Skip to main content
  • 496 Accesses

Abstract

The world’s present and future challenges are impacted by the climate change, more and more limited access to resources along with the increase and aging of population. The engineering world will adapt to these challenges by developing new materials, new type of structural solutions, or new fire-based evaluation tools. The new developed materials or structural elements must be tested in order to validate and calibrate the existing or new fire-based evaluation tools, and hybrid fire testing is a new emerging promising technique. Generally, the fire tests are performed on single members, under constant mechanical boundary conditions, neglecting the action of the remainder structure. However, full-scale testing of full structural systems revealed different behaviors of the structural members, but the high cost makes the practice uncommon. Hybrid fire testing is keeping the advantage of testing only parts of the structure, but at the same time considering the effect of the remainder structure, thus reproducing the results of the full-scale testing. In the context of new emerging fire-based evaluation tools, i.e., machine learning has the potential to facilitate performance-based fire design of structures. This chapter conceptually describes the overlap of the hybrid fire testing methodology and the new fire-based evaluation tool, machine learning. A detailed description of hybrid fire testing method is presented along with a benchmark case study for exemplification purposes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Open System for Earthquake Engineering Simulation.

    Google Scholar 

  2. OpenFresco. Library Catalog: openfresco.berkeley.edu.

    Google Scholar 

  3. SFS C Studs | Drywall Steel Sections.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ABAQUS. ABAQUS Documentation, 2011. ZSCC: 0000003.

    Google Scholar 

  5. G. Abbiati, P. Covi, N. Tondini, O. Bursi, and B. Stojadinovic. A Real-Time Hybrid Fire Simulation Method Based on Dynamic Relaxation and Partitioned Time Integration. ASCE Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  6. G. Abbiati, S. Marelli, N. Tsokanas, B. Sudret, and B. Stojadinović. A global sensitivity analysis framework for hybrid simulation. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 146:106997, January 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Jean-Marc Franssen and Thomas Gernay. Modeling structures in fire with SAFIRⓇ: theoretical background and capabilities. JSFE, 8(3):300–323, September 2017.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ian Goodfellow, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. Deep learning. Adaptive computation and machine learning. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 2016.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. A. Gravouil and A Combescure. Multi-time-step explicit–implicit method for non-linear structural dynamics. Int. J. Numer. Methods, 50 (1):199–225, 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  10. ISO. Iso 834: Fire-resistance tests - Elements of building construction, 1975.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Mustesin Ali Khan, Liming Jiang, Katherine A. Cashell, and Asif Usmani. Analysis of restrained composite beams exposed to fire using a hybrid simulation approach. Engineering Structures, 172:956–966, October 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Kiel. Entwicklung einer intelligenten PrĂĽfmaschine fĂĽr brandbeanspruchte Gesamttragwerke, 1989. ZSCC: 0000004.

    Google Scholar 

  13. M. Korzen, G. Magonette, and P Buchet. Mechanical loading of columns in fire tests by means of the substructuring method. Zeitschrift für Angewandte Mathematik und Mechanik, 79:S617–S618, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  14. M. Korzen, J. Rodrigues, and A. Correia. Thermal restraint effects on the fire resistance of steel and composite steel and concrete columns. Appl. Struct. Fire Eng., pages 512–517, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  15. B. Lattimer, J. Hodges, A. Lattimer, and Russia) International Seminar On Fire And Explosion Hazards (9; 2019; Saint Petersburg. Using Machine Learning in Physics-based Simulation of Fire. 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Margaret McNamee, Brian Meacham, Patrick van Hees, Luke Bisby, W.K. Chow, Alexis Coppalle, Ritsu Dobashi, Bogdan Dlugogorski, Rita Fahy, Charles Fleischmann, Jason Floyd, Edwin R Galea, Michael Gollner, Tuula Hakkarainen, Anthony Hamins, Longhua Hu, Peter Johnson, Björn Karlsson, Bart Merci, Yoshifuni Ohmiya, Guillermo Rein, Arnaud Trouvé, Yi Wang, and Beth Weckman. IAFSS agenda 2030 for a fire safe world. Fire Safety Journal, 110:102889, December 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mehrdad Memari, Xuguang Wang, Hussam Mahmoud, and Oh-Sung Kwon. Hybrid Simulation of Small-Scale Steel Braced Frame Subjected to Fire and Fire Following Earthquake. J. Struct. Eng., 146(1):04019182, January 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  18. E. Mergny, G. Drion, and J.-M. Franssen. Stability in Hybrid Fire Testing Using PI Control. Exp Tech, May 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  19. E. Mergny, G. Drion, T. Gernay, and J.M. Franssen. A PI-controller for hybrid fire testing in a non-linear environment. In 10th International Conference on Structures in Fire, Belfast, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hossein Mostafaei. Hybrid fire testing for assessing performance of structures in fire—Application. Fire Safety Journal, 56:30–38, February 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hossein Mostafaei. Hybrid fire testing for assessing performance of structures in fire—Methodology. Fire Safety Journal, 58:170–179, May 2013. ZSCC: 0000038.

    Google Scholar 

  22. M. Z. Naser. Autonomous Fire Resistance Evaluation. J. Struct. Eng., 146(6):04020103, June 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  23. M.Z. Naser. Fire resistance evaluation through artificial intelligence - A case for timber structures. Fire Safety Journal, 105:1–18, April 2019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gerald M. Newman, Jef T. Robinson, and Colin G. Bailey. Fire safe design: a new approach to multi-storey steel-framed buildings. Number 288 in SCI publication Fire and steel construction. Steel Construction Inst, Ascot, 2. ed edition, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nicolas Pinoteau, Duc Toan Pham, Hong Hai Nguyen, and Romain Mège. Development of hybrid fire testing by real-time subdivision of physical and numerical substructures. JSFE, ahead-of-print(ahead-of-print), July 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Alexander L. Pyayt, Ilya I. Mokhov, Bernhard Lang, Valeria V. Krzhizhanovskaya, and Robert J. Meijer. Machine Learning Methods For Environmental Monitoring And Flood Protection. June 2011. Publisher: Zenodo.

    Google Scholar 

  27. R. Qureshi and N. Elhami-Khorasani. Instantaneous stiffness correction for hybrid fire testing. In 10th International Conference on Structures in Fire, Belfast, 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ramla Karim Qureshi, Negar Elhami-Khorasani, and Thomas Gernay. Adaption of active boundary conditions in structural fire testing. JSFE, 10(4):504–528, December 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  29. I Rahmanian. Thermal and Mechanical Properties of Gypsum Boards and their Influences on Fire Resistance of Gypsum Board Based Systems. PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  30. S. Renard, J.-C. Mindeguia, F. Robert, S. Morel, and J.-M. Franssen. An Adaptive Controller for Hybrid Fire Testing. Exp Tech, June 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  31. F Robert, S Rimlinger, and C Collignon. PROMETHEE, FIRE RESISTANCE FACILITY TAKING INTO ACCOUNT THE SURROUNDING STRUCTURE. 1st International Workshop on Concrete Spalling Due to Fire Exposure, page 7, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Victor E. Saouma and Mettupalayam V. Sivaselvan, editors. Hybrid simulation: theory, implementation and applications. Balkema-proceedings and monographs in engineering, water, and earth sciences. Taylor & Francis, London; New York, 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  33. A. Sauca, E. Mergny, T. Gernay, and J.M. Franssen. A method for hybrid fire testing: Development, implementation and numerical application. In Martin Gillie and Yong Wang, editors, Applications of Fire Engineering, pages 225–234. CRC Press, September 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Ana Sauca. Development and implementation of a methodology for hybrid fire testing applied to concrete structures with elastic boundary conditions. Doctoral Thesis, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium, 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sauca, A., Gernay, T., Robert, F., Tondini, N. and Franssen, J.-M. (2018), Hybrid fire testing: Discussion on stability and implementation of a new method in a virtual environment, Journal of Structural Fire Engineering, 9(4):319–341. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSFE-01-2017-0017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ana Sauca, Nils Mortensen, Anders Drustrup, and Giuseppe Abbiati. Experimental validation of a hybrid fire testing framework based on dynamic relaxation. Fire Safety Journal, 121:103315, May 2021.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Ana Sauca, Chao Zhang, Artur Chernovsky, and Mina Seif. Communication framework for hybrid fire testing: Developments and applications in virtual and real environments. Fire Safety Journal, 111:102937, January 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Andreas H Schellenberg, Stephen A Mahin, and Gregory L Fenves. Advanced Implementation of Hybrid Simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center PEER 2009/104, College of Engineering University of California, Berkeley, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  39. P. Schulthess. Consolidated fire analysis—Coupled numerical simulation and physical testing for global structural fire analysis. Doctoral Thesis, ETH Zurich, 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  40. H. A. Schwarz. Gesammelte Mathematische Abhandlungen: Erster Band. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 1890.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  41. B. Taylor and C. Kuyatt. Guidelines for Evaluating and Expressing the Uncertainty of NIST Measurement Results. Technical Report NIST, Technical Note 1297, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  42. N. Tondini, G. Abbiati, L. Posidente, and B. Stojadinovic. A static partitioned solver for hybrid fire testing. In 9th International Conference on Structures in Fire, Princeton, NJ, USA, 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  43. N. Tondini and J.-M. Franssen. IMPLEMENTATION OF A WEAK COUPLING APPROACH BETWEEN A CFD AND AN FE SOFTWARE FOR FIRES IN COMPARTMENT. In V International Conference on Computational Methods for Coupled Problems in Science and Engineering, pages 185–192, Ibiza, Spain, June 2013.

    Google Scholar 

  44. N. Tondini, V.L. Hoang, J.-F. Demonceau, and J.-M. Franssen. Experimental and numerical investigation of high-strength steel circular columns subjected to fire. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 80:57–81, January 2013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. P. Underwood. Dynamic relaxation techniques: a review. Computational Methods for Transient Analysis, 1983.

    Google Scholar 

  46. Laura von Rueden, Sebastian Mayer, Rafet Sifa, Christian Bauckhage, and Jochen Garcke. Combining Machine Learning and Simulation to a Hybrid Modelling Approach: Current and Future Directions. In Michael R. Berthold, Ad Feelders, and Georg Krempl, editors, Advances in Intelligent Data Analysis XVIII, volume 12080, pages 548–560. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Xuguang Wang, Robin E. Kim, Oh-Sung Kwon, and Inhwan Yeo. Hybrid Simulation Method for a Structure Subjected to Fire and Its Application to a Steel Frame. J. Struct. Eng., 144(8):04018118, August 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Catherine A. Whyte, Kevin R. Mackie, and Bozidar Stojadinovic. Hybrid Simulation of Thermomechanical Structural Response. J. Struct. Eng., 142(2):04015107, February 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  49. Xilei Zhao, Ruggiero Lovreglio, and Daniel Nilsson. Modelling and interpreting pre-evacuation decision-making using machine learning. Automation in Construction, 113:103140, May 2020.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ana Sauca .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2022 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Sauca, A. (2022). Hybrid Fire Testing: Past, Present and Future. In: Naser, M., Corbett, G. (eds) Handbook of Cognitive and Autonomous Systems for Fire Resilient Infrastructures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98685-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-98685-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-98684-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-98685-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics