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion - WWW 2017 Companion, Perth, Australia, pp. 1431–1436. ACM Press (2017). https://doi.org/10.1145/3041021.3053895

  16. Hoffman, M.R.: Can blockchains and linked data advance taxation. In: Companion of the Web Conference 2018 - WWW 2018, Lyon, France, pp. 1179–1182. ACM Press (2018). https://doi.org/10.1145/3184558.3191555

  17. Crepaldi, M.: Why blockchains need the law: Secondary rules as the missing piece of blockchain governance. In: Proceedings of the Seventeenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law, Montreal, QC, Canada, pp. 189–193. ACM Press (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3322640.3328780

  18. Bindra, L., Lin, C., Stroulia, E., Ardakanian, O.: Decentralized access control for smart buildings using metadata and smart contracts. In: 2019 IEEE/ACM 5th International Workshop on Software Engineering for Smart Cyber-Physical Systems (SEsCPS) , Montreal, QC, Canada, pp. 32–38. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/SEsCPS.2019.00013

  19. García, R., Gil, R.: Social media copyright management using semantic web and blockchain. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Information Integration and Web-Based Applications & Services, Munich Germany, pp. 339–343. ACM (2019). https://doi.org/10.1145/3366030.3366128

  20. Ramachandran, M., Chowdhury, N., Third, A., Domingue, J., Quick, K., Bachler, M.: Towards complete decentralised verification of data with confidentiality: different ways to connect solid pods and blockchain. In: Companion Proceedings of the Web Conference 2020, Taipei Taiwan, pp. 645–649. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3366424.3385759

  21. Johng, H., Kim, D., Park, G., Hong, J.-E., Hill, T., Chung, L.: Enhancing business processes with trustworthiness using blockchain: a goal-oriented approach. In: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pp. 61–68 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3341105.3374022

  22. Wang, H., Yuan, Y., Yang, F.: A personal data determination method based on blockchain technology and smart contract. In: Proceedings of the 2020 4th International Conference on Cryptography, Security and Privacy, Nanjing China, pp. 89–94. ACM (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3377644.3377656

  23. Kleinaki, A.-S., Mytis-Gkometh, P., Drosatos, G., Efraimidis, P.S., Kaldoudi, E.: A blockchain-based notarization service for biomedical knowledge retrieval. Comput. Struct. Biotechnol. J. 16, 288–297 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csbj.2018.08.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen, Z.: Understanding granular aspects of ontology for blockchain databases. Procedia Comput. Sci. 162, 361–367 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2019.11.296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hofman, W.J.: A methodological approach for development and deployment of data sharing in complex organizational supply and logistics networks with blockchain technology. IFAC-Pap. 52, 55–60 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ifacol.2019.06.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roehrs, A., da Costa, C.A., da Rosa Righi, R., da Silva, V.F., Goldim, J.R., Schmidt, D.C.: Analyzing the performance of a blockchain-based personal health record implementation. J. Biomed. Inform. 92, 103140 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103140

  27. Weigand, H., Blums, I., de Kruijff, J.: Shared ledger accounting - implementing the economic exchange pattern. Inf. Syst. 90, 101437 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2019.101437

  28. Zhou, X., Lim, M.Q., Kraft, M.: A Smart Contract-based agent marketplace for the J-Park Simulator - a knowledge graph for the process industry. Comput. Chem. Eng. 139, 106896 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compchemeng.2019.106577

  29. Hofman, D.L.: Legally speaking: smart contracts, archival bonds, and linked data in the blockchain. In: 26th International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks, Vancouver, BC, Canada, pp. 1–4 (ICCCN). IEEE (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2017.8038515

  30. Choudhury, O., Rudolph, N., Sylla, I., Fairoza, N., Das, A.: Auto-generation of smart contracts from domain-specific ontologies and semantic rules. In: 2018 IEEE International Conference on Internet of Things (IThings) and IEEE Green Computing and Communications (GreenCom) and IEEE Cyber, Physical and Social Computing (CPSCom) and IEEE Smart Data (SmartData) , Halifax, NS, Canada, pp. 963–970. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/Cybermatics_2018.2018.00183

  31. Norta, A.: Self-aware smart contracts with legal relevance. In: 2018 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN), Rio de Janeiro, pp. 1–8. IEEE (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/IJCNN.2018.8489235

  32. Baqa, H., Truong, N.B., Crespi, N., Lee, G.M., le Gall, F.: Semantic smart contracts for blockchain-based services in the internet of things. In: IEEE 18th International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA), pp. 1–5 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/NCA.2019.8935016

  33. Li, M., Xia, L., Seneviratne, O.: Leveraging standards based ontological concepts in distributed ledgers: a healthcare smart contract example. In: IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures, Newark, CA, USA, pp. 152–157. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/DAPPCON.2019.00029

  34. Laurier, W., Kiehn, J., Polovina, S.: REA2: a unified formalisation of the Resource-Event-Agent ontology. Appl. Ontol. 13, 201–224 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3233/AO-180198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Lee, S.-M., Park, S., Park, Y.B.: Formal specification technique in smart contract verification. In: International Conference on Platform Technology and Service (PlatCon) , Jeju, Korea (South), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/PlatCon.2019.8669419

  36. Kudumakis, P., Wilmering, T., Sandler, M., Rodriguez-Doncel, V., Boch, L., Delgado, J.: The challenge: from MPEG intellectual property rights ontologies to smart contracts and blockchains [standards in a nutshell]. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 37, 89–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2019.2955207

  37. Norta, A.: Creation of smart-contracting collaborations for decentralized autonomous organizations. In: Matulevičius, R., Dumas, M. (eds.) BIR 2015. LNBIP, vol. 229, pp. 3–17. Springer, Cham (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-21915-8_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Norta, A., Ma, L., Duan, Y., Rull, A., Kõlvart, M., Taveter, K.: eContractual choreography-language properties towards cross-organizational business collaboration. J. Internet Serv. Appl. 6(1), 1–23 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13174-015-0023-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Narendra, N.C., Norta, A., Mahunnah, M., Ma, L., Maggi, F.M.: Sound conflict management and resolution for virtual-enterprise collaborations. SOCA 10(3), 233–251 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11761-015-0183-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. García-Barriocanal, E., Sánchez-Alonso, S., Sicilia, M.-A.: Deploying metadata on blockchain technologies. In: Garoufallou, E., Virkus, S., Siatri, R., Koutsomiha, D. (eds.) Metadata and Semantic Research. CCIS, vol. 755, pp. 38–49. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70863-8_4

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  41. de Kruijff, J., Weigand, H.: Understanding the blockchain using enterprise ontology. In: Dubois, E., Pohl, K. (eds.) Advanced Information Systems Engineering. LNCS, vol. 10253, pp. 29–43. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-59536-8_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. de Kruijff, J., Weigand, H.: Ontologies for commitment-based smart contracts. In: Panetto, H., et al. (eds.) On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems. OTM 2017 Conferences. LNCS, vol. 10574, pp. 383–398. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69459-7_26

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Ladleif, J., Weske, M.: A unifying model of legal smart contracts. In: Laender, A.H.F., Pernici, B., Lim, E.-P., de Oliveira, J.P.M. (eds.) ER 2019. LNCS, vol. 11788, pp. 323–337. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-33223-5_27

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  44. García-Barriocanal, E., Sicilia, M., Sánchez-Alonso, S.: The case for ontologies in expressing decisions in decentralized energy systems. In: Garoufallou, E., Sartori, F., Siatri, R., Zervas, M. (eds.) Metadata and Semantic Research. CCIS, vol. 846, pp. 365–376. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-14401-2_35

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Risius, M., Spohrer, K.: A blockchain research framework. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 59(6), 385–409 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12599-017-0506-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially supported by the project P2P Models (https://p2pmodels.eu) funded by the European Research Council ERC-2017-STG [grant no.: 759207]; and by the project Chain Community funded by the Spanish Ministry of Science, Innovation and Universities [grant no.: RTI2018-096820-A-100].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Knowledge Technology, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    María-Cruz Valiente & David Rozas

Authors
  1. María-Cruz Valiente
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. David Rozas
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María-Cruz Valiente .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. International Hellenic University, Thessaloniki, Greece

    Emmanouel Garoufallou

  2. Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain

    María-Antonia Ovalle-Perandones

  3. University College London, London, UK

    Andreas Vlachidis

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Valiente, MC., Rozas, D. (2022). Integration of Ontologies with Decentralized Autonomous Organizations Development: A Systematic Literature Review. In: Garoufallou, E., Ovalle-Perandones, MA., Vlachidis, A. (eds) Metadata and Semantic Research. MTSR 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1537. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98876-0_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98876-0_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98875-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98876-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation