Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disturbance Ecology: A Guideline

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disturbance Ecology

Part of the book series: Landscape Series ((LAEC,volume 32))

  • 891 Accesses

Abstract

The guideline contextualizes the field of disturbance ecology over time and space. It addresses fundamental elements of disturbance ecology, such as drivers of disturbances, adaptations of plants to disturbance, disturbance effects on biodiversity, disturbance resilience, disturbances in the context of ecosystem management, and climate change impacts on disturbance regimes. The chapter introduces the structure of the book and highlights the audience for which the book was written.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the past, there has been some difference in the terms used between the European literature and the Anglo-American literature. In Europe, floristic geobotany was the term often used for the branch of biogeography concerned with the distribution of plant species. The equivalent term in the Anglo-American literature was phytogeography (Mueller-Dombois and Ellenberg 1974).

References

  • Braun-Blanquet J (1964) Pflanzensoziologie. Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde, 3rd edn, Wien/New York, 865 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Bugmann H (1996) A simplified forest model to study species composition along climate gradients. Ecology 77:2055–2074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill ED, Hansen HC (1958) The concept of climax in arctic and alpine vegetation. Bot Rev 24:127–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements FE (1916) Plant succession: an analysis of the development of vegetation. Carnegie Institution of Washington, Washington, DC, 515 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs: high diversity of trees and corals is maintained only in a non-equilibrium state. Science 199:1302–1310

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Grime JP, Thompson K (2000) Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 88:528–534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellenberg H (1996) Vegetation Mitteleuropas mit den Alpen in ökologischer, dynamischer und historischer Sicht (5). Ulmer, Stuttgart, 1095 p

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2017) Review of the 2012 European bioeconomy strategy. European Commission, Directorate-General for Research and Innovation: Directorate F Bioeconomy, Brussels, 84 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Forcier LK (1975) Reproductive strategies and co-occurrences of climax tree species. Science 189:808–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Glenn-Lewin DC, van der Maarel E (1992) Pattern and processes of vegetation dynamics. In: Glenn-Lewin DC, Peet RK, Veblen TT (eds) Plant succession. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 11–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Grime JP (1973) Competitive exclusion in herbaceous vegetation. Nature 242:344–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevich J, Scheiner SM, Fox GA (2006) The ecology of plants. Sinauer, Sunderland, 574 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (2005) Millennium ecosystem assessment. In: Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends, vol 1. Island Press, Washington, DC, 917 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Hector A, Hautier Y, Saner P, Wacker L, Bagchi R, Joshi J, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Spehn EM, Bazeley-White E, Weilenmann M, Caldeira MC, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Finn JA, Huss-Danell K, Jumpponen A, Mulder CPH, Palmborg C, Pereira JS, Siamantziouras ASD, Terry AC, Troumbis AY, Schmid B, Loreau M (2010) General stabilizing effects of plant diversity on grassland productivity through population asynchrony and overyielding. Ecology 91:2213–2220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2021) Climate Change 2021: the physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Masson-Delmotte V, Zhai P, Pirani A, Connors SL, Péan C, Berger S, Caud N, Chen Y, Goldfarb L, Gomis MI, Huang M, Leitzell K, Lonnoy E, Matthews JBR, Maycock TK, Waterfield T, Yelekçi O, Yu R, Zhou B (eds)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  • Isbell F, Craven D, Connolly J, Loreau M, Schmid B, Beierkuhnlein C, Bezemer TM, Bonin C, Bruelheide H, de Luca E, Ebeling A, Griffin JN, Guo Q, Hautier Y, Hector A, Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Lanta V, Manning P, Meyer ST, Mori AS, Naeem S, Niklaus PA, Polley HW, Reich PB, Roscher C, Seabloom EW, Smith MD, Thakur MP, Tilman D, Tracy BF, van der Putten WH, van Ruijven J, Weigelt A, Weisser WW, Wilsey B, Eisenhauer N (2015) Biodiversity increases the resistance of ecosystem productivity to climate extremes. Nature 526:574–577

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jentsch A, Kreyling J, Beierkuhnlein C (2007) A new generation of climate-change experiments: events, not trends. Front Ecol Environ 5:365–374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson EA, Miyanishi K (2007) Plant disturbance ecology: the process and the response. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 698 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kienast F, Kuhn N (1989) Simulating forest succession along ecological gradients in southern Central Europe. Vegetatio 79:7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kratochwil A, Schwabe A (2001) Ökologie der Lebensgemeinschaften: Biozönologie. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 756 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Kulakowski D, Seidl R, Holeksa J, Kuuluvainen T, Nagel TA, Panayotov M, Svoboda M, Thorn S, Vacchiano G, Whitlock C, Wohlgemuth T, Bebi P (2017) A walk on the wild side: disturbance dynamics and the conservation and management of European mountain forest ecosystems. For Ecol Manag 388:120–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA, Paine RT (1974) Disturbance, patch formation and community structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 71:2744–2747

    Google Scholar 

  • Mueller-Dombois D, Ellenberg H (1974) Aims and methods of vegetation ecology. Wiley, New York, 547 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller J (2015) Prozessschutz und Biodiversität: Ãœberraschungen und Lehren aus dem Bayerischen Wald. Natur Landsch 90:421–425

    Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Finn JT, Franz EH (1979) Perturbation theory and the subsidy-stress gradient. Bioscience 29:349–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe S, Wirth C, Jucker T, van der Plas F, Scherer-Lorenzen M, Verheyen K et al (2017) Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning relations in European forests depend on environmental context. Ecol Lett 20:1414–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scherzinger W (1996) Naturschutz im Wald: Qualitätsziele einer dynamischen Waldentwicklung. Eugen Ulmer, Stuttgart, 448 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidl R, Fernandes PM, Fonseca TF, Gillet F, Jönsson AM, Merganicová K, Netherer S, Arpaci A, Bontemps JD, Bugmann H, González-Olabarria JR, Lasch P, Meredieu C, Moreira F, Schelhaas MJ, Mohren F (2011) Modelling natural disturbances in forest ecosystems: a review. Ecol Model 222:903–924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla PR, Skea J, Calvo Buendia E, Masson-Delmotte V, Pörtner H-O, Roberts DC, Zhai P, Slade R, Connors S, van Diemen R, Ferrat M, Haughey E, Luz S, Neogi S, Pathak M, Petzold J, Portugal Pereira J, Vyas P, Huntley E, Kissick K, Belkacemi M, Malley J (2020) Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems – summary for policymakers (revised version). International Panel on Climate Change IPCC, 36 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Sousa WP (1984) The role of disturbance in natural communities. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 15:353–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thom D, Seidl R (2016) Natural disturbance impacts on ecosystem services and biodiversity in temperate and boreal forests. Biol Rev 91:760–781

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thorn S, Bässler C, Brandl R, Burton PJ, Cahall R, Campbell JL, Castro J, Choi CY, Cobb T, Donato DC, Durska E, Fontaine JB, Gautier S, Hebert C, Hothorn T, Hutto RL, Lee EJ, Leverkus A, Lindenmayer D, Obrist MK, Rost J, Seibold S, Seidl R, Thom D, Waldron K, Wermelinger B, Winter B, Zmihorski M, Müller J (2018) Impacts of salvage logging on biodiversity: a meta-analysis. J Appl Ecol 55:279–289

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • UN (1992) Convention on biological diversity. Rio de Janeiro, 30 p

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker LR, Wardle DA (2014) Plant succession as an integrator of contrasting ecological time scales. Trends Ecol Evol 29:504–510

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Watt AS (1947) Pattern and process in the plant community. J Ecol 35:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White PS (1979) Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation. Bot Rev 45:229–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White PS, Jentsch A (2001) The search for generality in studies of disturbance and ecosystem dynamics. Prog Bot 62:399–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White PS, Pickett STA (1985) Natural disturbance and patch dynamics: an introduction. In: Pickett STA, White PS (eds) The ecology of natural disturbance and patch dynamics. Academic, New York, pp 3–13

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Forest Dynamics Research Unit, Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research WSL, Birmensdorf, Switzerland

    Thomas Wohlgemuth

  2. Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany

    Anke Jentsch

  3. Ecosystem Dynamics and Forest Management Group, School of Life Sciences, Technical University of Munich, Freising, Germany

    Rupert Seidl

  4. Berchtesgaden National Park, Berchtesgaden, Germany

    Rupert Seidl

Authors
  1. Thomas Wohlgemuth
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Anke Jentsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rupert Seidl
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thomas Wohlgemuth .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. WSL Swiss Federal Research Institute, Birmensdorf, Zürich, Switzerland

    Thomas Wohlgemuth

  2. Universität Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Bayern, Germany

    Anke Jentsch

  3. Technical University of Munich, Freising, Bayern, Germany

    Rupert Seidl

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Wohlgemuth, T., Jentsch, A., Seidl, R. (2022). Disturbance Ecology: A Guideline. In: Wohlgemuth, T., Jentsch, A., Seidl, R. (eds) Disturbance Ecology. Landscape Series, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98756-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation